Blood pressure measurement in adults: large cuffs for all?

[Blood pressure in Germany 2008-2011: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)]

High blood pressure is one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and chronic kidney disease. It is a main determinant of morbidity and mortality in Germany. In the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) the blood pressure of 7,096 adults aged 18-79 years was measured in a standardised way using oscillometric blood pressure devices (Datascope Accutorr Plus). The average of the second and third measurements was used for analysis. The mean systolic blood pressure was 120.8 mmHg in women and 127.4 mmHg in men, while the mean diastolic blood pressure was 71.2 mmHg in women and 75.3 mmHg in men. Blood pressure values were hypertensive (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg) in 12.7 % of women and in 18.1 % of men. Hypertension (defined as having hypertensive blood pressure or taking antihypertensive medication in known cases of hypertension) was present in 29.9 % of women and 33.3 % of men. Almost 75 % of the survey's highest age group, 70-79, had hypertension. DEGS1 demonstrates that high blood pressure remains a highly prevalent risk factor in the population at large. The methodology employed in measuring blood pressure has been improved as compared to that of the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey 1998 (GNHIES98) and it will be possible to draw comparisons soon, once a procedure for calibrating the 1998 data has been finalised. An English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink as supplemental.

Differences and effects of medium and large adult cuffs on blood pressure readings in individuals with muscular arms

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) reading differences in individuals with muscular arms, using medium and large adult cuffs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Resting blood pressures (BPs) were measured in bodybuilders competing at the Mexican National Bodybuilding and Fitness Championship. The means of two bilateral simultaneous arm BP measurements were obtained using two different cuff sizes, 12 cm (medium adult) and 16 cm (large adult).

RESULTS

A total of 193 bodybuilders completed the measurements. With an arm circumference greater than 33 cm, the SBP and DBP average taken with the medium adult cuff was higher than that obtained with the large adult cuff, 8.2+/-10.6 and 1.6+/-7.4 mmHg, respectively; however, a significant difference was observed only with the SBP. With the medium adult cuff, 48 of 144 individuals showed SBP at least 140 mmHg, whereas with the large adult cuff there were only 17 of 144 individuals. In those participants with an arm circumference less than 33 cm, the BP was nonsignificantly lower with the large cuff, -4.24+/-9.2 and -2.24+/-5.4 mmHg for the SBP and DBP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Incorrect cuffing of a muscular arm leads to significant errors in the measurement of SBP and DBP, similar to that observed in miscuffing of nonmuscular arms.

Blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: the effect of arm circumference and sphygmomanometer cuff size

This study aimed to assess the difference in blood pressure readings between the standard and large cuff and to determine if such a difference applies over a range of arm circumferences (ACs) in pregnancy. We measured blood pressure on 219 antenatal women. Six blood pressure readings were taken, three with a standard 'adult' and three with a 'large' cuff, in random order. A random zero sphygmomanometer was used by a trained observer. Women with an AC >33 cm were similar in age, gestational age and parity but were heavier and had more hypertension than those with AC ≤33 cm. There was a systematic difference between the standard and large cuff of 5-7 mmHg with little effect due to AC. We were unable to demonstrate an association between the standard and large cuff blood pressure difference and increasing blood pressure. Our study has shown that both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements are more dependent on the cuff size used than AC and for the individual it is difficult to predict the magnitude of effect the different cuff sizes will have on blood pressure measurements. This study has shown the presence of an average difference in blood pressure measurement between standard and large cuffs in pregnancy, and does not support the arbitrary 33 cm 'cut-off' recommended in guidelines for the use of a large cuff in pregnancy.

Use of a neonatal blood pressure cuff to monitor blood pressure in the adult finger--comparison with a standard adult arm cuff

BACKGROUND

There are few suitable methods for monitoring blood pressure continuously (or intermittently) for research in adult stroke patients, who are ill but do not justify invasive intensive care monitoring.

METHOD

We tested a neonatal arm blood pressure in adults by placing it on the forefinger ("finger cuff"). We compared the repeatability of the finger cuff with blood pressure measured by a standard adult arm cuff using the oscillometric technique in 168 ambulatory outpatients attending a cerebrovascular disease clinic.

RESULTS

The mean difference between sequential mean blood pressure readings with the finger cuff was 0.55 mm Hg (95% confidence interval (CI) -14.36 to 15.47 mm Hg), and for the arm cuff was 3.31 mm Hg (95% CI -23.33 to 16.71 mm Hg). Measurements made with the arm cuff were shown to affect subsequent arm cuff readings made within a few minutes of the first. The mean difference between the finger cuff and arm cuff mean blood pressure readings was 0.03 mm Hg (95% CI -26.07 to 26.14 mm Hg) and agreement was better when the blood pressure was measured with the finger cuff first rather than the arm cuff. However, although there was no difference in the mean blood pressure recordings both systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements differed systematically between arm and finger cuff.

CONCLUSION

The reproducibility of sequential blood pressure measurements made with the finger cuff was better than with the arm cuff. The performance of the finger cuff compared with that of the arm cuff was sufficiently good to encourage use of the finger cuff in research involving automatic intermittent monitoring to observe sequential blood pressures over time in stroke patients. However, measurements of systolic and diastolic pressure were not the same with the two cuffs and further work on calibration of the finger cuff would be useful.

Improving hypertension control among excessive alcohol drinkers: a randomised controlled trial in France. The WALPA Group

OBJECTIVES

To improve blood pressure control among hypertensive ( > 140/90 mmHg) excessive alcohol drinkers.

DESIGN

Fourteen worksite physicians were randomised onto an intervention group and a control group. The intervention was based on training the worksite physicians and follow up of those hypertensive subjects defined as excessive drinkers. Follow up was based on self monitoring of alcohol consumption by the subject, in view of the results of their gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity determination.

SETTING

Fourteen workplaces in France - mainly in the industrial sector.

SUBJECTS

Altogether 15 301 subjects were screened by the 14 physicians: 129 of these were included in the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

This was the difference between the initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the SBP one year later (delta BP). Secondary criteria were the difference between the initial and final diastolic blood pressure (delta DBP) and delta BP at two years; antihypertensive treatment; state alcohol consumption (delta AC); delta GGT; and body mass index (delta BMI).

RESULTS

The decrease in SBP levels was significantly larger in the intervention group than in the control group: at one year, delta SBP values were -11.9 (15.6) mmHg and -4.6 (13.8) respectively (p < 0.05). This benefit was still observed after two years of follow up (-13.8 (17.4) mmHg v -7.5 (14.2) mmHg (p < 0.05)). No difference was observed in DBP. The percentage of treated subjects did not differ between groups. At one year, delta AC was larger in the intervention group (-2.8 (5.2) U/d) than in the control group (-1.6 (3.4) (p < 0.1)). delta GGT and delta BMI did not differ between the two groups. A weak positive correlation was observed between delta AC and delta SBP (r = 0.16).

CONCLUSION

An intervention aimed at the hypertensive excessive drinkers in a working population was found to be effective in reducing SBP on a long term basis (two years). The mechanisms of reduction in alcohol consumption and improved drug compliance cannot be ascertained in this pragmatic study. From a public health point of view, reducing the excess cardiovascular risk among a "hard to reach" population seems feasible with a strategy specifically designed for this high risk group.

Confounders of auscultatory blood pressure measurement

The appropriate use of any test requires the clinician to appreciate that test's limitations. By recognizing the potential confounders of the auscultatory assessment of blood pressure, the clinician minimizes the likelihood of enacting therapeutic decisions based on inaccurate data. When approaching the treatment of a hypertensive patient, several points should be kept in mind. First, the measurement of persistent and severe hypertension in a patient receiving treatment who describes symptoms of orthostatic hypotension with apparently adequate standing blood pressure or who lacks corroborating retinal, echocardiographic, or electrocardiographic signs of hypertension should raise the concern of pseudohypertension or a white-coat response. Similarly, when one finds a normal or near-normal systolic blood pressure in a patient with a clinical picture consistent with severe hypertension, one should make a directed effort to look for an unrecognized auscultatory gap. Second, marked discrepancies in measurements as obtained by different operators or in different settings should raise concern of the white-coat response or methodologic errors by one operator, such as undercuffing, excessive pressure on the head of the stethoscope, rapid deflation of the cuff, or use of different arms. In treating hypertension in even the minimally obese patient, a special point must be made that an adequate size cuff be used for all blood pressure determinations. Third, when blood pressure is determined with the patient in any but the satndardized back-and-arm-supported seated position described above, the clinician should acknowledge the possibility that the position may alter the patient's classification. Fourth, the diagnosis and management of hypertension requires multiple measurements of blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Blood pressure measurement: rational and ritual actions

There is a prevailing wisdom that the taking and recording of arterial blood pressure is a non-problematic nursing activity. However, closer scrutiny reveals that the practices surrounding blood pressure measurement are subject to rational and ritual actions that have considerable significance for nursing practice.

Agreement between large and small cuffs in sphygmomanometry: a quantitative assessment

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to quantify agreement and differences between blood pressure (BP) measurements by large cuffs (15 x 33 cm) and small cuffs (12 x 23 cm) in a representative sample of the U.S. population with varying arm circumferences.

METHODS

The arm circumference and blood pressure (12 readings of each) of 85 subjects were measured, the latter with a mercury column sphygmomanometer. Data were classified according to arm circumference (small arm circumference, < or = 29 cm; large arm circumference, > 29 cm). Results were submitted to ANOVA, linear regression, difference between means (aggregate agreement), upper and lower limits of agreement at 95% confidence intervals, and intraclass correlation (individual-subject agreement/quantification of agreement).

RESULTS

Small cuffs overestimated BP obtained from the large cuffs for the sample population as a whole, regardless of arm circumference. Limits of agreement at the lower end of 95% confidence interval were not clinically acceptable (SBP -1.56 to 11.05 mm Hg; DBP -2.06 to 8.63 mm Hg). However, measurements by both cuffs agreed among subjects with small arm circumferences (< or = 29 cm).

CONCLUSION

Arm circumference plays an important role in determining proper cuff size for BP measurement. The small cuff overestimates BP in patients with large arm circumferences (> 29 cm), which represents more than 75% of the U.S. adult population. However, measurements of BP with the large cuff are not significantly different from those of small cuff measurements in subjects with small arm circumferences (< or = 29 cm). Therefore, we propose that the large cuff be used for routine BP measurement of the adults in the United States.

Cardiac cycle phase uncertainty: another source of error in indirect blood pressure measurement

Cardiac cycle phase uncertainty causes a small error in indirect estimation of arterial blood pressure by sphygmomanometry. A simple analysis yields a statistical description of the error and a rule for its reduction: correct bias by adding to the systolic estimate and subtracting from the diastolic estimate one-half of the per-cardiac-cycle cuff deflation decrement. If several measurements are taken, the least-square estimate is approximately the arithmetic mean of the greatest and least of the bias corrected estimates.

The costs of treating hypertension--an analysis of different cut-off points

In this article the effects of different cut-off points for hypertension treatment are analysed, with respect to treatment costs. A theoretical blood pressure distribution is used to calculate the potential annual cost of treating all persons in Sweden above certain cut-off points for drug treatment. A lowering of the cut-off point from 105 mm Hg to 100 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure could potentially lead to an increase in annual costs of approximately 80m pounds. Further lowering from 100 to 95 mm Hg in turn could increase annual costs by about 110m pounds. The potential annual cost of treating all persons (roughly 1.6 million) with a diastolic blood pressure of greater than or equal to 95 mm Hg with drugs is calculated as being roughly 40 pounds per inhabitant in Sweden. The Swedish cut-off point for treatment (95 mm Hg) can be expected to lead to roughly 50 per cent higher treatment costs than the British cut-off point (100 mm Hg).