1
|
Du EX, Betts KA, Wang T, Kitchen SA, He X, Yin X, Guttenplan SB, Beauchamp K, Delgado A, Rosenblatt L. Long-Term Temporal Trends of Real-World Healthcare Costs Associated with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab and Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib as First-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncol Ther 2024:10.1007/s40487-024-00297-0. [PMID: 39127872 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-024-00297-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) and pembrolizumab plus axitinib (PEM + AXI) are first-line (1L) treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC), although the long-term trends in their associated real-world healthcare costs are not well defined. We compared the real-world healthcare costs of patients with aRCC who received 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI over 24 months. METHODS Adults with RCC and secondary malignancy who initiated 1L NIVO + IPI or PEM + AXI were identified in the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (01/01/2004 to 09/30/2021). All-cause and RCC-related healthcare costs (unadjusted and adjusted) were assessed per patient per month (PPPM) at 6-month intervals post-treatment initiation (index date) up to 24 months, and differences between the NIVO + IPI and PEM + AXI cohorts were compared. RESULTS Of 325 patients with aRCC, 219 received NIVO + IPI and 106 received PEM + AXI as the 1L treatment. According to patients' follow-up length, the analyses for months 7-12 included 210 patients in the NIVO + IPI cohort and 103 in the PEM + AXI cohort; months 13-18 included 119 and 48 patients, respectively; and months 19-24 included 81 and 25 patients. PPPM unadjusted all-cause total costs were $46,348 for NIVO + IPI and $38,097 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $26,840 versus $27,983, respectively, in months 7-12; $22,899 versus $25,137 in months 13-18; and $22,279 versus $27,947 in months 19-24. PPPM unadjusted RCC-related costs were $44,059 for NIVO + IPI and $36,456 for PEM + AXI in months 1-6; $25,144 versus $26,692, respectively, in months 7-12; $21,645 versus $23,709 in months 13-18; and $20,486 versus $25,515 in months 19-24. PPPM costs declined more rapidly for patients receiving NIVO + IPI compared to those receiving PEM + AXI, resulting in significantly lower all-cause costs associated with NIVO + IPI during months 19-24 (difference - $10,914 [95% confidence interval - $21,436, - $1091]) and RCC-related costs during months 7-12 (- $4747 [(- $8929, - $512]) and 19-24 (- $10,261 [- $20,842, - $421]) after adjustment. Cost savings for NIVO + IPI versus PEM + AXI were driven by differences in drug costs which, after adjustment, were significantly lower in months 7-12 (difference - $5555 [all-cause], - $5689 [RCC-related]); 13-18 (- $7217 and - $6870, respectively); and 19-24 (- $16,682 and - $16,125). CONCLUSION Although the real-world PPPM healthcare costs of 1L NIVO + IPI were higher compared with PEM + AXI in the first 6 months of treatment, the costs associated with NIVO + IPI rapidly declined thereafter, resulting in significantly lower costs vs. PEM + AXI from months 7 to 24.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Xuanhao He
- Analysis Group, Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xin Yin
- Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zarba M, Fujiwara R, Yuasa T, Koga F, Heng DYC, Takemura K. Multidisciplinary systemic and local therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024; 24:693-703. [PMID: 38813778 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2362192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systemic and local therapies for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are often challenging despite the evolution of multimodal cancer therapies in the last decade. In this review, we will focus on recent multidisciplinary approaches for patients with mRCC. AREAS COVERED Systemic therapies for patients with mRCC have been garnering attention particularly after the approval of immuno-oncology (IO) agents, including anti-programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1. IO combinations have significantly prolonged overall survival in patients with mRCC in the first-line setting. Regarding local therapies, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has become less common in the post-Cancer du Rein Metastatique Nephrectomie et Antiangiogéniques (CARMENA) trial era, even though CN may still benefit selected patients with mRCC. In addition, metastasis-directed local therapies, namely metastasectomy or stereotactic radiotherapy, particularly for oligo-metastatic lesions or brain metastases, may have a prognostic impact. Several ablative techniques are also evolving while maintaining high local control rates with acceptable safety. EXPERT OPINION Multimodal cancer therapies are essential for conquering complex cases of mRCC. Modern systemic therapies including IO-based combination therapy as well as local therapies including CN, metastasectomy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and ablative techniques appear to improve oncologic outcomes of patients with mRCC, although appropriate patient selection is indispensable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Zarba
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Ryo Fujiwara
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Department of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Kosuke Takemura
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ohba K, Nakanishi H, Kawada K, Nakamura Y, Mitsunari K, Matsuo T, Mochizuki Y, Imamura R. Predictive factors of nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:827-832. [PMID: 38651176 PMCID: PMC11228832 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Nivolumab plus ipilimumab is a recommended first-line therapy regimen for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, it is not clear which patient characteristics are associated with its effectiveness. METHODS We retrospectively examined 67 metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab as a first-line therapy in multiple institutions from September 2018 to August 2022. We analyzed the relationships between survival outcomes and patient-related variables, including paraneoplastic symptoms. We also analyzed the relationships between changes in symptoms and parameters and outcomes. RESULTS Of the 67 patients, 32 patients had paraneoplastic symptoms. The median progression-free survival was 14.9 months and median overall survival was 43.3 months. The objective response rate was 49.25% (33 patients), including two patients with complete response. Patients with cytoreductive nephrectomy, bone metastasis, high C-reactive protein levels and paraneoplastic symptoms were significantly correlated with short progression-free survival in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis of these factors showed that the presence of paraneoplastic symptoms at treatment initiation remained an independent predictor of progression-free survival. Of the 32 patients with paraneoplastic symptoms at treatment initiation, 12 patients had symptomatic improvement and 20 did not. The 1-year progression-free survival rates were significantly longer in improved patients compared with those with no improvement. CONCLUSIONS Patients without cytoreductive nephrectomy and with bone metastasis, liver metastasis, high C-reactive protein levels and paraneoplastic symptoms were significantly correlated with shorter progression-free survival. The presence of paraneoplastic symptoms was an independent predictor of progression-free survival. Improvement in paraneoplastic symptoms may reflect the treatment efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kojiro Ohba
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiromi Nakanishi
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ken Kawada
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Nakamura
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kensuke Mitsunari
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Matsuo
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yasushi Mochizuki
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Imamura
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Badiola LB, Milagro NL, Lavín DC, Peraita SL, Ibarbia MA, Kareaga MM, Fernández Del Rivero TDP, Otero DSDP, López VA, Fernández CÁ, Emborujo AL, Arnaiz IG, Rodríguez RF, Verdún-Aguilar J, Sagastibeltza N, Duran I. RENO Study: Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns and survival results in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Northern Spain. Semin Oncol 2024; 51:77-86. [PMID: 38604897 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current available evidence on the management of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) in real life is scarce in our environment. We present a summary of the existing real-world data and the results of an analysis describing the clinical characteristics, treatments, and health outcomes of patients with mRCC in northern Spain. METHODS Retrospective observational study. Adult patients diagnosed with mRCC between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019 were included. Epidemiological, efficacy and toxicity data were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 829 patients were included (median age at diagnosis:63 years;73% men). Median follow-up was 180 months. The preponderant histology was clear cell (85%). In 50% the initial diagnosis was advanced disease. The distribution according to IMDC prognosis was good (24%), intermediate (50%) and poor (26%). The most frequent metastatic locations were lung (68.3%) and lymph node (41.0%). Most patients (95%) received a first line (1L) systemic treatment, 60% were treated with a second line (2L) of therapy and 37% received third line (3L). A VEGFR-TKIs was the most common treatment (1L: 90%, n = 507; 2L: 49%, n = 233; 3L: 54%, n = 156) followed by mTOR inhibitors (1L: 2%, n = 4; 2L: 27%, n = 126; 3L: 23%, n = 68) and immunotherapy (1L: 3.7%, n = 25; 2L: 27%, n = 126). Median OS was 24.5 months in the general population. According to IMDC prognostic groups, OS was 52.5, 25.7 and 9 months respectively. From the start of the 1L, 2L, and 3L treatment, median PFS was: 1L: 7.8 (6.8-9.0); 2L: 4.9 (4.3-5.5); 3L: 4.3 (3.8-4.8) months. No unexpected toxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS The Real-World Data on the management of mRCC in Northern Spain are comparable in epidemiology, efficacy, and safety to studies conducted in other areas of the world. The significant reduction in the number of patients receiving second and subsequent lines of therapy hampers the access to new therapies developed in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Diego Cacho Lavín
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ricardo Fernández Rodríguez
- Hospital Universitario de Cruces e Instituto Oncológico IMQ Bilbao, Bilbao, Spain - Clínica IMQ Zorrotzaurre, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | | - Naiara Sagastibeltza
- Medical Oncology Departments: Hospital Universitario Donostia-OSI Donostialdea, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dipasquale A, Barigazzi C, Losurdo A, Persico P, Di Muzio A, Navarria P, Pessina F, van den Bent M, Santoro A, Simonelli M. Brain metastases and next-generation anticancer therapies: a survival guide for clinicians. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104239. [PMID: 38128629 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Historically, patients with brain metastases (BMs) have been characterized by few systemic treatment options and poor prognosis. The recent introduction of next-generation anticancer therapies such as molecular targeted agents and immunotherapy have revolutionized the clinical decision-making process of this sub-population, posing new challenges to physicians. In this review, current evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies in patients with BMs are discussed, with a focus on lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and renal cell carcinoma, providing suggestions and potential workflows for daily clinical practice. Several other on-going and future challenges, such as clinical trials design, ways to improve CNS penetration of novel drugs and unique molecular characteristics of BMs, are also discussed. The aim is producing an updated and easy-to-read guide for physicians, to improve decision-making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Dipasquale
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Barigazzi
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Agnese Losurdo
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Pasquale Persico
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Di Muzio
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Pessina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Armando Santoro
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Simonelli
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takemura K, Lemelin A, Ernst MS, Wells JC, Saliby RM, El Zarif T, Labaki C, Basappa NS, Szabados B, Powles T, Davis ID, Wood LA, Lalani AKA, McKay RR, Lee JL, Meza L, Pal SK, Donskov F, Yuasa T, Beuselinck B, Gebrael G, Agarwal N, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC. Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving First-line Therapies: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Eur Urol 2024:S0302-2838(24)00005-8. [PMID: 38290965 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Patients with brain metastases (BrM) from renal cell carcinoma and their outcomes are not well characterized owing to frequent exclusion of this population from clinical trials. We analyzed data for patients with or without BrM using the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). A total of 389/4799 patients (8.1%) had BrM on initiation of systemic therapy. First-line immuno-oncology (IO)-based combination therapy was associated with longer median overall survival (OS; 32.7 mo, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.3-not reached) versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy (20.6 mo, 95% CI 15.7-24.5; p = 0.019), as were intensive focal therapies with stereotactic radiotherapy or neurosurgery (31.4 mo, 95% CI 22.3-37.5) versus whole-brain radiotherapy alone or no focal therapy (16.5 mo, 95% CI 10.2-21.1; p = 0.028). On multivariable analysis, IO-based regimens (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25-0.97; p = 0.040) and stereotactic radiotherapy or neurosurgery (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.78; p = 0.003) were independently associated with longer OS, as was IMDC favorable or intermediate risk (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). Intensive systemic and focal therapies were associated with better prognosis in this population. Further studies should explore the clinical effectiveness of multimodal strategies. PATIENT SUMMARY: In a large group of patients with advanced kidney cancer, we found that 8.1% had brain metastases when starting systemic therapy. Patients with brain metastases had significantly poorer prognosis than those without brain metastases. Receipt of combination immunotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, or neurosurgery was associated with longer overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kosuke Takemura
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | - Matthew S Ernst
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Talal El Zarif
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chris Labaki
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ian D Davis
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, Australia
| | - Lori A Wood
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Rana R McKay
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Luis Meza
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Frede Donskov
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Takeshi Yuasa
- Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Georges Gebrael
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah NJ, Sura SD, Shinde R, Shi J, Singhal PK, Robert NJ, Vogelzang NJ, Perini RF, Motzer RJ. Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Current Treatment Era. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:110-118. [PMID: 36874600 PMCID: PMC9974999 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immuno-oncology (IO) agents and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment paradigm for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Data on real-world usage and outcomes are limited. Objective To examine real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for mRCC. Design setting and participants This retrospective cohort study included 1538 patients with mRCC who received first-line treatment with pembrolizumab + axitinib (P + A; n = 279, 18%), ipilimumab + nivolumab (I + N; n = 618, 40%), or TKI monotherapy (TKIm; cabozantinib, sunitinib, pazopanib, or axitinib; n = 641, 42%) between January 1, 2018 and September 30, 2020 in US Oncology Network/non-network practices. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The relationship with outcomes, time on treatment (ToT), time to next treatment (TTNT), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models. Results and limitations The median age of the cohort was 67 yr (interquartile range 59.5-74.4), 70% were male, 79% had clear cell RCC, and 87% had an intermediate or poor International mRCC Database Consortium risk score. The median ToT was 13.6 for P + A versus 5.8 for I + N versus 3.4 mo for TKIm (p < 0.001) and the median TTNT was 16.4 for P + A versus 8.3 for I + N versus 8.4 mo for TKIm (p < 0.001) . Median OS was not reached for P + A, 27.6 mo for I + N, and 26.9 mo for TKIm (p = 0.237). On adjusted multivariable analysis, treatment with P + A was associated with better ToT (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.72 vs I + N; 0.37, 95% CI, 0.30-0.45 vs TKIm; p < 0.0001) and better TTNT (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.77 vs I + N; 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.67 vs TKIm; p < 0.0001). Limitations include the retrospective design and the limited follow-up for characterization of survival. Conclusions We noted substantial uptake of IO-based therapies in the first-line community oncology setting since their approval. In addition, the study provides insights into clinical effectiveness, tolerability, and/or compliance of IO-based therapies. Patient summary We examined the use of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic kidney cancer. The findings suggest rapid implementation of these new treatments by oncologists working in the community setting, which is reassuring for patients with this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil J Shah
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Reshma Shinde
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Robert J Motzer
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang W, Liu W, Yang Y, Xiao C, Xiao Y, Tan X, Pang Q, Wu H, Hua M, Shi X. Integrative analysis of transcriptomic landscape and urinary signature reveals prognostic biomarkers for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1102623. [PMID: 37035174 PMCID: PMC10079990 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1102623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients with venous tumor thrombus (VTT) have poor prognosis. We aimed to reveal features of ccRCC with VTT and develop a urine-based prognostic classifier to predict ccRCC prognosis through integrative analyses of transcriptomic landscape and urinary signature. Methods RNA sequencing was performed in five patients with ccRCC thrombus-tumor-normal tissue triples, while mass spectrometry was performed for urine samples from 12 ccRCC and 11 healthy controls. A urine-based classifier consisting of three proteins was developed to predict patients' survival and validated in an independent cohort. Results Transcriptomic analysis identified 856 invasion-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Furthermore, proteomic analysis showed 133 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Integration of transcriptomic landscape and urinary signature reveals 6 urinary detectable proteins (VSIG4, C3, GAL3ST1, TGFBI, AKR1C3, P4HB) displaying abundance changes consistent with corresponding genes in transcriptomic profiling. According to TCGA database, VSIG4, TGFBI, and P4HB were significantly overexpressed in patients with shorter survival and might be independent prognostic factors for ccRCC (all p<0.05). A prognostic classifier consisting of the three DEPs highly associated with survival performed satisfactorily in predicting overall survival (HR=2.0, p<0.01) and disease-free survival (HR=1.6, p<0.001) of ccRCC patients. The ELISA analysis of urine samples from an independent cohort confirmed the satisfied predictive power of the classifier for pathological grade (AUC=0.795, p<0.001) and stage (AUC=0.894, p<0.001). Conclusion Based on integrative analyses of transcriptomic landscape and urinary signature, the urine-based prognostic classifier consisting of VSIG4, TGFBI, and P4HB has satisfied predictive power of ccRCC prognosis and may facilitate ccRCC molecular subtyping and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiren Yang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengwu Xiao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yutian Xiao
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaojie Tan
- Department of Epidemiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingyang Pang
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Han Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meimian Hua
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xiaolei Shi, ; Meimian Hua,
| | - Xiaolei Shi
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Xiaolei Shi, ; Meimian Hua,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haghpanah M, Azimi A, Fadavi P, Bagheri SM, Arefpour AM. The Complete Response of a Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic to Brain, Lungs, and Liver to Second-Line Nivolumab: A Case Report. Cureus 2022; 14:e29680. [PMID: 36321052 PMCID: PMC9615099 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a therapeutic challenge to clinicians since it shows significant resistance to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. With the introduction of immunotherapy, the treatment paradigm for RCC has evolved. Here, we describe the case of a 55-year-old male who presented with flank pain. An abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a right renal mass. Following open right radical nephrectomy, first-line treatment with sunitinib was administered. After four months he developed multiple metastases to the liver, lungs, abdominal wall, and brain. He initiated second-line treatment with nivolumab and also received whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Six months following combined treatment with nivolumab and WBRT, a CT scan revealed complete radiologic response in the lungs, abdominal wall, brain, and liver except for the persistence of a subhepatic mass. Despite the discontinuation of nivolumab and starting bevacizumab due to financial problems, the patient was stable for 22 months, and after this, he was hospitalized with high bilirubin levels. An abdominal CT scan detected the development of the necrotic subhepatic mass compressing the common bile duct (CBD), with no other sign of metastatic disease. We believe that the explanation for this long-term disease control could be the combination of immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) with WBRT resulting in significant cranial and extracranial immune response, known as "the abscopal effect". This report highlights the importance of local therapy combined with ICI-based therapy in metastatic RCC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tiako Meyo M, Chen J, Goldwasser F, Hirsch L, Huillard O. A Profile of Avelumab Plus Axitinib in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2022; 18:683-698. [PMID: 35837579 PMCID: PMC9275425 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s263832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Until recently, the approved first-line treatment for metastatic RCC (mRCC) consisted of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR) monotherapy. The landscape of first-line treatment has been transformed in the last few years with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or VEGFR TKI plus ICI combinations. This article focuses on the profile of one of these ICI plus VEGFR TKI combination, avelumab plus axitinib. We detail the characteristics of each drug separately, and then we explore the rationale for their association, its efficacy and the resulting toxicity. Finally, we examine the factors associated with avelumab plus axitinib outcomes, and their impact on therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuela Tiako Meyo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group (CERTIM), AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Jeanne Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group (CERTIM), AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Francois Goldwasser
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group (CERTIM), AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Laure Hirsch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group (CERTIM), AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Huillard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Immunomodulatory Therapies Multidisciplinary Study Group (CERTIM), AP-HP, APHP.Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chen S, Zhang E, Jiang L, Wang T, Guo T, Gao F, Zhang N, Wang X, Zheng J. Robust Prediction of Prognosis and Immunotherapeutic Response for Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Through Deep Learning Algorithm. Front Immunol 2022; 13:798471. [PMID: 35197975 PMCID: PMC8860306 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.798471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
It is of great urgency to explore useful prognostic markers and develop a robust prognostic model for patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Three independent patient cohorts were included in this study. We applied a high-level neural network based on TensorFlow to construct the robust model by using the deep learning algorithm. The deep learning-based model (FB-risk) could perform well in predicting the survival status in the 5-year follow-up, which could also significantly distinguish the patients with high overall survival risk in three independent patient cohorts of ccRCC and a pan-cancer cohort. High FB-risk was found to be partially associated with negative regulation of the immune system. In addition, the novel phenotyping of ccRCC based on the F-box gene family could robustly stratify patients with different survival risks. The different mutation landscapes and immune characteristics were also found among different clusters. Furthermore, the novel phenotyping of ccRCC based on the F-box gene family could perform well in the robust stratification of survival and immune response in ccRCC, which might have potential for application in clinical practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siteng Chen
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Encheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Liren Jiang
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Tuanjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Pathology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Department of Urology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Junhua Zheng
- Department of Urology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|