1
|
Bizzi E, Picchi C, Mastrangelo G, Imazio M, Brucato A. Recent advances in pericarditis. Eur J Intern Med 2022; 95:24-31. [PMID: 34556390 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Pericardial diseases are an heterogeneous group of entities, ranging from acute pericarditis to asymptomatic pericardial effusions. New advances in understanding the processes underlying them have been made. In 2020 a prospective study defined the reference intervals of the component of normal pericardial fluid, that was found to be rich in nucleated cells, proteins, albumin and LDH, at levels compatible with the inflammatory exudates of other biological fluids such as pleural or peritoneal fluid; Light's criteria should not be used to evaluate it. Recently we also analyzed systematically large chronic idiopathic non-inflammatory pericardial effusions, observing that a non-invasive wait-and-see approach may be the best choice in clinical practice in oligosymptomatic cases. Concerning acute recurrent pericarditis (RP), an innovative interaction between cardiologists, internists and pediatric rheumatologists led to the intuition of a pivotal role of IL-1 in recurrent pericarditis characterized by an evident inflammatory recurrent phenotype, and recent data have shown the striking efficacy of anakinra and rilonacept in these patients. The proper selection of the patient is important; the ideal candidate for anti-IL-1 therapy is the patient with RP with high levels of serum C-reactive protein, high fever, neutrophil leukocitosis, pleuropulmonary involvement, frequent exacerbations and resistant to conventional therapy. On the contrary, anti-IL-1 drugs are not indicated in patients with pericardial effusion whose cause is not attributable to inflammatory phenomena. Finally, many patients with RP are women of childbearing age, and the possibility for these women to become pregnant must be addressed by multidisciplinary teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuele Bizzi
- Internal Medicine Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Piazzale Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milano, Italy.
| | - Chiara Picchi
- Internal Medicine Department, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Piazzale Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milano, Italy.
| | - Greta Mastrangelo
- Department of Pediatrics, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Piazzale Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milano, Italy.
| | - Massimo Imazio
- Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, University Hospital Santa Maria della Misericordia, Piazzale Santa Maria della Misericordia, 15, 33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Antonio Brucato
- University of Milano, Department of biomedical and clinical sciences "Luigi Sacco", Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Piazzale Principessa Clotilde 3, 20121, Milano, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seghezzi M, Previtali G, Moioli V, Alessio MG, Guerra G, Buoro S. Performance evaluation of automated cell counts compared with reference methods for body fluid analysis. Diagnosis (Berl) 2021; 9:369-378. [PMID: 34599561 DOI: 10.1515/dx-2021-0088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cellular analysis of body fluids (BFs) can assist clinicians for the diagnosis of many medical conditions. The aim of this work is the evaluation of the analytical performance of the UF-5000 body fluid mode (UF-BF) analyzer compared to the gold standard method (optical microscopy, OM) and to XN-1000 (XN-BF), another analyzer produced by the same manufacturer (Sysmex) and with a similar technology for BF analysis. METHODS One hundred BF samples collected in K3EDTA tubes were analyzed by UF-BF, XN-BF and OM. The agreement was evaluated using Passing and Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were selected for evaluating the diagnostic agreement between OM classification and UF-BF parameters. RESULTS Comparison between UF-BF and OM, in all BF types, showed Passing and Bablok's slope comprised between 0.99 (polymorphonuclear cells count, PMN-BF) and 1.39 (mononuclear cells count, MN-BF), the intercepts ranged between 26.47 (PMN-BF parameter) and 226.80 (white blood cell count). Bland-Altman bias was comprised between 7.3% (total cell count, TC-BF) and 52.9% (MN-BF). Comparison between UF-BF and XN-BF in all BF showed slopes ranged between 1.07 (TC-BF and PMN-BF) and 1.16 (MN-BF), intercepts ranged between 8.30 (PMN) and 64.78 (WBC-BF). Bland-Altman bias ranged between 5.8 (TC-BF) and 21.1% (MN-BF). The ROC curve analysis showed an area under the curve ranged between 0.9664 and 1.000. CONCLUSIONS UF-BF shows very good performance for the differential counts of cells in ascitic, pleural and synovial fluids and therefore it is useful to screen and count cells in this type of BF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Seghezzi
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Giulia Previtali
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Valentina Moioli
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni Guerra
- Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Sabrina Buoro
- Regional Reference Center for the Quality of Laboratory Medicine Services, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alcaide Martín MJ, Altimira Queral L, Sahuquillo Frías L, Valiña Amado L, Merino A, García de Guadiana-Romualdo L. Automated cell count in body fluids: a review. ADVANCES IN LABORATORY MEDICINE 2021; 2:149-177. [PMID: 37363326 PMCID: PMC10197423 DOI: 10.1515/almed-2021-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Body fluid cell counting provides valuable information for the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of conditions. Chamber cell count and cellularity analysis by optical microscopy are considered the gold-standard method for cell counting. However, this method has a long turnaround time and limited reproducibility, and requires highly-trained personnel. In the recent decades, specific modes have been developed for the analysis of body fluids. These modes, which perform automated cell counting, are incorporated into hemocytometers and urine analyzers. These innovations have been rapidly incorporated into routine laboratory practice. At present, a variety of analyzers are available that enable automated cell counting for body fluids. Nevertheless, these analyzers have some limitations and can only be operated by highly-qualified laboratory professionals. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant automated cell counters currently available for body fluids, the interpretation of the parameters measured by these analyzers, their main analytical features, and the role of optical microscopy as automated cell counters gain ground.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María José Alcaide Martín
- Committee of Laboratory Tests, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
- Hematologic Biology Committee, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Altimira Queral
- Committee of Laboratory Tests, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Sahuquillo Frías
- Committee of Laboratory Tests, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Valiña Amado
- Committee of Laboratory Tests, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Merino
- Hematologic Biology Committee, Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQC-ML), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Haslacher H, Rappel R, Thalhammer R, Demyanets S, Simbrunner B, Reiberger T, Eberhard S, Schwarzinger I. Adequate scattergram interpretation increases the reliability of automated polymorphonuclear (pmn) cell counts from ascitic fluid of patients with liver cirrhosis. Int J Lab Hematol 2021; 43:O176-O180. [PMID: 33605534 PMCID: PMC8451782 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Helmuth Haslacher
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Renate Thalhammer
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Svitlana Demyanets
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benedikt Simbrunner
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Reiberger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Vienna Hepatic Hemodynamic Lab, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Simone Eberhard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ilse Schwarzinger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buoro S, Tombetti E, Ceriotti F, Simon C, Cugola D, Seghezzi M, Innocente F, Maestroni S, del Carmen Baigorria Vaca M, Moioli V, Previtali G, Manenti B, Adler Y, Imazio M, Brucato A. What is the normal composition of pericardial fluid? Heart 2020; 107:1584-1590. [DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveBiochemical and cytological pericardial fluid (PF) analysis is essentially based on the knowledge of pleural fluid composition. The aim of the present study is to identify reference intervals (RIs) for PF according to state-of-art methodological standards.MethodsWe prospectively collected and analysed the PF and venous blood of consecutive subjects undergoing elective open-heart surgery from July 2017 to October 2018. Exclusion criteria for study enrolment were evidence of pericardial diseases at preoperatory workup or at intraoperatory assessment, or any other condition that could affect PF analysis.ResultsThe final study sample included 120 patients (median age 69 years, 83 men, 69.1%). The main findings were (1) High levels of proteins, albumin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), but not of glucose and cholesterol (2) High cellularity, mainly represented by mesothelial cells. RIs for pericardial biochemistry were: protein content 1.7–4.6 g/dL PF/serum protein ratio 0.29–0.83, albumin 1.19–3.06 g/dL, pericardium-to-serum albumin gradient 0.18–2.37 g/dL, LDH 141–2613 U/L, PF/serum LDH ratio 0.40–2.99, glucose 80–134 mg/dL, total cholesterol 12–69 mg/dL, PF/serum cholesterol ratio 0.07–0.51. RIs for pericardial cells by optic microscopy were: 278–5608 × 106 nucleated cells/L, 40–3790 × 106 mesothelial cells/L, 35–2210 × 106 leucocytes/L, 19–1634 × 106 lymphocytes/L.ConclusionsPF is rich in nucleated cells, protein, albumin, LDH, at levels consistent with inflammatory exudates in other biological fluids. Physicians should stop to interpret PF as exudate or transudate according to tools not validated for this setting.
Collapse
|