Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met?

Opioid Consumption and Mobilization in Staged Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty: Did We Learn Our Lesson the First Time?

BACKGROUND

In patients who require bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA), staged procedures are a reasonable option for treatment of bilateral osteoarthritis. We sought to determine whether perioperative outcomes differed between first and second total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA or TKA between January 30, 2017, and April 8, 2021. All patients who were included underwent their second procedure within 1 year of the first. Patients were separated based on whether both their procedures took place before or subsequently after an institution-wide opioid-sparing protocol that was implemented on October 1, 2018. A total of 961 patients who underwent 1,922 procedures met the inclusion criteria for this study. For THA, 388 unique patients comprised 776 procedures, while 573 unique patients comprised 1,146 TKAs. Opioid prescriptions were prospectively documented on nursing opioid administration flowsheets and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for comparison. Activity measure scores for postacute care (AM-PAC) were used as a measurement of physical therapy progression.

RESULTS

Hospital stays, home discharges, perioperative opioid usages, pain scores, and AM-PAC scores were not significantly different for the second THA or TKA compared to first procedure, regardless of timing in relation to the opioid-sparing protocol.

CONCLUSION

Patients experienced similar outcomes following their first versus their second TJA. Limited opioid prescriptions following TJA do not negatively impact pain and functional outcomes. These protocols can safely be instituted to help mitigate the opioid epidemic.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Hip-related toxicity after prostate radiotherapy: Treatment related or coincidental?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence and predictors of hip toxicity postradiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

4067 prostate cancer patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n=2569; 63%) or brachytherapy with or without supplemental EBRT (n=1508; 27%). 43% (n=1738) were treated with neo-adjuvant and concurrent ADT and 57% (n=2329) with radiotherapy alone. Hip toxicity was defined as moderate or severe pain upon ambulation with or without the need for hip-revision surgery. Median follow-up was 7years (range, 3-21years).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one (2.7%) patients developed moderate-to-severe hip pain after radiotherapy affecting ambulation. Of these, 73 (60%) required hip replacement secondary to persistent hip pain. Among patients with baseline degenerative joint disease (DJD) changes on scans, 10-year incidence of hip-related toxicity was 11% versus 3% for those without such changes (P<.001). The only variables on multivariate analysis associated with hip-related toxicity post-radiotherapy were baseline DJD on imaging (P<.0001) and prolonged ADT for salvage therapy (P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate EBRT or brachytherapy is associated with low incidence of long-term hip-related toxicity. The only variables identified associated with hip toxicity posttherapy was the presence of baseline DJD and prolonged salvage ADT posttreatment for patients developing recurrence.

Orthopedic surgery core curriculum hip and knee reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To develop a core curriculum for orthopedic surgery and to conduct a national survey to assess the importance of 281 curriculum items. Attention was focused on 55 topics pertaining to hip and knee reconstruction.

METHODS

A 281-item curriculum was developed. We completed a content review and cross-sectional survey of a random selection of orthopedic surgeons whose primary affiliation was nonuniversity. We analyzed the data descriptively and quantitatively, using histograms, a modified Hotelling's T2 statistic with the p value determined by a permutation test, and the Benjamini- Hochberg/Yekutieli procedure. Our analyses assumed that each respondent answered questions independently of the answers of any other respondent but that the answers to different questions by the same respondent might be dependent.

RESULTS

Of 156 orthopedic surgeons, 131 (84%) participated in this study. Of 55 items ranked by all respondents, 42 received an average mean score greater than 3.5/4.0, and 51 received an average mean score equal to or greater than 3.0/40 (the standard deviation for each item ranged from 0.00 to 0.08), suggesting that 92.7% of the items are important or probably important to know by the end of residency.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates agreement that it is important to include 92.7% of the items that pertain to hip and knee reconstruction in a core curriculum for orthopedic surgery. Residency training programs may need to ensure that appropriate educational opportunities focusing on complex primary and revision surgery are available to meet the future needs of orthopedic surgeons whose primary affiliation is nonuniversity.

Total hip and knee replacement surgeries in Alberta utilization and associated outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Between 1994/95 and 1996/7, the healthcare system in Alberta underwent a radical transformation that saw the regionalization of service delivery and a reduction in overall healthcare funding. The aim of this study is to examine trends in utilization and associated post-operative complications and readmissions for two procedures, total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during this period of restructuring.

METHODS

This is a six-year retrospective analysis using hospital separation and healthcare insurance plan registry databases. During the study period, we looked at trends in inpatient procedure volumes, average lengths of stay, post-operative complications during the index hospital stay and readmissions within one year.

RESULTS

Over a six-year period, the age-sex standardized provincial rate of THAs increased by 18% while the rate of TKAs increased by 73%. Average lengths of stay decreased for both procedures by over 50%. The rate of procedures with at least one post-operative complication within the index episode of care decreased over the study period by 19% for THA and 21% for TKA. Readmissions due to complications of surgery increased overall by 32% for THA and 2% for TKA. Regional and sex differences were observed throughout the period.

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall rate of hospitalizations has decreased in Alberta, the rates of THA and TKA procedures have increased. The lengths of stay following these procedures have, at the same time, reduced dramatically. Adverse outcomes as measured by complication rates associated with these procedures have decreased, though readmissions due to complications after surgery have increased.

Geographic variations in the rates of operative procedures involving the shoulder, including total shoulder replacement, humeral head replacement, and rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND

Although geographic variations in the rates of orthopaedic procedures have been well documented, considerable controversy remains regarding the factors that drive these variations, particularly the role of the availability of orthopaedic surgeons. Moreover, little attention has been specifically focused on variations in the rates of commonly performed shoulder procedures.

METHODS

The current study documents state-to-state variations in the rates of total shoulder replacement, humeral head replacement, and rotator cuff repair and examines factors that might account for these variations. The regional incidences of these three procedures were analyzed with use of the Health Care Financing Administration Medicare database (MEDPAR, 1992). The rates were age-adjusted, and variations were measured with use of high:low ratios, variation coefficients, and systematic components of variation. Potential causes of variation were analyzed with use of Spearman and partial correlations as well as with Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Rates for the three procedures that were studied varied from one state to another by as much as tenfold. Humeral head replacement had the lowest rate of variation according to all three measures. All three procedures were performed less often in states that were more densely populated. With the numbers available for study, no consistent, significant relationship was found between the density of orthopaedists and shoulder surgeons and the rates of any procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The striking variations that were noted for these commonly performed procedures showed that there is a clear need for well designed clinical research to further define the factors that account for the variations and to examine the effectiveness and appropriate indications for the procedures.

Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty

A hospital-based computer system was used to compare the inpatient costs of performing bilateral simultaneous sequential, staged, and unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasties. Bilateral simultaneous sequential total knee arthroplasty was 36% less costly than 2 unilateral total knee arthroplasties. Bilateral simultaneous sequential total hip arthroplasty saved 25% over the costs of performing 2 unilateral hip arthroplasties. Prosthetic costs range between 28% and 43% of the total costs of hospitalization. There was a significant correlation between hospital length of stay, morbidity, and total costs, but no correlation with patient age and sex except in the unilateral knee patients. Bilateral simultaneous sequential joint arthroplasty can save more than $10,000 for each total knee patient and more than $8,000 for each total hip patient.

The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of three types of patient-based health status instrument--generic, disease-specific and site-specific--in assessing changes resulting from total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS

A two-stage prospective study of patients undergoing surgery for THR involving an assessment at a pre-surgical clinic and a follow-up clinic at 6 months. 173 patients with a diagnosis of arthritis and being admitted for unilateral THR were recruited in the outpatient departments of a specialist orthopaedic hospital and peripheral clinics within Oxfordshire. Patients' health status was assessed using the 12-item Oxford Hip Score, the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales (AIMS) and SF-36 general health questionnaire together with their surgeons' assessment using Charnley hip score obtained before and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Effect sizes, used to compare change scores, revealed that pain and function domains changed most following THR on both the AIMS and the SF-36. 71 patients (41%) were assessed as having symptoms or problems currently affecting lower limb joints other than the hip recently replaced. Change scores were compared between these patients and all other patients who reported no current problems with other joints. The Oxford Hip Score found no significant difference between change scores for these two groups of patients while both AIMS and SF-36 physical and pain dimensions recorded significant differences of similar magnitude (physical P < 0.01, pain P < 0.05). Likely reasons for this were apparent on closer inspection of the item content of each instrument.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of outcomes in THR is necessarily long-term. Within studies of this kind, a hip-specific instrument (Oxford Hip Score) is likely to be more able to distinguish between symptoms and functional impairment produced by the index joint, as compared with other joints and conditions, than either a disease-specific instrument (AIMS) or a generic health status measure (SF-36). This is important given the high probability of existing and subsequent co-morbidity affecting such populations of patients. This consideration is likely to be relevant to any long-term assessment programme following treatment for a condition which threatens bilateral expression over time.

Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of a disease specific and a general health questionnaire in assessing changes resulting from total hip replacement.

DESIGN

Two stage prospective study of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery involving an assessment at a clinic before and six months after surgery. 60(32%) patients were followed up by post.

SETTING

Outpatient departments at a specialist orthopaedic hospital and peripheral clinics within Oxfordshire.

PATIENTS

188 patients admitted for unilateral total hip replacement between February and mid-August 1994.

MAIN MEASURES

Patients' self assessed scores with the 12 item Oxford hip score and SF-36 general health questionnaire together with surgeons' assessment with Charnley hip score obtained before and again at six months after surgery.

RESULTS

186 patients were followed up six months after total hip replacement; a subsample (n=60) by post. Of the 60 postal patients, 59(98.3%) fully completed the Oxford hip score compared with 44(73.3%) who fully completed the SF-36. For the followup sample as a whole, post operative changes in scores produced a large effect size of 2.75 on the Oxford hip score, compared with -1.89 physical function (SF-36), -2.13 pain (SF-36). With the exception of physical function and role (physical), postoperative SF-36 scores were shown to be similar to or better than those found by two population surveys on patients of comparable age. The responsiveness of a disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and relevant sections of a general questionnaire, SF-36, were found to be similar as assessed by three different criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

A disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and a general state of health questionnaire, SF-36, performed similarly in assessing outcomes of total hip replacement except that the disease specific questionnaire resulted in a higher completion rate and greater responsiveness in some sections. On the other hand the general health questionnaire drew attention to broader problems of physical function not considered by the Oxford hip score. The health questionnaires examined here offer a valid and practical means of monitoring outcomes of hip replacement surgery.

Primary hip and knee replacement surgery: Ontario criteria for case selection and surgical priority

OBJECTIVES

To develop, from simple clinical factors, criteria to identify appropriate patients for referral to a surgeon for consideration for arthroplasty, and to rank them in the queue once surgery is agreed.

DESIGN

Delphi process, with a panel including orthopaedic surgeons, rheumatologists, general practitioners, epidemiologists, and physiotherapists, who rated 120 case scenarios for appropriateness and 42 for waiting list priority. Scenarios incorporated combinations of relevant clinical factors. It was assumed that queues should be organised not simply by chronology but by clinical and social impact of delayed surgery. The panel focused on information obtained from clinical histories, to ensure the utility of the guidelines in practice. Relevant high quality research evidence was limited.

SETTING

Ontario, Canada.

MAIN MEASURES

Appropriateness ratings on a 7-point scale, and urgency rankings on a 4-point scale keyed to specific waiting times.

RESULTS

Despite incomplete evidence panellists agreed on ratings in 92.5% of appropriateness and 73.8% of urgency scenarios versus 15% and 18% agreement expected by chance, respectively. Statistically validated algorithms in decision tree form, which should permit rapid estimation of urgency or appropriateness in practice, were compiled by recursive partitioning. Rating patterns and algorithms were also used to make brief written guidelines on how clinical factors affect appropriateness and urgency of surgery. A summary score was provided for each case scenario; scenarios could then be matched to chart audit results, with scoring for quality management.

CONCLUSIONS

These algorithms and criteria can be used by managers or practitioners to assess appropriateness of referral for hip or knee replacement and relative rankings of patients in the queue for surgery.

Hospital- and patient-related characteristics determining length of hospital stay for hip and knee replacements

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are among the most prestigious health care technologies. Their popularity has grown rapidly, and an increasing proportion of health care resources is allocated to them. We studied patient- and hospital-related factors that cause variation in a major determinant of hospital costs, the length of hospital stay (LOS) for THA and TKA. We gathered data on 10,288 hip and 5,173 knee patients with primary or secondary arthrosis from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register, which we linked with the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register. Patient- and hospital-related variations in LOS were explained using regression models. Of the patient-related factors, complications caused the greatest prolongation of hospital stay, but patient's age, gender, and charge category also influenced LOS. Hospital-related factors were major causes of LOS variation. In the hospitals the average case-mix-adjusted LOS ranged from less than a week to 3 weeks. The number of arthroplasties performed in hospital was inversely related to LOS. The within-hospital LOS figures for THA and TKA were strikingly similar and persistent.