Han K, Lee W, Harris CP, Simsiman RC, Lee K, Kang C, Meisner LF. Comparison of chromosome aberrations in leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma using FISH on archival tissues.
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS 1994;
74:19-24. [PMID:
8194042 DOI:
10.1016/0165-4608(94)90023-x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific probes was used to study cytogenetic changes in five cases of leiomyosarcoma (LMS) and nine cases of uterine leiomyoma (LM). Biotinylated DNA probes for the centromeric regions of chromosomes 1, 6, 8, 9, 17, and 18, painting probes for chromosomes 1 and 22, and the cosmid probe for chromosome region 21q22.3 were used on nuclei isolated from paraffin blocks. Four of five LMS cases revealed major chromosomal aberrations, while the only case with minor clonal aberrations was subsequently found not to be a typical LMS. The most common numerical aberrations found in the LMS cases were extra copies of chromosome 8 (three of five cases), loss of chromosome 1 (three of five cases), and loss of chromosome 6 (two of five cases). One of two LMS cases studied with a chromosome 1 painting probe demonstrated translocations of chromosome 1. In contrast to LMS, only five of nine uterine LM cases had abnormal clones, and these were smaller than those in LMS. Two LM cases showed 9% tetrasomy 8 with 17 or 20% monosomy 6, and three other cases had monosomy 6 clones in 18-34% of cells. These results indicate that typical LMS is characterized by multiple chromosomal aberrations affecting most of the cells, whereas borderline LMS and LM have fewer affected chromosomes and less clonal involvement.
Collapse