1
|
Lynch M, Bucknall M, Jagger C, Kingston A, Wilkie R. Demographic, health, physical activity, and workplace factors are associated with lower healthy working life expectancy and life expectancy at age 50. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5936. [PMID: 38467680 PMCID: PMC10928117 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53095-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Although retirement ages are rising in the United Kingdom and other countries, the average number of years people in England can expect to spend both healthy and work from age 50 (Healthy Working Life Expectancy; HWLE) is less than the number of years to the State Pension age. This study aimed to estimate HWLE with the presence and absence of selected health, socio-demographic, physical activity, and workplace factors relevant to stakeholders focusing on improving work participation. Data from 11,540 adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were analysed using a continuous time 3-state multi-state model. Age-adjusted hazard rate ratios (aHRR) were estimated for transitions between health and work states associated with individual and combinations of health, socio-demographic, and workplace factors. HWLE from age 50 was 3.3 years fewer on average for people with pain interference (6.54 years with 95% confidence interval [6.07, 7.01]) compared to those without (9.79 [9.50, 10.08]). Osteoarthritis and mental health problems were associated with 2.2 and 2.9 fewer healthy working years respectively (HWLE for people without osteoarthritis: 9.50 years [9.22, 9.79]; HWLE with osteoarthritis: 7.29 years [6.20, 8.39]; HWLE without mental health problems: 9.76 years [9.48, 10.05]; HWLE with mental health problems: 6.87 years [1.58, 12.15]). Obesity and physical inactivity were associated with 0.9 and 2.0 fewer healthy working years respectively (HWLE without obesity: 9.31 years [9.01, 9.62]; HWLE with obesity: 8.44 years [8.02, 8.86]; HWLE without physical inactivity: 9.62 years [9.32, 9.91]; HWLE with physical inactivity: 7.67 years [7.23, 8.12]). Workers without autonomy at work or with inadequate support at work were expected to lose 1.8 and 1.7 years respectively in work with good health from age 50 (HWLE for workers with autonomy: 9.50 years [9.20, 9.79]; HWLE for workers lacking autonomy: 7.67 years [7.22, 8.12]; HWLE for workers with support: 9.52 years [9.22, 9.82]; HWLE for workers with inadequate support: 7.86 years [7.22, 8.12]). This study identified demographic, health, physical activity, and workplace factors associated with lower HWLE and life expectancy at age 50. Identifying the extent of the impact on healthy working life highlights these factors as targets and the potential to mitigate against premature work exit is encouraging to policy-makers seeking to extend working life as well as people with musculoskeletal and mental health conditions and their employers. The HWLE gaps suggest that interventions are needed to promote the health, wellbeing and work outcomes of subpopulations with long-term health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marty Lynch
- School of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Newcastle under Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK.
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Milica Bucknall
- School of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Newcastle under Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Carol Jagger
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Andrew Kingston
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Ross Wilkie
- School of Medicine, Keele University, David Weatherall Building, Newcastle under Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Health and Work, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oldroyd RA, Hobbs M, Campbell M, Jenneson V, Marek L, Morris MA, Pontin F, Sturley C, Tomintz M, Wiki J, Birkin M, Kingham S, Wilson M. Progress Towards Using Linked Population-Based Data For Geohealth Research: Comparisons Of Aotearoa New Zealand And The United Kingdom. APPLIED SPATIAL ANALYSIS AND POLICY 2021; 14:1025-1040. [PMID: 33942015 PMCID: PMC8081771 DOI: 10.1007/s12061-021-09381-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Globally, geospatial concepts are becoming increasingly important in epidemiological and public health research. Individual level linked population-based data afford researchers with opportunities to undertake complex analyses unrivalled by other sources. However, there are significant challenges associated with using such data for impactful geohealth research. Issues range from extracting, linking and anonymising data, to the translation of findings into policy whilst working to often conflicting agendas of government and academia. Innovative organisational partnerships are therefore central to effective data use. To extend and develop existing collaborations between the institutions, in June 2019, authors from the Leeds Institute for Data Analytics and the Alan Turing Institute, London, visited the Geohealth Laboratory based at the University of Canterbury, New Zealand. This paper provides an overview of insight shared during a two-day workshop considering aspects of linked population-based data for impactful geohealth research. Specifically, we discuss both the collaborative partnership between New Zealand's Ministry of Health (MoH) and the University of Canterbury's GeoHealth Lab and novel infrastructure, and commercial partnerships enabled through the Leeds Institute for Data Analytics and the Alan Turing Institute in the UK. We consider the New Zealand Integrated Data Infrastructure as a case study approach to population-based linked health data and compare similar approaches taken by the UK towards integrated data infrastructures, including the ESRC Big Data Network centres, the UK Biobank, and longitudinal cohorts. We reflect on and compare the geohealth landscapes in New Zealand and the UK to set out recommendations and considerations for this rapidly evolving discipline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. A. Oldroyd
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M. Hobbs
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- Health Sciences, College of Education, Health and Human Development, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - M. Campbell
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- School of Earth and Environment, College of Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - V. Jenneson
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - L. Marek
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - M. A. Morris
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - F. Pontin
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - C. Sturley
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M. Tomintz
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - J. Wiki
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - M. Birkin
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Alan Turing Institute, London, UK
| | - S. Kingham
- GeoHealth Laboratory, Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
- School of Earth and Environment, College of Science, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | - M. Wilson
- Geospatial Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allen J, Alpass FM. Trajectories of material living standards, physical health and mental health under a universal pension. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 74:362-368. [PMID: 31941674 PMCID: PMC7079189 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2019-213199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aged pension schemes aim to support material and non-material well-being of older populations. The current work aimed to describe dominant trajectories of material living standards in the decades prior to and following eligibility for an aged pension, and describe associated trajectories of physical and mental health. METHODS Longitudinal data on living standards and indices of health Short Form 12 were collected over 2-12 years follow-up from 4811 New Zealand adults aged 55-76. Growth mixture models were used to identify dominant trajectories of living standards with age. Latent growth curve models were used to describe trajectories of physical and mental health associated with each living standards trajectory class. RESULTS A group characterised by good living standards with age (81.5%) displayed physical and mental health scores comparable to those of the general adult population. Smaller groups experienced hardship but increasing living standards (11.8%) and hardship and declining living standards (6.8%). While both groups in hardship experienced poor health in the decade prior pension eligibility, mental health improved among those with increasing living standards, while physical and mental health declined among those with declining living standards. CONCLUSION Under the current policy settings, a majority of older adults in New Zealand maintain a good level of living standards and health in later life. However, significant proportions experience material hardship and poor health in the decade prior to pension eligibility. Alleviation of material hardship may reduce health inequalities in later life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Allen
- School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Fiona M Alpass
- School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|