1
|
Evans DG, Green K, Burghel GJ, Forde C, Lalloo F, Schlecht H, Woodward ER. Cascade screening in HBOC and Lynch syndrome: guidelines and procedures in a UK centre. Fam Cancer 2024; 23:187-195. [PMID: 38478259 PMCID: PMC11153258 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-024-00360-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
In the 33 years since the first diagnostic cancer predisposition gene (CPG) tests in the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, there has been substantial changes in the identification of index cases and cascade testing for at-risk family members. National guidelines in England and Wales are usually determined from the National Institute of healthcare Evidence and these have impacted on the thresholds for testing BRCA1/2 in Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) and in determining that all cases of colorectal and endometrial cancer should undergo screening for Lynch syndrome. Gaps for testing other CPGs relevant to HBOC have been filled by the UK Cancer Genetics Group and CanGene-CanVar project (web ref. https://www.cangene-canvaruk.org/ ). We present time trends (1990-2020) of identification of index cases with germline CPG variants and numbers of subsequent cascade tests, for BRCA1, BRCA2, and the Lynch genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2). For BRCA1/2 there was a definite increase in the proportion of index cases with ovarian cancer only and pre-symptomatic index tests both doubling from 16 to 32% and 3.2 to > 8% respectively. A mean of 1.73-1.74 additional family tests were generated for each BRCA1/2 index case within 2 years. Overall close to one positive cascade test was generated per index case resulting in > 1000 risk reducing surgery operations. In Lynch syndrome slightly more cascade tests were performed in the first two years potentially reflecting the increased actionability in males with 42.2% of pre-symptomatic tests in males compared to 25.8% in BRCA1/2 (p < 0.0001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Gareth Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
- Division of Evolution Infection and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Kate Green
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - George J Burghel
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Claire Forde
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Helene Schlecht
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Emma R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and North-West Genomics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
- Division of Evolution Infection and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Washington AM, Foss K, Krause JH, Davis AM, Kuczynski KJ, Milko LV, Berg JS, Roberts MC. Consideration of the Beneficiary Inducement Statute on Access to Health Care Systems' Population Genetic Screening Programs. Public Health Genomics 2023; 26:183-187. [PMID: 37778346 PMCID: PMC10619584 DOI: 10.1159/000534365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora M. Washington
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly Foss
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joan H. Krause
- School of Law, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Arlene M. Davis
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kristine J. Kuczynski
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Laura V. Milko
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Megan C. Roberts
- School of Pharmacy – Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reisel D, Burnell M, Side L, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Desai R, Sanderson S, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Wardle J, Menon U, Jacobs I, Manchanda R. Jewish cultural and religious factors and uptake of population-based BRCA testing across denominations: a cohort study. BJOG 2021; 129:959-968. [PMID: 34758513 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of Jewish cultural and religious identity and denominational affiliation with interest in, intention to undertake and uptake of population-based BRCA (Breast Cancer Gene)-testing. DESIGN Cohort-study set within recruitment to GCaPPS-trial (ISRCTN73338115). SETTING London Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) population. POPULATION OR SAMPLE AJ men and women, >18 years. METHODS Participants were self-referred, and attended recruitment clinics (clusters) for pre-test counselling. Subsequently consenting individuals underwent BRCA testing. Participants self-identified to one Jewish denomination: Conservative/Liberal/Reform/Traditional/Orthodox/Unaffiliated. Validated scales measured Jewish Cultural-Identity (JI) and Jewish Religious-identity (JR). Four-item Likert-scales analysed initial 'interest' and 'intention to test' pre-counselling. Item-Response-Theory and graded-response models, modelled responses to JI and JR scales. Ordered/multinomial logistic regression modelling evaluated association of JI-scale, JR-scale and Jewish Denominational affiliation on interest, intention and uptake of BRCA testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Interest, intention, uptake of BRCA testing. RESULTS In all, 935 AJ women/men of mean age = 53.8 (S.D = 15.02) years, received pre-test education and counselling through 256 recruitment clinic clusters (median cluster size = 3). Denominational affiliations included Conservative/Masorti = 91 (10.2%); Liberal = 82 (9.2%), Reform = 135 (15.1%), Traditional = 212 (23.7%), Orthodox = 239 (26.7%); and Unaffiliated/Non-practising = 135 (15.1%). Overall BRCA testing uptake was 88%. Pre-counselling, 96% expressed interest and 60% intention to test. JI and JR scores were highest for Orthodox, followed by Conservative/Masorti, Traditional, Reform, Liberal and Unaffiliated Jewish denominations. Regression modelling showed no significant association between overall Jewish Cultural or Religious Identity with either interest, intention or uptake of BRCA testing. Interest, intention and uptake of BRCA testing was not significantly associated with denominational affiliation. CONCLUSIONS Jewish religious/cultural identity and denominational affiliation do not appear to influence interest, intention or uptake of population-based BRCA testing. BRCA testing was robust across all Jewish denominations. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Jewish cultural/religious factors do not affect BRCA testing, with robust uptake seen across all denominational affiliations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Reisel
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - M Burnell
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - L Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - K Loggenberg
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - S Gessler
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - R Desai
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK
| | - S Sanderson
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Dept Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - H Dorkins
- St Peter's College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Y Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Jacobs
- Dept Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.,University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - R Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - U Beller
- Department of Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - I Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Wardle
- Behavioral Sciences Unit, Dept Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - I Jacobs
- Institute for Women's Health, University College, London, UK.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R Manchanda
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.,Wolfson Institute of Population Health, CRUK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Primiero CA, Yanes T, Finnane A, Soyer HP, McInerney-Leo AM. A Systematic Review on the Impact of Genetic Testing for Familial Melanoma II: Psychosocial Outcomes and Attitudes. Dermatology 2021; 237:816-826. [PMID: 33508831 DOI: 10.1159/000513576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although genetic testing for known familial melanoma genes is commercially available, clinical implementation has been restrained as utility is unclear, concerns of causing psychological distress are often cited, and consumer interest and perceptions are not well understood. A review of studies exploring participant-reported psychosocial outcomes and attitudes towards genetic testing for familial melanoma will provide insight into common emotional and cognitive responses. METHODS Database searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were conducted using a date range of January 1995 to June 2020. Studies examining any psychosocial outcomes alongside genetic testing (real or hypothetical), in participants described as having a high risk of melanoma, were eligible. A narrative synthesis of results was used to describe psychosocial outcomes and summarise participant beliefs and attitudes towards genetic testing. RESULTS Limited evidence of adverse psychosocial outcomes was found. No impacts on perceived risk or control were reported, and minimal decisional regret was recorded. Generalised distress was comparable between both genetic mutation carriers and non-carriers, often decreasing over time from pretesting levels. Melanoma-specific distress was frequently higher in carriers than non-carriers; however, this difference was present prior to testing and often associated with personal melanoma history. Overall, participants' attitudes towards testing were largely positive, with benefits more frequently described than limitations, and support for testing minors was strong. CONCLUSIONS This review has found evidence of few adverse psychological outcomes following genetic testing. There was no indication of increased distress after genetic test results had been disclosed. If these findings were replicated in additional, larger, diverse populations over a longer follow-up period, this would be compelling evidence to guide clinical recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare A Primiero
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tatiane Yanes
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna Finnane
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - H Peter Soyer
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Dermatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Aideen M McInerney-Leo
- The University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia,
| |
Collapse
|