Evaluation of potential biomarkers for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab among patients with advanced endometrial cancer: results from Study 111/KEYNOTE-146

Immunotherapy after progression to double immunotherapy: pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus conventional chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma after failure of PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition

Background

Programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1) inhibition as monotherapy followed by Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition in case of progression or as upfront double co-inhibition has drastically improved the survival outcomes of metastatic melanoma. Still, many patients develop primary or acquired resistance to both agents, relapse soon, and survive less. For these patients, the therapeutic options are very limited, and for many years, conventional chemotherapy (CC) was the standard of care. Recently, the phase II LEAP-004 trial supported that pembrolizumab/lenvatinib could potentially overcome anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy refractoriness.

Materials and methods

In the absence of any prospective comparative study and to evaluate in a real-world context the clinical benefit of re-administering a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, Q3W) with a multi-kinase inhibitor (lenvatinib, but at a reduced dose 10 mg p.o. daily due to its known toxicity) in this frail population of unmet need, we conducted here a retrospective comparison of LEAP-004-proposed combination with CC (carboplatin 4 AUC and dacarbazine 850 mg/m2 i.v. Q3W) in melanoma patients who relapsed to both checkpoint inhibitors, either in combinatorial or in sequential setting, between July 2022 and January 2024. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment outcomes (objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All patients were also considered for safety analysis.

Results

A total of 84 patients were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis (pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, n=39 and CC, n=45). The median age was 67 (45-87) years and 64 (34-87) years, and men were 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. The distribution of their metastatic sites was comparable, including 12.8% and 20% with brain involvement. Most patients had a good PS<2 (69.9% and 56.5%), increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (71.8% and 84.4%), BRAF-wild status (82.1% and 84.8%), and received ≥2 previous systemic therapies (61.5% and 53.3%). The median follow-up was 18 months. The ORR was 23.1% and 11.1% (p<0.0001), the median PFS was 4.8 months and 3.8 months [HR (95%CI), 0.57 (0.36-0.92); p=0.017], and the median OS was 14.2 months and 7.8 months [HR (95%CI), 0.39 (0.22-0.69), p=0.0009] in pembrolizumab/lenvatinib and CC arms, respectively. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were documented in 48.7% (pembrolizumab/lenvatinib) and 75.6% (CC) of patients (p=0.034), which led to treatment discontinuation in 10.3% and 17.8% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first comparative study in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition and showed significantly longer outcomes in cases treated with pembrolizumab/lenvatinib versus CC.

Potential prognostic predictors of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

Prognostic predictors of immunotherapy in patients with advanced endometrial cancer remain unclear. The potential role of inflammatory predictors, including pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet scores, was investigated.

METHODS

Between August 2018 and December 2023, 35 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Prognostic predictors were compared, and optimal cut-off values that exhibited the greatest discrimination for overall response, disease control, progression-free survival and overall survival were determined. Multivariate analysis was used to assess the prognostic significance of the predictors.

RESULTS

The greatest discrimination for overall response, progression-free survival and overall survival included platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte and platelet; the areas under the curve were 0.638, 0.649 and 0.641, respectively. The precise cut-off values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.92 and 5.40, respectively. The lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio group had a significantly longer progression-free survival (P = 0.001, median survival; 4.0 months vs. 19 months) and longer overall survival (P = 0.002, median survival; 5.0 months vs. 21 months). Of the risk factors assessed, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio = 4.409; 95% CI = 1.10-17.64; P = 0.036) and regimen (hazard ratio = 5.559; 95% CI = 1.26-24.49; P = 0.023) were independently correlated with overall survival.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced endometrial cancer, pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may be a prognostic predictor of those who would benefit from immunotherapy.

Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometrial cancer is the sixth commonest cancer in women worldwide, with over 417,000 diagnoses in 2020. The disease incidence has increased by 132% over the last 30 years and is set to continue to rise in response to an ageing population and increasing global rates of obesity and diabetes. A greater understanding of the mechanisms driving endometrial carcinogenesis has led to the identification of potential strategies for primary disease prevention, although prospective evaluation of their efficacy within clinical trials is still awaited. The early diagnosis of endometrial cancer is associated with improved survival, but has historically relied on invasive endometrial sampling. New, minimally invasive tests using protein and DNA biomarkers and cytology have the potential to transform diagnostic pathways and to allow for the surveillance of high-risk populations. The molecular classification of endometrial cancers has been shown to not only have a prognostic impact, but also to have therapeutic value and is increasingly used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. Advanced and recurrent disease management has also been revolutionised by increasing the use of debulking surgery and targeted treatments, particularly immunotherapy. This review summarises the recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer and seeks to identify areas for future research.