IKDC Subjective Knee Form and Marx Activity Rating Scale are suitable to evaluate all orthopaedic sports medicine knee conditions: a systematic review

Does concomitant meniscus repair and meniscectomy show different efficacy in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Currently, it is advised to perform meniscal repair instead of meniscectomy in certain cases of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the level of evidence is low. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of meniscectomy and meniscus repair in addition to ACLR.

Methods

The systematic search was conducted in three online databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane) from inception until October 2021 for the literature on primary ACLR and concomitant meniscal surgery. Eligible studies compared the following outcomes between meniscal repair and meniscectomy groups: the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and KT-arthrometer examinations. Lastly, we calculated pooled mean differences (MDs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) from the change between pre- and post-intervention values.

Results

Of 10,565 studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria, with a follow-up between 6 and 43 months. We found no difference when comparing the KOOS subscale changes-only in the KOOS pain subscale (MD = -1.6; CI: -2.48, -0.72). However, these results were not clinically significant. We analyzed the lateral and media meniscal injuries separately and concluded the same results regarding KOOS changes. We found no significant differences in the Lysholm score change (MD = -2.61; CI: -5.51, 0.29), changes in IKDC score (MD = 1.08; CI: -4.05, 6.21) or the change for the KT-arthrometer side-to-side difference (MD = -0.50; CI: -1.06, 0.06).

Conclusion

Based on our result, we did not find a clinically significant difference between meniscus repair and meniscectomy during primary ACLR regarding patient-reported outcomes in a short-term follow-up.

Translational potential

Our research supports the prompt integration of findings into clinical practice for treating meniscus injuries during ACL reconstruction. We recommend considering both meniscus repair and meniscectomy, as the available data indicate their effectiveness. Further studies are necessary to assess the long-term impacts, particularly on osteoarthritis, and to identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from each technique.

Development and validation of a novel method for assessing physical activity profiles after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The Sports and Physical Activity scale

OBJECTIVES

To describe and evaluate the preliminary validity of a novel scoring system for assessing the physical activity of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

The Sports and Physical Activity (SPA) scale consists of thirty options of sports and physical activities, followed by four frequency options for each option selected. Factors used to develop the scoring system were frequency of participation and intensity of the sports or physical activities. Possible scores ranged from a low of 0 to a high of 24. The scale was assessed for validity and responsiveness.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 418 primary ACL reconstructed patients 2 years after surgery, and a subgroup of 183 patient 5 years after surgery. The mean and median SPA scores for the cohort were 12.35 ( ​± ​6.95) and 12, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the scores of men and women (U ​= ​21,541.0, p ​= ​0.921). The SPA scale had a small but statistically significant inverse correlation with age (rs ​= ​-0.2, p = <0.001), indicating divergent validity. Patients who had returned to sport had a statistically significantly higher score (U ​= ​21593.5, p = <0.001), and there was a statistically significant difference between scores of the three current sports status groups (H ​= ​19.99, p value = <0.001) indicating convergent validity. Construct validity was indicated with a statistically significant correlation with the Marx scale (rs ​= ​0.422, p value= <0.001). In a subgroup (n ​= ​183) of the patient sample, comparison between scores at 2-years (13.27 ​± ​7.02) and 5-years (12.11 ​± ​7.88) found a statistically significant decline (p= <0.001). However, this decline was smaller than the decline seen in the Marx score between 2 and 5 years (11.11 ​± ​4.07 and 9.30 ​± ​4.52 p= <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary validity was found for the SPA scale. Women and men were found to be participating in a similar amount of activity 2 years post ACL reconstruction, despite return to sport differences between men and women being well documented. The scores of the SPA scale showed a statistically significant decrease over time with a negligible effect size.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic partial resection of mucoid degeneration of anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

Mucoid degeneration of the anterior cruciate ligament is rare condition; mucoid degeneration affects the range of motion of the knee with pain on terminal extension and terminal flexion. Arthroscopic treatment of the mucoid anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the treatment of choice. The purpose of this study was to provide demographic and clinical characteristic of mucoid degeneration of ACL and assess the outcomes of partial arthroscopic ACL resection.

METHODS

Patients who underwent partial ACL resection for mucoid degeneration between February 2007 and February 2019 were considered for study eligibility. Patients were evaluated for International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), The Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner activity scale.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent partial ACL resection for mucoid degeneration of the ACL. Nine patients were lost to follow-up, 43 were males, the average age was 52.12±12.09 and a mean follow-up of 83.55±44.79 months. At final follow-up six patients underwent ACL reconstruction for ACL rupture (11.7%) at an average of 15.66±12 months. Patient satisfaction was at 71%.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic partial resection of the ACL led to good clinical outcome for treating mucoid degeneration of the ACL.

The Dutch language short Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale has good to excellent construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability when assessing athletes undergoing rehabilitation after ACL injury or ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

To examine the validity and reliability of the Dutch language short Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury scale (short ACL-RSI-NL) in recreational athletes undergoing rehabilitation after ACL injury or ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

The original 12-item version of the ACL-RSI had been translated into Dutch. Short ACL-RSI-NL items were derived from this 12-item Dutch version. Content validity was evaluated by a team consisting of eight ACL experts and eight athletes. A cohort of 115 athletes with ACL injury or after ACLR completed the short ACL-RSI-NL and related questionnaires at various time points during their rehabilitation. Construct validity (hypothesis testing using Spearman correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), floor and ceiling effects (percentage of athletes having the lowest or highest score possible), and structural validity (exploratory factor analysis) were evaluated in the entire ACL athlete group. Test-retest reliability (using intra-class correlation, ICC; standard error of measurement, SEM; smallest detectable change, SDC, at both group and individual levels) was investigated in a subgroup of athletes with a stable outcome on psychological readiness within a two-week interval (n ​= ​27).

RESULTS

The short ACL-RSI-NL demonstrated good construct validity (83% of hypotheses confirmed). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha 0.84), and there were no floor and ceiling effects (≤13.9% lowest or highest score). Test-retest reliability was good (ICC 0.89 with 95% CI 0.77-0.95, SEM 6.93, SDC individual level 19.2, SDC group level 3.7). Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the presence of a single underlying factor (accounting for 56.4% of the total variance of the score).

CONCLUSION

The short ACL-RSI-NL exhibited good to excellent construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. An averaged score ranging from 0 to 100 can be used to measure psychological readiness to return to sport. The short ACL-RSI-NL has potential for use in day-to-day practice to assess the psychological readiness of recreational athletes to return to sport after ACL injury or ACLR during their rehabilitation process.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in a Heterogeneous Sample of Post-Operative Patients

Background

The International Knee Document Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) is a patient-reported outcome measure used in orthopedics and sports medicine. Further psychometric assessment is necessary to confirm measurement properties in a large, heterogenous sample.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the IKDC-SKF in a large, heterogenous sample.

Study Design

Cross-Sectional Study.

Methods

An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to identify a sound latent structure and to assess internal consistency in a large sample of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to confirm structural validity. Multi-group invariance was conducted to assess factorial stability across sex and age groups, while longitudinal invariance procedures were performed to assess stability over time.

Results

A 3-factor, 9-item IKDC-SKF short form was identified with EFA procedures. The model was confirmed with CFA (CFI = 0.983; TLI = 0.975; IFI = 0.983; RMSEA = 0.057), while a sound 2-factor, 6-item model was also identified (CFI = 1.0; TLI = 0.999; IFI = 1.0; RMSEA = 0.11). The 9-item IKDC-SKF short form was invariant across groups but not time; removal of a single item (i.e., 8-item IKDC-SKF short form) resulted in longitudinal invariance. The 6-item IKDC-SKF short form was invariant across groups and time.

Conclusion

The 6-item, 8-item, and 9-item short form versions of the IKDC-SKF exceed contemporary fit recommendations and present as plausible alternatives to the IKDC-SKF with improved measurement properties, reduced scale response burden, and evidence of multi-group and longitudinal invariance. Further, the 6- and 8-item IKDC-SKF short forms may be used to assess group differences or change across time.# Level of evidence hereLevel 3©The Author(s).

Good stability and mid-term subjective outcomes after repeated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery using allografts

PURPOSE

To evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients who underwent multiple ACL revision reconstructions. The hypothesis was that patients with pre-existing meniscal deficiency conditions, malalignment and cartilage degeneration would have obtained lower results.

METHODS

All cases of multiple ACL revisions performed with allograft tissue at one single sport-medicine institution were extracted and patients with a minimum 2 years of follow-up were included. WOMAC, Lhysolm, IKDC, and Tegner activity level before the injury and at last follow-up was collected and laxity evaluated with KT-1000 arthrometer and KiRA triaxial accelerometer.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 241 ACL revisions, 28 patients (12%) with Repeated ACL Revision reconstructions were included. Fourteen cases (50%) were considered "Complex" due to the addition of meniscal allograft transplantation (8) or meniscal scaffold (3) or high tibial osteotomy (3). The remaining 14 cases (50%) were considered as "Isolate". The mean WOMAC score was 84.6 ± 11.4, Lysholm 81.7 ± 12.3, subjective IKDC 77.2 ± 12.1, and median Tegner score 6 (IQR 5-6) at pre-injury and at final follow-up. Statistically significant inferior values of WOMAC (p = 0.008), Lysholm (p = 0.02) and Subjective IKDC (p = 0.0193) were detected between "Complex" and "Isolate" revision groups. Higher average values of anterior translation at KT-1000 at both 125 N (p = 0.03) and manual maximum displacement test (p = 0.03) were reported in "Complex" with respect to "Isolate" revisions. Four patients were considered as failures and occurred in patients with "Complex" revisions, none occurred in the "Isolate" (30% vs 0%; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Good mid-term clinical results can be obtained after repeated ACL revision with allograft in patients who experienced multiple failures; however, those who need additional procedure due to malalignment or post-meniscectomy syndrome reported lower objective and subjective results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Concomitant periarticular fractures predict worse patient-reported outcomes in multiligament knee injuries: a matched cohort study

AIM

There is a shortage of high-level evidence regarding periarticular fractures affect outcomes after MLKIs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether concomitant periarticular fractures with mutliligament knee injuries (MLKIs) predict worse patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) when compared to MLKIs without concomitant periarticular fractures after surgical repair and/or reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who sustained MLKIs from January 1, 2009 to June 1, 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients aged 18-65 years with grade III injuries of two or more knee ligaments and 1-year minimum follow-up were included. Patients with injuries or surgeries to either knee before their MLKIs were excluded. Radiographs and computed tomography imaging obtained at the time of injury were used to detect concomitant periarticular fractures. Patients with and without concomitant periarticular fractures were matched on a 1:2 basis, respectively. Multiple PROMs were collected, including the IKDC Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The independent t-test was used to compare PROMs between patients with and without periarticular fractures.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (10 males, 8 females) with a mean follow-up of 4.0 years (range 1.1-8.6 years) were included in the final analysis, with six patients having MLKIs and concomitant periarticular fractures. Compared to patients with isolated ligamentous MLKIs (n   =  12), patients with concomitant periarticular fracture (n = 6) demonstrated significantly worse outcomes on the IKDC-SKF (54.2 ± 13.3 vs. 74.0 ± 19.6, p = 0.04) and KOOS-Sports and Recreation subscale (41.2 ± 32.4 vs. 70.8 ± 19.4, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a periarticular fracture predicted significantly worse clinical outcomes in the setting of MLKI. These findings may be useful in determining the prognosis of MLKI with concomitant periarticular fractures treated with surgical repair and/or reconstruction.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Romanian Marx Activity Rating Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

AIM

We aimed to translate, cross-cultural adapt and validate the Marx activity rating scale (MARS) of the knee for Romanian patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHOD

The original English form was translated according to guidelines. We included patients with ACL injury undergoing reconstruction in two centers over 3 years. Subjects completed the translated MARS, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form and EuroQol EQ5D. The examining physician completed the Tegner Lysholm scale as an objective evaluation. Re-testing was obtained after one month. We used Spearman`s correlation to evaluate construct validity and reproducibility, Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and intraclass correlation for test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

We collected valid forms from 99 patients (32.1 ± 8.8 years, 64.6% males) during the preoperative evaluation and 45 were re-tested. Significant, very good correlations were found between the MARS and Tegner Lysholm (Spearman's r = 0.712, p < 0.0001) and IKDC (Spearman's r = 0.801, p < 0.0001). Cronbach's alpha was 0.893 at the initial completion and 0.799 at re-test. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.895.

CONCLUSIONS

The Romanian-translated MARS is a valid, consistent and reliable physical activity outcome measure in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Postural stability during visual-based cognitive and motor dual-tasks after ACLR

OBJECTIVES

Determine the effect of visual-based motor and cognitive dual tasking on postural stability in those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction relative to matched controls.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

METHODS

Fourteen volunteers with history of anterior crucaite ligament reconstruction were matched with fourteen healthy controls. Participants performed single leg balance tasks under 4 conditions: (1) single leg balance with eyes-open, (2) single leg balance while catching a ball (dual-motor), (3) single leg balance while repeating a string of numbers in reverse order after viewing them (dual-cognitive) and (4) single leg balance with eyes-closed. Participants completed several patient-reported outcomes of knee function. Mixed effects models were used to identify group differences on the center of pressure measures of ellipse area and root-mean-squared excursion (medial-lateral and anterior-posterior). The mixed models included subject pair as a random factor and group (control, anterior cruciate liagement reconstruction), balance condition (eyes-open, eyes-closed, dual-cognitive, and dual-motor), and group*condition as fixed effects. Tukey post-hoc pairwise comparisons were performed for significant interaction and main effects with an α=0.05.

RESULTS

A significant group by condition interaction was observed for ellipse area and medial-lateral root-mean-squared excursion. The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group had higher ellipse area (p=0.002, d=0.44) and medial-lateral root-mean-squared excursion (p<0.001, d=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

Postural stability is greatly impaired under eyes-closed and dual-motor conditions relative to eyes-open. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed individuals have greater postural instability during the dual-cognitive condition that may indicate unique neural processing deficits remain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries, validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires. In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.

No difference between full thickness and partial thickness quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to compare outcomes and complication profiles of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) between full thickness (FT-Q) and partial thickness (PT-Q) quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts.

METHODS

As per PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were searched in September 2017 for English language, human studies of all levels of evidence on patients undergoing primary ACL-R with FT-Q or PT-Q. This search was repeated in March 2018 to capture additional articles. Data regarding postoperative outcomes and complications were abstracted. Due to heterogeneous reporting, data were not combined in meta-analysis and were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

Upon screening 3670 titles, 18 studies satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. The second search identified an additional two studies for a total of 20 studies (50% case-control, 50% case series). These studies examined 1212 patients (1219 knees) of mean age 29.8 years (range 15-59) followed a mean of 42.2 months (range 12-120). FT-Q and PT-Q autografts were used in eight studies (50.5% of knees), and thirteen studies (49.5% of knees), respectively. Only one study directly compared FT-Q to PT-Q. Instrumented laxity was less than 3 mm in 74.8 and 72.4% of the FT-Q and PT-Q groups, respectively. Postoperative IKDC Subjective Knee Form scores were similar between the FT-Q (82.5) and PT-Q (82.1) groups. Postoperative quadriceps strength, measured as a percentage of the contralateral side, were similar in the FT-Q (89.5%) and PT-Q (85.1%) groups. Graft failure rates for the FT-Q and PT-Q groups were 3.7 and 3.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Across the 20 studies included in this review, there appeared to be no difference in outcomes or complications between either FT-Q or PT-Q in primary ACL-R. Moreover, primary ACL-R using QT autografts appears to have successful outcomes with a low rate of graft failure, irrespective of tendon thickness. While further comparative studies are needed to better delineate the optimal thickness of quadriceps tendon for primary ACL-R, these data suggest that, in primary ACL-R, either FT-Q or PT-Q is efficacious and, in the clinical setting, surgeons may be justified in using either graft thickness.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.

Patient Characteristics and Predictors of Return to Sport at 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Importance of Patient Age and Postoperative Rehabilitation

Background:

Preventing and mitigating the risk of reinjury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) rest on variables including age, surgical restoration of knee stability, adequate physical function, and thorough and complete postoperative rehabilitation, but to what degree these factors influence return to sport is unclear.

Purpose:

To investigate factors predictive of return to sport 12 months after ACLR. The factors specifically evaluated were strength, hop function, self-reported knee function, patient age, and quality of postoperative rehabilitation.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

This study evaluated 113 patients approximately 12 months after ACLR using a rehabilitation grading tool, the subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, and a return-to-sport battery consisting of maximal isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring strength and 4 functional hop tests. Mann-Whitney U tests and chi-square analyses were used to determine differences between patients who had or had not returned to sport. A subsequent binary logistic hierarchical regression determined the factors predictive of a patient’s return to sport. In those patients who had returned to sport, relationships between either age or level of rehabilitation and passing the return-to-sport battery were also investigated.

Results:

Complete rehabilitation (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 7.95; P = .009), age ≤25 years (adjusted OR, 3.84; P = .024), and higher IKDC scores (P < .001) were predictive of return to sport at 12 months. In participants who had returned to sport, 21% passed the return-to-sport battery compared with only 5% who did not. Of those who had returned to sport, 37% who underwent complete rehabilitation passed the return-to-sport battery as opposed to 5% who underwent incomplete rehabilitation. In patients aged ≤25 years, only 48% underwent complete rehabilitation, despite having returned to sport. Additionally, in this group of patients, 40% underwent complete rehabilitation and passed the physical performance battery as opposed to only 4% who did not undergo complete rehabilitation.

Conclusion:

Younger patients and higher subjective IKDC scores were predictive of return to sport. Patients who completed 6 months of rehabilitation incorporating jumping and agility tasks had a higher rate of return to sport, suggesting that postoperative rehabilitation is important in predicting return to sport. Specialists and physical therapists alike should stress the importance of thorough postoperative rehabilitation and adequate neuromuscular strength and function to patients whose goals are to return to sport.