Molecular clonality assessment shows high performance to predict malignant B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using cytological smears

A Novel Approach to Classification and Reporting of Lymph Node Fine-Needle Cytology: Application of the Proposed Sydney System

Fine-needle cytology (FNC) is a useful diagnostic tool in the first line evaluation of lymphadenopathy of unknown aetiology. Nevertheless, considering the large number of conditions presenting as lymphadenopathy, lymph node cytology represents a challenging scenario. Recently, an expert panel published the proposal of the Sydney system for performing classification and reporting of lymph node cytopathology; the aim of the present study was to evaluate the applicability of this system. Thus, 300 lymph node FNCs performed over 1 year were reviewed and categorized according to the Sydney system classification. Overall, n = 20 cases (6.7%) were categorized as L1-inadequate/non-diagnostic; n = 104 (34.7%) as benign (L2); n = 25 (8.3%) as atypical (L3); n = 13 (4.3%) as suspicious (L4), and n = 138 (46%) as malignant (L5). FNC diagnoses were correlated with histopathologic and clinical follow-up to assess the diagnostic accuracy and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category. Statistical analysis showed the following results: sensitivity 98.47%, specificity 95.33%, positive predictive value 96.27%, negative predictive value 98.08%, and accuracy 97.06%. The ROM was 50% for the category L1, 1.92% for L2, 58.3% for L3, and 100% for L4 and L5. In conclusion, FNC coupled with ancillary techniques ensures satisfactory diagnostic accuracy and the implementation of the Sydney system may improve the practice of cytopathologists.

Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults: Guideline From the American Society for Clinical Pathology and the College of American Pathologists

CONTEXT.—

The diagnostic workup of lymphoma continues to evolve rapidly as experience and discovery led to the addition of new clinicopathologic entities and techniques to differentiate them. The optimal clinically effective, efficient, and cost-effective approach to diagnosis that is safe for patients can be elusive, in both community-based and academic practice. Studies suggest that there is variation in practice in both settings.

OBJECTIVE.—

To develop an evidence-based guideline for the preanalytic phase of testing, focusing on specimen requirements for the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma.

DESIGN.—

The American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in the laboratory workup of lymphoma to develop evidence-based recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic review of literature to address key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, recommendations were derived based on the available evidence, strength of that evidence, and key judgements as defined in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision framework.

RESULTS.—

Thirteen guideline statements were established to optimize specimen selection, ancillary diagnostic testing, and appropriate follow-up for safe and accurate diagnosis of indolent and aggressive lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Primary diagnosis and classification of lymphoma can be achieved with a variety of specimens. Application of the recommendations can guide decisions on specimen suitability, diagnostic capabilities, and correct use of ancillary testing. Disease prevalence in patient populations, availability of ancillary testing, and diagnostic goals should be incorporated into algorithms tailored to each practice environment.

Laboratory Workup of Lymphoma in Adults

OBJECTIVES

The diagnostic workup of lymphoma continues to evolve rapidly as experience and discovery lead to the addition of new clinicopathologic entities and techniques to differentiate them. The optimal clinically effective, efficient, and cost-effective approach to diagnosis that is safe for patients can be elusive, in both community-based and academic practice. Studies suggest that there is variation in practice in both settings.

THE AIM OF THIS REVIEW IS TO

develop an evidence-based guideline for the preanalytic phase of testing, focusing on specimen requirements for the diagnostic evaluation of lymphoma.

METHODS

The American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, and the American Society of Hematology convened a panel of experts in the laboratory workup of lymphoma to develop evidence-based recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic review of the literature to address key questions. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, recommendations were derived based on the available evidence, the strength of that evidence, and key judgments as defined in the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework.

RESULTS

Thirteen guideline statements were established to optimize specimen selection, ancillary diagnostic testing, and appropriate follow-up for safe and accurate diagnosis of indolent and aggressive lymphoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary diagnosis and classification of lymphoma can be achieved with a variety of specimens. Application of the recommendations can guide decisions about specimen suitability, diagnostic capabilities, and correct utilization of ancillary testing. Disease prevalence in patient populations, availability of ancillary testing, and diagnostic goals should be incorporated into algorithms tailored to each practice environment.

The utility and limitations of B- and T-cell gene rearrangement studies in evaluating lymphoproliferative disorders

A hallmark of lymphoid malignancies is the presence of a monoclonal lymphocyte population. Monoclonality of B- and T-cell populations can be established through immunoglobulin (IG) or T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangement analysis, respectively. The biological rationale of IG and TCR gene rearrangement analysis is that due to the extensive combinatorial repertoire made possible by V(D)J recombination in lymphocytes, it is unlikely that any substantive lymphocyte population would share the same IG or TCR gene rearrangement pattern unless there is an underlying neoplastic or reactive origin. Modern IG and TCR gene rearrangement analysis is typically performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using commercially available primer sets followed by gel capillary electrophoresis. This process is highly sensitive in the detection of nearly all lymphoid malignancies. Several pitfalls and limitations, both biological and technical, apply to IG/TCR gene rearrangement analysis, but these can be minimised with high quality controls, performance of assays in duplicate, and adherence to strict criteria for interpreting and reporting results. Next generation sequencing (NGS) will likely replace PCR based methods of IG/TCR gene rearrangement analysis but is not yet widespread due to the absence of standardised protocols and multicentre validation.

Limited Tissue Biopsies and Hematolymphoid Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

Use of fine-needle aspiration/needle core biopsy (FNA/CNB) in evaluating hematolymphoid processes has been debated. We investigate its applicability in various clinicopathologic settings.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 152 cases of FNA/CNB.

RESULTS

Of 152 FNA/CNBs, 124 (81.6%) resulted in diagnoses without excisional biopsies, while 28 required subsequent excisional biopsies. Of these, 43 FNA/CNBs performed for suspected lymphoma relapse demonstrated 95.4% diagnostic rate (41/43), which was significantly better than those without history of lymphoma (77/109, 71%; odds ratio [OR], 8.5; confidence interval, 1.9-37.4). Patients with immunodeficiency also showed a high rate of diagnosis by FNA/CNB (100%). When stratified by types of disease, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma/high-grade B-cell lymphoma demonstrated a higher success rate (92.7%) than small B-cell lymphoma (79.2%), though the difference was not statistically significant (OR, 3.3; P value = .07). A subsequent excisional biopsy was required in 28 cases, 23 of which resulted in diagnoses concordant with the FNA/CNB. Five cases showed diagnostic discordance, reflecting pitfalls of FNA/CNB in unusual cases with complex pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

FNA/CNB is practical in evaluating most hematolymphoid lesions, with high efficacy in recurrent disease and some primary neoplasms with homogeneous/ aggressive histology, or characteristic immunophenotype.

Lymph node fine-needle cytology in the era of personalised medicine. Is there a role?

The 2016 World Health Organisation revised classification of lymphoma has sub-classified well-defined entities and added a number of provisional entities on the basis of new knowledge on genetic, epigenetics and phenotypical data; prognostic and predictive features are also part of this classification. New knowledge on well-defined entities further enlightens the mechanisms of lymphomagenesis, which are more complex and multifactorial than once believed. Therapies are also more complex because traditional clinical trials have been integrated with new drugs and compounds with unique mechanisms of actions against distinct molecular targets. As lymphoma acquires additional genetic and phenotypic features over the time, pathological assessment is also necessary. Histological evaluation and tissue collection by surgical biopsies are necessary for phenotypical and molecular purposes; however, these are demanding procedures for both the patient and the health care system. At the same time, the choice of the best treatment for a specific entity, in different phases and different patients requires information that may not be available when the biopsy is performed. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is successfully used in lymph nodes (LNs) in combination with different ancillary techniques and might be used to assess the phenotypic and genetic profile of specific targets and to get key information for therapy, in different phases and stages of the disease, with the option to re-check the same target over time, without surgical excision. This brief review describes LN-FNAC diagnostic criteria, current therapies for lymphomas and the potential role of LN-FNAC in selecting non-Hodgkin lymphomas patients for specific targeted treatments.