1
|
Liu X, Li X, Zhu C, Ji L. Effective control of postoperative recurrence of pregnancy-related gastric cancer using anti-PD-1 as a monotherapy: a case report. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1321149. [PMID: 38800370 PMCID: PMC11116784 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1321149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Pregnancy-related gastric cancer is characterized by a refractory nature and poor prognosis; few gastric cancer cases during pregnancy achieved acceptable outcomes by using anti-PD-1 as a monotherapy. A 32-year-old pregnant female patient was admitted to the emergency department of the obstetrics and gynecology department and eventually diagnosed with gastric cancer. Radical surgery for gastric cancer was conducted after the termination of pregnancy. At 1-year postoperative follow-up, tumor recurrence was revealed. This patient has achieved a decrease in tumor burden after receiving anti-PD-1 as a monotherapy. This case documents tumor response to PD-1 monotherapy in pregnancy-related gastric cancer and highlights the potential for future use in specific clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Linhua Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sereno M, Hernandez de Córdoba I, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez G, Casado E. Brain metastases and lung cancer: molecular biology, natural history, prediction of response and efficacy of immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2024; 14:1297988. [PMID: 38283359 PMCID: PMC10811213 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1297988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases stemming from lung cancer represent a common and challenging complication that significantly impacts patients' overall health. The migration of these cancerous cells from lung lesions to the central nervous system is facilitated by diverse molecular changes and a specific environment that supports their affinity for neural tissues. The advent of immunotherapy and its varied combinations in non-small cell lung cancer has notably improved patient survival rates, even in cases involving brain metastases. These therapies exhibit enhanced penetration into the central nervous system compared to traditional chemotherapy. This review outlines the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of brain metastases in lung cancer and explores the efficacy of novel immunotherapy approaches and their combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Sereno
- Medical Oncology Department, Infanta Sofía University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Fundación para la Innovación e Investigación Biomédica (FIIB) Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (HUIS) Hospital de Henares (HHEN), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Madrileño Investigación Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA), Precision Nutrition and Cancer Program, Clinical Oncology Group, IMDEA Food Institute, CEI Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Gerardo Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
- European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Fundación para la Innovación e Investigación Biomédica (FIIB) Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (HUIS) Hospital de Henares (HHEN), Madrid, Spain
- Neurology Department, Infanta Sofía University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Casado
- Medical Oncology Department, Infanta Sofía University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
- European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Fundación para la Innovación e Investigación Biomédica (FIIB) Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía (HUIS) Hospital de Henares (HHEN), Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Madrileño Investigación Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA), Precision Nutrition and Cancer Program, Clinical Oncology Group, IMDEA Food Institute, CEI Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marcon IG, Valsecchi D, Durso L, Premoli E, Sangiorgi D, Perrone V, Catena L, Degli Esposti L. Real-World Evaluation of the Management, Treatment Pathways and Outcome of Melanoma Patients with Target Therapies in Italy. Adv Ther 2023; 40:3875-3895. [PMID: 37368101 PMCID: PMC10427535 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02578-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In recent years, an increasing trend in the incidence of melanoma has been observed in Europe. Although early diagnosis and prompt intervention with local resection often results in positive outcomes, conversely, metastatic disease is still clinically challenging with a poor prognosis and a 5-year survival of around 30%. The growing awareness of melanoma biology and of antitumor immune responses has allowed the development of novel therapies targeted at specific molecular alterations occurring at advanced stages. This real-world analysis examined patients with melanoma in Italy, focusing on treatment patterns, outcome, time to discontinuation (TTD), and resource consumption. METHODS Two retrospective observational analyses were conducted for BRAF+ patients with metastatic melanoma and those with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in an adjuvant setting, retrieving data from the administrative databases covering 13.3 million residents. The cohort melanoma BRAF+ in metastatic setting comprised 729 patients with targeted therapy (TT) (n = 671 with TT as first line and 79 as second line). RESULTS Median TTD was 10.6 months in first line and 8.1 months in second line. Median overall survival from the start of first TT line was 27 months and was 11.8 months for patients with brain metastasis. In the dabrafenib plus trametinib patients, main healthcare resource consumption tended to increase in the presence of brain metastasis. The cohort with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy under adjuvant therapy (n = 289) included 8% patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib or tested BRAF+, 5% BRAF wild-type, and 10% under immunotherapy. CONCLUSION Our findings provided an overview on TT utilization on metastatic melanoma patients in real clinical practice and highlighted an increased burden in brain metastatic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Diego Sangiorgi
- CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9, 40137, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Perrone
- CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9, 40137, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Luca Degli Esposti
- CliCon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics and Outcomes Research, Via Murri, 9, 40137, Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dummer R, Welti M, Ramelyte E. The role of triple therapy and therapy sequence in treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. Response to overall survival with first-line atezolizumab in combination with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma (IMspire150): second interim analysis of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 study. J Transl Med 2023; 21:529. [PMID: 37543586 PMCID: PMC10403899 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04391-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Novel therapies have achieved unprecedented benefit in survival of advanced melanoma patients. While immunotherapy (ICI) can be administered independent of mutational status, BRAF and MEK kinase inhibitors represent another effective treatment option for patients with BRAF mutant melanoma. Given the benefits these therapies demonstrate, the natural instinct was to combine. Three studies have investigated the benefit of combination of ICI using anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody and targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors over TT and placebo. Among these studies, statistically significantly superior duration of response was observed, however overall and progression-free survival were only numerically superior, if at all. One triple combination was approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma; however, the expected synergistic effect of triple therapy could not be universally confirmed and the observed benefits with triple seem to depend on statistical considerations rather than a biological reason. As patients with BRAF mutant melanoma have both ICI and TT as their first-line treatment options, the question whether the sequence matters was addressed. Two prospective trials compared first-line ICI, followed by TT at progression, or vice-versa, with additional "sandwich" approach (8 weeks of TT followed by ICI until progression, then TT again) in the Secombit study. The benefit of first-line ICI was demonstrated in both studies with Secombit study showing the "sandwich" approach to have similar effect. Current data advices for immunotherapy based regiments in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma or, possibly, sandwich approach. Whether triple therapy is superior to ICI monotherapy still needs to be addressed considering not only efficacy, but also safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Michèle Welti
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Egle Ramelyte
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trojaniello C, Sparano F, Cioli E, Ascierto PA. Sequencing Targeted and Immune Therapy in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma: Lessons Learned. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:623-634. [PMID: 36995534 PMCID: PMC10164000 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01402-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The treatment strategy for BRAF-mutated melanoma remains unsatisfactory, although the advent of immune checkpoint inhibition has improved the prognosis of advanced melanoma. This article reports current evidence on the efficacy and safety of sequential immunotherapy with targeted therapy in patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. It discusses criteria for the use of available options in clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS Targeted therapy provides rapid disease control in a relatively high proportion of patients, although the development of secondary resistance limits the duration of responses; in contrast, immunotherapy may induce slow but more durable responses in a subset of patients. Therefore, the identification of a combination strategy for the use of these therapies seems a promising perspective. Currently, inconsistent data have been obtained, but most studies indicate that the administration of BRAFi/MEKi prior to immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy. On the contrary, several clinical and real-life studies suggest that frontline immunotherapy with subsequent targeted therapy may be associated with better tumor control than immunotherapy alone. Larger clinical studies are ongoing to confirm the efficacy and safety of this sequencing strategy for treating BRAF-mutated melanoma with immunotherapy followed by targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Trojaniello
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Sparano
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Eleonora Cioli
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Triple Combination of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and BRAF/MEK Inhibitors in BRAFV600 Melanoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225489. [PMID: 36428582 PMCID: PMC9688939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), namely programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or cytotoxic t-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, are currently the standard of care for the treatment of advanced melanoma, with robust and durable responses in a subset of patients. For BRAFV600-mutant melanoma, treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has resulted in high objective response rates, but most responses are short-lived. Preclinical data suggest that BRAF and MEK inhibitors result in immunomodulatory changes in the tumor microenvironment; early data in murine models further suggest that these changes could enhance sensitivity to ICIs. Subsequently, the notion of combining the two therapy modalities for a more effective response was further evolved in early phase clinical trials. In this review, we analyzed the results of recent phase 2 and 3 clinical trials investigating the combination of ICIs with targeted therapy in BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma. Furthermore, we evaluated the results of recent studies investigating the first-line treatment sequencing of ipilimumab/nivolumab and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in these patients. We discussed the study limitations and interpreted how these recent advances could be incorporated into the treatment landscape of advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma.
Collapse
|