Seatbelt use is associated with lower risk of high-grade hepatic injury in motor vehicle crashes in a national sample

The Impact of Seatbelt Use on Trauma Outcomes in Adult Motor Vehicle Collision Patients With Rib Fractures: A National ACS-TQP-PUF Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. However, there is limited evidence examining the effects seatbelt use has on MVC-related injuries and outcomes in patients with rib fractures. We aim to assess how seatbelt use affects associated injuries and outcomes in adult MVC patients with ≥2 rib fractures.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Programs (TQP) Participant Use File (PUF) Database. Drivers/passengers who sustained ≥2 rib fractures following an MVC and had an AIS ≤2 for extra-thoracic body regions were analyzed. Patients were then subdivided by presence of flail chest into two cohorts, which were subdivided according to injury severity score (ISS) and seatbelt use. Logistic and linear regression was used to assess the impact of seatbelt use on outcomes.

RESULTS

Among both low and intermediate ISS classifications, restrained patients in the non-flail chest cohort had decreased incidence of pneumothorax, pulmonary contusion, and liver injury (P < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, restrained patients (versus unrestrained) had decreased odds of pneumothorax (aOR = 0.91, P = <0.001) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (aOR=0.65, P = 0.02), while having increased odds of splenic laceration (aOR = 1.18, P = 0.003) (intermediate ISS group). Compared to unrestrained patients, restrained non-flail chest patients had a significantly decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit LOS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Seatbelt use may be protective against serious injuries in patients with ≥2 rib fractures, resulting in improved outcomes. Education programs should be developed to bolster seatbelt compliance.

Case report: Evisceration of abdomen after blunt trauma

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal evisceration is uncommon after blunt abdominal trauma; therefore, it warrants urgent laparotomy. We report a young adult male who sustained multiple injuries due to a high impact mechanism resulting in blunt abdominal injury and underwent numerous laparotomies.

CASE REPORT

In a high-speed motorcycle accident, a twenty-six-year-old male sustained a direct, blunt injury to his abdomen, which resulted in a right hemothorax, perforation of the stomach, and small bowel. Multiple mesenteric vessels tear, a retroperitoneal hematoma, liver, and pancreatic injury. The abdominal wall split transversely, extruding intact bowel. After resuscitation, according to the ATLS protocol, the patient underwent eight laparotomies for damage control. After 45 days in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit, then 11 days in the surgical ward, he was discharged in a satisfactory condition. Eight months later, he was admitted electively for ileostomy reversal, which was uneventful.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high trauma mechanisms have high mortality and morbidity rate. Blunt injury with eviscerated abdominal contents requires prompt, expeditious, and timely intervention, particularly at the initial operative intervention with damage control procedures, both prompt management and structured approach, were tailored depending in the magnitude of the injury. A multidisciplinary approach is mandatory throughout the period of treatment until recovery and rehabilitation.

Seatbelt use and risk of major injuries sustained by vehicle occupants during motor-vehicle crashes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Background

In 2004, a World Health Report on road safety called for enforcement of measures such as seatbelt use, effective at minimizing morbidity and mortality caused by road traffic accidents. However, injuries caused by seatbelt use have also been described. Over a decade after publication of the World Health Report on road safety, this study sought to investigate the relationship between seatbelt use and major injuries in belted compared to unbelted passengers.

Methods

Cohort studies published in English language from 2005 to 2018 were retrieved from seven databases. Critical appraisal of studies was carried out using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) checklist. Pooled risk of major injuries was assessed using the random effects meta-analytic model. Heterogeneity was quantified using I-squared and Tau-squared statistics. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to investigate publication bias. This review is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015020309).

Results

Eleven studies, all carried out in developed countries were included. Overall, the risk of any major injury was significantly lower in belted passengers compared to unbelted passengers (RR 0.47; 95%CI, 0.29 to 0.80; I² = 99.7; P = 0.000). When analysed by crash types, belt use significantly reduced the risk of any injury (RR 0.35; 95%CI, 0.24 to 0.52). Seatbelt use reduces the risk of facial injuries (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.84), abdominal injuries (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.98) and, spinal injuries (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.37 to 0.84). However, we found no statistically significant difference in risk of head injuries (RR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.22 to 1.08), neck injuries (RR = 0.69: 95%CI 0.07 to 6.44), thoracic injuries (RR 0.96, 95%CI, 0.74 to 1.24), upper limb injuries (RR = 1.05, 95%CI 0.83 to 1.34) and lower limb injuries (RR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.58 to 1.04) between belted and non-belted passengers.

Conclusion

In sum, the risk of most major road traffic injuries is lower in seatbelt users. Findings were inconclusive regarding seatbelt use and susceptibility to thoracic, head and neck injuries during road traffic accidents. Awareness should be raised about the dangers of inadequate seatbelt use. Future research should aim to assess the effects of seatbelt use on major injuries by crash type.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-6280-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.