Role of staging surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in adult patients with apparent stage I pure immature ovarian teratoma after fertility-sparing surgery

Comparison of overall and patterns of care in patients with a malignant ovarian germ cell tumor by age in the United States: a National Cancer Database (2004-2016) analysis

BACKGROUND

Women aged ≥40 years diagnosed with a malignant ovarian germ cell tumor are more likely to have poor outcomes than their younger counterparts (aged 15-39 years).

OBJECTIVE

We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate patterns of care and overall survival for individuals diagnosed with one of the four most common histologic subtypes of malignant ovarian germ cell tumor by age group.

METHODS

We identified women aged 15-90 diagnosed with ovarian germ cell tumors in the NCDB (2004-2016). Logistic regression was used to compare patterns of care, demographic, and disease characteristics by age group. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate associations between a range of demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics with overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of n=2998 patients who were diagnosed with one of the four most common histologic subtypes (immature teratoma, dysgerminoma, yolk sac tumor, and mixed germ cell) of ovarian germ cell tumor were included in the analysis. Patients aged ≥40 years diagnosed with ovarian germ cell tumors were more likely to have co-morbidities, a bilateral tumor, higher stage of disease, receive chemotherapy only, and have a residual tumor after resection as compared with patients aged <40 years. Moreover, women aged ≥40 years had the highest risk of death (reference: 15-24 year olds; HR=5.37, 95% CI 3.76 to 7.66) after adjustment for demographic characteristics, tumor histology, and treatment received. In stratified analyses, women aged ≥40 years had significantly worse overall survival at each disease stage and histologic subtype.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that women aged ≥40 years who are diagnosed with ovarian germ cell tumors have worse overall survival than those aged <40, independent of stage, disease characteristics, and treatment. Our study highlights the need for future research to better understand reasons for poorer outcomes in women aged ≥40 years.

Navigating Fertility Preservation Options in Gynecological Cancers: A Comprehensive Review

(1) Background: Currently, an increasing number of women postpone pregnancy beyond the age of 35. Gynecological cancers affect a significant proportion of women of reproductive age, necessitating the development of fertility preservation methods to fulfill family planning. Consequently, providing treatment options that preserve fertility in women diagnosed with gynecological cancers has become a crucial component of care for survivors. (2) Methods: We conducted an extensive search of relevant scientific publications in PubMed and Embase databases and performed a narrative review, including high-quality peer-reviewed research on fertility after being treated for gynecologic cancers, reporting pregnancy rates, birth rates, and pregnancy outcomes in cancer survivors as well as therapeutic options which partially preserve fertility and methods for obtaining a pregnancy in survivors. (3) Discussion: The medicine practiced today is focused on both treating the neoplasm and preserving the quality of life of the patients, with fertility preservation being an important element of this quality. This leads to an improved quality of life, allowing these women to become mothers even in the seemingly adverse circumstances posed by such a pathology. However, although there are guidelines on female fertility preservation in the context of neoplasms, an analysis shows that physicians do not routinely consider it and do not discuss these options with their patients. (4) Conclusions: Advancements in medicine have led to a better understanding and management of gynecological neoplasms, resulting in increased survival rates. Once the battle against these neoplasms is won, the issue of preserving the quality of life for these women arises, with fertility preservation being an important aspect for women who have not yet fulfilled their family planning desires at the time of diagnosis. It is important for patients to be informed about the available options for fertility preservation and to be encouraged to make informed decisions in collaboration with their medical team. Standardized recommendations for onco-fertility into guidelines should be taken into consideration in the future.

Outcome of patients with stage I immature teratoma after surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy

Objective

Immature teratomas are rare malignant ovarian germ cell tumours, typically diagnosed in young women, where fertility-sparing surgery is the treatment of choice. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I disease remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of surveillance versus chemotherapy on the recurrence rate in stage I immature teratomas.

Methods

We collected a single centre retrospective series of patients with stage I immature teratomas treated with fertility-sparing surgery at San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy, between 1980 and 2019. Potential risk factors for recurrence were investigated by multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Of the 74 patients included, 12% (9/74) received chemotherapy, while 88% (65/74) underwent surveillance. Median follow-up was 188 months. No difference in recurrence was found in stage IA/IB and IC immature teratomas [10% (6/60) vs. 28.6% (4/14) (P=0.087)], grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 [7.1% (2/28) vs. 14.3% (4/28) vs. 22.2% (4/18) (p=0.39)], and surveillance versus chemotherapy groups [13.9% (9/65) vs. 11.1% (1/9)) (p = 1.00)]. In univariate analysis, the postoperative approach had no impact on recurrence. The 5-year disease-free survival was 87% and 90% in the surveillance and chemotherapy groups, respectively; the overall survival was 100% in both cohorts.

Conclusions

Our results support the feasibility of surveillance in stage I immature teratomas. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be reserved for relapses. However, the potential benefit of chemotherapy should be discussed, especially for high-risk tumours. Prospective series are warranted to confirm our findings.

What is already known on this topic

To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I immature teratomas of the ovary. Some studies suggest that only surveillance is an acceptable choice. However, guidelines are not conclusive on this topic.

What this study adds

No difference in terms of recurrence was observed between the surveillance and the adjuvant chemotherapy group. All patients who relapsed were successfully cured with no disease-related deaths.

How this study might affect research practice or policy

Adjuvant chemotherapy should be appropriately discussed with patients. However, it may be reserved for relapse according to our data.

Prognostic factors for pure ovarian immature teratoma and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I diseases

BACKGROUND

The prognostic factors for patients with pure ovarian immature teratoma (POIT) and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IA G2-G3 and IB-IC POIT remains controversial.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 155 POIT patients treated in our hospital between 2000 and 2022. The recurrence-free survival (RFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and potential prognostic factors of POIT patients were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was conducted in stage I other than stage IA G1 POIT.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 23.0 years (range: 4.0 - 39.0), and 126 (81.3%), 2 (1.3%), 26 (16.8%), and 1 (0.6%) patients had FIGO stage I, stage II, stage III, and stage IV disease, respectively. Twenty-three patients relapsed and five died of the diseases after a median follow-up of 7.6 years, with a 5-year RFS and DSS rate of 86.0% and 97.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that positive postoperative tumour markers (TM) were the risk factor for recurrence in the overall cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 4.058, 95% CI 1.175 - 14.019, p = 0.027) and subgroup (HR 10.237, 95% CI 2.175 - 48.179, p = 0.003), and FIGO stage II-IV was the only factor for DSS in overall cohort (HR 7.751, 95% CI 1.281 - 46.895, p = 0.026). In 110 patients subjected to subgroup analysis, 29 patients received surveillance without chemotherapy and 81 patients were administered adjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed active surveillance significantly increased the recurrence rate (5-year RFS of 75.7% vs. 93.6%, HR 7.562, 95% CI 2.441 - 23.424, p < 0.001) but not the death related to POIT (p = 0.338).

CONCLUSION

Positive postoperative TM and FIGO stage II-IV were the prognostic factors for POIT. Active surveillance in stage I POIT of any grade may be practical for those with negative postoperative TM.

Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage I Pure Ovarian Immature Teratoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To determine the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IA G2-3 and stage IB-IC pure ovarian immature teratoma (POIT), we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomized controlled trials or cohort studies on stage IA G2-G3 or stage IB-IC POIT between 1 January 1970 and 15 December 2022 were enrolled. The recurrence rate and mortality rate were the primary outcomes, and subgroup analysis based on the tumor stage and grade was also conducted. In total, 15 studies with 707 patients were included. Compared with surveillance, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly decreased the mortality rate (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11–0.88, p = 0.03), but not recurrence (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.39–1.42, p = 0.37), in the overall population. Subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference in the recurrence rate and mortality rate between patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and surveillance in pediatric POIT, stage IA G2-3 POIT, stage IB-IC POIT, and stage IA-IC G3 POIT (all with p > 0.05). However, patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy appeared to have a lower risk of both recurrence (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03–0.83, p = 0.03) and death (RR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00–1.00, p = 0.05) in adult POIT. Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly decreased the mortality rate in patients with stage I POIT and lowered the risk of recurrence in the adult subgroup. Surveillance administered in stage I POIT over IA G1 should be cautious, especially in adult patients.

Pelvic masses after surgery for immature ovarian teratoma: A 10-year experience of Western China

There are debates on the management of immature ovarian teratoma and its recurrence. This study aimed to report the incidence of pelvic masses after surgery for immature ovarian teratoma and to identify prognostic factors of disease-free survival after surgery, discussing aspects of primary treatment and postoperative management. Data on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with immature teratomas were collected. Follow-up data were acquired from clinic visits and telephone interviews. Disease-free survival was defined as the time interval between the initial surgery for immature ovarian teratoma and the diagnosis of a new pelvic mass. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan-Meire method, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model using PASW statistics software. The estimated 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival were 74.3% (95%CI 63.9%-84.7%) and 96.5% (95%CI 91.6%-100.0%), respectively. The incidence of growing teratoma syndrome and immature teratoma relapse at a median follow-up of 46 months were 20.0% and 7.7%, respectively. Two patients died of repeated relapses or repeated growing teratoma syndrome. Rupture of initial lesions (RR 4.010, 95%CI 1.035-5.531), lymph node dissection (RR 0.212, 95%CI 0.051-0.887) and adjuvant chemotherapy (RR 0.143, 95%CI 0.024-0.845) were independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival. The development of growing teratoma syndrome is more prevalent than relapse after treatment of immature ovarian teratomas. Lymph node dissection and chemotherapy are recommended to reduce recurrence. Close surveillance and active surgical intervention are important for the diagnosis and appropriate management of new pelvic masses.

Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: The study aimed to assess if additional lymphadenectomy with primary staging surgery improves overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of early-stage ovarian cancer (ESOC).

Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for any type of study comparing OS or DFS between lymphadenectomy and control groups for any type of ESOC. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were pooled in a random-effects model.

Results: Twelve studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated that lymphadenectomy is associated with significantly improved OS only for epithelial tumors (HR 0.75 95% CI 0.68, 0.82 I² = 0% p < 0.00001) but not for malignant germ cell tumors (HR 1.31 95% CI 0.88, 1.94 I² = 0% p = 0.18). Single studies indicated a tendency of improved OS with lymphadenectomy which was significant for ovarian carcinosarcoma but not for sex cord-stromal tumors. On meta-regression of all histological types, the percentage of patients with lymph node metastasis in the lymphadenectomy group was not found to influence the effect size. Meta-analysis also indicated that lymphadenectomy is associated with significantly improved DFS for epithelial tumors (HR 0.59 95% CI 0.45, 0.77 I² = 0% p < 0.0001). Single studies on malignant germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors failed to demonstrate any significant beneficial effect of lymphadenectomy on DFS.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of the review, lymphadenectomy may improve OS and DFS for epithelial ESOC. Scarce data suggest that lymphadenectomy is not associated with improved outcomes for malignant germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors but may benefit ovarian carcinosarcoma. Large-scale RCTs and robust observational studies shall improve current evidence.

Oncological and Reproductive Outcomes of Cystectomy Compared with Unilateral Salpingo-Oophorectomy as Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Apparent Early Stage Pure Immature Ovarian Teratomas

PURPOSE

To compare the oncological and reproductive outcomes of patients with apparent early stage pure ovarian immature teratomas (IMTs) treated with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) or cystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with apparent early stage pure ovarian IMTs who received fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) between 1984 and 2019. FSS was defined as preservation of the uterus and at least one adnexa. Recurrence rates were compared between patients receiving USO and cystectomy. Reproductive outcomes and menstrual histories were assessed by telephone interview.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients were included, of whom 83 underwent USO and 41 underwent cystectomy. After a median follow-up of 70.6 months (range: 6.2-410.6 months), eight patients suffered recurrences (5 in the USO group and 3 in the cystectomy group). The median times to recurrence were 5.0 and 5.1 months in the USO and cystectomy groups, respectively (P = 0.764). All patients with recurrence were successfully salvaged by surgery, except for one death. Univariate analysis showed no difference in disease-free survival and overall survival between the groups (P = 0.781, 0.155). Of the 111 patients contacted by telephone, 97 resumed menstruation following the surgery. Of the 31 patients desiring pregnancy, 26 achieved 28 pregnancies. USO (83.3%), like cystectomy (85.7%), resulted in excellent pregnancy rates.

CONCLUSIONS

A USO is the standard treatment for women with early stage pure IMTs who want to preserve fertility. However, a cystectomy with adjuvant chemotherapy may be a suitable fertility-sparing therapy when a cystectomy is the only surgical option.

Outcomes after Fertility-sparing Surgery for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To compare reproductive and oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, borderline ovarian tumors, or nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma according to receipt of fertility-sparing surgery or conventional surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched from January 1, 1995, to May 29, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they (1) enrolled women of childbearing age diagnosed with ovarian cancer between the ages of 18 years and 50 years, (2) reported on oncologic and/or reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer, and (3) included at least 20 patients.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 995 studies. After duplicates were removed, we abstracted 980 unique citations. Of those screened, 167 publications were identified as potentially relevant, and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final review included 44 studies in epithelial ovarian cancer, 42 in borderline ovarian tumors, and 31 in nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma. The narrative synthesis demonstrated that overall survival does not seem to be compromised in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery compared with those undergoing conventional surgery, although long-term data are limited. Areas of controversy include safety of fertility-sparing surgery in the setting of high-risk factors (stage IC, grade 3, and clear cell histology), as well as type of surgery (salpingo-oophorectomy vs cystectomy). It seems that although there may be some fertility compromise after surgery, pregnancy and live-birth rates are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery is safe and feasible in women with early-stage low-risk ovarian cancer. Pregnancy outcomes for these patients also seem to be similar to those of the general population.

Ovarian Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States and is the country's fifth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. These NCCN Guidelines discuss cancers originating in the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, as these are all managed in a similar manner. Most of the recommendations are based on data from patients with the most common subtypes─high-grade serous and grade 2/3 endometrioid. The NCCN Guidelines also include recommendations specifically for patients with less common ovarian cancers, which in the guidelines include the following: carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, low-grade serous, grade 1 endometrioid, borderline epithelial, malignant sex cord-stromal, and malignant germ cell tumors. This manuscript focuses on certain aspects of primary treatment, including primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and maintenance therapy options (including PARP inhibitors) after completion of first-line chemotherapy.

Retrospective Analysis of Pure Ovarian Immature Teratoma in Patients Aged 15-39 Years: A Turkish Multicenter Study

Purpose: To evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical outcomes in patients with pure ovarian immature teratomas (POITs). Materials and Methods: In this multicenter study, a retrospective review was made of the databases of six Gynecology Oncology Departments in Turkey to identify patients with POITs who had undergone surgery between 1993 and 2019. Results: Evaluation was made of 48 patients with a median age at diagnosis of 22.5 years (range, 15-37 years). In 40 (83%) patients, stage I was determined and in eight patients, an advanced stage (IIIB, IIIC, and IVB) was determined. Tumors were found to be grade I in 17 (35.4%) cases, grade II in 12 (25%), and grade III in 19 (39.6%). Fertility-sparing surgery was applied to 42 (87.5%) patients and radical surgery to 6 (12.5%). The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 3-246 months). Recurrence was seen in seven patients, all with grade III tumors. In the final pathological examination of recurrent tumors, mature teratoma was reported in five patients, and immature teratoma in one patient. Salvage surgery was not performed in one patient as the tumor was unresectable and so a regimen of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) was administered. Conclusion: POITs are rare tumors seen at a young age, and benign or malignant relapse can be seen in these tumors. In this cohort, the malignant recurrence rate was 4.1%, and the benign recurrence rate was 10.4%. All the recurrences were in grade III tumors. Benign recurrences can be treated with surgery alone and the malignant group should be treated with surgery followed by chemotherapy.