Evaluating Antibody Pharmacokinetics as Prerequisite for Determining True Efficacy as Shown by Dual Targeting of PD-1 and CD96.
Biomedicines 2022;
10:biomedicines10092146. [PMID:
36140247 PMCID:
PMC9495994 DOI:
10.3390/biomedicines10092146]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
One important prerequisite for developing a therapeutic monoclonal antibody is to evaluate its in vivo efficacy. We tested the therapeutic potential of an anti-CD96 antibody alone or in combination with an anti-PD-1 antibody in a mouse colon cancer model. Early anti-PD-1 treatment significantly decreased tumor growth and the combination with anti-CD96 further increased the therapeutic benefit, while anti-CD96 treatment alone had no effect. In late therapeutic settings, the treatment combination resulted in enhanced CD8+ T cell infiltration of tumors and an increased CD8/Treg ratio. Measured anti-PD-1 concentrations were as expected in animals treated with anti-PD-1 alone, but lower at later time points in animals receiving combination treatment. Moreover, anti-CD96 concentrations dropped dramatically after 10 days and were undetectable thereafter in most animals due to the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies that were increasing antibody clearance. Comparison of the anti-PD-1 concentrations with tumor growth showed that higher antibody concentrations in plasma correlated with better therapeutic efficacy. The therapeutic effect of anti-CD96 treatment could not be evaluated, because plasma concentrations were too low. Our findings strongly support the notion of measuring both plasma concentration and anti-drug antibody formation throughout in vivo studies, in order to interpret pharmacodynamic data correctly.
Collapse