Detection of ampicillin resistant Haemophilus influenzae in United Kingdom laboratories

Prevalence of and detection of resistance to ampicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics in Haemophilus influenzae in Denmark

The susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to penicillin V and G, ampicillin and cefuroxime was investigated by MIC, disc and tablet diffusion methods, using chocolate agar as test medium, to determine the prevalence of ampicillin-resistant isolates and the optimal method for their detection. Eighty-six isolates were clinical isolates collected prospectively from July to September 1998 and 22 isolates were clinical isolates with decreased susceptibility to ampicillin previously referred to the reference laboratory. Eighty-seven isolates were ampicillin-susceptible and 16 were ampicillin-resistant. Thirteen produced beta-lactamases. Among the consecutive isolates 12.8% were resistant. With each of the Rosco Neo-sensitabs containing penicillin G, 2.5 microg ampicillin and 33 microg ampicillin, 3 very major errors occurred (resistant isolates misinterpreted as susceptible) and 5-13 major errors (susceptible isolates misinterpreted as resistant). The AB biodisk containing ampicillin (10 microg) was superior to the penicillin V and G discs, i.e. only 1 very major error occurred and major and minor errors were infrequent. The cefuroxime disc identified 4/8 beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant isolates. Thus, for susceptibility testing with chocolate agar as test medium, the use of an inoculum of 10(5) colony-forming units, 10 microg ampicillin discs and interpretative zone diameters of > or = 28 mm indicating susceptibility and < or = 25 mm indicating resistance was found to produce reliable identification of ampicillin-resistant isolates of H. influenzae.

Reevaluation of interpretive criteria for Haemophilus influenzae by using meropenem (10-microgram), imipenem (10-microgram), and ampicillin (2- and 10-microgram) disks

A collection of 300 Haemophilus influenzae clinical strains was used to assess in vitro susceptibility to carbapenems (meropenem, imipenem) by MIC and disk diffusion methods and to compare disk diffusion test results with two potencies of ampicillin disks (2 and 10 micrograms). The isolates included ampicillin-susceptible or- intermediate (167 strains), beta-lactamase-positive (117 strains), and beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR; 16 strains) organisms. Disk diffusion testing was performed with 10-micrograms meropenem disks from two manufacturers. Meropenem was highly active against H. influenzae strains (MIC50, 0.06 microgram/ml; MIC90, 0.25 microgram/ml; MIC50 and MIC90, MICs at which 50 and 90%, respectively, of strains are inhibited) and was 8- to 16-fold more potent than imipenem (MIC50, 1 microgram/ml; MIC90, 2 micrograms/ml). Five non-imipenem-susceptible strains were identified (MIC, 8 micrograms/ml), but the disk diffusion test indicated susceptibility (zone diameters, 18 to 21 mm). MIC values of meropenem, doxycycline, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone for BLNAR strains were two- to fourfold greater than those for other strains. The performance of both meropenem disks was comparable and considered acceptable. A single susceptible interpretive zone diameter of > or = 17 mm (MIC, < = or 4 micrograms/ml) was proposed for meropenem. Testing with the 2-micrograms ampicillin disk was preferred because of an excellent correlation between MIC values and zone diameters (r = 0.94) and superior interpretive accuracy with the susceptible criteria at > or = 17 mm (MIC, < or = 1 microgram/ml) and the resistant criteria at < or = 13 mm (MIC, > or = 4 micrograms/ml). Among the BLNAR strains tested, 81.3% were miscategorized as susceptible or intermediate when the 10-micrograms ampicillin disk was used, while the 2-micrograms disk produced only minor interpretive errors (12.5%). Use of these criteria for testing H. influenzae against meropenem and ampicillin should maximize reference test and standardized disk diffusion test performance with the Haemophilus Test Medium. The imipenem disk diffusion test appears compromised and should be used with caution for detecting strains for which imipenem MICs are elevated.

Haemophilus influenzae: then and now

Haemophilus influenzae has long been recognised as a major cause of serious infection and mortality in children less than 5 years old. Prior to the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) immunisation, the incidence of a child suffering an invasive Haemophilus infection was 20-50/100,000 in industrialised countries and up to ten times higher in developing regions. The introduction of a Hib vaccine programme results in a rapid and dramatic decline in the incidence of Hib infection in the susceptible childhood population. For example, within two years of the introduction of routine Hib vaccination of infants in the UK, the risk of serious Hib infection had fallen from 1:600 to 1:30,000 by 5 years of age. Many other European countries have introduced, or are in the process of introducing, a routine Hib immunisation programme. Because the epidemiology of Haemophilus influenzae infection is changing so dramatically, it is opportune to review Haemophilus influenzae as it was perceived in the pre-vaccine era (the past) and during vaccine implementation (the present), and how its role may change in the post-vaccination era (the future). This review will summarise the historical landmarks that have led to our present-day understanding of Haemophilus influenzae pathogenicity, the concerns about antibiotic resistance, the features of the host immune response to Haemophilus influenzae, and the introduction of the Hib vaccine. Furthermore, the possible importance of this organism in the future will be discussed.

Haemophilus aphrophilus discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis

An unusual case of discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis due to Haemophilus aphrophilus is described. Infections due to this organism have usually responded to treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics. However, our isolate was resistant to third-generation cephalosporins which has not been reported previously in the world literature. The patient made a good clinical response to ciprofloxacin treatment.

Antibiotic susceptibility of 206 Haemophilus influenzae isolates collected from children in central Italy

Susceptibility of 206 H. influenzae isolates was evaluated by disk diffusion method for 11 antimicrobial agents. No isolates were found to be resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, amoxicillin+clavulanic acid, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. Four untypable isolates (1.9%) were beta-lactamase producing ampicillin-resistant; one of these was also resistant to chloramphenicol. The rate of resistance against rifampin was 0.5 percent.

Antibiotic resistance in Haemophilus influenzae: mechanisms, clinical importance and consequences for therapy

Invasive and non-invasive infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae are frequently diagnosed in children below the age of 5 years. The treatment of choice for these infections was ampicillin. However, since the early 1970s the increasing prevalence of resistance to ampicillin and other antibiotics has necessitated major changes in antibiotic therapy. This article summarizes some of the important clinical features of diseases caused by H. influenzae. The epidemiology, the problems with in vitro susceptibility testing and the mechanisms of resistance to major antibiotics are reviewed. The consequences of antibiotic resistance for the treatment of diseases caused by H. influenzae are discussed.

Prospects for standardisation of methods and guidelines for disc susceptibility testing

The disc diffusion method of susceptibility testing is widely used in diagnostic laboratories throughout the world. It is simple to perform and very suited to the clinical laboratory where a single isolate can be tested with a series of antibiotics in one experiment. For these two reasons the test is by far the commonest type of susceptibility method used. Other methods such as determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration or "breakpoint" methods are used in only a small number of laboratories. If standardisation of methods is to be achieved in order to agree on uniform reporting and guidelines, methods using disc tests are of the highest priority.