False positivity in HER2 testing of breast cancer: novel paths for approaching an old dilemma

HER2 Expression in Peritoneal Dissemination of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Immunohistochemical Reactivity Using Four HER2 Antibodies

Most high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs) involving the peritoneum are aggressive. Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is aberrantly activated in a variety of solid cancers. The HER2 status of a tumor is based on cytoplasmic membrane staining of an intracellular domain (ICD)-specific HER2 antibody. We compared four anti-HER2 antibodies in an immunohistochemical study of HGSOC with peritoneal dissemination. HER2 expression was assessed in peritoneal disseminated HGSOC specimens from 38 patients by immunohistochemistry using four different anti-HER2 antibodies (an ICD antibody (clone A0485), an extracellular domain (ECD) antibody (clone SP3), and two antibodies recognizing HER2 phosphorylated at tyrosine 877 or 1248 (pHER2Y877 and pHER2Y1248)). HER2 gene amplification was accessed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). The antibodies showed HER2 positivity as follows: 31.6% of cases (12/38) with A0485, 26.3% (10/38) with SP3, 7.9% (3/38) with pHER2Y877, and 21.1% (8/38) with pHER2Y1248. Fifteen out of thirty-eight (39.5%) cases were positive for at least one of the four HER2 antibodies. HER2 gene amplification was detected in 3/19 cases. All four HER2 antibodies could be used for patient selection for anti-HER2 therapies. These findings raise the possibility of anti-HER2 therapeutic strategies for HGSOC with peritoneal dissemination.

Discordance of positive immunohistochemical results among different primary HER2 antibodies used in breast cancer: A comparison between Histofine® HER2 Kit (MONO) SV2-61γ antibody and Ventana I-VIEW PATHWAY™ HER2 4B5 antibody

INTRODUCTION

Immunohistochemical (IHC) testing for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression status renders variable scores among different primary antibodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed HER2 expression status by IHC score using two types of kits, i.e., Roche Ventana I-VIEW PATHWAY™ HER2 using the 4B5 antibody that recognizes the intracellular domain (ICD) and Nichirei Biosciences Histofine® HER2 Kit (MONO) using the SV2-61γ antibody that recognizes the extracellular domain (ECD). In addition, we determined the presence or absence of the ECD in samples by Western blotting (WB) and examined its relationship with the IHC score.

RESULTS

Of 101 samples, 44 and 9 samples received a score of 2+/3+ by IHC with 4B5 and SV2-61γ, respectively. A verification by WB in samples with a discrepancy of IHC scores found that samples with the score of 2+/3+ with SV2-61γ showed a significantly higher protein intensity of p185HER2 with the ECD, whereas samples with a score of 2+/3+ with 4B5 but as 0/1+ with SV2-61γ showed a significantly higher protein intensity of p95HER2 without the ECD.

CONCLUSION

The nature of primary antibodies used for IHC and the presence or absence of the ECD in samples may contribute to different positive rates between 4B5 and SV2-61γ.

Analytical validation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry by the use of the A0485 antibody versus the 4B5 antibody and breast versus gastric scoring guidelines in ovarian clear cell carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) by using two antibodies and two scoring guidelines in correlation with HER2 amplification and clinicopathological features.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tissue microarray was constructed by use of a total of 71 OCCC cases for IHC (the A0485 antibody and the 4B5 antibody) and dual-colour silver in-situ hybridisation (DISH). Two pathologists independently scored the IHC according to the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) breast cancer guidelines (breast guidelines) and the 2016 ASCO/CAP gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma guidelines (gastric guidelines). IHC concordances between A0485 and 4B5 were 87.3-93.0%. Three to 16 (4.2-22.5%) cases had an IHC score of 2+/3+ with frequent basolateral/lateral membranous staining. The 4B5 antibody yielded fewer IHC 2+ cases than the A0485 antibody (n = 2-6 versus n = 5-12). Five (7.0%) cases had HER2 amplification as determined with DISH. Cases with papillary-predominant growth patterns were significantly more likely to have HER2 amplification (P = 0.0051). In predicting DISH results, IHC scored according to the gastric guidelines yielded 100%/100% sensitivity and 83.3-95.5%/98.2-100% specificity, and IHC scored according to the breast guidelines yielded 60-80%/33.3-66.7% sensitivity and 95.5-100%/100% specificity (including/excluding IHC 2+ cases). One case had intratumoral heterogeneity, with discordant results between primary and metastatic tumour specimens.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated HER2 amplification in 7% of OCCC cases, and the molecular change is significantly associated with papillary-predominant growth patterns. In predicting HER2 amplification, a combination of 4B5 IHC and gastric guidelines provides the best sensitivity and fewer equivocal (IHC 2+) cases. Given the intratumoral heterogeneity, assessment of HER2 status on whole tissue sections and on both primary and metastatic tumour specimens is recommended.

Quantitative Assessment of Immunohistochemistry Laboratory Performance by Measuring Analytic Response Curves and Limits of Detection

Context.—

Numerous studies highlight interlaboratory performance variability in diagnostic immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing. Despite substantial improvements over the years, the inability to quantitatively and objectively assess immunostain sensitivity complicates interlaboratory standardization.

Objective.—

To quantitatively and objectively assess the sensitivity of the immunohistochemical stains for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) across IHC laboratories in a proficiency testing format. We measure sensitivity with parameters that are new to the field of diagnostic IHC: analytic response curves and limits of detection.

Design.—

Thirty-nine diagnostic IHC laboratories stained a set of 3 slides, one each for HER2, ER, and PR. Each slide incorporated a positive tissue section and IHControls at 5 different concentrations. The IHControls comprise cell-sized clear microbeads coated with defined concentrations of analyte (HER2, ER, and/or PR). The laboratories identified the limits of detection and then mailed the slides for quantitative assessment.

Results.—

Each commercial immunostain demonstrated a characteristic analytic response curve, reflecting strong reproducibility among IHC laboratories using the same automation and reagents prepared per current Good Manufacturing Practices. However, when comparing different commercial vendors (using different reagents), the data reveal up to 100-fold differences in analytic sensitivity. For proficiency testing purposes, quantitative assessment using analytic response curves was superior to subjective interpretation of limits of detection.

Conclusions.—

Assessment of IHC laboratory performance by quantitative measurement of analytic response curves is a powerful, objective tool for identifying outlier IHC laboratories. It uniquely evaluates immunostain performance across a range of defined analyte concentrations.

Measurement of Domain-Specific HER2 (ERBB2) Expression May Classify Benefit From Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that antibodies targeting the intracellular (ICD) or extracellular domains (ECD) of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are equivalent when traditional methods are used. We describe a new method to quantify ICD and ECD expression separately and assess the prognostic value of domain-specific HER2 results in patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab therapy.

METHODS

We measured HER2 protein expression with quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) in tissue microarrays (TMA) using two different antibodies targeting the ICD (CB11 and A0485) and ECD (SP3 and D8F12). We assessed the prognostic value of ICD and ECD expression in 180 patients from a clinical trial of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by trastuzumab (HeCOG 10/05). We performed an exploratory univariate domain-specific, disease-free survival (DFS) analysis and compared DFS functions with Kaplan-Meier estimates. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

HER2 ICD expression by QIF showed slightly higher sensitivity to predict ERBB2 (HER2) gene amplification than ECD expression, which was more specific and had higher positive predictive value. In the HeCOG 10/05 trial specimens, 15% of cases showed discordant results for ICD and ECD expression. High ECD was statistically associated with longer DFS (log-rank P = .049, HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.144 to 0.997), while ICD status was not. Among patients with low ECD, there was no difference in DFS by ICD status. However, when ICD was high, high ECD was statistically associated with longer DFS (log-rank P = .027, HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.037 to 0.82) compared with low ECD.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative measurements of HER2 ICD and ECD expression in breast cancer suggest a subclassification of HER2-positive tumors. Trastuzumab-treated patients with high ECD showed better DFS than patients with low ECD. This suggests differential benefit from trastuzumab therapy based on HER2 ECD expression.

Oncogene addiction: pathways of therapeutic response, resistance, and road maps toward a cure

A key goal of cancer therapeutics is to selectively target the genetic lesions that initiate and maintain cancer cell proliferation and survival. While most cancers harbor multiple oncogenic mutations, a wealth of preclinical and clinical data supports that many cancers are sensitive to inhibition of single oncogenes, a concept referred to as 'oncogene addiction'. Herein, we describe the clinical evidence supporting oncogene addiction and discuss common mechanistic themes emerging from the response and acquired resistance to oncogene-targeted therapies. Finally, we suggest several opportunities toward exploiting oncogene addiction to achieve curative cancer therapies.

HER2 expression and markers of phosphoinositide-3-kinase pathway activation define a favorable subgroup of metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinomas

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary adenocarcinomas (ADC) can be sub-grouped based on dominant oncogenic drivers. EGFR mutations define an entity of metastatic ADC with favorable prognosis and high susceptibility to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition. In contrast, the clinical impact of additional ERBB family members in ADC is less defined. To this end we prospectively studied HER2 expression, gene amplification, and mutation in relation to outcome of patients with advanced or metastatic ADC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Diagnostic tumor biopsies from 193 sequential patients with stage III/IV ADC were prospectively studied for HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Cases with IHC scores 2+ or 3+ were analyzed by HER2 chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), and sequencing of HER2 exons 20 and 23. Additional prospectively determined biomarkers included PTEN, cMET, pAKT, and pERK expression, KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations, and ALK fluorescence ISH (FISH).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

HER2-IHC was feasible in 176 (91.2%) cases. Of 53 (30%) cases with IHC scores 2+/3+, 45 (85%) could be studied by CISH and 34 (64%) by sequencing. The lower number of HER2-mutational analyses resulted from exhaustion of tumor tissue and DNA following mutational analysis of KRAS, EGFR, BRAF and PIK3CA. HER2 amplification was detected in 4 cases (2.3%), while no mutation was found. HER2 expression correlated with expression of pAKT and cMET. Expression of HER2 and pAKT was associated with favorable overall survival in stage IV disease. HER2-expressing ADC more frequently harbored KRAS mutations, while HER2 expression was absent in all 4 cases with BRAF mutation. HER2-IHC was not predictive of HER2 gene amplification or mutation, which both were rare events in prospectively studied patients with advanced or metastatic ADC. Expression of HER2 and pAKT define a population of patients with stage IV ADC with a distinct disease course, who could benefit from specifically tailored pharmacotherapies.