Pathology reporting of bone marrow biopsy in myelofibrosis; application of the Delphi consensus process to the development of a standardised diagnostic report

Application Value of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT in the Evaluation of Myelofibrotic Diseases

PURPOSE

Fibroblast activation protein is highly expressed in neoplastic lesions and various fibrotic tissues, making it an attractive target for disease evaluation. 68 Ga-labeled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI), a new tumor interstitial imaging agent, holds promise for evaluating myelofibrosis. Therefore, this study aimed to use 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the noninvasive visualization and quantification of the extent of myelofibrosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study involving 22 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT. The uptake of 68 Ga-FAPI was measured in their respective bone marrow and spleen, and the obtained imaging findings were compared with laboratory, cytogenetic, and histopathological data.

RESULTS

68 Ga-FAPI uptake in the bone marrow was significantly and positively correlated with the myelofibrosis grade ( r > 0.8, P < 0.001). 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT showed visually negative results in patients with grades 0-1 myelofibrosis and positive in those with grades 2-3, but the level of involvement varied. 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT provides a noninvasive means of visualizing the extent of systemic bone marrow involvement and differentiation between the early and advanced stages of fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT shows promise as a method for visualizing and quantifying myelofibrosis, providing suitable sites for bone marrow biopsy. The extent of 68 Ga-FAPI uptake by bone marrow increases with the progression of myelofibrosis, thus it is a simple and noninvasive measurement that can be used to evaluate the progression of myelofibrosis. Nevertheless, although 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT has demonstrated a potential value in prognostic assessment, further confirmation is needed.

Developing consensus in Histopathology: the role of the Delphi method

The Delphi method is a well-established research tool, used for consensus building across a number of fields. Despite its widespread use, and popularity in many medical specialities, there is a paucity of literature on the use of the Delphi method in Histopathology. This literature review seeks to critique the Delphi methodology and explore its potential applications to histopathology-based clinical and research questions. We review those published studies that have utilized the Delphi methodology in Histopathology settings and specifically outline the advantages and limitations of this technique, highlighting situations where its application can be most effective.

A provider's guide to primary myelofibrosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management

Although understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular biology of primary myelofibrosis continues to improve, treatment options are limited, and several biological features remain unexplained. With an appropriate clinical history, exam, laboratory evaluation, and bone marrow biopsy, the diagnosis can often be established. Recent studies have better characterized prognostic factors and driver mutations in myelofibrosis, facilitated by use of next-generation sequencing. These advances have facilitated development of a management strategy that is based on both risk factors and clinical phenotype. For low-risk patients, treatment will depend on symptom severity. For patients with higher-risk disease, several treatments are available including JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and clinical trials using novel molecularly targeted therapies and rational drug combinations. In this review, we outline what is known about the disease pathogenesis, discuss an approach to reaching the diagnosis, review the prognosis of myelofibrosis, and detail current therapeutic strategies.

Management of Adult Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Clinical Practice: A Consensus Approach of the Spanish ITP Expert Group

Background and Objective

Diagnosis and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have changed dramatically in the last decade. The aim of the study was to obtain information about the opinion of the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) members regarding the best clinical practices for diagnosis and management of adult patients with ITP.

Materials and Methods

A two-round Delphi method was carried out by sending to 129 experts a 90-item questionnaire developed by 11 specialists, with a 4-point Likert scale (“never,” “sometimes,” “frequently,” and “always”) for the assessment of responses.

Results

Forty out of the 129 experts participated in the survey (participation rate 30.2%) and 39 completed the questionnaire (response rate 97.5%). Salient consensus points included the following: the need to indicate workup studies from a sustained platelet count < 100 x 10⁹/L in the absence of a clear etiology; bone marrow aspiration in elderly patients with suspected ITP; beginning treatment in asymptomatic patients with a platelet count < 20 x 10⁹/L; not exceeding 6-7 weeks of corticosteroid therapy; switching from corticosteroids to one thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TRA); switching to other TRA or other options as combinations of them with immunosuppressive drugs in case of failure; how to reduce tapering TRA; treating patients with symptomatic persistent ITP and platelet count > 20 x 10⁹/L; and considering mucosal or severe bleeding as a basic criterion for hospital admission.

Conclusions

The present consensus document provides a reference framework for the management of patients with ITP in clinical practice.

Laboratory Investigation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs): Recommendations of the Canadian Mpn Group

OBJECTIVES

To standardize diagnostic investigations for myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to increase homogeneity in patient care and to streamline diagnostic approaches in the most efficient and cost-effective manner.

METHODS

The development of Canadian expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis of MPNs began with a review of the following: clinical evidence, daily practice, existing treatment guidelines, and availability of diagnostic tools. Each group member was assigned a specific topic, which they discussed with the entire group during several consensus meetings.

RESULTS

This document provides the Canadian MPN group's recommendations, proposed diagnostic algorithms, and background evidence upon which decisions were made.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardization of diagnostic investigations will increase homogeneity in patient care and provide a foundation for future clinical research in this rapidly evolving therapeutic area. Streamlining diagnostic approaches in the most efficient and cost-effective manner will also result in significant cost saving for the health care system.

Current opinion and consensus statement regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of patients with essential thrombocythemia: a survey of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (GEMFIN) using the Delphi method

The current consensus on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of essential thrombocythemia (ET) is based on experts' recommendations. However, several aspects of the diagnosis of, prognosis of, and therapy for ET are still controversial. The Delphi method was employed with an expert panel of members of the Spanish Group of Ph-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in order to identify the degree of agreement on the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ET. Nine leading experts selected a total of 41 clinical hematologists with well-known expertise in ET. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect the questions rated in a four-step scale. The questions were grouped into four blocks: diagnosis, risk stratification, goals of therapy, and treatment strategy. After the first round consisting of 80 questions, a second round including 14 additional questions focused on the recommendations advocated by experts of the European LeukemiaNet in 2011 was analyzed. The median and mean values for the first and second rounds were calculated. A summary of the conclusions considered as the most representative of each block of questions is presented. The Delphi method is a powerful instrument to address the current approaches and controversies surrounding ET.