1
|
Gietel-Habets JJG, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, van Osch LADM. Support needs of couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer during reproductive decision making. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1795-1801. [PMID: 29644780 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reproductive decision making for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is complex and can result in decisional conflict or regret. This study investigated couples' support needs and aimed to identify vulnerable couples. Ultimately, we should strive to develop a clear standard of care guideline regarding reproductive decision support. METHODS Mixed methods were used for data collection. A focus group study was conducted among 18 couples (N = 35) with HBOC who had made a reproductive decision after reproductive counselling. Subsequently, 129 similar couples (N = 258) were invited to complete a cross-sectional survey based on the focus group study. RESULTS Clinical and practical aspects of reproductive counselling were positively evaluated in the focus group study, although couples indicated a need for additional support with emotional and social concerns in which their relationship, social environment, and the way they picture their desired family were key elements. The survey was completed by 86 participants. Making a reproductive choice was experienced as (very) difficult by 43%, and 69% showed a need for additional support during decision making. Younger participants and those who opted for a natural pregnancy experienced more difficulty with reproductive decision making, and partners showed a higher need for psychological support than carriers. CONCLUSIONS Couples with HBOC who need to make a reproductive decision have specific needs for guidance and support, of which the desired content and methods can vary. It is therefore important to identify vulnerable couples and to attune counselling to couples' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I A P Derks-Smeets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Golde
- GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dommering CJ, Henneman L, van der Hout AH, Jonker MA, Tops CMJ, van den Ouweland AMW, van der Luijt RB, Mensenkamp AR, Hogervorst FBL, Redeker EJW, de Die-Smulders CEM, Moll AC, Meijers-Heijboer H. Uptake of prenatal diagnostic testing for retinoblastoma compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands. Fam Cancer 2017; 16:271-277. [PMID: 27826806 PMCID: PMC5357498 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9943-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Since the 1980s the genetic cause of many hereditary tumor syndromes has been elucidated. As a consequence, carriers of a deleterious mutation in these genes may opt for prenatal diagnoses (PND). We studied the uptake of prenatal diagnosis for five hereditary cancer syndromes in the Netherlands. Uptake for retinoblastoma (Rb) was compared with uptake for Von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL), Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and hereditary breast ovarian cancer (HBOC). A questionnaire was completed by all nine DNA-diagnostic laboratories assessing the number of independent mutation-positive families identified from the start of diagnostic testing until May 2013, and the number of PNDs performed for these syndromes within these families. Of 187 families with a known Rb-gene mutation, 22 had performed PND (11.8%), this was significantly higher than uptake for FAP (1.6%) and HBOC (<0.2%). For VHL (6.5%) and LFS (4.9%) the difference was not statistically significant. PND for Rb started 3 years after introduction of diagnostic DNA testing and remained stable over the years. For the other cancer syndromes PND started 10-15 years after the introduction and uptake for PND showed an increase after 2009. We conclude that uptake of PND for Rb was significantly higher than for FAP and HBOC, but not different from VHL and LFS. Early onset, high penetrance, lack of preventive surgery and perceived burden of disease may explain these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte J Dommering
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lidewij Henneman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie H van der Hout
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Jonker
- Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carli M J Tops
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rob B van der Luijt
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen R Mensenkamp
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Egbert J W Redeker
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Annette C Moll
- Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanne Meijers-Heijboer
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gietel-Habets JJG, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derks-Smeets IAP, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, Kets CM, van Osch LADM. Awareness and attitude regarding reproductive options of persons carrying a BRCA mutation and their partners. Hum Reprod 2017; 32:588-597. [PMID: 28073972 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION To what extent are BRCA mutation carriers and their partners in the Netherlands aware about preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and prenatal diagnosis (PND) as reproductive options and what is their attitude towards these options? SUMMARY ANSWER Awareness of PGD (66%) and PND (61%) among BRCA mutation carriers and their partners is relatively high and 80% and 26%, respectively, of BRCA carriers and their partners find offering PGD and PND for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) acceptable. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Internationally, awareness of PGD among persons with a genetic cancer predisposition appears to be relatively low (35%) and although acceptability is generally high (71%), only a small proportion of mutation carriers would consider using PGD (36%). However, for HBOC, there are no studies available that investigated the perspective of individuals with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation and their partners about PGD and PND including demographic and medical correlates of awareness and acceptability. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A cross-sectional survey was completed by 191 participants between July 2012 and June 2013. Participants were recruited through patient organizations (88%) and the databases of two Clinical Genetics departments in the Netherlands (12%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Male and female BRCA carriers and their partners completed an online survey, which assessed demographic and medical characteristics, and awareness, knowledge, acceptability and consideration of PGD and PND as main outcomes. Correlations between demographic and medical characteristics and the main outcomes were investigated. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE The majority of respondents were female (87%), of reproductive age (86%) and about half reported a desire for a child in the future. About two-thirds (66%) were aware of PGD and 61% of PND for HBOC. PGD knowledge was moderate (5.5 on a 9-point scale) and acceptability of PGD and PND for HBOC was 80% and 26%, respectively. A minority would personally consider using PGD (39%) or PND (20%). Individuals with a higher educational level were more likely to be aware of PGD (P < 0.001) and PND (P < 0.001) and persons with a more immediate child wish were more often aware of PGD (P = 0.044) and had more knowledge about PGD (P = 0.001). PGD acceptability was positively associated with knowledge about PGD (P = 0.047), and PND acceptability was higher among partners in comparison to carriers (P = 0.001). Participants with a history of cancer and with a higher perceived seriousness of breast and ovarian cancer were more likely to consider using PGD (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001 respectively) or PND (P = 0.021 and P = 0.017 respectively). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The response rate (23%) of participants invited by the clinical genetics departments was low, probably related to a simultaneous study that used a similar recruitment strategy within the same target group, which may have resulted in selection bias. Moreover, PGD knowledge was measured with an instrument that is not yet validated since to date such an instrument is not available in the literature. Finally, the cross-sectional design of this study limits us from drawing any causal conclusions. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Improvement of information provision remains needed, in order to timely inform all couples with HBOC about the available reproductive options and enable them to make a balanced reproductive decision. This may limit the risk of negative psychological impact due to decisional conflict and possible regret. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The Dutch breast cancer foundation Stichting Pink Ribbon (grant number 2010.PS11.C74). None of the authors have competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J G Gietel-Habets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C E M de Die-Smulders
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I A P Derks-Smeets
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A Tibben
- Centre for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E Gomez-Garcia
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C M Kets
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, code 848, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - L A D M van Osch
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Promotion/CAPHRI, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Derks-Smeets IAP, Gietel-Habets JJG, Tibben A, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Geraedts JPM, van Golde R, Gomez-Garcia E, van den Bogaart E, van Hooijdonk M, de Die-Smulders CEM, van Osch LADM. Decision-making on preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for couples with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Hum Reprod 2014; 29:1103-12. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
5
|
Ahmed S, Ahmed M, Sharif SM, Sheridan E, Taylor GR. Attitudes towards prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy in British Pakistani parents and relatives of children with recessive conditions in the UK. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:954-9. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.3940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Revised: 06/12/2012] [Accepted: 06/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. Ahmed
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine; University of Leeds; 101 Clarendon Road Leeds LS2 9LJ UK
| | - M. Ahmed
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service; Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust; UK
| | - S. M. Sharif
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service; Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust; UK
| | - E. Sheridan
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service; Leeds NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust; UK
| | - G. R. Taylor
- Translational Genomics; Leeds University and Leeds Teaching Hospital; UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ormondroyd E, Donnelly L, Moynihan C, Savona C, Bancroft E, Evans DG, Eeles R, Lavery S, Watson M. Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20:4-10. [PMID: 21811309 PMCID: PMC3234514 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2011] [Revised: 05/25/2011] [Accepted: 06/28/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The scope of conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is licensed has recently been expanded in the United Kingdom to include genetic predisposition to adult-onset cancer. This qualitative interview study explores reproductive decision making, knowledge of and attitudes to reproductive genetic testing (prenatal diagnosis and PGD) with 25 women aged 18-45 years who received a positive BRCA test in the United Kingdom before having children. In this cohort of younger women, BRCA testing was motivated by risk management decisions; for some, BRCA status has affected their later decisions about having children. The perceived severity of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (HBOC) influences thoughts about passing on the mutation to children and willingness to consider reproductive genetic testing, but most participants do not believe HBOC is a condition for which pregnancy termination is justified. PGD is considered more acceptable and advantageous because it would prevent transmission to future generations, but women have concerns about selecting embryos and the fact that they and affected family members would not have been selected. Women would also be deterred by the need to undergo in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and ovarian stimulation for PGD. Awareness of reproductive testing options was very variable among the cohort. The findings highlight the complexities of reproductive decision making for young women who knowingly carry a BRCA mutation, and the dilemmas inherent to reproductive genetic testing when the condition being tested for also affects a prospective parent. Counselling and psychological support for BRCA-positive women and couples concerning reproductive options are strongly indicated.
Collapse
|
7
|
Shaw A. Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73:111-20. [PMID: 21641705 PMCID: PMC3149658 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2010] [Revised: 04/08/2011] [Accepted: 04/11/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
How far does ethnicity/culture/religion mediate couples' responses to genetic risk? This paper examines the responses of 51 British Pakistani couples referred to a genetics clinic in southern England to counselling about recurrence risks for genetic problems in children. It is based on fieldwork conducted between 2000 and 2004 that combined participant observation of genetics consultations with interviews in respondents' homes. Interviews were conducted with 62 adults in connection with these 51 cases, of which 32 were followed through two or more clinical consultations and 12 through more than one pregnancy. Risk responses were categorized as: taking the risk; postponing; exploring risk management or dismissing the risk as irrelevant to current circumstances. Responses were cross-referenced for associations with the severity of the condition, number of affected and unaffected children, availability of a prenatal test, age, gender, and migration history. I found that most couples were initially risk-takers who already had an unaffected child or children. Couples caring for living children with severe conditions were more likely to postpone. However, the risk responses of 15 couples changed over time, most towards and some away from risk management, reflecting changes in couples' appreciation of the severity of the condition and their subsequent reproductive experiences. The study highlights the diversity and dynamism of responses within one ethnic group and challenges stereotypes about cultural and religious responses to genetic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Shaw
- Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6HE, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Attitudes toward genetic testing in childhood and reproductive decision-making for familial adenomatous polyposis. Eur J Hum Genet 2009; 18:186-93. [PMID: 19809485 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Childhood DNA testing, prenatal diagnosis (PND) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) are available for familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). However, the use of PND and PGD is controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate attitudes toward, and experiences with, childhood DNA testing, PND and PGD among members of families at high risk for FAP. In this nationwide, cross-sectional study, questionnaires were sent to individuals from families at high risk for FAP assessing attitudes toward and experiences with childhood testing, PND and PGD, as well as several sociodemographic, clinical and psychosocial variables. Of the individuals from FAP families invited to participate in the study, 525 members participated (response rate=64%). Most parents who had children who were minors (n=93) (82%) were satisfied with the DNA testing procedure. One-third of all individuals wanted DNA testing for their children before age 12. Forty percent of FAP patients indicated that the disease influenced their desire to have children. Only 15% considered termination of pregnancy for FAP acceptable. Approximately 30% of individuals with a FAP diagnosis and their partners considered PND and PGD as acceptable for themselves. A positive attitude was associated with higher levels of guilt and a positive attitude toward termination of pregnancy. Importantly, of those with FAP at childbearing age, 84% had had no previous information at all about either PND or PGD. Future efforts should be aimed at educating FAP family members about reproductive options, allowing them to make an informed choice about family planning. Routine discussion of all reproductive options with a medical specialist should be encouraged.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mezer E, Babul-Hirji R, Wise R, Chipman M, DaSilva L, Rowell M, Thackray R, Shuman CT, Levin AV. Attitudes Regarding Predictive Testing for Retinitis Pigmentosa. Ophthalmic Genet 2009; 28:9-15. [PMID: 17454742 DOI: 10.1080/13816810701199423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess attitudes towards predictive testing for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (ADRP). METHODS A prospective questionnaire study of 46 affected adults and their adult family members identified from pedigrees clearly consistent with ADRP or who had had DNA-testing confirmation of ADRP before the study commenced. RESULTS High proportions of unaffected siblings (73%) and patients (67%) agreed to prenatal testing. Patients agreed to prenatal testing. Patients agreed significantly more often than unaffected siblings that treatment should be available prior to initiating predictive testing. Psychoemotional distress was reported in 57% of the affected adults and their family members in recollecting their own predictive testing as children. CONCLUSIONS ADRP families indicate a favorable attitude towards testing presymptomatic children with counseling to lessen the psychological and social impact of results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eedy Mezer
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wie viele Verbote brauchen wir? Der Gesetzgeber und das ärztliche Ethos. Ethik Med 2009. [DOI: 10.1007/s00481-009-0005-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
11
|
Ahmed S, Hewison J, Green JM, Cuckle HS, Hirst J, Thornton JG. Decisions About Testing and Termination of Pregnancy for Different Fetal Conditions: A Qualitative Study of European White and Pakistani Mothers of Affected Children. J Genet Couns 2008; 17:560-72. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9176-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2007] [Accepted: 06/12/2008] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
12
|
Jasper MJ, Liebelt J, Hussey ND. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for BRCA1 exon 13 duplication mutation using linked polymorphic markers resulting in a live birth. Prenat Diagn 2008; 28:292-8. [PMID: 18302307 DOI: 10.1002/pd.1925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of breast cancer associated with inheriting a BRCA1 mutation is extremely high, in addition, there is a 50% chance of transmitting this familial cancer mutation to any offspring. METHODS A 31-year-old woman with a strong maternal family history of early onset of breast cancer had experienced 3 years of primary infertility. Presymptomatic testing confirmed the woman had inherited a 6 kb duplication of exon 13 (ins6KbEx13) in BRCA1 from her mother. Neither gamete donation or adoption were acceptable options for this infertile couple, and as termination of pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis following in vitro fertilization (IVF) was not ethically acceptable, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was sought. A single-cell PCR protocol for PGD for the breast and ovarian cancer predisposing BRCA1 exon 13 duplication mutation was developed which involved amplification of three specific gene regions, including the BRCA1 mutation (ins6KbEx13), an intragenic marker (D17S855) and a flanking marker (D17S1185). RESULTS In the first cycle of IVF, three embryos were analyzed and two were determined to be at low risk of having inherited the maternal BRCA1 mutation. Following the transfer of both embryos on day 5, a singleton pregnancy resulted. Declining confirmatory prenatal diagnosis, a male baby was subsequently delivered at term. CONCLUSIONS Successful PGD for BRCA1 resulted in the delivery of a live-born male. PGD using linked polymorphic markers provides an alternate option for reproduction for couples with or at risk of having inherited a BRCA1 mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda J Jasper
- Research Centre for Reproductive Health, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Paediatrics & Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, South Australia, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Staton AD, Kurian AW, Cobb K, Mills MA, Ford JM. Cancer risk reduction and reproductive concerns in female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Fam Cancer 2007; 7:179-86. [PMID: 18026853 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-007-9171-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2007] [Accepted: 10/26/2007] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women with mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 cancer susceptibility genes face unique choices regarding management of their high risk for breast and ovarian cancer that impact their reproductive options. In order to explore women's preferences for management of elevated cancer risk, we evaluated the decisions of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers about contraception, prophylactic surgery, and family planning. METHODS An internet-based questionnaire assessing high-risk women's preferences about cancer risk management and reproductive options was designed, pilot-tested and administered electronically to 284 participants of an internet-based advocacy group for women with BRCA1/2 mutations. RESULTS Two hundred and thirteen eligible participants completed the majority of the survey. Mean age was 34 years; 66% were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 34% were BRCA2 mutation carriers. Most women (92%) had used oral contraceptive pills. About 88% of responders reported frequent or extreme worry about transmitting the mutation to their children. Despite their high level of worry, few responders said they would likely consider using assisted reproduction technologies such as a pregnancy surrogate (3%), cryopreservation of oocytes or embryos (8%), or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to select embryos without BRCA1/2 mutations (13%). CONCLUSIONS Although they expressed substantial concern about transmitting BRCA1/2 mutations to their children, only a minority of the high-risk women surveyed were likely to consider currently available assisted reproductive strategies. Further research is necessary to explore the risk management preferences of patients with inherited cancer predisposition, and to incorporate these preferences into clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley D Staton
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CCSR Building, Room 1115, 269 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5151, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hewison J, Green JM, Ahmed S, Cuckle HS, Hirst J, Hucknall C, Thornton JG. Attitudes to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality: a comparison of white and Pakistani women in the UK. Prenat Diagn 2007; 27:419-30. [PMID: 17318913 DOI: 10.1002/pd.1701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the attitudes of women from two different ethnic backgrounds to prenatal testing for a range of conditions, and to see if "clusters" of attitudes to different conditions could be identified, for which prenatal testing might be offered as a package. METHODS Four hundred and twenty white and Pakistani women living in the UK were surveyed about their attitudes to prenatal testing and termination for 30 different fetal conditions. All participants had recently had a baby. RESULTS Pakistani women held more favourable attitudes to prenatal testing, but less favourable attitudes to termination than their white counterparts. Both groups were most in favour of termination for the same four conditions: anencephaly, trisomy 13 or 18, quadriplegia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The rank ordering of conditions was also similar. Only 4% of Pakistani and 2% of white women wanted no prenatal testing at all. Fewer than a quarter of participants would consider a termination of pregnancy for 85% of the conditions, but only 25% of Pakistani women and 6% of white women would consider termination for none of the conditions. More advanced statistical analyses were used to measure how closely associated the 30 conditions were in respondents' answers. These analyses identified a principal dimension, reflecting the overall perceived seriousness of the conditions, and a cluster of severely disabling conditions-anencephaly, trisomy 13 or 18, quadriplegia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and severe learning difficulties-which stood out from the rest. Even within this cluster there remained a considerable amount of individual variation. CONCLUSION Women in the study wanted to make up their own minds about the conditions that to them merited testing or termination. These findings have implications for obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny Hewison
- Professor of the Psychology of Healthcare, Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, University of Leeds School of Medicine, 15 Hyde Terrace, Leeds LS2 9LT, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kasparian NA, Meiser B, Butow PN, Job RFS, Mann GJ. Better the Devil You Know? High-Risk Individuals’ Anticipated Psychological Responses to Genetic Testing for Melanoma Susceptibility. J Genet Couns 2006; 15:433-47. [PMID: 17103321 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9038-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The psychological consequences of genetic testing for mutations among individuals at increased risk of developing melanoma remain unexamined. The present study aimed to explore anticipated emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and familial responses to hypothetical genetic testing for melanoma susceptibility. METHODS Forty semi-structured interviews were undertaken with affected (n=20) and unaffected (n=20) individuals at either high or average risk of developing melanoma due to family history. RESULTS In-depth thematic analysis revealed that, in response to being identified as a mutation carrier, most participants with a family history anticipated calmly accepting their increased risk; either increasing precaution adoption or maintaining already vigilant behavioral practices; perceiving such information as important and valuable; and communicating genetic test results to family members, despite the acknowledgement of potential difficulties. In response to being identified as a non-carrier, the majority of participants expected to feel relieved; to maintain current precautionary health practices; to still perceive themselves at some risk of developing melanoma; and to be wary of the potential negative behavioral consequences of disclosing such information to family members. Women appeared more likely than men to acknowledge the potential for depression and worry following genetic testing. In contrast, more males than females expected to carry a gene mutation, and viewed their current preventive practices as optimum. CONCLUSION Genetic testing for melanoma risk is likely to elicit a complex array of emotional, behavioral, cognitive, and familial responses for both testees and their family members, and these responses are likely to bear subtle differences for males and females.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine A Kasparian
- Medical Psychology Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Medlej-Hashim M, Mégarbané A. [Pre-symptomatic diagnosis of severe hereditary diseases with late onset in Lebanon: a choice or a necessity?]. SANTE PUBLIQUE 2006; 17:617-26. [PMID: 16485442 DOI: 10.3917/spub.054.0617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Progress achieved in the field of molecular genetics has opened the door to pre-symptomatic diagnosis tests of several severe hereditary disease, a majority of which are dominant and appear later in life. Given the importance of diagnosis in some of the cases where medical supervision and prevention are possible, there are a number of ethical dilemmas with regards to most of these diseases that, unfortunately, do not have a cure or any preventive treatment available. Above and beyond the capacity for medical care provision, there is a very high level of pressure and anxiety felt by every member of a family who has someone affected by one of these diseases in that they might be a carrier of a mutated gene which could be the cause or source of illness. They carry the burden of uncertainty that they may have already transmitted this gene or could give it to any of their children, and often there is also a significant level of guilt when one is the carrier but not to be affected by the disease itself. More and more frequently in these types of cases, there is a strong desire to know--in order to better organise and plan one's life and that of one's potential future family in the instance where one wishes to found one. This article discusses these problems based upon the consideration of four examples of such diseases with late onset: Huntington's disease, the common forms of thyroid cancer, the familiar forms of a predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer, and von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. However, regardless of the type of disease, the decision to take a genetic test is solely the choice of the individual in question, and the person should be accompanied and guided in his or her reflection by a multi-disciplinary team who can advise him or her and initiate useful deliberations on the various possibilities, their advantages and their disadvantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Medlej-Hashim
- Université Saint Joseph, Faculté de Médecine, Unité de Génétique Médicale, BP 11-5076 Riad El Solh, Beyrouth 1107 2180, Liban
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peterson SK. The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2005; 32:627-39. [PMID: 16148209 DOI: 10.1177/1090198105278751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This article addresses conceptual challenges and theoretical approaches for examining the role of the family in responding and adapting to genetic testing for inherited conditions. Using a family systems perspective, family-based constructs that are relevant to genetic testing may be organized into three domains: family communication, organization and structure of family relationships, and health-related cognitions and beliefs shared within families. Empirical findings are presented from key content areas in family-based genetics research, including family communication, how genetic testing affects family relationships, psychological responses to genetic testing in the family context, and family-based influences on health decisions. Future research should explore decision making about genetic testing or behavior change specifically within the context of the family system and should identify family-based determinants of genetic testing outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science-Unit1330, University of Texas, M. D. AndersonCancer Center, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith KR, Ellington L, Chan AY, Croyle RT, Botkin JR. Fertility Intentions Following Testing for a BRCA1 Gene Mutation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004. [DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.733.13.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: To test whether fertility intentions differed among persons who tested positive, tested negative, or did not know their genetic status for a mutation of the BRCA1 gene. Method: Participants were members of a large Utah-based kindred with an identified mutation at the BRCA1 locus. Participants received genetic counseling prior to testing and were interviewed at baseline before testing and at three points after receiving test results from a genetic counselor. The sample included men and women who completed all interviews, were between ages 18 and 45, and were fertile, resulting in a sample of 101 respondents. The primary dependent variable measured whether a subject indicated that they were moderately or very sure at all three post-testing interviews that they intended to have additional children. Effects of BRCA1 mutation status on fertility intentions were estimated using multivariate logistic regressions where we controlled for gender, age, marital status, and baseline fertility intentions. Results: Female carriers were less likely to want additional children in relation to female noncarriers (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.01–1.23; P = 0.074). No differences were found among men. There was a significant difference in the effect of mutation status on fertility intentions between males and females (Gender × Carrier status interaction; P = 0.009). Persons who did not know their mutation status were less likely to want more children than noncarriers (odds ratio 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.75; P = 0.027). Conclusion: Predictive genetic testing for late-onset cancer susceptibility affects family planning decision-making. Persons contemplating predictive testing should be informed about possible effects such testing may have on their plans for future fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anna Y. Chan
- 2U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, District of Columbia; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Albin RL. Genomic medicine. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2170-1; author reply 2170-1. [PMID: 14645650 DOI: 10.1056/nejm200311273492219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
20
|
Wustner K. Ethics and practice: two worlds? The example of genetic counselling. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY 2003; 22:61-87. [PMID: 15282905 DOI: 10.1080/1463677032000069718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to work out the relationship between ethics and practice with reference to genetic counselling. First, the most important principles with respect to genetic counselling and to counsellor-client-interaction, are explained briefly. Then, we discuss what these principles might mean, when applied to the practice of counselling. To do so, we also look at some empirical data. Finally, we draw some conclusions.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bernard R, Boyer A, Nègre P, Malzac P, Latour P, Vandenberghe A, Philip N, Lévy N. Prenatal detection of the 17p11.2 duplication in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A: necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for heterogeneous disorders. Eur J Hum Genet 2002; 10:297-302. [PMID: 12082504 DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2001] [Revised: 03/14/2002] [Accepted: 03/19/2002] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease is a typical example of a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder and, in most cases, is dominantly inherited and caused by a 1.5 megabase duplication on chromosome 17p11.2 containing the PMP22 gene. This is a non-lethal disease with a wide spectrum of severity, from asymptomatism to severe motor and sensory disability. Unpredictable degree of disability is usually the reason why prenatal diagnosis is required and must be addressed. Molecular procedures such as the use of polymorphic non microsatellite STRs, allowing very fast and reliable results even when requiring a gene dosage interpretation are now available and have been recently validated in post-natal diagnosis. Our results indicate that this approach is also the best-adapted method in case of prenatal diagnosis. Nevertheless, ethical considerations raised by prenatal diagnosis in CMT and more generally in non-lethal disorders remain to be actively considered. Here, we present our experience in genetic counselling, and address the psychological issues for 7 CMT at risk pregnancies. In five cases, a CMT1A duplication was evidenced; pregnancy was terminated in four of these cases and the parents from one affected foetus decided to pursue the pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafaëlle Bernard
- Département de Génétique Médicale, Hôpital d'enfants de la Timone, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Current Awareness. Prenat Diagn 2002. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|