A rapid and safe method to fix india ink on specimen resection margins

Recommendations on maximising the clinical value of tissue in the management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background & Aims

Patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma can now be managed with targeted therapies directed against specific molecular alterations. Consequently, tissue samples submitted to the pathology department must produce molecular information in addition to a diagnosis or, for resection specimens, staging information. The pathologist's role when evaluating these specimens has therefore changed to accommodate such personalised approaches.

Methods

We developed recommendations and guidance for pathologists by conducting a systematic review of existing guidance to generate candidate statements followed by an international Delphi process. Fifty-nine pathologists from 28 countries in six continents rated statements mapped to all elements of the specimen pathway from receipt in the pathology department to authorisation of the final written report. A separate survey of 'end-users' of the report including surgeons, oncologists, and gastroenterologists was undertaken to evaluate what information should be included in the written report to enable appropriate patient management.

Results

Forty-eight statements reached consensus for inclusion in the guidance including 10 statements about the content of the written report that also reached consensus by end-user participants. A reporting proforma to allow easy inclusion of the recommended data points was developed.

Conclusions

These guiding principles and recommendations provide a framework to allow pathologists reporting on patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma to maximise the informational yield of specimens required for personalised patient management.

Impact and Implications

Biopsy or resection lesional tissue from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma must yield information about the molecular abnormalities within the tumour that define suitability for personalised therapies in addition to a diagnosis and staging information. Here, we have developed international consensus guidance for pathologists that report such cases using a Delphi process that sought the views of both pathologists and 'end-users of pathology reports. The guide highlights the need to report cases in a way that preserves tissue for molecular testing and emphasises that reporting requires interpretation of histological characteristics within the broader clinical and radiological context. The guide will allow pathologists to report cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in a uniform manner that maximises the value of the tissue received to facilitate optimal multidisciplinary patient management.

Utility of nail enamel for inking of surgical margins in oral biopsy: a comparative study

Background: India Ink is the most commonly used ink in surgical pathology. The main disadvantages of India Ink are longer drying time, monochrome, toxicity and cost. Because of these disadvantages, alternative materials have been suggested to replace India ink. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of nail enamel for inking of surgical margin and to compare it with India ink. Materials and methods: N = 20, which included 10 mucosal and 10 skin samples. Each selected margin is divided into 2 equal halves and one is inked with India ink and the other with nail enamel (Vernis A Ongles: Dark green). After routine processing and staining, the effectiveness of nail enamel and India ink were compared based on macroscopic and microscopic parameters. Results: Less drying time and visibility on paraffin wax block were excellent for nail enamel. Microscopic visibility of nail enamel was comparable with that of India ink. However, processing fluids contamination is the main drawback of nail enamel. Conclusion: Nail enamel can be used as an alternative to India ink because of its less drying time, ease of application, good visibility on wax blocks and microscopically, availability in multiple colours, cost effectiveness and non-toxicity.

[Application of tissue-marking dyes for pathologic examination of surgical and autopsy specimens]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the applicability of imported tissue-marking dyes and the samples of experimental dyes and decorative acrylic paints to mark the resection margins of a surgical specimen.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three sets of tissue-marking dyes: 2 imported sets and 1 experimental set, each containing red, orange, yellow, green, blue, purple, and black dyes, and a set of decorative acrylic paints containing black, blue, light blue, green, yellow, ocher, orange, magenta, and purple dyes. The experimental dyes and imported ones were used to mark tonsillar fragments obtained at tonsillectomy. The set of experimental dyes and that of decorative acrylic paints were used to stain the fragments of autopsy specimens (the skeletal muscles, pancreas, and large bowel). The tissues obtained at autopsy were marked before and after fixation in 40% formalin for 30 min and 24 hours. The specimens were subjected to standard tissue processing. Paraffin blocks were cut into 5-μm sections that were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. To estimate resection margin marking, each specimen was examined by 7 researchers who independently assessed the covering ability of a dye and its color in the paraffin block and microslides.

RESULTS

All researchers correctly identified purple, black, and green colors from the three sets of dyes in the surgical tonsillar specimen. When examining the autopsy specimens, all the experts correctly recognized magenta and green decorative acrylic paints and black and blue experimental dyes. The time of fixation and the type of tissue did not affect the color of a dye in the paraffin block and tissue specimen.

CONCLUSION

Some of experimental dyes and decorative acrylic paints are highly competitive with imported tissue-marking dyes in their characteristics, are correctly recognized in the block and tissue specimen under a microscope, and can be proposed to mark the resection margins of the examined tissues.

Variable fidelity of tissue-marking dyes in surgical pathology

AIMS

Pathology specimens often contain important margins that must be identified from gross examination of specimens through to microscopic examination. Commonly, unique colours of tissue-marking dye (TMD) are applied to each margin, which facilitates both macroscopic and microscopic identification. Various techniques have been described, but the colour endurance and fidelity of TMDs following special tissue processing have not been addressed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of various TMDs through decalcification and immunohistochemistry (IHC) protocols.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Samples of TMDs from two manufacturers and acrylic artists' inks were obtained in seven colours and applied to excess non-diagnostic surgical pathology tissue. Tissues were subjected to a decalcification protocol or directly processed in a routine fashion. The presence and colour of TMD or ink were assessed on routine H&E sections and following IHC. Of the colours that reliably survived routine processing, loss of colour and colour change following decalcification and IHC protocols were seen with one manufacturer's product.

CONCLUSIONS

TMD may lose or change its colour during special tissue processing. This previously unreported artefact may lead to potentially serious errors in margin assessment and reporting. Laboratories should evaluate TMDs and inks through routine processing, decalcification, and IHC protocols, to ensure colour endurance and fidelity.

Cartilage labelling for mechanical testing in T-peel configuration

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to find a suitable method of labelling cartilage samples for the measurement of distraction distances in biomechanical testing.

METHODS

Samples of bovine cartilage were labelled using five different methods: hydroquinone and silver nitrate (AgNO3), potassium permanganate (KMnO4) with sodium thiosulphate (Na2S2O3), India ink, heat, and laser energy. After the labelling, we analysed the cartilage samples with regard to cytotoxity by histochemical staining with ethidiumbromide homodimer (EthD-1) and calcein AM. Furthermore, we tested cartilages labelled with India ink and heat in a T-peel test configuration to analyse possible changes in the mechanical behaviour between marked and unlabelled samples.

RESULTS

Only the labelling methods with Indian ink or a heated needle showed acceptable results in the cytotoxity test with regard to labelling persistence, accuracy, and the influence on consistency and viability of the chondrocytes. In the biomechanical T-peel configuration, heat-labelled samples collapsed significantly earlier than unlabelled samples.

CONCLUSION

Labelling bovine cartilage samples with Indian ink in biomechanical testing is a reliable, accurate, inexpensive, and easy-to-perform method. This labelling method influenced neither the biomechanical behaviour nor the viability of the tissue compared to untreated bovine cartilage.

Marking the surgical margins of specimens: commercial acrylic pigments are reliable, rapid and safe

AIM

To find a medium to mark the surgical margins and orientation of complex specimens that is reliable, easy to use, safe and inexpensive.

METHODS

Several different paints, dyes and pigments were tested. A series of pigments supplied by SICPA Australia Pty Ltd, when fixed to the specimen in acetic formalin, was used on over 7000 complex specimens.

RESULTS

The pigments were easily visualised macroscopically on gross specimen and processed blocks and microscopically at the surgical margins. Review of early material confirmed its stability.

CONCLUSION

These pigments fulfill all the criteria of being reliable, easy to use, inexpensive, safe and stable and have been used successfully in our department for 4 years.