Increased incidence of cancer in first degree relatives of women with double primary carcinomas of the breast and colon

Cross detection for odor of metabolic waste between breast and colorectal cancer using canine olfaction

Although several studies have been performed to detect cancer using canine olfaction, none have investigated whether canine olfaction trained to the specific odor of one cancer is able to detect odor related to other unfamiliar cancers. To resolve this issue, we employed breast and colorectal cancer in vitro, and investigated whether trained dogs to odor related to metabolic waste from breast cancer are able to detect it from colorectal cancer, and vice versa. The culture liquid samples used in the cultivation of cancerous cells (4T1 and CT26) were employed as an experimental group. Two different breeds of dogs were trained for the different cancer odor each other. The dogs were then tested using a double-blind method and cross-test to determine whether they could correctly detect the experimental group, which contains the specific odor for metabolic waste of familiar or unfamiliar cancer. For two cancers, both dogs regardless of whether training or non-training showed that accuracy was over 90%, and sensitivity and specificity were over 0.9, respectively. Through these results, it was verified that the superior olfactory ability of dogs can discriminate odor for metabolic waste of cancer cells from it of benign cells, and that the specific odor for metabolic waste of breast cancer has not significant differences to it of colorectal cancer. That is, it testifies that metabolic waste between breast and colorectal cancer have the common specific odor in vitro. Accordingly, a trained dogs for detecting odor for metabolic waste of breast cancer can perceive it of colorectal cancer, and vice versa. In order to the future work, we will plan in vivo experiment for the two cancers and suggest research as to what kind of cancers have the common specific odor. Furthermore, the relationship between breast and colorectal cancer should be investigated using other research methods.

Family History of Cancer in Relation to Breast Cancer Subtypes in African American Women

BACKGROUND

The evidence on the relation of family history of cancers other than breast cancer to breast cancer risk is conflicting, and most studies have not assessed specific breast cancer subtypes.

METHODS

We assessed the relation of first-degree family history of breast, prostate, lung, colorectal, ovarian, and cervical cancer and lymphoma or leukemia, to the risk of estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)), ER(-), and triple-negative breast cancer in data from the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

There were 3,023 ER(+) and 1,497 ER(-) breast cancer cases (including 696 triple-negative cases) and 17,420 controls. First-degree family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk of each subtype: OR = 1.76 (95% CI, 1.57-1.97) for ER(+), 1.67 (1.42-1.95) for ER(-), and 1.72 (1.38-2.13) for triple-negative breast cancer. Family history of cervical cancer was associated with increased risk of ER(-) (OR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.36-4.20), but not ER(+) cancer. Family history of both breast and prostate cancer was associated with increased risk of ER(+) (3.40; 2.42-4.79) and ER(-) (2.09; 1.21-3.63) cancer, but family history of both breast and lung cancer was associated only with ER(-) cancer (2.11; 1.29-3.46).

CONCLUSIONS

A family history of cancers other than breast may influence the risk of breast cancer, and associations may differ by subtype.

IMPACT

Greater surveillance and counseling for additional screening may be warranted for women with a family history of cancer.

Inherited association of breast and colorectal cancer: limited role of CHEK2 compared with high-penetrance genes

We assessed the association between breast cancer (BC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) from referral pattern to the Regional Genetics Service including molecular analysis. Hospital computer records and/or department referral books were used to identify cases referred to the Regional Genetic Service during a 16-year period (1990-2005 inclusive). All files were reviewed along with associated demographic data, risk assessments, referral details and results from mutation testing. Families were assessed for hereditary breast and colorectal cancer (HBCC) criteria, and all families with eligible individuals were tested for the 1100delC mutation in CHEK2. A total of 8,612 families were identified. One hundred and sixteen of 1,631 (7.5%) families with a primary referral for CRC fulfilled the criteria for HBCC, whereas only 68/6981 (1%) BC referrals fulfilled these criteria. Blood samples were obtained from 113 individuals from 83/184 families. Only 1/113 (1%) has screened positive for the CHEK2 mutation, whereas 14 (17%) families segregate BRCA1/2 mutations and at least 7 (8.5%) carry MLH1/MSH2 mutations. HBCC syndrome, if it exists as a separate entity, is not likely to be due to CHEK2 mutations. Many families are explicable by existing high-penetrance genes, and further work is necessary to elucidate whether the remainder is due to chance or as yet undiscovered genes.

Double primary cancers of the breast and thyroid in women: molecular analysis and genetic implications

Multiple primary cancers are characteristic of hereditary cancer syndromes. A familial association between breast and thyroid cancer has been suggested, but a genetic basis for this association has not yet been established. To determine the extent to which double primary cancers of the breast and thyroid are due to common hereditary factors, we conducted a registry- and hospital-based study in Ontario and Quebec. We obtained family histories of 74 women diagnosed with both cancer of the breast and thyroid before 70 years of age. Cancer histories were obtained for the 533 first- degree relatives of these women. The observed cancer rate in the relatives was compared with the expected number, based on age- standardized Canadian cancer incidence rates, and relative risks were estimated. A total of 87 cancers were observed in the relatives, compared to 93.7 expected cancers, giving a relative risk of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7-1.1). The risk for breast cancer was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.6-1.7) and the risk for thyroid cancer was 0.7 (95% CI: 0-3.8). Blood samples were collected on 53 patients for mutational analysis of the BRCA1, BRCA2, and PTEN genes. One woman was found to be a carrier of a BRCA1 mutation (exon 11 3227delT). Our findings do not support the hypothesis that a significant proportion of double primary cancers of the breast and thyroid are due to hereditary factors.

Risk factors for colorectal cancer following breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate risk factors for colorectal cancer following breast cancer.

METHODS

In this nested case-control study, all women (n = 14,900) with a first primary breast cancer (1978-1992) were identified from the western Washington population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Cancer Registry. Cases (n = 160) developed a second primary colorectal cancer before 1995, at least 6 months after the first cancer diagnosis. Controls (n = 310, matched to the cases on calendar year, age and breast cancer stage) were randomly selected from those who did not develop a second primary cancer and who survived to the case's colorectal cancer diagnosis date. Characteristics of the cases and controls at initial diagnosis were compared using conditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

The incidence of colorectal cancer was associated with a family history of breast cancer (v.s. no family history, matched odds ratio (mOR) = 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-4.1), high body mass index (> or = 30kg/m2 v.s. < 30kg/m2, mOR = 2.2, CI: 1.2-3.9), and lobular breast cancer histology (v.s. ductal, mOR = 2.0, CI: 0.9-4.4). Risk was unrelated to menopausal status, prior hormone replacement therapy and estrogen/progesterone receptor status of the breast tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of developing a second primary colorectal cancer may be elevated among certain subsets of breast cancer patients.

Risk of colorectal cancer after breast cancer

BACKGROUND

History of breast cancer has been reported as a risk factor for colorectal cancer in women. In view of the ambiguous nature of existing evidence and the growing interest in targeted colorectal cancer prevention, we sought to quantify this risk.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to estimate risk of colorectal cancer after breast-cancer diagnosis in women with first incident breast cancer between 1974 and 1995. Observed colon and rectal cancer risk was compared with that expected in the general population. We stratified comparisons by age at breast-cancer diagnosis, stage of cancer, ethnic origin of patient, and follow-up time.

FINDINGS

Overall, women with previous breast cancer were 5% less likely (95% CI 1-9) to develop colon and 13% less likely (6-19) to develop rectal cancer than women in the general population. Stratified analyses suggested that the risk reductions observed for colon and rectal cancer were most pronounced for women with breast cancer diagnosed after age 65 years, in white women, women with local stage breast cancer, and women diagnosed in the later study years (1990-94).

INTERPRETATIONS

Breast cancer does not increase subsequent colorectal cancer risk, and reduced risk was seen for certain subgroups of women. Because no biologically plausible endogenous protective factor has been identified, we suggest that reduced risk could stem from an accumulation of exposures that increase breast-cancer frequency but protect against colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer in hereditary breast cancer kindreds

PURPOSE

This study compared characteristics of colorectal cancer between families with dominant breast cancer inheritance and the general population. The cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer was also studied in genetically determined breast cancer syndrome subjects with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and compared with the general population.

METHODS

Subjects included 42 patients with colorectal cancer from 32 clinically determined hereditary breast cancer kindreds based on the autosomal dominant inheritance of breast cancers and early age of onset. The general population colorectal cancer cohort was composed of 755 patients from a tumor registry. Lifetime risk of colorectal cancer was determined in 164 BRCA1 and 88 BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and compared with the general population. Mean age of colorectal cancer onset, anatomic site distribution, histologic stage at presentation, and five year stage-stratified survival rates were compared between clinically determined hereditary breast cancer family members and the general population.

RESULTS

The lifetime risk of colorectal cancer in male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers was 5.6 percent, which was not different from 6 percent in males from the general population. Likewise, the lifetime colorectal cancer risk in female BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers was 3.2 percent, which was not different from 5.9 percent in females from the general population. Mean age of onset +/- standard error for patients with colorectal cancer was 60 +/- 2 years for hereditary breast cancer kindreds compared with 67 +/- 0.4 years for the general population (P = 0.0004). Colorectal cancer site distribution did not vary between hereditary breast cancer and the general population. Overall colorectal cancer stage distribution was significantly different, with more Stage I and fewer Stage IV cancers in subjects with hereditary breast cancer compared with the general population (P = 0.01). Overall five year stage-stratified colorectal cancer survival rate +/- standard error was 66 +/- 8 percent for hereditary breast cancer kindreds and 46 +/- 2 percent for the general population (P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Lifetime cumulative colorectal cancer incidence in subjects with BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations was not different from the general population. However, significant differences in colorectal cancer were noted between hereditary breast cancer family members and the general population. Hereditary breast cancer-associated colorectal cancer had an earlier age of onset, lower tumor stage, and better survival rate than the general population. Except for age of onset, colorectal cancer in hereditary breast cancer kindreds exhibited more favorable characteristics than colorectal cancer in the general population.

Association between breast and colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

The risk of breast and colorectal cancers in immigrants from non-industrialised countries is sharply increased when they adopt a Western lifestyle. In addition, epidemiological studies on Western populations show an association between the two tumours, both in the same individual and also in close relatives. Most studies agree that high energy intake, obesity and inadequate physical exercise are associated with an increased risk of both tumours.

METHODS

Risk markers for each cancer are examined in order to identify causative nutritional factors or metabolic-endocrine dysfunction. The role of steroid hormones and other possible carcinogenic mechanisms is discussed, concentrating on evidence of a role for insulin and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) in the promotion of carcinogenesis in both organs.

RESULTS

Individuals with a genetic susceptibility to insulin resistance show triggering of hyperinsulinaemia following excessive weight gain or long-term diet high in saturated fat. Case-control studies show an association between hyperinsulinaemia and evidence of breast or colorectal carcinoma. Multiple laboratory studies show that increased activity of IGFs can stimulate the growth of human breast and colorectal cancer cells.

CONCLUSION

It is postulated that either insulin resistance and its concomitants promote the development of breast and colorectal cancers, or that they share common risk factors. Sex steroid metabolism and organ specificity may explain age and sex differences between the tumours in relation to the role of obesity. Recent research suggests that a diet high in n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids may reduce the risk of developing insulin resistance. This observation may be applied to test the hypothesis that an effect on hyperinsulinaemia may modify the risk of developing breast or colorectal cancer.