Differences between serum and plasma for intact parathyroid hormone measurement in patients with chronic renal failure in routine clinical practice

Clinical Guidelines and PTH Measurement: Does Assay Generation Matter?

PTH is an important regulator of calcium and phosphate homeostasis and bone remodeling. It is metabolized into PTH fragments, which are measured to a different extent by PTH assays of different generations because of differences in fragments recognized and lack of assay standardization. PTH is measured in the workup of several conditions, and clinical guidelines provide recommendations concerning these measurements. This review provides an overview of the impact of differences between PTH assays, applying distinct clinical guidelines for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism and perioperative use of PTH measurements. Guidelines deal with PTH measurement in different ways, recommending either trend monitoring, the use of a fold increase of the upper reference limit, or an absolute PTH cutoff value. For classic primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), the type of PTH assay used will not affect diagnosis or management because the precise concentration of PTH is less relevant. In chronic kidney disease, the guideline recommends treating secondary hyperparathyroidism above a twofold to ninefold PTH increase, which will result in different clinical decisions depending on the assay used. For patients after bariatric surgery, guidelines state absolute cutoff values for PTH, but the impact of different generation assays is unknown because direct comparison of PTH assays has never been performed. During parathyroid surgery, PTH measurements with a third-generation assay reflect treatment success more rapidly than second-generation assays. Increased awareness among clinicians regarding the complexity of PTH measurements is warranted because it can affect clinical decisions.

Parathyroid hormone: Data mining for age-related reference intervals in adults

OBJECTIVE

Age-related changes in parathyroid hormone (PTH) have been previously documented in adults. However, because of the limitations of traditional approaches to establishing reference intervals, age-related reference intervals have not been defined. We sought to use a data mining approach to derive age-related PTH reference intervals.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

Results from patients undergoing PTH testing over a 4-year period were extracted from the database of a private pathology laboratory in New South Wales, Australia. Patients were included in the study if they were 18 years or older and had simultaneous determination of PTH, serum calcium, estimated glomerular filtration rate and 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD). Patients with abnormalities of serum calcium or renal function were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS

Bhattacharya analysis of log-transformed data was used to derive age-related PTH reference intervals across adulthood.

RESULTS

Results were available for 33 652 subjects. Among patients with optimal 25-OHD status, older age was associated with higher PTH concentrations. Age-related reference intervals were derived and showed a 63% increase in the upper and lower reference limits between the youngest (18-29 years of age) and the oldest (80 years of age or older) age partitions. The appropriateness of using a single reference interval for patients of all ages was evaluated against objective criteria and was found to be unsatisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

Data mining was demonstrated to be a useful tool for establishing age-related PTH reference intervals. The technique demonstrated that increasing age is associated with higher PTH concentrations and that age-related reference intervals are important for accurate result interpretation.

FGF23-S129F mutant bypasses ER/Golgi to the circulation of hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis patients

FGF23 is essential for the homeostasis of phosphate, and vitamin D. Loss-of-function mutations in this hormone cause hyperphosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis (HFTC). Earlier reports suggested that intact FGF23 from loss of function mutants such as FGF23/S129F (iFGF23/S129F) is retained intracellularly while the carboxy-terminal fragment is secreted. We sought to investigate the fate of iFGF23/S129F mutant hormone in vivo and in vitro. Five patients clinically diagnosed with HFTC and confirmed by DNA sequencing to carry the c.386 C>T; p.S129F mutation in the homozygous state were studied. Healthy and heterozygous individuals were used as controls in the study. Using ELISA assays, we showed that iFGF23/S129F was 2-5 folds higher in patients' plasma, compared to heterozygous or healthy controls. Importantly, the mutant hormone could not be detected in the patients' sera. However, using proteinase inhibition profiling, we found that a serum metalloproteinase degraded the iFGF23/S129F explaining our failure to detect it in sera. The serum metalloproteinase degrades the WT and the mutant at different rates. Also, confocal microscopy imaging using wild-type (WT) FGF23 or FGF23/S129F mutant in transiently transfected HEK293 and HeLa cells showed weak staining of the Golgi complex with some vesicular staining resembling the ER. Additionally, FGF23 variants (FGF23/WT, FGF23/S129F, FGF23/S71G, and FGF23/R176Q) from stably transfected HEK293 cells secreted high levels into a serum-free medium that can be detected by ELISA and Western blot. Our results suggest that iFGF23/S129F mutant bypasses the ER/Golgi quality control system to the circulation of HFTC patients by an unknown pathway. Finally, we hypothesize that either the mutant hormone is unable to bind α-Klotho-FGFR1c, or it binds the dyad receptor with low affinity and, therefore, incapable of initiating maximal intracellular signaling. Our findings raise the potential use of the WT hormone in therapies of some HFTC patients.

Performance characteristics of six intact parathyroid hormone assays

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance characteristics of 6 intact parathyroid hormone assays: Access 2 (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA), ARCHITECT i2000(SR) (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), ADVIA Centaur (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL), Modular E170 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics), and LIAISON (DiaSorin, Stillwater, MN). Sample collection tubes and storage conditions were compared. Imprecision studies were performed using commercial quality control materials. Linearity was assessed using pools prepared from samples. For method comparison, serum and EDTA plasma samples were tested by all methods, and the ARCHITECT was used as the comparison method. Reference intervals were determined using various vitamin D cutoffs. The types of collection tubes and storage conditions are more important for some methods than others. Total coefficients of variation were 10.9% or less. The maximum deviation from the target recovery for linearity ranged from 5.0% to 82.2%. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated percentage biases ranging from -36.3% to 24.4%. The lower limit of the reference interval was not influenced by vitamin D status, whereas the upper reference limit was affected.

Mysterious PTH values after parathyroidectomy in a patient on maintenance dialysis

A 25-year-old patient with end-stage renal disease on maintenance peritoneal dialysis underwent parathyroidectomy when his secondary hyperparathyroidism did not respond to medical management. However, over the subsequent months he developed extremely raised parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. When surgical removal of the autotransplant was considered, preoperative work-up revealed a PTH level within the target range. It became apparent that the very high PTH values were due to the location of the blood draw close to the autotransplant, thus measuring a local rather than the systemic PTH value. The multiple causes of varying PTH measurements other than clinical and physiological reasons are reviewed.

Critical issues of PTH assays in CKD

Measurement of bioactive parathyroid hormone (PTH) is essential for the optimal management of secondary hyperparathyroidism and its associated bone disorders in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. For this purpose, three generations of increasingly specific PTH assays have been developed over the last 4 decades. To date, however, only second-generation PTH assays are most widely used, although these have been shown to cross-react with large PTH fragments having a partially preserved N-structure, mostly PTH(7-84). The newly developed third-generation PTH assays are believed to be the most specific means of measuring PTH(1-84), but their clinical utility remains debatable. More recently, these latter assays have also been shown to react with a new N-form of PTH, which has been identified in patients with severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroid carcinoma. Progressive research in this area has advanced our understanding considerably regarding the circulating molecular forms of PTH and their pathophysiological roles in bone abnormalities associated with CKD. However, developing an ideal PTH assay continues to be difficult because of key issues such as the reliability of PTH as a surrogate marker for bone turnover, practicality of employing third-generation PTH assays, and unknown biological implications of N-PTH and other PTH fragments. Further research exploring these issues is mandatory to understand and optimally manage parathyroid disorders and bone abnormalities in CKD patients.

Variation in serum and plasma PTH levels in second-generation assays in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Previous reports show that parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations may vary widely depending on the assay used to assess PTH. In this cross-sectional study, we aim to determine the usefulness of standardizing blood handling for optimal interpretation of PTH in patients with chronic kidney disease.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic test study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Predialysis blood was sampled in 34 long-term hemodialysis patients at a single academic medical center.

INDEX TEST

PTH was measured by using 6 different automated second-generation assays (Elecsys, Advia Centaur, LIAISON, Immulite, Architect, and Access assays), 3 blood specimen types (serum, EDTA plasma, and citrate plasma), and 2 consecutive days of measurement (after thawing and 18 hours later with samples having been let at room temperature).

REFERENCE TEST

None.

RESULTS

A mixed statistical analysis model showed that the nature of the assay (P < 0.001) and nature of the blood sample (P < 0.001) significantly influenced variability in PTH concentrations, whereas day of measurement (day 1 or 2) did not (P = 0.5). Most PTH variability was caused by observations (96.8%), then manufacturer's kit (2.5%), and last, specimen type (0.7%). PTH concentrations measured in citrate plasma were lower with every assay method used than those observed in serum or EDTA plasma. The interaction between manufacturer and specimen type was of moderate statistical significance (P = 0.04). To evaluate the potential clinical consequence of PTH measure variability, we classified patients according to Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative cutoff values (PTH < 150 pg/mL; PTH, 150 to 300 pg/mL; and PTH > 300 pg/mL). Overall, statistical classification agreement was moderate to high for comparison between assays and high to very high between different blood samples and between days of measurement. However, we found that up to 11 of 34 patients were classified in different categories with some assays (LIAISON versus Architect) and up to 7 of 34 in different categories with different blood specimen type (citrate plasma versus serum [corrected] in LIAISON assay).

LIMITATIONS

This is a cross-sectional study that used single lots of reagents. There currently is no reference method for the measurement of PTH and no recombinant PTH standard for PTH assay.

CONCLUSION

PTH variability caused by the nature of the assay and/or blood specimen type is large enough to potentially influence clinical decision making. A specified collection method therefore should be used for PTH measurements. In routine practice, we recommend serum PTH over EDTA or citrate plasma.

The role of ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) as in vitro anticoagulant for diagnostic purposes

Anticoagulants are used to prevent clot formation both in vitro and in vivo. In the specific field of in vitro diagnostics, anticoagulants are commonly added to collection tubes either to maintain blood in the fluid state for hematological testing or to obtain suitable plasma for coagulation and clinical chemistry analyses. Unfortunately, no universal anticoagulant that could be used for evaluation of several laboratory parameters in a sample from a single test tube is available so far. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a polyprotic acid containing four carboxylic acid groups and two amine groups with lone-pair electrons that chelate calcium and several other metal ions. Calcium is necessary for a wide range of enzyme reactions of the coagulation cascade and its removal irreversibly prevents blood clotting within the collection tube. Historically, EDTA has been recommended as the anticoagulant of choice for hematological testing because it allows the best preservation of cellular components and morphology of blood cells. The remarkable expansion in laboratory test volume and complexity over recent decades has amplified the potential spectrum of applications for this anticoagulant, which can be used to stabilize blood for a variety of traditional and innovative tests. Specific data on the behavior of EDTA as an anticoagulant in hematology, including possible pitfalls, are presented. The use of EDTA for measuring cytokines, protein and peptides, and cardiac markers is described, with an outline of the protection of labile molecules provided by this anticoagulant. The use of EDTA in proteomics and in general clinical chemistry is also described in comparison with other anticoagulants and with serum samples. Finally, the possible uses of alternative anticoagulants instead of EDTA and the potential use of a universal anticoagulant are illustrated.

Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: implication for the care of CKD patients

The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1-84 and 7-84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7-84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1-84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.