No difference in outcome between early versus delayed weight-bearing following microfracture surgery of the hip, knee or ankle: a systematic review of outcomes and complications

Management of chondral and osteochondral lesions of the hip : A comprehensive review

Chondral and osteochondral lesions encompass several acute or chronic defects of the articular cartilage and/or subchondral bone. These lesions can result from several different diseases and injuries, including osteochondritis dissecans, osteochondral defects, osteochondral fractures, subchondral bone osteonecrosis, and insufficiency fractures. As the cartilage has a low capacity for regeneration and self-repair, these lesions can progress to osteoarthritis. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the subject matter that it covers. PubMed, Scopus and Google Scholar were accessed using the following keywords: "chondral lesions/defects of the femoral head", "chondral/cartilage lesions/defects of the acetabulum", "chondral/cartilage lesions/defects of the hip", "osteochondral lesions of the femoral head", "osteochondral lesions of the acetabulum", "osteochondral lesions of the hip", "osteochondritis dissecans," "early osteoarthritis of the hip," and "early stage avascular necrosis". Hip osteochondral injuries can cause significant damage to the articular surface and diminish the quality of life. It can be difficult to treat such injuries, especially in patients who are young and active. Several methods are used to treat chondral and osteochondral injuries of the hip, such as mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based treatment, surgical repair, and microfractures. Realignment of bony anatomy may also be necessary for optimal outcomes. Despite several treatments being successful, there is a lack of head-to-head comparisons and large sample size studies in the current literature. Additional research will be required to provide appropriate clinical recommendations for treating chondral/osteochondral injuries of the hip joint.

Is Early or Delayed Weightbearing the Better Choice After Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries requiring surgery. Arthroscopic microfracture treatment is effective and acceptable. Although the concept of postoperative rehabilitation is continuously being updated, the choice between early weightbearing (EWB) versus delayed weightbearing (DWB) following microfracture is still not settled. A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to compare the rehabilitation effect of 2 different weightbearing protocols following microfracture. Five databases were searched for relevant studies, and full-text articles comparing EWB and DWB were reviewed. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to summarize the results of the included studies. Two reviewers independently filtered the studies, assessed quality, extracted data, and estimated the risk of bias. The pain score and functional assessment of the ankle were selected as the endpoints. The mean difference was calculated as the summary statistic for continuous data. Then, visual analog scale and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale scores were collected and pooled. Five randomized controlled trials including 283 patients were identified for this study, revealing that there was no significant difference in pain scores between EWB and DWB following microfracture 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Function assessment showed similar results. Comprehensive analysis of current evidence still suggests that EWB and DWB after microfracture of OLT produce comparable clinical outcomes in terms of pain and functional activity. Therefore, EWB is recommended to shorten the length of time before returning to work or sports after microfracture of OLT.

Recent strategies in cartilage repair: A systemic review of the scaffold development and tissue engineering

Osteoarthritis results in irreparable loss of articular cartilage. Due to its avascular nature and low mitotic activity, cartilage has little intrinsic capacity for repair. Cartilage loss leads to pain, physical disability, movement restriction, and morbidity. Various treatment strategies have been proposed for cartilage regeneration, but the optimum treatment is yet to be defined. Tissue engineering with engineered constructs aimed towards developing a suitable substrate may help in cartilage regeneration by providing the mechanical, biological and chemical support to the cells. The use of scaffold as a substrate to support the progenitor cells or autologous chondrocytes has given promising results. Leakage of cells, poor cell survival, poor cell differentiation, inadequate integration into the host tissue, incorrect distribution of cells, and dedifferentiation of the normal cartilage are the common problems in tissue engineering. Current research is focused on improving mechanical and biochemical properties of scaffold to make it more efficient. The aim of this review is to provide a critical discussion on existing challenges, scaffold type and properties, and an update on ongoing recent developments in the architecture and composition of scaffold to enhance the proliferation and viability of mesenchymal stem cells. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 2343-2354, 2017.