IARC Monographs: The Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Volume 4: Some Aromatic Amines, Hydrazine and Related Substances, N-Nitroso Compounds and Miscellaneous Alkylating Agents, Volume 5: Some Organochlorine Pesticides, Assessment of the Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity of Chemicals: Report of a WHO Scientific Group

Methods of Inactivation of Highly Pathogenic Viruses for Molecular, Serology or Vaccine Development Purposes

The handling of highly pathogenic viruses, whether for diagnostic or research purposes, often requires an inactivation step. This article reviews available inactivation techniques published in peer-reviewed journals and their benefits and limitations in relation to the intended application. The bulk of highly pathogenic viruses are represented by enveloped RNA viruses belonging to the Togaviridae, Flaviviridae, Filoviridae, Arenaviridae, Hantaviridae, Peribunyaviridae, Phenuiviridae, Nairoviridae and Orthomyxoviridae families. Here, we summarize inactivation methods for these virus families that allow for subsequent molecular and serological analysis or vaccine development. The techniques identified here include: treatment with guanidium-based chaotropic salts, heat inactivation, photoactive compounds such as psoralens or 1.5-iodonaphtyl azide, detergents, fixing with aldehydes, UV-radiation, gamma irradiation, aromatic disulfides, beta-propiolacton and hydrogen peroxide. The combination of simple techniques such as heat or UV-radiation and detergents such as Tween-20, Triton X-100 or Sodium dodecyl sulfate are often sufficient for virus inactivation, but the efficiency may be affected by influencing factors including quantity of infectious particles, matrix constitution, pH, salt- and protein content. Residual infectivity of the inactivated virus could have disastrous consequences for both laboratory/healthcare personnel and patients. Therefore, the development of inactivation protocols requires careful considerations which we review here.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of the genotoxic effects of ceric ammonium nitrate and 1,3-propane sultone

A variety of methods have been developed for accurate and systematic evaluation of chemical genotoxicity. Ceric ammonium nitrate (CAN) and 1,3-propane sultone (1,3-PS) have been extensively applied in industrial fields. Although 1,3-PS, but not CAN, has been reported as a potent carcinogen, systematic assessment of the genotoxic properties of these chemicals has not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to establish a decision tree for evaluating genotoxicity based on the good laboratory practices (GLP) system using 1,3-PS and CAN as test chemicals. In vitro studies were performed including the bacterial reverse mutation assay, chromosomal aberration assay, and micronucleus assay. We conducted in vivo studies using a combined micronucleus and alkaline comet (MN-CMT) assay and the Pig-a gene mutation assay, which is a promising method for detecting gene mutations in vivo. CAN showed negative responses in all in vitro genotoxicity assays and the in vivo combined MN-CMT assay. Meanwhile, 1,3-PS had positive results in all in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity assays. In this study, we confirmed the genotoxicity of 1,3-PS and CAN using both in vitro and in vivo assays. We propose a decision tree for evaluating chemical-induced genotoxicity.