CD10 positivity in breast epithelial neoplasms

Novel O-[11C]-methylated derivatives of the neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril: Radiosynthesis, autoradiography and plasma stability evaluation

INTRODUCTION

The O-[11C]methylated derivatives of the clinically used neprilysin inhibitor (NEPi) sacubitril ([11C]SacOMe, (2R,4S)-ethyl 5-([biphenyl]-4-yl)-4-(4-[11C]methoxy-4-oxobutanamido)-2-methylpentanoate) and LBQ657 ([11C]MeOLBQ, (2R,4S)-5-(biphenyl-4-yl)-4-[(3-carboxypropionyl)amino]-2-methylpentanoic acid [11C]methyl ester and [11C]LBQOMe, (2R,4S)-5-(biphenyl-4-yl)-4-[(4-[11C]methoxy-4-oxobutanamido)]-2-methylpentanoic acid) were evaluated to determine their potential as PET imaging tracers and investigate the effect of such labeling esterification on neprilysin (NEP) binding.

METHODS

[11C]MeOLBQ, [11C]SacOMe and [11C]LBQOMe were synthesized by O-[11C]methylation using [11C]methyl triflate. Binding of these radiolabeled derivatives (5 nM) were assessed by autoradiography on rat neprilysin rich kidney slices with or without 10 μM NEPi (thiorphan or sacubitril) for 20 min at 37 °C. [11C]LBQOMe was further tested for binding selectivity in the presence of 10 μM of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi, captopril) or angiotensin II AT1 receptor blocker (AT1R, losartan). Radioligands were evaluated for their in vitro stability up to 20 min after incubation at 37 °C in rat and human plasma by reverse-phase column-switch HPLC. Non-radioactive SacOMe incubated in rat and human plasma was analyzed by HPLC-coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) to confirm the metabolites' identity. [11C]SacOMe main labeled metabolite was further analyzed by HPLC after incubation in rat kidney slices at 37 °C.

RESULTS

The novel [11C]SacOMe and [11C]LBQOMe were produced in 32 ± 3% RCY and 15 ± 6% at EOS (decay-corrected from [11C]CO2, n = 3), high molar activity (407 ± 92 GBq/μmol and 260 ± 92 GBq/μmol), and high chemical (≥90%) and radiochemical (≥99%) purities in a total synthesis time of 31 and 34 min, respectively. High accumulation of [11C]SacOMe and [11C]LBQOMe in kidneys was completely blocked (>99.9%) by pre-incubation with NEPi, whereas [11C]MeOLBQ displayed negligible uptake in autoradiography studies. [11C]LBQOMe binding was not affected by saturating doses of losartan or captopril indicating binding selectivity for NEP. While [11C]SacOMe and [11C]LBQOMe were stable in human plasma (>92%) even after 20 min incubation at 37 °C, rat plasma analyses exhibited >95% biotransformation of [11C]SacOMe, 40% of [11C]LBQOMe and >80% loss of the 11C-methyl group of [11C]MeOLBQ after 5 min of incubation. Comparable results using the non-radioactive SacOMe were obtained by HPLC-HRMS. Radio-HPLC analysis of the extracted activity of rat kidney slices incubated with [11C]SacOMe demonstrated that >95% of the radioactive signal corresponded to [11C]LBQOMe as the main metabolite.

CONCLUSION

The desethyl active metabolite of [11C]SacOMe, [11C]LBQOMe, displayed stability in human plasma, binding selectivity for neprilysin over ACE or AT1R in rat kidney slices. Rapid plasmatic dealkylation at the 2-methylbutanoic acid position is in line with the necessity of incorporating the labeling group on oxobutanoic acid side in the strategy to develop a stable O-alkylated labeled derivative of sacubitril.

CD10 Immunohistochemical Expression in Apocrine Lesions of the Breast

OBJECTIVE

In the breast, CD10 is expressed by myoepithelial cells (MECs), and apocrine metaplasia has also been mentioned as being positive with this marker. Apocrine lesions have been explored for the expression of CD10.

METHODS

The apocrine lesions studied included 11 cysts, 6 cases of apocrine adenosis, 2 of apocrine metaplasia or hyperplasia in papilloma, 13 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinomas (14 ductal and 4 lobular).

RESULTS

Benign apocrine lesions showed complete or partial luminal CD10 staining, although most cases included parts without staining, and 2 lesions were completely negative. The MECs were often but not always positive. Nine of the 13 cases of apocrine DCIS displayed no luminal staining, but 4 demonstrated very focal luminal positivity. The MECs around the DCIS showed a spectrum of staining from nil to strong and complete. Only 4 invasive carcinomas demonstrated luminal/membranous staining. Cytoplasmic CD10 positivity was seen focally in 4 invasive cancers and in 3 DCIS.

CONCLUSION

CD10 positivity is luminal/membranous in most benign apocrine lesions, the staining being nonuniversal and sometimes focal. Analogous staining in apocrine malignancies seems rarer in DCIS and even rarer in invasive apocrine carcinomas, but atypical cytoplasmic positivity may also occur. CD10 is not an ideal myoepithelial marker in apocrine lesions.

Comparision of Immunohistochemical Expression of CD10 in Odontogenic Cysts

BACKGROUND

Expression of CD10 has been documented in various tumors like nasopharyngeal carcinoma, gastric carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, odontogenic tumors.

AIM

To evaluate and compare CD10 expression in odontogenic cysts like radicular cyst, dentigerous cyst and odontogenic keratocyst (OKC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total 60 cases were included in the study, comprising 20 cases each of radicular, dentigerous and odontogenic keratocyst. Each case was evaluated and compared for immunohistochemical expression of CD10. RESULTS obtained were statistically analysed using ANOVA test followed by post hoc test Tukey-Kramer Multiple Comparisons Test for continuous variable and Chi-square test for discrete variable.

RESULTS

More number of cases showing sub-epithelial stromal CD10 expression were found in OKC among the cysts.

CONCLUSION

CD10 expression was more in OKC compared to radicular and dentigerous cysts.

Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: myoepithelial markers in breast pathology

CONTEXT

Numerous immunohistochemical stains have been shown to exhibit exclusive or preferential positivity in breast myoepithelial cells relative to their luminal/epithelial counterparts. These myoepithelial markers provide invaluable assistance in accurately classifying breast proliferations, especially in core biopsies. Although numerous myoepithelial markers are available, they differ in their sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation, which may be attributed, to a large extent, to the variable immunoreactivity of these markers in stromal cells including myofibroblasts, vessels, luminal/epithelial cells, and tumor cells.

OBJECTIVE

To review commonly used myoepithelial markers in breast pathology and a selection of diagnostic scenarios where they may be useful.

DATA SOURCES

The information outlined in this review article is based on our experiences with routine cases and a review of English-language articles published between 1987 and 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

To demonstrate the presence or absence of myoepithelial cells, a panel-based approach of 2 or more markers is recommended. Markers that most effectively combine sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation include smooth muscle myosin heavy chains, calponin, p75, p63, P-cadherin, basal cytokeratins, maspin, and CD10. These markers, however, display varying cross-reactivity patterns and variably reduced expression in the myoepithelial cells bordering in situ carcinomas. The choice of a myoepithelial marker should be dependent on a combination of factors, including published evidence on its diagnostic utility, its availability, performance characteristics that have been achieved in a given laboratory, and the specific diagnostic scenario. When its use is deemed necessary, immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial cells in breast pathology is most effective when conceptualized as supplemental, rather than central to routine morphologic interpretation.