Treatment switch in Fabry disease- a matter of dose?

Effects of switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β on biomarkers, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity in fabry disease forming neutralizing antidrug antibodies: a case report

Fabry disease is an X-linked hereditary disorder caused by deficient α-galactosidase A (GLA) activity. Patients with Fabry disease are often treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT). However, ERT often induces the formation of neutralizing antidrug antibodies (ADAs), which may impair the therapeutic efficacy. Here, we report the case of a 32-year-old man with Fabry disease and resultant neutralizing ADAs who was treated by switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β. We monitored biomarkers, such as plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3), urinary globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), urinary mulberry bodies, renal and cardiac parameters, and disease severity during the treatment period. Although plasma lyso-Gb3 and urinary Gb3 levels quickly decreased within two months after the initiation of ERT with agalsidase-α, they gradually increased thereafter. The urinary mulberry bodies continued to appear. Both the ADA titer and serum mediated GLA inhibition rates started to increase after two months. Moreover, 3.5 years after ERT, the vacuolated podocyte area in the renal biopsy decreased slightly from 23.1 to 18.9%. However, plasma lyso-Gb3 levels increased, and urinary Gb3, mulberry body levels, and ADA titers remained high. Therefore, we switched to agalsidase-β which reduced, but did not normalize, plasma lyso-Gb3 levels and stabilized renal and cardiac parameters. Disease severity was attenuated. However, urinary Gb3 and mulberry body levels did not decrease noticeably in the presence of high ADA titers. The kidneys take up a small amount of the administered recombinant enzyme, and the clearance of Gb3 that has accumulated in the kidney may be limited despite the switching from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β.

Anderson-Fabry disease management: role of the cardiologist

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by glycolipid accumulation in cardiac cells, associated with a peculiar form of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Up to 1% of patients with a diagnosis of HCM indeed have AFD. With the availability of targeted therapies for sarcomeric HCM and its genocopies, a timely differential diagnosis is essential. Specifically, the therapeutic landscape for AFD is rapidly evolving and offers increasingly effective, disease-modifying treatment options. However, diagnosing AFD may be difficult, particularly in the non-classic phenotype with prominent or isolated cardiac involvement and no systemic red flags. For many AFD patients, the clinical journey from initial clinical manifestations to diagnosis and appropriate treatment remains challenging, due to late recognition or utter neglect. Consequently, late initiation of treatment results in an exacerbation of cardiac involvement, representing the main cause of morbidity and mortality, irrespective of gender. Optimal management of AFD patients requires a dedicated multidisciplinary team, in which the cardiologist plays a decisive role, ranging from the differential diagnosis to the prevention of complications and the evaluation of timing for disease-specific therapies. The present review aims to redefine the role of cardiologists across the main decision nodes in contemporary AFD clinical care and drug discovery.

An expert consensus on the recommendations for the use of biomarkers in Fabry disease

Fabry disease is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by the accumulation of glycosphingolipids in various tissues and body fluids, leading to progressive organ damage and life-threatening complications. Phenotypic classification is based on disease progression and severity and can be used to predict outcomes. Patients with a classic Fabry phenotype have little to no residual α-Gal A activity and have widespread organ involvement, whereas patients with a later-onset phenotype have residual α-Gal A activity and disease progression can be limited to a single organ, often the heart. Diagnosis and monitoring of patients with Fabry disease should therefore be individualized, and biomarkers are available to support with this. Disease-specific biomarkers are useful in the diagnosis of Fabry disease; non-disease-specific biomarkers may be useful to assess organ damage. For most biomarkers it can be challenging to prove they translate to differences in the risk of clinical events associated with Fabry disease. Therefore, careful monitoring of treatment outcomes and collection of prospective data in patients are needed. As we deepen our understanding of Fabry disease, it is important to regularly re-evaluate and appraise published evidence relating to biomarkers. In this article, we present the results of a literature review of evidence published between February 2017 and July 2020 on the impact of disease-specific treatment on biomarkers and provide an expert consensus on clinical recommendations for the use of those biomarkers.

New insights in efficacy of different enzyme replacement therapy dosages in Fabry disease: Switch studies data following agalsidase beta shortage

The update of the review on the effects of switching from agalsidase beta to alfa showed, in comparison to the previous review, an increased number of clinical events, a significant loss of renal function, and an increase in lyso Gb-3 levels, underscoring the importance of dose in the treatment of FD.

Assessment and impact of dose escalation on anti-drug antibodies in Fabry disease

Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant α-galactosidase A (AGAL) can lead to the formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADA), which significantly limit treatment efficacy in patients with Fabry disease (FD). The effects of dose escalation on ADA titer and plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb₃) level are unknown. We screened 250 FD patients (200 males, 50 females) under ERT for ADAs and assessed the impact of an approved dose escalation in affected patients, focusing on ADA titers and plasma lyso-Gb₃. ADA-positive patients were identified by serum-mediated inhibition assays, followed by titration assays to determine the individual inhibitory capacities of ADAs against agalsidase-alfa and agalsidase-beta. 70 (35%) of the male patients were ADA-positive, with a mean inhibitory capacity of 83.5 ± 113.7mg AGAL. Although patients receiving agalsidase-beta showed higher inhibitory capacities (84.7 ± 34.7mg) than patients under agalsidase-alfa (60.3 ± 126.7mg, p<0.001), the "theoretical deficit" to the infused dose was lower in patients receiving agalsidase-beta. In seven patients receiving agalsidase-alfa (0.2 mg/kg) ADAs were saturable by switching patients to agalsidase-beta (1.0 mg/kg). The switch resulted in increasing ADA titers within the first months. In 2 out of 7 (28.6%) therapy switchers, dose escalation could lead to durable ADA saturation. Independent of an increase in ADA titers, lyso-Gb₃ levels decrease and cardiac and renal parameters remained stable after dose escalation. Dose escalation results in a heterogeneous, unpredictable ADA response, with more than a quarter of all treatment switchers succeeding in ADA saturation. Longitudinal ADA measurements are required to assess the individual risk of affected patients.

Agalsidase-β should be proposed as first line therapy in classic male Fabry patients with undetectable α-galactosidase A activity

BACKGROUND

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the α-galactosidase A (GLA) gene leading to deficiency of α-galactosidase A (α-gal A). This results in progressive multisystemic glycosphingolipid accumulation, especially globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) and globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3). Enzyme replacement therapy with two recombinant enzymes, agalsidase-α and -β is approved for two different dosages. However, little is known about which enzyme is more effective in decreasing the metabolite load in male and female patients with the classic form of the disease.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, 14 consecutive adult Fabry patients (10 males) with a classic GLA-mutation, were switched from agalsidase-α to agalsidase-β at the respective licensed doses. Lyso-Gb3 levels were measured before the switch and for a period of 12 months after the switch in dried blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Mean age at start of the switch was 36.7 ± 14 years. Plasma Lyso-Gb3 levels decreased from 27.2 ± 17.9 ng/mL before the switch to 16.8 ± 10.5 ng/mL after the switch (mean reduction of 30.1%; p = 0.004). The decrease was maximal in the subgroup of 7 male patients with no or very low residual enzyme activity (mean reduction of 40.4%). However, two females with high residual enzyme activity also showed a reduction >30% after the switch. In male patients, the reduction of plasma Lyso-Gb3 correlated negatively with the residual α-gal A activity: r = -0.803; p = 0.009.

CONCLUSION

Agalsidase-β at licensed dose is significantly more effective than agalsidase-α to reduce Lyso-Gb3 levels in classic Fabry patients, and should be used as first line therapy in classic males with no residual enzyme activity.

Mechanisms of Neutralizing Anti-drug Antibody Formation and Clinical Relevance on Therapeutic Efficacy of Enzyme Replacement Therapies in Fabry Disease

Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by mutations in the α-galactosidase A (AGAL/GLA) gene. The lysosomal accumulation of the substrates globotriaosylceramide (Gb₃) and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb₃) results in progressive renal failure, cardiomyopathy associated with cardiac arrhythmia, and recurrent strokes, significantly limiting life expectancy in affected patients. Current treatment options for FD include recombinant enzyme-replacement therapies (ERTs) with intravenous agalsidase-α (0.2 mg/kg body weight) or agalsidase-β (1 mg/kg body weight) every 2 weeks, facilitating cellular Gb₃ clearance and an overall improvement of disease burden. However, ERT can lead to infusion-associated reactions, as well as the formation of neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) in ERT-treated males, leading to an attenuation of therapy efficacy and thus disease progression. In this narrative review, we provide a brief overview of the clinical picture of FD and diagnostic confirmation. The focus is on the biochemical and clinical significance of neutralizing ADAs as a humoral response to ERT. In addition, we provide an overview of different methods for ADA measurement and characterization, as well as potential therapeutic approaches to prevent or eliminate ADAs in affected patients, which is representative for other ERT-treated lysosomal storage diseases.