Targeted therapy for mucinous ovarian carcinoma: evidence from clinical trials

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma: A survey of practice in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare ovarian cancer with limited evidence to support clinical care.

AIMS

We undertook a clinician survey to better understand current practice in treating MOC in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine any features associated with variation in care. In addition, we aimed to understand future research priorities.

METHODS

A RedCap survey was distributed to clinician members of the Australia New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group (ANZGOG). Questions included respondent demographics, three case studies and future research priorities. Clinicians were asked questions specific to their speciality.

RESULTS

Respondents (n = 47) were commonly experienced gynae-oncology specialists, most often surgical (38%) or medical (30%) oncologists. There was good consensus for surgical approaches for stage I disease; however, variation in practice was noted for advanced or recurrent MOC. Variation was also observed for medical oncologists; in early-stage disease there was no clear consensus on whether to offer chemotherapy, or which regimen to recommend. For advanced and recurrent disease a wide range of chemotherapy options was considered, with a trend away from an ovarian-type toward gastrointestinal (GI)-type regimens in advanced MOC. This practice was reflected in future research priorities, with 'Is a GI chemotherapy regimen better than an ovarian regimen?' the most highly ranked option, followed by 'Should stage 1C patients receive chemotherapy?'

CONCLUSIONS

Although the number of respondents limited the analyses, it was clear that chemotherapy selection was a key point of divergence for medical oncologists. Future research is needed to establish well-evidenced guidelines for clinical care of MOC.

A Novel Method for the Early Detection of Single Circulating, Metastatic and Self-Seeding Cancer Cells in Orthotopic Breast Cancer Mouse Models

BACKGROUND

Metastasis is the main cause of cancer-related deaths, but efficient targeted therapies against metastasis are still missing. Major gaps exist in our understanding of the metastatic cascade, as existing methods cannot combine sensitivity, robustness, and practicality to dissect cancer progression. Addressing this issue requires improved strategies to distinguish early metastatic colonization from metastatic outgrowth.

METHODS

Luciferase-labelled MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and 4T1 breast cancer cells were spiked into samples from tumour-naïve mice to establish the limit of detection for disseminated tumour cells. Luciferase-labelled breast cancer cells (±unlabelled cancer-associated fibroblasts; CAFs) were orthotopically implanted in immunocompromised mice. An ex vivo luciferase assay was used to quantify tumour cell dissemination.

RESULTS

In vitro luciferase assay confirmed a linear and positive correlation between cancer cell numbers and the bioluminescence detected at single cell level in blood, brain, lung, liver, and mammary fat pad samples. Remarkably, single luciferase-labelled cancer cells were detectable in all of these sites, as the bioluminescence quantified in the analysed samples was substantially higher than background levels. Ex vivo, circulating tumour cells, metastasis, and tumour self-seeding were detected in all samples from animals implanted with highly metastatic luciferase-labelled MDA-MB-231 cells. In turn, detection of poorly metastatic luciferase-labelled MCF7 cells was scarce but significantly enhanced upon co-implantation with CAFs as early as 20 days after the experiment was initiated.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate the feasibility of using an ultrasensitive luciferase-based method to dissect the mechanisms of early metastatic colonization to improving the development of antimetastatic therapies.

New windows of surgical opportunity for gynecological cancers in the era of targeted therapies

Precision medicine through molecular profiling has taken a prominent role in the treatment of solid tumors and it is widely expected that this will continue to expand. With respect to gynecological cancers, a major change has particularly been observed in the treatment landscape of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Regarding the former, maintenance therapy with either poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and/or bevacizumab has become an indispensable treatment option following the traditional combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Considering endometrial cancer, the molecular classification system has now been incorporated into virtually every guideline available and molecular-directed treatment strategies are currently being researched, presumably leading to a further transformation of its treatment paradigm. After all, treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors that target the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor has already been shown to significantly improve disease outcomes in these patients, especially in those with mismatch repair deficient, microsatellite stability-high (MMRd-MSI-H) disease. Similarly, in recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer patients, these agents elicited improved survival rates when being added to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. Interestingly, implications of these targeted therapies for surgical management have been touched on to a minor extent, but are at least as intriguing. This review therefore aims to address the wide-ranging opportunities the molecular tumor characteristics and their corresponding targeted therapies have to offer for the surgical management of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers, both in the primary and recurrent setting.

Systematic Review of the Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors

Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer have predominantly included women with high-grade serous carcinomas. The response rate and oncological outcomes of NACT for malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) are poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the effects of NACT on women with MOGCT by conducting a systematic review of four public search engines. Fifteen studies were identified, and a further descriptive analysis was performed for 10 original articles. In those studies, most women were treated with a bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin regimen, and one to three cycles were used in most studies. Four studies comparing NACT and primary debulking surgery showed similar complete response rates (n = 2; pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-5.27), comparable overall survival (n = 3; 87.0-100% versus 70.0-100%), disease-free survival (n = 3; 87.0-100% versus 70.0-100%), recurrence rate (n = 1; OR 3.50, 95%CI 0.38-32.50), and adverse events rate from chemotherapy between the groups. In conclusion, NACT may be considered for the management of MOGCT; however, possible candidates for NACT use and an ideal number of NACT cycles remain unknown. Further studies are warranted to validate the efficacy of NACT in advanced MOGCT patients.

Mucins and mucinous ovarian carcinoma: Development, differential diagnosis, and treatment

Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare histological type of epithelial ovarian cancer. It has poor response to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and PARPi-based maintenance treatment, resulting in short survival and poor prognosis in advanced-disease patients. MOC is characterized by mucus that is mainly composed of mucin in the cystic cavity. Our review discusses in detail the role of mucins in MOC. Mucins are correlated with MOC development. Furthermore, they are valuable in the differential diagnosis of primary and secondary ovarian mucinous tumors. Some types of mucins have been studied in the context of chemoresistance and targeted therapy for ovarian cancer. This review may provide a new direction for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced MOC.

Cisplatin in Ovarian Cancer Treatment-Known Limitations in Therapy Force New Solutions

Cisplatin is one of the most commonly used anticancer drugs worldwide. It is mainly used in the treatment of ovarian cancer, but also used in testicular, bladder and lung cancers. The significant advantage of this drug is the multidirectional mechanism of its anticancer action, with the most important direction being damaging the DNA of cancer cells. Unfortunately, cisplatin displays a number of serious disadvantages, including toxicity to the most important organs, such as kidneys, heart, liver and inner ear. Moreover, a significant problem among patients with ovarian cancer, treated with cisplatin, is the development of numerous resistance mechanisms during therapy, including changes in the processes of cellular drug import and export, changes in the DNA damage repair mechanisms, as well as numerous changes in the processes of apoptosis and autophagy. Due to all of the mentioned problems, strategies to increase the effectiveness of cisplatin in the treatment of ovarian cancer are intensively sought. The most important strategy includes the development of less toxic cisplatin analogs. Another important direction is combination therapy, involving the simultaneous use of cisplatin with different anticancer drugs, substances derived from plants, temperature or radiotherapy. Many years of observations accompanying the presence of cisplatin in the therapy made it possible to provide a series of verifiable, statistically significant data, but also to show how, over time, with the new information and scientific discoveries, it is possible to describe and understand the therapeutic problems observed in practice, such as the acquisition of drug resistance by tumor cells or induction of changes in the tumor microenvironment. According to the authors, confronting what we knew so far with what new trends offer has a profound meaning. This paper presents information on the history of cisplatin and describes the molecular mechanisms of its action and the development of resistance by cancer cells. In addition, our goal was to highlight a number of therapeutic strategies to increase the effectiveness of cisplatin in the treatment of ovarian cancer, as well as to identify methods to eliminate problems associated with the use of cisplatin.