Effect of antibiotic concentration in a selective medium on the isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens

Toilet plume aerosol generation rate and environmental contamination following bowl water inoculation with Clostridium difficile spores

INTRODUCTION

Clostridium difficile is the leading cause of health care-associated gastric illness. Environmental contamination with C difficile spores is a risk factor for contact transmission, and toilet flushing causes such contamination. This work explores toilet contamination persistence and environmental contamination produced over a series of flushes after contamination.

METHODS

A flushometer toilet was seeded with C difficile spores in a sealed chamber. The toilet was flushed 24times, with postflush bowl water samples and settle plates periodically collected for culturing and counting. Air samples were collected after each of 12 flushes using rotating plate impactors.

RESULTS

Spores were present in bowl water even after 24 flushes. Large droplet spore deposition accumulated over the 24-flush period. Droplet nuclei spore bioaerosol was produced over at least 12 flushes.

CONCLUSIONS

Toilets contaminated with C difficile spores are a persistent source of environmental contamination over an extended number of flushes.

Development of a novel method for detection of Clostridium difficile using HS-SPME-GC-MS

AIMS

A novel method has been developed that allows successful differentiation between Clostridium difficile culture-positive and culture-negative stool samples based on volatile organic compound (VOC) evolution and detection by headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The method is based on the activation of p-hydroxyphenylacetate decarboxylase produced by Cl. difficile and the detection of a specific VOC, that is 2-fluoro-4-methylphenol from an enzyme substrate. In addition, other VOCs were good indicators for Cl. difficile, that is isocaproic acid and p-cresol, although they could not be used alone for identification purposes. One hundred stool samples were tested, of which 77 were positive by culture. Detection using HS-SPME-GC-MS allowed confirmation of the presence of Cl. difficile within 18 h with a sensitivity and specificity of 83·1 and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that this new approach could be used alongside conventional methods for Cl. difficile detection, including toxin detection methods, which would allow any false-negative results to be eliminated.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

The ability to identify Cl. difficile-positive stool samples by the analysis of VOCs could allow the development of a VOC detection device which could allow rapid diagnosis of disease and hence prompt treatment with appropriate antibiotics.

Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate, and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme for recovery of Clostridium difficile isolates from fecal samples

Cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate (CCFA-HT), and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme (CCMB-TAL) were compared for recovery of Clostridium difficile from 120 stool specimens. Compared to CCFA, CCFA-HT enhanced C. difficile growth and improved recovery by 4%. In a separate study, 9% (8/91) of stool samples previously C. difficile negative on plate medium were C. difficile positive when cultured in CCMB-TAL.

Clostridium difficile infection: a comprehensive review

Clostridium difficile is one of the most important causes of healthcare acquired diarrhea. The disease spectrum caused by C. difficile infection ranges from mild, self-limited, illness to a severe, life-threatening colitis. The incidence of C. difficile associated disease has risen dramatically over the last decade, leading to increased research interest aiming at the discovery of new virulence factors and the development of new treatment and prevention regimens. This review summarizes the pathogenesis and changing epidemiology of C. difficile associated disease, the clinical spectrum and laboratory methods to diagnose C. difficile infection, and current treatment strategies.

Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours

Rapid and effective methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples are desirable to obtain isolates for typing or to facilitate accurate diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. We report on the evaluation of a prototype chromogenic medium (ID C. difficile prototype [IDCd]) for isolation of C. difficile. The chromogenic medium was compared using (i) 368 untreated stool samples that were also inoculated onto CLO medium, (ii) 339 stool samples that were subjected to alcohol shock and also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars, and (iii) standardized suspensions of 10 C. difficile ribotypes (untreated and alcohol treated) that were also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars. Two hundred thirty-six isolates of C. difficile were recovered from 368 untreated stool samples, and all but 1 of these strains (99.6%) were recovered on IDCd within 24 h, whereas 74.6% of isolates were recovered on CLO medium after 48 h. Of 339 alcohol-treated stool samples cultured onto IDCd and five other selective agars, C. difficile was recovered from 218 samples using a combination of all media. The use of IDCd allowed recovery of 96.3% of isolates within 24 h, whereas 51 to 83% of isolates were recovered within 24 h using the five other media. Finally, when they were challenged with pure cultures, all 10 ribotypes of C. difficile generated higher colony counts on IDCd irrespective of alcohol pretreatment or duration of incubation. We conclude that IDCd is an effective medium for isolation of C. difficile from stool samples within 24 h.

Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile

Both for epidemiologic studies and for diagnostic testing, there is a need for effective, economical, and readily available selective media for the culture of Clostridium difficile. We have developed a reduced-cost substitute for cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA), which is an effective but expensive selective medium for C. difficile. The modified medium, called C. difficile brucella agar (CDBA), includes an enriched brucella base as a substitute for proteose peptone no. 2, and the concentration of sodium taurocholate has been reduced from 0.1% to 0.05%. To compare the sensitivities and selectivities of CDBA and CCFA, cultures for C. difficile were performed using stool samples from patients with C. difficile-associated disease. CDBA was as sensitive as CCFA for the recovery of C. difficile, with a similar frequency of breakthrough growth of stool microflora (25% versus 31%, respectively). A liquid formulation of the modified medium, termed C. difficile brucella broth (CDBB), stimulated rapid germination and outgrowth of C. difficile spores, at a rate comparable to that in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth. Our results suggest that CDBA and CDBB are sensitive, selective, and reduced-cost media for the recovery of C. difficile from stool samples.

Clostridium difficile diarrhea: infection control in horses

C difficile has emerged as an important cause of diarrheic disease in horses. C difficile diarrhea is usually diagnosed in mature horses, mostly when they are treated with antimicrobials and hospitalized. It is important for clinicians at veterinary hospitals to have knowledge about the organism and the infection. To prevent C difficile diarrhea, judicious use of antimicrobials is important, as is minimizing different stress factors at the animal hospital or clinic. Infected horses must be isolated. Routine examination for C difficile and toxin A or B is recommended in horses with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. When treating foals for R equi pneumonia, it is important to avoid accidental ingestion of erythromycin by the dams. To reduce the number of environmental spores, thorough cleaning and surface disinfection of the animal hospital and clinic are important. Routine handwashing should be performed by all staff.

Clostridium difficile infections in animals with special reference to the horse. A review

In human medicine, Clostridium (C.) difficile is since many years a well-known cause of nosocomial diarrhea induced by antibiotic treatment. In horses, C. difficile was recently suggested as a possible enteric pathogen. The bacterium is associated with acute colitis in mature horses following treatment with antibiotics. C. difficile, and/or its cytotoxin, is also associated with acute colitis in mares when their foals are being treated with erythromycin and rifampicin for Rhodococcus equi pneumonia. The colitis can have resulted from an accidental ingestion of erythromycin by the mares. In an experimental study it was also demonstrated in mature horses that erythromycin can induce severe colitis associated with proliferation of C. difficile. A new interesting finding was that in healthy foals younger than 14 days, C. difficile was isolated from every third foal whereas older foals proved negative. In this paper the current state of knowledge of C. difficile infections in animals, especially in horses, is reviewed. A short description is given of the historical background of Clostridium difficile and the antibiotic-associated colitis and diarrhea caused by infection with this bacterium. The taxonomy of Clostridium difficile is described extensively. A summary is given of the diseases associated with clostridia infections in animals. Special attention is paid to the pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical symptoms, laboratory diagnosis, and pathology of Clostridium difficile infections in horses. Finally, some other bacterial causes of colitis in horses are discussed shortly.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease

The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) is based on culture and toxin detection in fecal specimens. Culture is performed on a commercially available selective media. C. difficile colony morphology is typical when viewed under a dissecting microscope. Definitive identification is best obtained by gas liquid chromatography. Culture is very sensitive but, when used alone without toxin testing, it leads to low specificity and misdiagnosis of CDAD when high rates of asymptomatic carriage exist. Toxin detection by a tissue culture cytotoxin assay followed by neutralisation with specific antiserum is often considered the standard. However, this approach lacks sensitivity and has not detected up to 30% of patients with confirmed CDAD. Multiple enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) have been introduced by various manufacturers for the detection of toxin A alone or for both toxins A and B. Some of these are designed to give results in less than 1 h. Comparative studies of EIA kits reported that the sensitivity and specificity are slightly lower than cytotoxin assays. Toxigenic culture tests C. difficile isolates for toxin production: colonies isolated on selective media are tested for in-vitro toxin production either by a cytotoxicity assay or by direct EIA. It has higher sensitivity than the cytotoxicity assay and equivalent specificity. In the routine laboratory, culture and toxin detection should be performed on every specimen and, in culture-positive and fecal toxin-negative cases, toxigenic cultures should be performed on isolated colonies.

Role of culture and toxin detection in laboratory testing for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Two variations of an egg yolk agar base medium containing cycloserine, cefoxitin, and fructose (CCFA), one with 250 micrograms and other with 500 micrograms of cycloserine/ml of agar medium were compared to study the effect of the cycloserine concentration on recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool samples. In addition, the role of prior anaerobic reduction of these media in the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) was tested. Each medium was studied over a two-month period, with outcome compared between the testing periods and to historical data from our institution. Clinical correlation of test results was performed. The use of the originally described formulation of CCFA with 500 microgram of cycloserine/ml of agar combined with 4 h of anaerobic reduction prior to specimen inoculation increased the rate of isolation of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from clinical specimens from 6 to 17% (p < 0.001). Combining direct detection of stool toxin and properly performed culture for toxigenic Clostridium difficile enhances the potential for diagnosis of CDAD. For optimal performance the culture medium should contain the originally proposed cycloserine concentration of 500 microgram/ml of agar and should be anaerobically reduced at least 4 h prior to specimen inoculation.

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis

OBJECTIVES

To review and summarize the status of diagnosis, epidemiology, infection control, and treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD).

DIAGNOSIS

A case definition of CDAD should include the presence of symptoms (usually diarrhea) and at least one of the following positive tests: endoscopy revealing pseudomembranes, stool cytotoxicity test for toxin B, stool enzyme immunoassay for toxin A or B, or stool culture for C difficile (preferably with confirmation of organism toxicity if a direct stool toxin test is negative or not done). Testing of asymptomatic patients, including those who are asymptomatic after treatment, is not recommended other than for epidemiologic purposes. Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy is the only diagnostic test for pseudomembranous colitis, but it is expensive, invasive, and insensitive (51% to 55%) for the diagnosis of CDAD. Stool culture is the most sensitive laboratory test currently in clinical use, but it is not as specific as the cell cytotoxicity assay.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

C difficile is the most frequently identified cause of nosocomial diarrhea. The majority of C difficile infections are acquired nosocomially, and most patients remain asymptomatic following acquisition. Antimicrobial exposure is the greatest risk factor for patients, especially clindamycin, cephalosporins, and penicillins, although virtually every antimicrobial has been implicated. Cases of CDAD unassociated with prior antimicrobial or antineoplastic use are very rare. Hands of personnel, as well as a variety of environmental sites within institutions, have been found to be contaminated with C difficile, which can persist as spores for many months. Contaminated commodes, bathing tubs, and electronic thermometers have been implicated as sources of C difficile. Symptomatic and asymptomatic infected patients are the major reservoirs and sources for environmental contamination. Both genotypic and phenotypic typing systems for C difficile are available and have enhanced epidemiologic investigation greatly.

INFECTION CONTROL

Successful infection control measures designed to prevent horizontal transmission include the use of gloves in handling body substances and replacement of electronic thermometers with disposable devices. Isolation, cohorting, handwashing, environmental disinfection, and treatment of asymptomatic carriers are recommended practices for which convincing data of efficacy are not available. The most successful control measure directed at reduction in symptomatic disease has been antimicrobial restriction.

TREATMENT

Treatment of symptomatic (but not asymptomatic) patients with metronidazole or vancomycin for 10 days is effective; metronidazole may be preferred to reduce risk of vancomycin resistance among other organisms in hospitals. Recurrence of symptoms occurs in 7% to 20% of patients and is due to both relapse and reinfection. Over 90% of first recurrences can be treated successfully in the same manner as initial cases. Combination treatment with vancomycin plus rifampin or the addition orally of the yeast Saccharomyces boulardii to vancomycin or metronidazole treatment has been shown to prevent subsequent diarrhea in patients with recurrent disease.

Clinical significance of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in faeces of immunocompromised children

In this study, clinical and laboratory findings were tested for correlation with the presence of Clostridium difficile. The toxigenicity of the isolated strains and the toxins were determined in faecal samples of immunocompromised children admitted to a single room for protective isolation. Using the toxin assay as the gold standard, the culture sensitivity of toxigenic C difficile was 94.1%, the specificity 93.8%, the positive predictive value 62.8%, and the negative predictive value 99.3%. Correction for stools with a positive culture of toxigenic C difficile preceding detection of toxin, resulted in a positive prediction value of 78.4%. A statistically significant association was found between a positive faecal toxin assay and fever, and between a positive culture of toxigenic C difficile and abdominal pain: 42% of the patients with positive toxin assays had fever versus 21% with negative toxin assays, and 66% of the patients with a positive culture for toxigenic C difficile had abdominal pain, versus 22% with negative cultures. Further analysis of the cultures and toxin assays showed no statistically significant association with diarrhoea, fever, white blood cell count, C reactive protein concentrations, or abdominal pain. Based on these findings, it is suggested that immunocompromised children should be treated when toxigenic C difficile is cultured or when toxin is detected in stool samples.

Use of gene amplification to detect Clostridium difficile in clinical specimens

The combined use of an enrichment broth and gene amplification following simple DNA extraction to detect toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in feces was investigated by examining feces from 329 cases of suspected C. difficile infection. DNA was extracted by heating the washed centrifuged deposit from the broth in a microwave oven. For comparison, specimens were tested concurrently using standard methods for culture and cytotoxin testing. Amplified fragments were identified by molecular weight estimation, restriction enzyme digestion patterns and Southern blot hybridization. The combination of an enrichment broth followed by gene amplification was shown to be a sensitive, specific and rapid method for detecting toxigenic strains of C. difficile in feces. Use of the method in diagnostic laboratories may require the development of improved detection and verification systems for the amplified gene fragment.

Improvement of Clostridium difficile isolation by heat-shock and typing of the isolated strains by SDS-PAGE

Clostridium difficile plays an essential role in causing pseudomembranous colitis. We looked for the presence of these bacteria in the stools of 169 hospitalized patients and 38 nurses from wards with cases of diarrhea (207 subjects). The study was divided into three parts. In the first part, we compared three methods for isolating Clostridium difficile from stool samples: pre-selection with heat-shock, direct plating on Cycloserine-Cefotaxime-Fructose Agar (CCFA) and culturing in a selective broth medium. Final identification of Clostridium difficile was achieved by gas-chromatography and ApiZym. From the 207 consecutively obtained stool specimens, Clostridium difficile was isolated in 108 (52%) when pre-treated by heat-shock compared to only 26 (13%) when plated on modified CCFA and 23 (11%) when cultured in selective broth medium. Pre-selection significantly increases the isolation rate for Clostridium difficile and should be used in further epidemiological research. In the second part of our study, a retrospective review of subjects' records showed that the heat-shock method detected Clostridium difficile in all age groups at a higher rate than the other methods. In the third part of our study, we typed the 157 isolates of Clostridium difficile strains by protein patterns using SDS-PAGE, and 16 distinct groups were identified. In 19 cases different Clostridium difficile strains were found in the same subject by SDS-PAGE. Finally, the isolated strains were compared with strains from Brussels and Freiburg. Matching patterns were noted in only three cases.

New selective medium for isolating Clostridium difficile from faeces

AIMS

To compare CCFA (cycloserine, cefoxitin fructose agar) with a new selective medium CDMN (containing cysteine hydrochloride, norfloxacin, and moxalactam) for the isolation of Clostridium difficile after direct faecal culture.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of norfloxacin was determined for 64 strains of C difficile, 17 strains of other Clostridium sp, and 66 various isolates of faecal origin, together with MIC determinations of moxalactam against the 81 strains of Clostridium sp and 15 isolates of Bacteroides sp. Using C difficile agar base with 0.5 g/l of cysteine hydrochloride, norfloxacin and moxalactam were incorporated into the medium and compared with CCFA for the isolation of C difficile after direct faecal culture.

RESULTS

Norfloxacin (12 mg/l) inhibited the growth of enterobacteriaceae and faecal streptococci; moxalactam (32 mg/l) inhibited the growth of most strains of Bacteroides sp tested, together with Clostridium sp other than C difficile. Using the antibiotics in combination (CDMN), the growth and colonial morphology of 64 strains of C difficile were unaffected. When CDMN medium was compared with CCFA for the isolation of C difficile from 832 faeces from inpatients with diarrhoea, the CDMN agar isolated 20% more strains and reduced the number of contaminating colonies by 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

CDMN both improves the isolation rate of C difficile from faecal specimens and reduces the growth of other organisms compared with CCFA.

Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites

Cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth (CCFB) containing either 500 or 250 micrograms of cycloserine per ml were compared for efficacy in the isolation of Clostridium difficile from hospital ward environmental sites. A RODAC imprint technique was used to inoculate prereduced CCFA. Moistened swabs were used to inoculate prereduced CCFB from environmental sites immediately adjacent to the RODAC sample sites. CCFA (6% positive) was significantly more sensitive than CCFB (3% positive; P less than 0.005), regardless of the cycloserine concentration. When the CCFA cycloserine concentration was decreased from 500 to 250 micrograms/ml, the overall rate of positive cultures rose from 4 to 17%. Medium containing 500 micrograms of cycloserine per ml may be too inhibitory to isolate many moderately sensitive strains of C. difficile from environmental sites. Regardless of the cycloserine concentration, the CCFA RODAC imprint technique is superior to the CCFB method.

Prospective, controlled study of vinyl glove use to interrupt Clostridium difficile nosocomial transmission

PURPOSE

Despite recognition that Clostridium difficile diarrhea/colitis is a nosocomial infection, the manner in which this organism is transmitted is still not clear. Hands of health care workers have been shown to be contaminated with C. difficile and suggested as a vehicle of transmission. Therefore, we conducted a controlled trial of the use of disposable vinyl gloves by hospital personnel for all body substance contact (prior to the institution of universal body substance precautions) to study its effect on the incidence of C. difficile disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The incidence of nosocomial C. difficile diarrhea was monitored by active surveillance for six months before and after an intensive education program regarding glove use on two hospital wards. The interventions included initial and periodic in-services, posters, and placement of boxes of gloves at every patient's bedside. Two comparable wards where no special intervention was instituted served as controls.

RESULTS

A decrease in the incidence of C. difficile diarrhea from 7.7 cases/1,000 patient discharges during the six months before intervention to 1.5/1,000 during the six months of intervention on the glove wards was observed (p = 0.015). No significant change in incidence was observed on the two control wards during the same period (5.7/1,000 versus 4.2/1,000). Point prevalence of asymptomatic C. difficile carriage was also reduced significantly on the glove wards but not on the control wards after the intervention period (glove wards, 10 of 37 to four of 43, p = 0.029; control wards, five of 30 to five of 49, p = 0.19). The cost of 61,500 gloves (4,505 gloves/100 patients) used was $2,768 on the glove wards, compared with $1,895 (42,100 gloves; 3,532 gloves/100 patients) on the control wards.

CONCLUSIONS

Vinyl glove use was associated with a reduced incidence of C. difficile diarrhea and is indirect evidence for hand carriage as a means of nosocomial C. difficile spread.

Identification of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens by culture-enhanced gas-liquid chromatography

We have developed a sensitive and specific method for the identification of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens based on the detection of metabolic breakdown products of the organism by gas-liquid chromatography after incubation of stool samples in a selective broth medium containing cefoxitin. Use of this approach to test samples from two different populations of patients at separate medical centers showed this method to be superior to plate cultures or cytotoxin testing alone for both populations. The combined results from the two patient populations showed that 225 of 226 confirmed isolates were identified correctly, resulting in a sensitivity of 99.6% and a specificity of 99.0%. This method eliminates the delay caused by subculturing for tests requiring a pure isolate. The culture phase amplifies even low numbers of C. difficile in fecal samples (due to low in vivo concentrations or delayed transport) and thus increases sensitivity. Other advantages include the ability to detect C. difficile in the mixed flora of the stool and the ability of most clinical laboratories to use this procedure. Given the complexities of the detection of C. difficile toxins and the increasing importance of this organism as a nosocomial agent, culture-based methods remain the preferred approach to screening and routine workup for cases of diarrhea.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea

This paper reviews the various laboratory procedures available for the isolation and identification of Clostridium difficile and the detection of toxins produced by this organism. Laboratories should be selective in determining which patients require investigation for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. Transport and storage of stool specimens at 4 degrees C is recommended when delays in processing may occur. Tissue culture techniques are still the best method for detection of cytotoxin and a variety of cell lines can be used. Other methods for detecting cytotoxin, and methods for detecting other toxins are not sufficiently developed yet to warrant introduction into diagnostic laboratories. Culture techniques remain the most sensitive for diagnosis, particularly since the development of a variety of enrichment techniques. Cycloserine cefoxitin fructose agar is still adequate, although reduced concentrations of antimicrobial agents are necessary, and improvements, such as the addition of sodium taurocholate, increase the recovery of spores. Enrichment cultures have markedly increased isolation rates for Clostridium difficile but the significance of these isolates needs to be carefully evaluated. Until simpler and more reliable tests are available in clinical laboratories for the detection of toxins, the isolation of Clostridium difficile from patients with diarrhoeal disease should be considered paramount.

Clostridium difficile: its disease and toxins

Clostridium difficile is the etiologic agent of pseudomembranous colitis, a severe, sometimes fatal disease that occurs in adults undergoing antimicrobial therapy. The disease, ironically, has been most effectively treated with antibiotics, although some of the newer methods of treatment such as the replacement of the bowel flora may prove more beneficial for patients who continue to relapse with pseudomembranous colitis. The organism produces two potent exotoxins designated toxin A and toxin B. Toxin A is an enterotoxin believed to be responsible for the diarrhea and mucosal tissue damage which occur during the disease. Toxin B is an extremely potent cytotoxin, but its role in the disease has not been as well studied. There appears to be a cascade of events which result in the expression of the activity of these toxins, and these events, ranging from the recognition of a trisaccharide receptor by toxin A to the synergistic action of the toxins and their possible dissemination in the body, are discussed in this review. The advantages and disadvantages of the various assays, including tissue culture assay, enzyme immunoassay, and latex agglutination, currently used in the clinical diagnosis of the disease also are discussed.

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated intestinal disease

Toxigenic Clostridium difficile is the major cause of antimicrobial agent-associated pseudomembranous colitis and is the etiological agent of approximately 30% of cases of nonspecific colitis and diarrhea (without colitis) induced by antimicrobial agents. In addition, C. difficile has been implicated in certain intestinal diseases not related to prior antimicrobial administration. C. difficile has been reported to be one of the most common enteropathogens isolated from stool specimens submitted to hospital laboratories. Thus, diagnosis of C. difficile-associated intestinal disease should now be routinely performed in diagnostic clinical laboratories. The diagnosis of C. difficile-associated intestinal disease relies on the demonstration of either the organism or the toxin(s) in stool specimens or antibody response in serum to the toxin(s). Several selective medium are available for the recovery of C. difficile from stool specimens. The toxin(s) of C. difficile can be demonstrated using a variety of techniques, including biological assays as well as immunological assays. This article will review the techniques currently available to aid in the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated intestinal disease.