Can early closure and restenosis after endoluminal stenting be predicted from clinical, procedural, and angiographic variables at the time of intervention?

State-of-art review: intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary interventions

The history of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) reflects the relentless pursuit of innovation in interventional cardiology. These intravascular imaging technologies have played a pivotal role in our understanding of coronary atherosclerosis, vascular pathology, and the interaction of coronary stents with the vessel wall. Two decades of clinical investigations demonstrating the clinical efficacy and safety of intravascular imaging modalities have established these technologies as staples in the contemporary cardiac catheterization lab's toolbox and earning their place in revascularization clinical practice guidelines. In this comprehensive review, we will delve into the historical evolution, mechanisms, and technical aspects of IVUS and OCT. We will discuss the expanding evidence supporting their use in complex percutaneous coronary interventions, emphasizing their crucial roles in optimizing patient outcomes and ensuring procedural success. Furthermore, we will explore the substantial advances that have propelled these imaging modalities to the forefront of contemporary interventional cardiology. Finally, we will survey the latest developments in the field and explore the promising future directions that have the potential to further revolutionize coronary interventions.

Drug-eluting stent thrombosis: results from the multicenter Spanish registry ESTROFA (Estudio ESpañol sobre TROmbosis de stents FArmacoactivos)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcome of drug-eluting stent(DES) thrombosis in real-world clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

The DES thromboses in randomized trials could not be comparable to those observed in clinical practice, frequently including off-label indications.

METHODS

We designed a large-scale, nonindustry-linked multicentered registry, with 20 centers in Spain. The participant centers provided follow-up data for their patients treated with DES, reporting a detailed standardized form in the event of any angiography-documented DES-associated thrombosis occurring.

RESULTS

Of 23,500 patients treated with DES, definite stent thrombosis(ST) developed in 301: 24 acute, 125 subacute, and 152 late. Of the late, 62 occurred >1 year(very late ST). The cumulative incidence was 2% at 3 years. Antiplatelet treatment had been discontinued in 95 cases(31.6%). No differences in incidences were found among stent types. Independent predictors for subacute ST analyzed in a subgroup of 14,120 cases were diabetes, renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, stent length, and left anterior descending artery stenting, and for late ST were ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, stenting in left anterior descending artery, and stent length. Mortality at 1-year follow-up was 16% and ST recurrence 4.6%. Older age, left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, nonrestoration of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3, and additional stenting were independent predictors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative incidence of ST after DES implantation was 2% at 3 years. No differences were found among stent types. Patient profiles differed between early and late ST. Short-term prognosis is poor, especially when restoration of normal flow fails.

Does a well developed collateral circulation predispose to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention? An intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a well developed collateral circulation predisposes to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

58 patients undergoing elective single vessel PCI in a tertiary referral interventional cardiac unit in the UK.

METHODS

Collateral flow index (CFI) was calculated as (Pw-Pv)/(Pa-Pv), where Pa, Pw, and Pv are aortic, coronary wedge, and right atrial pressures during maximum hyperaemia. Collateral supply was considered poor (CFI < 0.25) or good (CFI > or = 0.25).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In-stent restenosis six months after PCI, classified as neointimal volume > or = 25% stent volume on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or minimum lumen area < or = 50% stent area on IVUS, or minimum lumen diameter < or = 50% reference vessel diameter on quantitative coronary angiography.

RESULTS

Patients with good collaterals had more severe coronary stenoses at baseline (90 (11)% v 75 (16)%, p < 0.001). Restenosis rates were similar in poor and good collateral groups (35% v 43%, p = 0.76 for diameter restenosis, 27% v 45%, p = 0.34 for area restenosis, and 23% v 24%, p = 0.84 for volumetric restenosis). CFI was not correlated with diameter, area, or volumetric restenosis (r2 < 0.1 for each). By multivariate analysis, stent diameter, stent length, > 10% residual stenosis, and smoking history were predictive of restenosis.

CONCLUSION

A well developed collateral circulation does not predict an increased risk of restenosis after PCI.

Short- and long-term clinical outcome after various stent implantation: Overview of the results of uni- and multicenter stent registries

The present study reports the results of the short- and long-term outcomes of prospective uni- and multicenter stent registries: Palmaz-Schatz (n = 140 patients), Ave-Micro and GFX (n = 280), Multilink Duet (n = 340), Multilink Tetra (n = 192), and Carbo (n = 140) Stent Registries, as well as the predictors and angiographic cutoff points predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after different stent implantations. Significant decrease in subacute stent thrombosis (from 2.9% to 0) and MACE (from 35% to 8.3%) occurred as the improved stents, optimized stent implantation technique, and new postintervention drug therapy were introduced. The changes of angiographic cutoff values (postintervention minimal lumen diameter and preintervention reference diameter: from 2.9 and 3.1 mm for Palmaz-Schatz to 2.5 and 2.8 mm for Multilink Duet, Multilink Tetra, and Carbo stents) and clinical and angiographic factors predicting MACE indicated the change of traditional restenosis paradigm and that progress in clinical practice might be able to counterbalance unfavorable lesion and intervention-related characteristics.

Comparison of a silicon carbide coated stent versus a noncoated stent in humans: the Tenax- versus Nir-Stent Study (TENISS)

PURPOSE

Stents coated with hypothrombogenic silicon carbide (a-SiC:H) exhibited low restenosis rates in the rabbit and in an observational study in humans. Thus, the clinical and angiographic outcome was assessed in a large multicenter study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Four hundred and ninety-seven patients (63.4 +/- 9.8 years) were randomized to either receive the a-SiC:H-coated Tenax stent or the stainless steel Nir stent. Lesions (diameter > or = 2.8 mm, length < 20 mm) were covered with one single stent.

RESULTS

Fifty-one of 497 (10.3%) patients were excluded for protocol violation. Three hundred and forty-two of 446 (76.7%) patients presented for scheduled angiographic follow-up after 4.7 +/- 1.2 months and 29 of 446 (6.5%) prematurely. In-hospital complications comprised two deaths (0.8%) (P > 0.99) and one (0.4%) (P > 0.99) CK-elevation in each group, target lesion revascularization in 5 of 250 (2%) of the Tenax and 4 of 244 (1.6%) of the Nir sample (P > 0.99), and subacute thrombosis in 2 of 250 (0.8%) of the Tenax patients (P = 0.5). In the Tenax/Nir patients mean percent diameter stenosis decreased from 82.3 +/- 9.1%/80.7 +/- 8.4% (P = 0.49) to 17.6 +/- 5.5%/17.6 +/- 5.5% (P = 0.99) postprocedure and increased to 34.5 +/- 21.5%/34.2 +/- 23.1% (P = 0.90) at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, there appears to be no advantage of the silicon carbide coated stent over a stainless steel stent after 4.7 +/- 1.2 months with regard to clinical and angiographic restenosis rates.

Prospective randomized comparison of early and late results of 4 different stent designs

BACKGROUND

Late results of interventional procedures using coronary stents are largely determined by the rate of restenosis. So far, few data are available addressing the effect of stent design on this crucial variable and on early and late adverse events after stent implantation.

METHODS

From 1996 through 1998, a total of 965 lesions in 925 patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to treatment with 1 of 4 different stent designs (Micro stent II [M] AVE, Düsseldorf, Germany; Sito [S] Sitomed, Rangendingen, Germany; Pura Vario [PV], Devon, Hamburg, Germany; Inflow [ID] Inflow Dynamics, München, Germany). The primary end point of the study was the degree of diameter stenosis measured by quantitative coronary angiography 6 months after stent implantation.

RESULTS

Diameter stenosis at 6 months follow-up was not different in the 4 study arms (M 40.3 +/- 24.1, S 42.8 +/- 27.0, PV 42.6 +/- 26.9 and ID 42.3 +/- 26.8, P =.7). No significant differences could be detected in net lumen gain and late lumen loss, resulting in comparable restenosis rates (>or=50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up (M 26.0%, S 30.5%, PV 31.3%, and ID 28.7%, P =.7). Early adverse events like stent loss, stent thrombosis, periinterventional acute myocardial infarctions and emergency coronary artery bypass graft also showed no significant differences. Multivariate regression analyses revealed reference vessel diameter <3.0 mm, overall stented length, a history of bypass grafting, localization of the target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery, type C lesions, dissection before stent implantation, and diabetes mellitus to be independent predictors for restenosis.

CONCLUSION

Stent design does not have significant influence on development of restenosis. Adverse event rates were similar with all stent types used in this trial.

Treating atherosclerosis: local drug delivery from laboratory studies to clinical trials

Treating only the specific section of the vascular bed that is diseased appears to make sense. Giving drugs systematically to treat perhaps only a few centimetres of affected artery carries with it the risk of systemic side effects and reduced efficacy consequent on low concentrations of agent at the site of the problem. There has thus been great interest since the early 1990s in local drug delivery. Initial targets were the thrombotic response to plaque disruption but the problems arising from the incidental damage inflicted by devices used in interventional cardiology and the pathological consequences of this, namely smooth muscle cell initiated intimal hyperplasia, soon became the focus of pre-clinical studies. Problems to be overcome were the low efficiency of delivery of drugs and the low retention rates. Solutions to these problems included the development of strategies to target drugs, through the use of antibodies directed at antigens newly released at the site of damage. As it became clear that stents were becoming central to the attainment of a better clinical response to intervention by their inherent physical properties, it also became obvious that stents could be used to deliver agents. Issues such as which stent, how to load the drug onto the stent and what drug to use to inhibit the unwanted pathobiological response are ongoing issues.

Adjunctive intracoronary dipyridamole in the interventional treatment of small coronary arteries: a prospectively randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing intracoronary stent placement or balloon angioplasty for the treatment of small coronary arteries are at an increased risk of an adverse outcome from a higher incidence of abrupt closure and restenosis. Intracoronary thrombus formation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of abrupt vessel closure and of restenosis. Dipyridamole prevents platelet aggregation by a mechanism that differs from aspirin. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of intracoronary dipyridamole on acute complications and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

In a prospectively randomized study including 491 dilatations of coronary arteries with a diameter <2.75 mm, additional intracoronary application of dipyridamole was compared with conventional pretreatment consisting of heparin and aspirin. Study end points were defined as incidence of abrupt vessel closure, myocardial infarction, angiographic restenosis, and target vessel revascularization rate.

RESULTS

Intracoronary dipyridamole was associated with a significant reduction of abrupt vessel closure (2.8% vs 8.6%; P =.005) and a nonsignificant reduction of myocardial infarction (1.6% vs 4.5%; P =.07) after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Net gain 6 months after angioplasty was significantly higher in the dipyridamole group (0.60 +/- 0.35 mm vs 0.42 +/- 0.34 mm; P <.001). However, dipyridamole failed to reduce the incidence of angiographic restenosis (41.6% vs 49.1%; P =.11) and target vessel revascularization rate (20.6% vs 269%; P =.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary dipyridamole reduces the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in the first 48 hours after balloon angioplasty of small coronary arteries. Reduction of restenosis rates failed to reach statistical significance. However, a significant increase in net gain was observed. Thus intracoronary application of dipyridamole should be considered in the treatment of small coronary arteries when intracoronary stenting is not appropriate.

Angiographic and clinical restenosis following the use of long coronary Wallstents

This study assessed clinical and angiographic restenosis following the deployment of the long coronary Wallstent. Between May 1995 and June 1997, 182 Wallstents were deployed in 162 vessels in this unit. Forty-eight percent had an unstable coronary syndrome and 94% had AHA grade B or C lesions. The mean lesion length was 37 +/- 20 mm and the mean stent length was 48 +/- 20 mm. The procedural success rate was 99% and the primary success rate was 93%. Six in-patients suffered subacute stent thrombosis, the majority being in the era of anticoagulation rather than antiplatelet regimes. Seventy-three percent remained free of major adverse clinical events in the follow-up period, but 41% had angiographic restenosis. The Wallstent can be deployed in complex lesions with a high primary success rate and an acceptably low restenosis rate. The optimal management of in-stent restenosis remains to be defined.

Endovascular manipulation to restrict restenosis

The processes that take place following damage to the vessel wall are well understood. Endovascular manipulation by its very nature induces such damage and the repair process can lead to a recurrence of symptoms. There have been many clinical trials of drugs chosen for their known impact on preventing excess vessel wall response. With one or two exceptions none of these trials has shown any benefit, partly because only low doses could be given systemically to avoid side effects. Local drug delivery allows high doses to be given where needed, at the site of the process, without inducing systemic complications. There are various drugs and agents that have been shown to be effective in models of vessel wall damage, including heparin, nitric oxide, inhibitors of platelet function and the antisense oligonucleotides. Some of these agents are now being tested in clinical trials. Methods of delivering the agent include devices that bathe the luminal layer, deliver the agent to the media or inject it into the adventitia where a reservoir can form. Stents improve the outcome after angioplasty, but can also induce a proliferative vessel wall response. To overcome this, stents have recently been considered as local delivery devices with radiation being delivered and polymer coated stents, loaded with agents, being developed. While local drug delivery provides great promise as a way of reducing the adverse effect of response of the vessel wall to damage, the results of clinical trials in humans are awaited.

Interlesion dependence of the risk for restenosis in patients with coronary stent placement in in multiple lesions

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the behavior with regard to restenosis of multiple lesions within the same patient treated with intracoronary stenting. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that there is an intrapatient dependence of restenosis between lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Quantitative analysis was carried out on angiograms obtained before, immediately after, and at 6 months after coronary stent placement in 1734 lesions in 1244 patients. We used a specialized logistic regression that not only accounts for intraclass correlation but also quantifies it in the form of odds ratio (OR) as the change in risk of a lesion to develop restenosis if another companion lesion had restenosis. The model was based on 23 patient- and lesion-related variables with binary restenosis (diameter stenosis > or =50%) as end point. The overall restenosis rate was 27.5%: 24.4% for single-lesion, 28.6% for double-lesion, and 33.8% for > or =3-lesion interventions. After adjustment for the influence of significant factors (hypercholesterolemia, systemic arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, previous PTCA, ostial lesion, location in left anterior descending coronary artery, number of stents placed, vessel size, stenosis severity, balloon-to-vessel ratio, and final result), the analysis found a significant intrapatient correlation, OR 2.5 (1.8 to 3.6). This means that in patients with multilesion interventions, the risk of a lesion to develop restenosis is 2.5 times higher if a companion lesion has restenosis, independently of the presence or absence of analyzed patient risk factors (eg, diabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that there is a dependence of restenosis between coronary lesions in patients who undergo a multilesion intervention. The likelihood of restenosis for a lesion is higher when another companion lesion has also developed restenosis. Other, as yet unidentified patient factors may be the source of this intrapatient correlation of restenosis.

Predictors of restenosis after coronary stent implantation

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting (CS) in a consecutive series of patients.

BACKGROUND

Although stenting in highly selected patient groups reduces restenosis, the results of stenting in a heterogeneous patient group and the effects of clinical and procedural factors on stent restenosis are currently unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed the 6-month angiographic outcome of 500 lesions in 463 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS. Clinical, qualitative and quantitative angiographic variables were correlated with restenosis assessed as both a binary and a continuous variable.

RESULTS

Restenosis, defined as the presence of >50% diameter stenosis in the dilated segment, was present in 105 (26%) of the 405 lesions with angiographic follow-up. The mean late lumen loss during the follow-up period was 0.79+/-0.64 mm. Implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.0001) and a high acute gain (p < 0.0002) were independently associated with a higher late lumen loss. In contrast, the use of high inflation pressure (p < 0.02) and Palmaz-Schatz stents (p < 0.005) was independently associated with a lower late lumen loss. When restenosis was defined as a qualitative variable, implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.001), stenosis length (p < 0.01), small reference diameter (p < 0.02) and stent type other than Palmaz-Schatz (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of restenosis. None of the clinical variables tested was associated with restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary stenting in an unselected patient group is associated with an acceptable restenosis rate. Although some risk factors were identified, the risk of restenosis was not related to most of the variables tested. This suggests that the superiority of CS over balloon angioplasty, in terms of restenosis, might also apply to subgroups of patients that were not included in the recent randomized studies.

Risk factors for acute and subacute stent thrombosis after high-pressure stent implantation: a study by intracoronary ultrasound

BACKGROUND

In the era of coronary stenting with high-pressure expansion, stent thrombosis remains a major life-threatening risk. Because of its superior imaging mode, intracoronary ultrasound could provide insight into potential risk factors for stent thrombosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 215 patients with stent implantations controlled by intracoronary ultrasound, four occurrences of subacute stent thrombosis, two complete acute thrombotic occlusions, and four occurrences of incomplete acute thrombosis were observed. All stents were expanded with inflation pressures of at least 14 atm ( 17+/-3 atm). The clinical data and the qualitative and quantitative ultrasound information were compared between stents with thrombosis and stents without thrombosis. The luminal area and the plaque border of the reference segments, and of the smallest and largest site of the stented segment after the initial and final expansion, were measured.

RESULTS

Stents in the left anterior descending artery were more often involved in stent thrombosis than other vessels, but the vessel dimensions in this target vessel were smaller than in the right coronary artery. The plaque burden was considerably larger after stent implantation with subsequent thrombosis compared with no thrombosis (74.1+/-8.8% vs 63.6+/-8.0%; p < 0.001), and the stent area was smaller (4.80%+/-1.33 mm2 vs 6.86+/-2.08 mm2; p < 0.01 ). In stents with thrombosis the plaque burden of the stent site with the smallest and largest lumen differed by 15.2%, whereas the difference in plaque burden in stents without thrombosis was 2.7%. Intracoronary ultrasound showed that the best risk predictor of thrombosis was the residual plaque burden of the stented segment (odds ratio 15.7 [confidence interval 2.4 to 104.7]), and a small stent area after implantation (odds ratio 6.8 [confidence interval 1.9 to 24.3]).

CONCLUSION

In a multivariate risk analysis plaque burden was the strongest independent risk factor for stent thrombosis. The amount of residual plaque mass around the stent might be a potential trigger for thrombus formation.

Clinical one-year outcomes after stenting in acute myocardial infarction

We retrospectively review our results of 96 stent placements in 64 patients identified from our data base who received stents acutely and within 48 hr of acute myocardial infarction. The average age was 60 years; 77% were male. The average length of stay was 6.75 days. Three patients needed coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) before discharge: 2 for stent occlusion and 1 for papillary muscle rupture. Need for CABG, further percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), myocardial infarction, and death defined outcome. Mean patient follow-up was 10.3 (+/-5.3) months. Seventy-two percent of patients were free of outcome events at 1 year, 17% needed CABG, and 11% required further PTCA. There were 2 myocardial infarctions and 1 death. Presence of left bundle branch block on admission electrocardiogram and angina in hospital after stent placement predicted worse outcome (P < 0.01).