Effect of routine postdilatation on final coronary blood flow in primary percutaneous coronary intervention patients without angiographic stent expansion problems

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of postdilatation in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is feared to induce suboptimal coronary blood flow and compromise the outcome of the patients. This meta-analysis sought to verify whether postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse angiographic or long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EBSCO, and Europe PMC on 10 March 2024. Eligible studies reporting the outcomes of postdilatation among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were included. The primary outcome was no-reflow condition during primary PCI based on angiographic finding. The secondary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Ten studies were finally included in this meta-analysis encompassing 3280 patients, which was predominantly male (76.6%). Postdilatation was performed in 40.7% cases. Postdilatation was associated with increased risk of no-reflow during primary PCI [Odd Ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.12-1.58; P = .001)]. Conversely, postdilatation had a tendency to reduce MACE (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; P = .03) specifically in terms of TVR (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; P = .003). No significant differences between both groups in relation to mortality (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.32-1.05; P = .07) and myocardial infarction (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.78-2.89; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary PCI appears to be associated with an increased risk of no-reflow phenomenon after the procedure. Nevertheless, postdilatation strategy has demonstrated a significant reduction in MACE over the course of long-term follow-up. Specifically, postdilatation significantly decreased the occurrence of TVR. Key messages: What is already known on this topic?  Optimizing stent deployment by performing postdilatation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is essential for long-term clinical outcomes. However, its application during primary PCI is controversial due to the fact that it may provoke distal embolization and worsen coronary blood flow. What this study adds?  In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies, we confirm that postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse coronary blood flow immediately following the procedure. On the contrary, this intervention proves advantageous in improving long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in reducing target vessel revascularization. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  Given the mixed impact of postdilatation during primary PCI, this strategy should only be applied selectively. Future research should focus on identifying patients who may benefit from such strategy.

Results of systematic patient outcome monitoring: Does post-dilatation during angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention improve clinical outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluates clinical outcomes after implementing a liberal post-dilatation strategy during PCI.

BACKGROUND

Post-dilatation after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is performed to achieve optimal stent expansion and reduce complications. However, its prognostic effects are unclear and conflicting.

METHODS

This study is a pre-post-intervention analysis of two cohorts, before (2015-2017) and after (2018-2020) implementation of a liberal post-dilatation strategy. The primary end point consisted of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days. Secondary end points consisted of the individual components of the primary end point as well as 1 year mortality and target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

A total of 10,153 patients were included: 5,383 in the pre-cohort and 4,770 in the post-cohort. The 30-day MACE was 5.00% in the pre-cohort and 4.09% in the post-cohort (p = 0.008; OR 0.75 (CI 0.61-0.93)). There was a significant difference between the pre- and post-cohort in 30-day mortality, respectively, 2.91% and 2.25% (p = .01; OR 0.70 (CI 0.53-0.93)), and MI at 30 days, 1.17% versus 0.59% (p = .003; OR 0.49 (CI 0.31-0.78)). At 1 year, there was a significant difference in mortality between the pre-cohort, 5.84%, and post-cohort, 5.19% (p = .02; OR 0.79 (CI 0.66-0.96)).

CONCLUSIONS

A liberal post-dilatation strategy after PCI was associated with a significant decrease in 30-day MACE, 30-day MI, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. Future studies are warranted to validate the causality between post-dilatation and improvement of clinical outcomes.

The Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Postdilation after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

The effect of postdilation in patients with acute coronary syndrome is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to analyze the clinical and angiographic outcomes of postdilation after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wangfang databases were searched from inception to August 30, 2020. Eligible studies from acute coronary syndrome patients treated with postdilation were included. The primary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), the secondary clinical outcomes comprised all-cause death, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and the angiographic outcomes were no reflow and slow reflow.

Results

11 studies met inclusion criteria. In clinical outcomes, our pooled analysis demonstrated that the postdilation had a tendency of decreasing MACE (OR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45–1.00; P = 0.05) but significantly increased all-cause death (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.05–2.12; P = 0.03). No significant difference existed in stent thrombosis (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.40–1.26; P = 0.24), myocardial infarction (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 0.51–3.83; P = 0.51), and target vessel revascularization (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.21–1.80; P = 0.37) between postdilation and non-postdilation groups. In angiographic outcomes, there were no significant differences in no reflow (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.54–2.65; P = 0.66) and slow reflow (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.93–1.35; P = 0.24) between two groups.

Conclusions

The postdilation tends to reduce the risk of MACE but significantly increases all-cause death, without significantly affecting stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, and coronary TIMI flow grade. However, more randomized controlled trials are required for investigating the effect of postdilation for patients with acute coronary syndrome (registered by PROSPERO, CRD42020160748).

Impact of Postdilation on Intervention Success and Long-Term Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) among Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Postdilation is frequently used during coronary interventions to prevent stent malapposition. Currently there are contradictory findings regarding the benefits of postdilation for both intraprocedural and long-term outcomes. We evaluated the impact of postdilation among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and underwent percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). A total of 258 consecutive patients who presented with ACS and underwent PCI were included in the study. The patients were followed up for 25±1.7 months for the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). During follow-up, 65 patients (25.2%) had MACE. Among patients without MACE, intracoronary nitrate infusion was less frequently used (P=0.005), myocardial blush grade was higher (P<0.001), and a drug-eluting stent was more frequently used (P=0.005). No significant differences were noted between groups regarding the predilation, recurrent dilation, postdilation, and other angiographic characteristics. In multivariate analysis, female sex (P=0.047), myocardial blush grade (P=0.038), previous coronary artery disease (P=0.030), and peak troponin level (P=0.002) were found to be predictors of MACE. In patients who were treated with PCI for ACS, performing postdilation did not predict final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade, corrected TIMI frame count, myocardial blush grade, or MACE.