How should we manage symptomatic aortic stenosis in the patient who is 80 or older?

One problem two issues! Left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis

Reports suggested that immediate post-aortic valve replacement (AVR); left ventricular (LV) dysfunction may be an important risk for morbidity and mortality in patients requiring positive inotropic support. Several factors have been identified as significant prognostic factors i.e., LV systolic dysfunction, LV diastolic dysfunction (LV-DD), heart failure and myocardial infarction (MI). Specific to pathophysiological changes associated with AS, markers of systolic LV function (e.g., LVEF) have been extensively studied in management, yet only a few studies have analysed the association between LV-DD and immediate post-operative LV dysfunction This review brings together the current body of evidence on this issue.

Aortic valve and ascending aorta guidelines for management and quality measures: executive summary

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines are intended to assist physicians and other health care providers in clinical decision making by describing a range of generally acceptable approaches for the diagnosis, management, or prevention of specific diseases or conditions. These guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed at obtaining the same results. Moreover, these guidelines are subject to change over time, without notice. The ultimate judgment regarding the care of a particular patient must be made by the physician in light of the individual circumstances presented by the patient.

Selection of prosthetic heart valves

Cardiovascular surgery for the repair or replacement of diseased heart valves has continually improved since its introduction in the early 1960s. Despite advances in prosthetic heart valve design, to date there is no valve that is comparable to the native human valve with respect to durability, risk of thrombosis, and overall hemodynamic function. Although bioprosthetic devices are similar to the native valve with respect to thrombogenicity, durability is a significant concern, particularly in younger patients. Approximately 45% of implanted bioprosthetic valves fail at 10 years. In contrast, mechanical prostheses have a significantly lower incidence of structural failure, with an implantation life of greater than 20 years, and are thus more often used for patients under the age of 65. Unfortunately, significant hemodynamic and thrombotic issues have yet to be resolved with the latest generation of mechanical valves. Thus, careful analysis of patient factors and valve-related complications must be considered when treatment of heart valve disease is offered to the patient. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current recommendations for surgical intervention for heart valve disease.

Risk factors for pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement: a single centre experience

OBJECTIVE

To identify perioperative clinical predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following aortic valve replacement.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Prospective cohort study on 276 patients submitted for aortic valve replacement: 267 patients (mean (SD) age, 57.5 (14) years) with no conduction disturbances, and nine patients (67.7 (5) years) with severe conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacing; 65 perioperative variables (38 preoperative, eight intraoperative, and 19 postoperative) were considered.

RESULTS

Nine patients (3.2%) had irreversible second or third degree atrioventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacing. Risk factors for permanent pacing identified by univariate analysis were: preoperative: additional valvar disease, aortic regurgitation, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, anaemia, use of digitalis; intraoperative: cardiac arrest; postoperative: cardiac arrest, conduction disturbances, electrolytic imbalance, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor use. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preoperative aortic regurgitation (p < 0.005; odds ratio (OR) 6.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6 to 12.2), myocardial infarction (p < 0.0005; OR 15.2, 95% CI 6.3 to 19.9), pulmonary hypertension (p < 0.005; OR 12.5, 95% CI 3.2 to 18.3), and postoperative electrolyte imbalance (p < 0.01; OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 6.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Irreversible AV block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation is an uncommon condition following aortic valve replacement. Previous aortic regurgitation, myocardial infarction, pulmonary hypertension, and postoperative electrolyte imbalance should be considered in order to identify patients at increased risk for advanced AV block.

Is there any indication for aortic valvuloplasty in the elderly?

Elderly patients with severe symptomatic calcific aortic stenosis do poorly with medical management. The optimal treatment for this group of patients is surgical valve replacement. Balloon valvuloplasty may be useful as a bridge to aortic valve replacement in hemodynamically unstable patients, in patients undergoing emergent noncardiac surgery, and in patients with severe comorbidities who are too ill to undergo cardiac surgery. Balloon valvuloplasty often results in symptomatic improvement; however, the postvalvuloplasty valve area is usually <1.0 cm2, the major periprocedural complication rate is roughly 5%, and the 6-month restenosis rate is quite high. There is no evidence that balloon valvuloplasty alters the natural history of aortic stenosis, although no randomized study has been performed.

Aortic valve replacement in patients age 70 years and older: early and late results

This retrospective analysis was performed to determine the early and late outcome in patients 70 years and older undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). From October 1994 to May 2001, 49 patients (24 men and 25 women, age 70 to 88 years [mean 74 +/- 4.6 years]) underwent primary AVR with or without concomitant procedures. Twenty-one received mechanical valves and 28 bioprostheses. Age was different between both groups: 72 +/- 2.3 years (mechanical) and 76 +/- 5.1 years (bioprosthetic) (p = 0.0005). Aortic stenosis was present in 25 patients (51%). Follow-up was 100% complete at a mean follow-up of 2.9 years (range 0.3-6.5 years). Overall hospital mortality was 4.1% (2/49). There were no postoperative complications in 24% of patients. Postoperative hospital stay or hospital survival was 27 +/- 13 days. Survival at 3 and 5 years was 89 +/- 5% and 80 +/- 7%, respectively. Three late deaths were due to noncardiac causes and 1 each had a cardiac or valve-related cause (thromboembolism). Other valve-related complications such as anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, perivalvular leak, endocarditis, prosthetic valve failure, and reoperation were not noted in any of the 49 patients. The actuarial survival curve was similar in each group of bioprosthetic versus mechanical and septuagenarians versus octogenarians. Under the selection criteria for AVR currently applied in our hospital, geriatric patients showed a satisfactory early outcome and medium-term survival benefit.

Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper

Atrial fibrillation and aortic stenosis commonly present doctors and patients with difficult decisions about the risks and benefits of treatment options and are both often inappropriately undertreated. Patients may be confused by risk information and doctors may be aware of patients' limitations and use this to manipulate choices to the ones desired by the doctors. This paper examines the importance of risk communication and discusses difficulties that can arise in decision making in these two common cardiovascular conditions.

Importance of risk communication and decision making in cardiovascular conditions in older patients: a discussion paper

Atrial fibrillation and aortic stenosis commonly present doctors and patients with difficult decisions about the risks and benefits of treatment options and are both often inappropriately undertreated. Patients may be confused by risk information and doctors may be aware of patients' limitations and use this to manipulate choices to the ones desired by the doctors. This paper examines the importance of risk communication and discusses difficulties that can arise in decision making in these two common cardiovascular conditions.

Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

Whether to perform valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic but severe aortic stenosis is controversial. Therefore, we studied the natural history of this condition to identify predictors of outcome.

METHODS

During 1994, we identified 128 consecutive patients with asymptomatic, severe aortic stenosis (59 women and 69 men; mean [+/-SD] age, 60+/-18 years; aortic-jet velocity, 5.0+/-0.6 m per second). The patients were prospectively followed until 1998.

RESULTS

Follow-up information was available for 126 patients (98 percent) for a mean of 22+/-18 months. Event-free survival, with the end point defined as death (8 patients) or valve replacement necessitated by the development of symptoms (59 patients), was 67+/-5 percent at one year, 56+/-5 percent at two years, and 33+/-5 percent at four years. Five of the six deaths from cardiac disease were preceded by symptoms. According to multivariate analysis, only the extent of aortic-valve calcification was an independent predictor of outcome, whereas age, sex, and the presence or absence of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia were not. Event-free survival for patients with no or mild valvular calcification was 92+/-5 percent at one year, 84+/-8 percent at two years, and 75+/-9 percent at four years, as compared with 60+/-6 percent, 47+/-6 percent, and 20+/-5 percent, respectively, for those with moderate or severe calcification. The rate of progression of stenosis, as reflected by the aortic-jet velocity, was significantly higher in patients who had cardiac events (0.45+/-0.38 m per second per year) than those who did not have cardiac events (0.14+/-0.18 m per second per year, P<0.001), and the rate of progression of stenosis provided useful prognostic information. Of the patients with moderately or severely calcified aortic valves whose aortic-jet velocity increased by 0.3 m per second or more within one year, 79 percent underwent surgery or died within two years of the observed increase.

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis, it appears to be relatively safe to delay surgery until symptoms develop. However, outcomes vary widely. The presence of moderate or severe valvular calcification, together with a rapid increase in aortic-jet velocity, identifies patients with a very poor prognosis. These patients should be considered for early valve replacement rather than have surgery delayed until symptoms develop.

To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the application of guidelines in the decision making process leading to medical or surgical treatment for aortic stenosis in elderly patients.

DESIGN

Cohort analysis based on a prospective inclusive registry.

SETTING

205 consecutive patients (>/= 70 years) with clinically relevant isolated aortic stenosis and without serious comorbidity, seen for the first time in the Doppler-echocardiographic laboratories of three university hospitals in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

The initial choice was surgery in 94 patients and medical treatment in 111. Only 59% of the patients who should have had valve replacement according to the practice guidelines were actually offered surgical treatment. These were mainly symptomatic patients under 80 years of age with a high gradient. Operative mortality (30 days) was only 2%. The three year survival was 80% in the surgical group (17 deaths among 94 patients) and 49% in the medical group (43/111). Multivariate analysis showed that only patients with a high baseline risk, mainly determined by impaired left ventricular function, had a significantly better three year survival with surgical treatment than with medical treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In daily practice, elderly patients with clinically relevant symptomatic aortic stenosis are often denied surgical treatment. This study indicates that a surgical approach, especially where there is impaired systolic left ventricular function, is associated with better survival.

Surgery for aortic stenosis in severely symptomatic patients older than 80 years: experience in a single UK centre

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the surgical risk and long term outcome of patients over 80 years old undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR).

DESIGN

Consecutive cases with respective case note audit and a telephone questionnaire.

SETTING

Single UK cardiothoracic surgical centre.

PATIENTS

103 (48 male) patients over 80 years old undergoing AVR. The median age was 82 years (80-95 years) and 95 of 103 patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Preoperative characteristics, operative course, cost, and outcome measures were ascertained. Mean bypass time was 56 minutes and 25 patients had simultaneous coronary artery bypass grafting. Overall mortality was 19 of 103. Univariate analysis of pertinent variables found that impaired renal function and peripheral vascular disease were significantly associated with early postoperative death. 10 of 12 patients requiring ventilation for more than 24 hours died. The 50% actuarial survival was 62 months. Late complications were uncommon with 92% of patients in NYHA class I or II at follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

AVR in patients over 80 years old has a significant risk. However, those patients who survive experience significant benefit with good long term prospects for general health and social independence.

The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow in patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS

50 asymptomatic patients with all grades of aortic stenosis were studied using dobutamine stress echocardiography. Individual plots of mean pressure drop against flow were drawn. Comparisons were made between grades of aortic stenosis as defined by the continuity equation.

RESULTS

A significant linear relation between pressure difference and flow was found in 34 patients (68%). There was a significant curvilinear relation in four (8%), while no significant regression line could be fitted in 12 (24%). In the 34 patients with linear fits, the slopes (mean (SD)) were 0.08 (0.07) in mild, 0.10 (0.04) in moderate, and 0.22 (0.16) in severe aortic stenosis (p = 0. 0055).

CONCLUSIONS

Transaortic pressure difference can be related directly to flow in many patients with all grades of aortic stenosis. However, there are individual differences in slope and intercept suggesting that resistance calculated at rest may not always be representative. Raw pressure drop/flow plots may be an alternative method of describing valve function.

Aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years of age and older: survival and cause of death based on 1100 cases: collective results from the UK Heart Valve Registry

BACKGROUND

Aging of the population and advances in preoperative and postoperative care are reflected in an increasing number of patients > or = 80 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United Kingdom. The present study presents data on postoperative 30-day mortality, actuarial survival, and cause of death based on a large collective patient population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were extracted from the UK Heart Valve Registry. From January 1986 to December 1995, 1100 patients > or = 80 years of age underwent AVR and were reported to the registry. Six hundred eleven patients (55.5%) were women. The mean follow-up time was 38.9 months. The 30-day mortality was 6.6%. Of the 73 early deaths, 42 were due to cardiac reasons. The actuarial survival was 89%, 79.3%, 68.7%, and 45.8% at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively. After the first 30 postoperative days, 144 of the 205 deaths were due to noncardiac reasons. Malignancy, stroke, and pneumonia were the most common causes of late death. Bioprosthetic valves were implanted in 969 patients (88%) and mechanical valves in 131 (12%) patients. There was no difference in early mortality and actuarial survival between the two groups (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The above results suggest that under the selection criteria for AVR currently applied in the United Kingdom, patients > or = 80 years of age show a satisfactory early postoperative outcome and moderate medium-term survival benefit.

Perhexiline improves symptomatic status in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis is poor without aortic valve replacement, with no previous reports of beneficial effects of any medical treatment on either symptoms or outcome. However, this condition is increasingly a disease of the elderly and cardiothoracic surgery is associated with significant mortality and morbidity in this group.

AIMS

We postulated that perhexiline, a novel anti-ischaemic agent with an oxygen-sparing metabolic effect in the myocardium (via inhibition of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1) and no adverse haemodynamic effects, may improve symptomatic status in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. We report here our initial experience with perhexiline treatment in such patients.

METHODS

Elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, who were deemed unsuitable for aortic valve replacement, were treated with perhexiline, the drug dosage titrated according to steady state plasma perhexiline concentrations. NYHA functional class was determined prior to and three months following commencement of perhexiline, and changes were analysed using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients, age range 73-87, were followed for up to 30 months (median 18 months). Symptomatic status improved in 13 of the 15 patients over the first three months of perhexiline therapy (p < 0.01), five patients becoming asymptomatic. Twelve month actuarial survival was 80% (95% CI = 57, 100). Perhexiline was well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to toxicity or deteriorating clinical status.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with perhexiline was associated with a marked improvement in clinical status in this group of elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis.