Social deprivation and patterns of consultation for respiratory symptoms: a population-based cohort study

The UK prevalence of hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia and its association with sex, socioeconomic status and region of residence: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder of aberrant blood vessel development characterised by arteriovenous malformations. HHT is associated with significant morbidity due to complications including epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. We explored the hypothesis that a diagnosis of HHT is associated with sex, socioeconomic status and geographical location.

METHODS

We used The Health Improvement Network, a longitudinal, computerised general practice database covering 5% of the UK population to calculate prevalence estimates for HHT stratified by age, sex, socioeconomic status and geographical location.

RESULTS

The 2010 UK point prevalence for HHT was 1.06/10 000 person years (95% CI 0.95 to 1.17) or 1 in 9400 individuals. The diagnosed prevalence of HHT was significantly higher in women compared with men (adjusted prevalence rate ratio (PRR) 1.53, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.88) and in those from the most affluent socioeconomic group compared with the least (adjusted PRR 1.74, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.64). The PRR varied between different regions of the UK, being highest in the South West and lowest in the West Midlands (adjusted PRR for former compared with latter 1.86, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.15).

CONCLUSIONS

HHT prevalence is more common in the UK population than previously demonstrated, though this updated figure is still likely to be an underestimate. HHT appears to be significantly under-diagnosed in men, which is likely to reflect their lower rates of consultation with primary care services. There is under-diagnosis in patients from lower socioeconomic groups and a marked variation in the prevalence of diagnosis between different geographical regions across the UK that requires further investigation.

The relationship between self-reported severe pain and measures of socio-economic disadvantage

AIMS

To determine the association of severe pain with socioeconomic characteristics.

METHODS

Data was extracted from the Health Survey for England (HSE), 2005. The HSE is a series of annual cross-sectional surveys designed to describe the health of people living in private homes in England, from a random sample of 720 postcode sectors. Interviewees were ≥ 16 years. Pain severity was characterised by the EQ-5D. Socioeconomic status was classified by ability to work, social security benefits, the National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC) and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).

RESULTS

Pain status was recorded for 9419 subjects of whom 431 (4.6%) reported severe pain. 156 of those reporting severe pain were of working age. Of these 68 (43.6%) stated they were unable to work due to sickness or disability and 64 (41.0%) claimed a state benefit. After adjusting for disease and demographic variables, severe pain was associated with the IMD with an odds ratio of 1.65 (95% CI 1.16-2.34, p=0.005), NS-SEC (OR=2.94; 95% CI 1.76-4.91) and equivalised household income (lowest versus highest quintile; OR=2.58 (95% CI 1.46-4.57, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated significant associations between pain and socio-economic disadvantage. Apart from the direct impact upon the individual, this clearly has wider societal implications in terms of additional health and social care costs for affected people.

Material and social deprivation and health and social services utilisation in Québec: a local-scale evaluation system

Very few studies have employed local-scale analyses to evaluate how well primary health care and social services reach the most socially and economically deprived individuals. This paper describes a project, conducted in close partnership with decision-makers and practitioners at selected local community service centres (in French, CLSCs) in Quebec, Canada, that developed a system for assessing primary care and social services utilisation by applying deprivation levels defined at the local scale (i.e., according to the distribution of deprivation in individual CLSC service areas). More than 25 years ago, Québec started setting up a province-wide network of publicly financed CLSCs whose mission was to offer first-line health and social services at the local level. Now approximately one Quebecer in four receives at least one service a year from a CLSC. The evaluation system presented in this article is built on deprivation profiles for each CLSC service area and comprises maps, relative indices of service utilisation, and an interpretation framework that facilitates the integration of new data into the decision-making and services planning processes. Study results show that deprivation levels, when defined using local perspectives, correspond more closely to decision-makers' perceptions, that relative indices are sensitive to key determinants of services provision and utilisation, and that the interpretation framework is useful for reassessing intervention strategies.