A multistep cytological approach for patients with jaundice and biliary strictures of indeterminate origin

The Role of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Pancreatobiliary Brushing Cytology: A Large Retrospective Review with Histologic Correlation

(1) Background: Although the specificity of brush cytology for the detection of malignant pancreaticobiliary strictures is high, its sensitivity is low. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to detect chromosomal aneuploidy in biliary brushing specimens, and when used as an adjunct to routine cytology, it significantly improves diagnostic sensitivity. (2) Methods: We searched our laboratory information system to identify all bile duct brush cytology cases with follow-up surgical pathology between January 2001 and September 2019. Cytologic diagnoses were classified as negative, atypical, suspicious, or malignant. Correlated surgical pathological diagnoses were classified as benign or malignant. FISH test results were obtained for a subset of cytology cases with concurrent FISH testing, and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in identifying malignancy for cytology alone, FISH alone, and combined cytology and FISH were calculated. (3) Results: A total of 1017 brushing cytology cases with histologic correlation were identified. A total of 193 FISH tests were performed concurrently with cytological specimens. Malignant diagnoses were identified in 623 of 1017 patients, while 394 patients had benign strictures. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive rate were 65%, 78%, 83%, and 49% for cytology alone; 72%, 67%, 63%, and 68% for FISH alone; and 85%, 42%, 60%, and 74% for combined cytology and FISH, respectively. Among FISH-positive cases, the risk of malignancy for polysomy was 82% and 32% for trisomy. (4) Conclusions: FISH improves the sensitivity and negative predictive rate of bile duct brush cytology. The combination of cytology and FISH has increased the sensitivity from 65% to 85% and the negative predictive rate from 49% to 74% when compared to cytology alone. A patient with a polysomy FISH result had a significantly higher risk of malignancy than a patient with a trisomy 7 result (82% vs. 32%, p < 0.00001).

High Diagnostic Yield of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Brush Cytology for Indeterminate Strictures

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) brush cytology is used frequently for sampling indeterminate biliary strictures. Studies have demonstrated that the diagnostic yield of brush cytology for malignant strictures is estimated to be 6%-70%. With improved diagnostic tools, sampling techniques and specimen processing, the yield of ERCP brush cytology may be higher. This study aimed to assess the yield of brush cytology and determine factors associated with a positive diagnosis.

Methods

This was a cohort study of patients who underwent ERCP brush cytology from October 2017 to May 2020. Patient demographics, clinical, procedural and pathological data were collected using chart review. Sampling data were captured up to 3 months post-index ERCP to capture repeat brushings, biopsies or surgical resections. Outcomes included the diagnostic yield, true/false positive values and true/false negative values of malignancy detection using ERCP brush cytology.

Results

A total of 126 patients underwent a brush cytology, 58% were male and 79% had a stricture in the extrahepatic region. Ninety-three patients were diagnosed with a malignancy, of which 78 had positive brush cytology results and 15 had a negative brush cytology result. The diagnostic yield, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 84%, 83%, 97%, 99%, 68% and 87% respectively.

Conclusion

ERCP brush cytology performed using updated sampling technique is associated with high diagnostic yield. This allows for earlier malignancy diagnosis, timely treatment and decreased need for further investigation.

Brush Cytology, Forceps Biopsy, or Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Sampling for Diagnosis of Bile Duct Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Endoscopic sampling is essential for tissue diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). To evaluate and compare the diagnostic sensitivities of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided brush cytology biopsy, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in patients with CCA. A comprehensive literature search through multiple databases was conducted for articles published between January 1995 and August 2020. The pooled rates of sensitivity for the diagnosis of CCA and of adverse events were compared among brushing, biopsy, brushing & biopsy, and EUS-FNA. In total, 1123 patients with CCA (32 studies), 719 patients (20 studies), 358 patients (13 studies), and 422 patients (17 studies) were tested by brushing, biopsy, brushing & biopsy, and EUS-FNA, respectively. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity was 56.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 48.8-63.1%, I² = 83.0%) with brushing, 67.0% (95% CI 60.2-73.5%, I² = 72.5%) with biopsy, 70.7% (95% CI 64.1-76.8%, I² = 42.7%) with brushing & biopsy, and 73.6% (95% CI 64.7-81.5%, I² = 74.7%) with EUS-FNA. The diagnostic sensitivity was significantly lower for brushing than for biopsy, brushing & biopsy, or EUS-FNA. No significant difference was noted in diagnostic sensitivities among biopsy, brushing & biopsy, and EUS-FNA. Adverse events were comparable between the groups. Intraductal biopsy, brushing & biopsy, and EUS-FNA had comparable efficacy and safety for the diagnosis of CCA. Brushing was the least sensitive diagnostic tool compared with intraductal biopsy or EUS-FNA. Given the modest diagnostic sensitivities of intraductal biopsy and EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of CCA, further studies for complementing these techniques with biomarkers may be needed.

Diagnostic power of DNA methylation markers suggestive of cholangiocarcinoma in ERCP-based brush cytology

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accurate differentiation between cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and benign biliary stricture is of paramount importance. Biliary brush cytology is a simple and safe diagnostic approach that provides relatively high specificity; however, sensitivity is limited. Previous reports indicated the aberrations of DNA methylation in CCA. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of the methylation index (MI) of HOXA1 and NEUROG1 gene promoters in CCA.

METHODS

Patients with biliary stricture who underwent ERCP with brush cytology in Siriraj Hospital from September 2016 to December 2019 were prospectively enrolled. The MI of HOXA1 (MI_H) and MI of NEUROG1 (MI_N) were determined by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. The diagnostic power for CCA was tested for MI from both genes and serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included in the study; 41 patients had a final diagnosis of CCA, and 26 patients were determined to have a benign biliary stricture. The results showed that both MI_H and MI_N had higher sensitivity and accuracy (95.1% and 82.3% and 90.2% and 89.5%, respectively) than brush cytology (61.5% and 78.1%) and CA19-9 (69.4% and 77.8%). The combination of brush cytology, both methylation markers, and CA19-9 increased the sensitivity and accuracy to 97.4% and 91.0%. Methylation markers were positive in 5 of 6 patients with confirmed CCA whose cytology and CA19-9 were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA methylation increased the sensitivity for the diagnosis of CCA; therefore, the use of DNA methylation is promising for diagnosis of CCA in patients with biliary strictures. A future validation study is warranted to assess its role in clinical practice. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04568512.).

Refined pancreatobiliary UroVysion criteria and an approach for further optimization

Pancreatobiliary strictures are a common source of false negatives for malignancy detection. UroVysion is more sensitive than any other method but remains underutilized because of conflicting sensitivities and specificities due to a lack of standardized cutoff criteria and confusion in interpreting results in the context of primary sclerosing cholangitis. We set out to determine the sensitivities and specificities of UroVysion, brushing cytology, forceps biopsies, and fine needle aspiration (FNAs) for pancreatobiliary stricture malignancy detection. A retrospective review was performed of all biopsied pancreatobiliary strictures at our institution over 5 years. UroVysion was unquestionably the most sensitive method and all methods were highly specific. Sensitivity was highest while maintaining specificity when a malignant interpretation was limited to cases with 5+ cells with the same polysomic signal pattern and/or loss of one or both 9p21 signals. Only UroVysion detected the metastases and a neuroendocrine tumor. In reviewing and analyzing the signal patterns, we noticed trends according to location and diagnosis. Herein we describe our method for analyzing signal patterns and propose cutoff criteria based upon observations gleaned from such analysis.

DNA flow cytometric analysis of paraffin-embedded tissue for the diagnosis of malignancy in bile duct biopsies

Differentiation of reactive versus neoplastic epithelial changes can be challenging in bile duct biopsies. The samples are often scant, distorted, and mixed with significant inflammation, ulceration, and/or debris. Histological confirmation of malignancy is often required before the initiation of surgical therapy, and an erroneous diagnosis of malignancy can lead to unnecessary clinical management. Aneuploidy assessment by DNA flow cytometry was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue from 63 bile duct biopsies: 10 with a malignant diagnosis (7 with adenocarcinoma and 3 with at least high-grade dysplasia [HGD]); 3 with an atypical diagnosis showing rare atypical glands/cells, concerning but not definite for malignancy; 28 likely reactive biopsies with acute/chronic inflammation, ulceration, and/or mild nuclear atypia; and 22 additional benign biopsies without significant inflammation, ulceration, or nuclear atypia. Aneuploidy was detected in 7 (70%) of the 10 biopsies with definite neoplasia (5 of 7 adenocarcinoma cases and 2 of 3 at least HGD cases), all 3 (100%) atypical biopsies, and none of the 50 benign biopsies. All 3 atypical cases with aneuploidy were subsequently found to have adenocarcinoma (n = 2) or HGD (n = 1). Among the 2 cases of at least HGD with aneuploidy, 1 case developed adenocarcinoma, but no follow-up information was available in the other case. The remaining 1 case of at least HGD, despite having normal DNA content, was found to have adenocarcinoma on follow-up. None of the 50 benign cases (further supported by normal DNA content) developed adenocarcinoma within a mean follow-up time of 37 months (range: 0-282 months). The estimated sensitivity of aneuploidy as a diagnostic marker of malignancy (adenocarcinoma and HGD) was 70%, with the specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 94%. In conclusion, DNA flow cytometry using FFPE tissue from bile duct biopsies demonstrates a high rate of aneuploidy (70%) in malignant cases and normal DNA content in all benign biopsies. Although the sample size is small, the results indicate that this assay can be potentially useful in challenging atypical cases, where morphological evaluation is limited by scarcity of atypical glands/cells, inflammation, and/or ulceration.

Cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive fibroinflammatory destruction of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. It is associated with a significantly increased risk of malignancy, particularly cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). In this review, we discuss what is currently known about the epidemiology of and risk factors for CCA in PSC as well as recent advances in its prevention, diagnosis, and surveillance.

RECENT FINDINGS

An area of major focus has been finding novel biomarkers (in serum, bile, and urine) for CCA. With the advancement of computing power, metabolomic and proteomic approaches, among other methods, may provide enhanced capability for differentiating between benign and malignant bile duct disease. Another area of focus has been the approach to CCA surveillance in PSC; a recent study has found that CCA surveillance in patients with PSC is associated with improved outcomes, including increased survival, thus advocating for its importance.

SUMMARY

Despite ongoing advancements in the study of PSC-associated CCA, early diagnosis of CCA remains difficult, treatment options are limited, and prognosis is often consequently poor. Continued research in the development of high-accuracy diagnostic tools, novel biomarkers, and surveillance techniques may help to increase the likelihood of diagnosing CCA at earlier stages, when therapeutic options have the highest likelihood of resulting in cure.

Biliary endoscopy in the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis and its complications

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic, idiopathic, cholestatic liver disease characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts. It can affect individuals of all age groups and gender, has no established pharmacotherapy, and is associated with a variety of neoplastic (e.g. cholangiocarcinoma) and non-neoplastic (e.g. dominant strictures) hepatobiliary complications. Given these considerations, endoscopy plays a major role in the care of patients with PSC. In this review, we discuss and provide updates regarding endoscopic considerations in the management of hepatobiliary manifestations and complications of PSC. Where evidence is limited, we suggest pragmatic approaches based on currently available data and expert opinion.

Diagnostic performance of a stepwise cytological algorithm for biliary malignancy in primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Detection of early cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a stepwise approach to biliary brush cytology with sequential use of fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) for the detection of biliary malignancy in PSC.

METHOD

We retrospectively studied consecutive patients with PSC who underwent biliary brushings at Karolinska University Hospital between 2009 and 2015 (n = 208). Brush samples were categorized as benign, equivocal (atypical or suspicious) and malignant. Equivocal cases were further analysed with FISH. Samples with a malignant cytology or positive FISH were considered positive. The diagnosis was determined after 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The diagnosis CCA was confirmed in 15 patients (7%), high-grade dysplasia in three patients, and low-grade dysplasia in five patients at follow-up. Using the diagnostic algorithm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) for a diagnosis of CCA were 80% (95%CI 52%-96%), 96% (95%CI 92%-98%), 60% (95%CI 36%-81%) and 98% (95% CI 95%-100%). In patients with equivocal cytology (n = 61), the sensitivity for CCA diagnosis increased to 100% (95%CI 72%-100%) with a lower PPV of 58% (95%CI 34%-78%). The diagnostic accuracy for detection of CCA in all patients was 95% (95%CI 91%-97%).

CONCLUSION

Biliary brush cytology with sequential use of FISH in equivocal cases seems to be a highly predictive diagnostic test for CCA in PSC. These results support the use of FISH when cytology is equivocal for detection of biliary malignancy in PSC.

An Increased Chromosome 7 Copy Number in Endoscopic Bile Duct Biopsy Specimens Is Predictive of a Poor Prognosis in Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The ability of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays in endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy specimens to predict the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has not been elucidated.

AIMS

We aimed to clarify the association between the results of UroVysion FISH assays and the prognosis of CCA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 49 specimens obtained by transpapillary forceps biopsy from consecutive patients with CCA. The copy numbers of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 were evaluated by FISH assay using UroVysion. We compared the overall survival (OS) of CCA patients with and without increased copy numbers of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17. Furthermore, we evaluated the association between OS and the clinicopathological parameters of CCA patients.

RESULTS

The OS was significantly shorter in patients with than without an increased chromosome 7 copy number (log-rank p = 0.015; median OS 11.9 vs. 20.7 months). In the univariate analyses, age (p = 0.012), ECOG performance status (p = 0.046), tumor stage (p = 0.046), surgery (p = 0.006), and an increased chromosome 7 copy number (p = 0.017) were significantly associated with OS. The multivariate analysis revealed that an increased chromosome 7 copy number (hazard ratio, 2.46; 95% CI 1.15-5.27; p = 0.021) and advanced clinical stage (hazard ratio, 2.26; 95% CI 1.11-4.63; p = 0.025) were independently predictive of a poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection by FISH assay of an increased chromosome 7 copy number in transpapillary forceps biopsy specimens is predictive of a poor prognosis in CCA patients.

Review article: Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations on endoscopic tissue acquisition for biliary strictures

BACKGROUND

Pre-operative tissue diagnosis for suspected malignant biliary strictures remains challenging.

AIM

To develop evidence-based consensus statements on endoscopic tissue acquisition for biliary strictures.

METHODS

The initial draft of statements was prepared following a systematic literature review. A committee of 20 experts from Asia-Pacific region then reviewed, discussed, and modified the statements. Two rounds of independent voting were conducted to reach a final version. Consensus was considered to be achieved when 80% or more of voting members voted "agree completely" or "agree with some reservation."

RESULTS

Eleven statements achieved consensus. The choice of tissue sampling modalities for biliary strictures depends on the clinical setting, the location of lesion, and availability of expertise. Detailed radiological and endoscopic evaluation is useful to guide the selection of appropriate tissue acquisition technique. Standard intraductal biliary brushing and/or forceps biopsy is the first option when endoscopic biliary drainage is required with an overall (range) sensitivity and specificity of 45% (26%-72%) and 99% (98%-100%), and 48% (15%-100%) and 99% (97%-100%), respectively, in diagnosing malignant biliary strictures. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and fluorescence in situ hybridisation using 4 fluorescent-labelled probes targeting chromosomes 3, 7, 17 and 9p21 locus may be added to improve the diagnostic yield. Cholangioscopy-guided biopsy and EUS-guided tissue acquisition can be considered after prior negative conventional tissue sampling with an overall (range) sensitivity and specificity of 60% (38%-88%) and 98% (83%-100%), and 80% (46%-100%) and 97% (92%-100%), respectively, in diagnosing malignant biliary strictures.

CONCLUSION

These consensus statements provide evidence-based recommendations for endoscopic tissue acquisition of biliary strictures.

Outcomes of Different Methods for Analysis of Biliary Brush Cytology and of Factors Associated with Positive Diagnosis in an Age-Dependent Retrospective Review

Background and Aims

Brush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most frequently used strategy for obtaining a tissue sample from an indeterminate biliary stricture. A recent study reported that age is a factor associated with positive yields, but further analysis of how age influences the results was lacking. We aimed to evaluate clinical effectiveness of biliary cytology and prognostic factors for a positive outcome, especially age.

Methods

This study was a single-center, retrospective, clinical study of 77 consecutive patients who underwent brush cytology during ERCP to obtain a diagnosis of an indeterminate biliary stricture. We compared 2 routine cytology techniques: A (smear); B (centrifugation of the cytological material collected and the cut-off brush + cell block when sufficient amount of material was available). The data were collected aiming to compare the accuracy of the different techniques used and the prognostic factors affecting the outcome, with a particular focus on age. The yield for brush cytology was compared with the gold standard defined as either definitive histology or the long-term clinical course.

Results

The overall accuracy of the 2 used methods was 75.3%. Sensitivity was 52.5%, specificity was 100%, positive predictive value was 100%, and negative predictive value was 66.1%. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward accuracy for method B compared with method A (80.4 vs. 65.4%; p = 0.153). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that younger age was the only independent prognostic factor associated with a positive diagnosis (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.90-0.99; p = 0.039). Receiver operating characteristic curves for age yielded an area under the curve value of 68.2%. On the basis of the Youden index, 69 years was found to be the optimal cutoff for age.

Conclusions

In this series, the accuracy of routine biliary brush cytology was not equal for all methods and ages; in particular, younger patients (below 69 years) tended to have a higher probability of a correct diagnosis.

Serum and tissue markers in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: clinical and prognostic implications

HCC represents the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Despite the high incidence, treatment options for advanced HCC remain limited and unsuccessful, resulting in a poor prognosis. Despite the major advances achieved in the diagnostic management of HCC, only one third of the newly diagnosed patients are presently eligible for curative treatments. Advances in technology and an increased understanding of HCC biology have led to the discovery of novel biomarkers. Improving our knowledge about serum and tissutal markers could ultimately lead to an early diagnosis and better and early treatment strategies for this deadly disease. Serum biomarkers are striking potential tools for surveillance and early diagnosis of HCC thanks to the non-invasive, objective, and reproducible assessments they potentially enable. To date, many biomarkers have been proposed in the diagnosis of HCC. Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy, characterized by early lymph node involvement and distant metastasis, with 5-year survival rates of 5%-10%. The identification of new biomarkers with diagnostic, prognostic or predictive value is especially important as resection (by surgery or combined with a liver transplant) has shown promising results and novel therapies are emerging. However, the relatively low incidence of CCA, high frequency of co-existing cholestasis or cholangitis (primary sclerosing cholangitis –PSC- above all), and difficulties with obtaining adequate samples, despite advances in sampling techniques and in endoscopic visualization of the bile ducts, have complicated the search for accurate biomarkers. In this review, we attempt to analyze the existing literature on this argument.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has improved the diagnostic performance of cytology for the evaluation of malignant biliary strictures in the United States and Europe. The utility of FISH for the diagnosis of biliary strictures in Asia is currently unknown. We aimed to compare the sensitivity of FISH and conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures in Thai patients.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed at 2 university hospitals between 2010 and 2013. Patients being evaluated for malignant-appearing biliary strictures were included (N = 99). Bile duct brushings were collected and assessed by cytology and FISH. Sensitivities with 95% confidence intervals of cytology and FISH were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 38% and 55%, respectively (P = .001). For those with a diagnosis of cancer based on clinical evidence without biopsy confirmation (n = 44), the sensitivities of cytology and FISH were 43% and 57%, respectively (P = .06). For the 49 patients for whom a cancer diagnosis was confirmed by pathology, FISH had a significantly higher sensitivity than cytology, with a sensitivity of 53% versus 33%, respectively (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

FISH improves the diagnostic performance of cytology and can be used as a complementary tool to bile duct brushing and biopsy for the evaluation of malignancy in biliary strictures in Asian populations.

Diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in pancreaticobiliary malignancy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) are two malignancies that carry significant morbidity and mortality. The poor prognoses of these cancers are strongly related to lack of effective screening modalities as well as few therapeutic options. In this review, we highlight novel biomarkers that have the potential to be used as diagnostic, prognostic and predictive markers. The focus of this review is biomarkers that can be evaluated on endoscopically-obtained biopsies or brush specimens in the pre-operative setting. We also provide an overview of novel serum based markers in the early diagnosis of both PDAC and CCA. In pancreatic cancer, the emphasis is placed on prognostic and theranostic markers, whereas in CCA the utility of molecular markers in diagnosis and prognosis are highlighted.

Advanced endoscopic imaging of indeterminate biliary strictures

Endoscopic evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures (IDBSs) has evolved considerably since the development of flexible fiberoptic endoscopes over 50 years ago. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography pancreatography (ERCP) was introduced nearly a decade later and has since become the mainstay of therapy for relieving obstruction of the biliary tract. However, longstanding methods of ERCP-guided tissue acquisition (i.e., biliary brushings for cytology and intraductal forceps biopsy for histology) have demonstrated disappointing performance characteristics in distinguishing malignant from benign etiologies of IDBSs. The limitations of these methods have thus helped drive the search for novel techniques to enhance the evaluation of IDBSs and thereby improve diagnosis and clinical care. These modalities include, but are not limited to, endoscopic ultrasound, intraductal ultrasound, cholangioscopy, confocal endomicroscopy, and optical coherence tomography. In this review, we discuss established and emerging options in the evaluation of IDBSs.

An Optimized Set of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Probes for Detection of Pancreatobiliary Tract Cancer in Cytology Brush Samples

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Pancreatobiliary cancer is detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of pancreatobiliary brush samples with UroVysion probes, originally designed to detect bladder cancer. We designed a set of new probes to detect pancreatobiliary cancer and compared its performance with that of UroVysion and routine cytology analysis.

METHODS

We tested a set of FISH probes on tumor tissues (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic carcinoma) and non-tumor tissues from 29 patients. We identified 4 probes that had high specificity for tumor vs non-tumor tissues; we called this set of probes pancreatobiliary FISH. We performed a retrospective analysis of brush samples from 272 patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for evaluation of malignancy at the Mayo Clinic; results were available from routine cytology and FISH with UroVysion probes. Archived residual specimens were retrieved and used to evaluate the pancreatobiliary FISH probes. Cutoff values for FISH with the pancreatobiliary probes were determined using 89 samples and validated in the remaining 183 samples. Clinical and pathologic evidence of malignancy in the pancreatobiliary tract within 2 years of brush sample collection was used as the standard; samples from patients without malignancies were used as negative controls. The validation cohort included 85 patients with malignancies (46.4%) and 114 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (62.3%). Samples containing cells above the cutoff for polysomy (copy number gain of ≥2 probes) were classified as positive in FISH with the UroVysion and pancreatobiliary probes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate associations between clinical and pathology findings and results from FISH.

RESULTS

The combination of FISH probes 1q21, 7p12, 8q24, and 9p21 identified cancer cells with 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity in pancreatobiliary tissue samples and were therefore included in the pancreatobiliary probe set. In the validation cohort of brush samples, pancreatobiliary FISH identified samples from patients with malignancy with a significantly higher level of sensitivity (64.7%) than the UroVysion probes (45.9%) (P < .001) or routine cytology analysis (18.8%) (P < .001), but similar specificity (92.9%, 90.8%, and 100.0% respectively). Factors significantly associated with detection of carcinoma, in adjusted analyses, included detection of polysomy by pancreatobiliary FISH (P < .001), a mass by cross-sectional imaging (P < .001), cancer cells by routine cytology (overall P = .003), as well as absence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (P = .011).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a set of FISH probes that detects cancer cells in pancreatobiliary brush samples from patients with and without primary sclerosing cholangitis with higher levels of sensitivity than UroVysion probes. Cytologic brushing test results and clinical features were independently associated with detection of cancer and might be used to identify patients with pancreatobiliary cancers.