Mural destabilization after aneurysm treatment with a flow-diverting device: a report of two cases

Evaluation of the Significance of Persistent Remnant Filling and Enlargement After Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical course after flow diversion (FD) treatment with a focus on aneurysms with remnant sac filling, by analyzing angiographic outcomes, aneurysm volume, and clinical events.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 patients who underwent FD for intracranial aneurysms between July 2014 and June 2021.

RESULTS

The majority of aneurysms (52.5%) were located in the internal carotid artery, with a median diameter of 16.6 mm and neck size of 9.3 mm. Remnant filling was observed in 17 aneurysms (27.9%) more than 18 months after FD, 10 (16.4%) of these aneurysms underwent enlargement, which occurred only in cases with subtotal filling or entry remnant states. Eleven patients experienced major adverse events, and three exhibited unfavorable functional outcomes. The incidence of major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes was significantly higher in the aneurysm enlargement group than that in the no-filling or stable remnant filling groups (P < 0.001). Aneurysmal diameter and the presence of incorporated branches were independent predictors of aneurysm enlargement, while the presence of incorporated branches was the only independent predictor of persistent remnant filling.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm enlargement after FD is not uncommon, particularly when the aneurysm is large, has incorporated vessels, or does not undergo occlusion within 12 months, often culminating in major adverse events and unfavorable functional outcomes. In addition to investigating angiographic results, it is necessary to evaluate the changes in aneurysm size and clinical events when assessing the efficacy of FD.

Methylprednisolone is related to lower incidence of postoperative bleeding after flow diverter treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysm

Background and objectives

Regarding the anti-inflammatory effect, methylprednisolone is a candidate to prevent patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) from postoperative bleeding (PB) after flow diverter (FD) treatment. This study aimed to investigate whether methylprednisolone is related to a lower incidence of PB after FD treatment for UIAs.

Methods

This study retrospectively reviewed UIA patients receiving FD treatment between October 2015 and July 2021. All patients were observed until 72  h after FD treatment. The patients receiving methylprednisolone (80  mg, bid, for at least 24 h) were considered as standard methylprednisolone treatment (SMT) users, otherwise as non-SMT users. The primary endpoint indicated the occurrence of PB, including subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, and ventricular bleeding, within 72 h after FD treatment. This study compared the incidence of PB between SMT users and non-SMT users and investigated the protective effect of SMT on PB after FD treatment using the Cox regression model. Finally, after controlling the potential factors related to PB, we performed subgroup analysis to further confirm the protective effect of SMT on PB.

Results

This study finally included 262 UIA patients receiving FD treatment. PB occurred in 11 patients (4.2%), and 116 patients (44.3%) received SMT postoperatively. The median time from the end of surgery to PB was 12.3 h (range: 0.5-48.0 h). SMT users had a lower incidence of PB comparing with non-SMT users (1/116, 0.9% vs. 10/146, 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.017). The multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that SMT users (HR, 0.12 [95%CI, 0.02-0.94], p = 0.044) had a lower risk of PB postoperatively. After controlling the potential factors related to PB (i.e., gender, irregular shape, surgical methods [FD and FD + coil] and UIA sizes), the patients receiving SMT still had a lower cumulative incidence of PB, comparing with patients receiving non-SMT (all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

SMT was correlated with the lower incidence of PB for patients receiving FD treatment and may be a potential method to prevent PB after the FD treatment.

Endovascular Treatment of Large or Giant Basilar Artery Aneurysms Using the Pipeline Embolization Device: Complications and Outcomes

Background

This study aimed to investigate clinical and angiographic outcomes of Pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment of large or giant basilar artery (BA) aneurysms and examine associated factors.

Methods

Clinical and angiographic data of 29 patients (18 men, 11 women) with large or giant BA aneurysms were retrospectively examined. Mean age was 44.1 ± 21.2 years (range, 30–68). Mean aneurysm size was 22.2 ± 8.3 mm (range, 12.0–40.1).

Results

Mean angiographic follow-up was 18.3 ± 3.4 months (range, 4.5–60). The rate of adequate aneurysmal occlusion (O'Kelly–Marotta grade C–D) was 87%. The overall complication rate was 44.8%; most complications (84.6%) occurred in the periprocedural period. Univariable comparison of patients who did and did not develop complications showed significant differences in aneurysm size (p < 0.01), intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.03), and mean number of PEDs used (p = 0.02). Aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.4; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for periprocedural complications in multivariable analysis. Mean clinical follow-up was 23.5 ± 3.2 months (range, 0.1–65). Nine patients (31%) had a poor clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score ≥3) at last follow-up, including 7 patients who died. Univariable comparisons between patients with favorable and unfavorable clinical outcomes showed that aneurysm size (p = 0.009) and intra-aneurysmal thrombus (p = 0.04) significantly differed between the groups. Multivariable analysis showed that aneurysm size (odds ratio, 1.1; p = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for poor clinical outcome.

Conclusion

PED treatment of large or giant BA aneurysms is effective and can achieve a satisfactory long-term occlusion rate. However, the treatment complications are not negligible. Aneurysm size is the strongest predictor of perioperative complications and poor clinical outcome.

Current Strategies in the Treatment of Intracranial Large and Giant Aneurysms

INTRODUCTION

Very large and giant aneurysms are among the most challenging cerebrovascular pathologies in neurosurgery.

METHODS

The aim of this paper is to review the current literature on the management of very large and giant aneurysms and to describe representative cases illustrating possible treatment strategies.

RESULTS

In view of the poor natural history, active management using multiprofessional individualized approaches is required to achieve aneurysm occlusion, relief of mass effect, and obliteration of the embolic source. Both reconstructive (clipping, coiling, stent-assisted coiling, flow diversion [FD]) and deconstructive techniques (parent artery occlusion [PAO], PAO in conjunction with bypass surgery, and strategies of flow modification) are available to achieve definitive treatment with acceptable morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients harboring such lesions should be managed at high-volume cerebrovascular centers by multidisciplinary teams trained in all techniques of open and endovascular neurosurgery.

Delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after placement of intra-luminal flow diverter

BACKGROUND

Though flow diverter is a safe and efficient modality, some patients can experience delayed aneurysmal rupture. The mechanism of delayed rupture is still obscure to us.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in the PubMed database for patients with delayed rupture of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter placement.

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles reporting on 60 patients were included in the final analysis. Of the 49 patients with description of presenting symptoms, six (12.2%) patients were incidentally diagnosed, 39 (87.8%) patients were admitted for aneurysmal rupture or mass effect. Multiple flow diverters were used in 38.3% (18/47) of the patients. Coil assistance was applied in 13.0% (7/54) of the patients. Delayed aneurysmal rupture led to intracranial hemorrhage or carotid-cavernous sinus fistula (CCF) in 76.8% (43/56) and 23.2% (13/56) of the patients, respectively. Of the 55 patients with description of outcome, 14 (25.5%) patients achieved good recovery, one (1.8%) patient was severely disabled, 40 (72.7%) patients died. All of the patients in the CCF group survived and experienced good recovery.

CONCLUSION

Increased intra-aneurysmal pressure, destabilization of the aneurysm wall by intra-aneurysmal thrombus, persistent residual intra-aneurysmal flow, characteristics of the specific aneurysm, and mechanical injury by the flow diverter might conjointly contribute to the final delayed rupture. There has been no established preventive measure to decrease the incidence of delayed rupture yet. The treatment and outcome depend on the presentation of delayed rupture. Patients presenting with aneurysm-related intracranial hemorrhage have a dismal outcome. Those presenting with CCFs usually have a satisfactory recovery.

Outcome of flow diverter placement for intracranial aneurysm with dual antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulant therapy

PURPOSE

Antiplatelet therapy initiated before flow diverter placement is effective for the prevention of ischemic complications. However, the effectiveness of oral anticoagulant treatment is unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the complications and obliteration rates after flow diverter placement in patients taking anticoagulants.

METHODS

A total of 155 cases were treated by Pipeline Flex placement for unruptured large and giant cerebral aneurysms in our hospital between October 2015 and June 2019. The groups of 8 patients taking anticoagulants before operation and 147 patients not taking anticoagulants were compared.

RESULTS

Clopidogrel oral dose (P = 0.002) was significantly lower in the anticoagulant group. Delayed aneurysm rupture (P = 0.002) and additional treatment (P = 0.009) rates were significantly higher and complete obliteration rate (P = 0.011) was lower in the anticoagulant group.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional oral anticoagulant administration before flow diverter placement does not reduce ischemic complications compared to dual antiplatelet therapy, but does increase hemorrhagic complications, especially delayed aneurysm rupture. Complete obliteration of the cerebral aneurysm is difficult to achieve in patients taking anticoagulants.

Delayed spontaneous rupture of cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery following dual ophthalmic segment aneurysms treatment with pipeline embolization device: A case report

RATIONALE

The incidence of double aneurysms on the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA) is very rare. Nevertheless, delayed rupture of a parent artery instead of the aneurysmal sac following pipeline embolization device (PLED) is unusual.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We present a 72-year-old female who was admitted at our facility with gradual onset of nonspecific visual changes.

DIAGNOSIS

Conventional angiography revealed 2 aneurysms located at the ophthalmic segment of the left ICA.

INTERVENTIONS

Both aneurysms were successfully treated with PLED.

OUTCOMES

Two months after discharge, the patient was rushed into the emergency with bilateral conjunctival congestion. Computed tomography revealed intracranial hemorrhage at left temporal lobe while digital subtraction angiography established a left direct carotid cavernous fistula. We utilized stent (Solitaire 6*30) assisted coils to occlude the fistula. The patient is well and go about her normal duties.

LESSIONS

Manipulation of the tortuous parent artery resulted in a focal traumatic weakness in the artery and subsequently a delay tear. We are of the view that, endovascular surgeons should be on the lookout for this complication following flow deviation treatment modalities.

Hemodynamic Analysis of Postoperative Rupture of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms after Placement of Flow-Diverting Stents: A Matched Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Postoperative rupture of intracranial aneurysm has been reported as a fatal complication after flow-diverter placement. We assessed several hemodynamic variables to explore risk factors in the postoperative rupture process.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 10 patients with intracranial aneurysms, treated with flow diverters between September 2014 and December 2018, who experienced postoperative aneurysm rupture (postoperative aneurysm rupture group). We matched these subjects 1:2 with 20 patients with postoperative unruptured (postoperative unruptured group) intracranial aneurysms based on clinical and morphologic factors. Using computational fluid dynamics, we assessed hemodynamic changes pre- and posttreatment between the 2 groups on a number of qualitative and quantitative parameters.

RESULTS

In the postoperative aneurysm rupture group, the proportion of patients with aneurysms with an unstable flow pattern increased to 60.0% after treatment, while the proportion in the postoperative unruptured group decreased to 20.0%, a significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .028). Energy loss in the postoperative unruptured group decreased after treatment but increased in the postoperative aneurysm rupture group. The reduction ratio of energy loss showed a significant difference between the 2 groups (22.73% ± 53.59% for postoperative unruptured versus -158.81% ± 183.95% for postoperative aneurysm rupture, P = .02). Other parameters and changes of pre- and posttreatment hemodynamic parameters showed no significant difference between 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with pretreatment, unstable flow pattern and higher energy loss after Pipeline Embolization Device placement for intracranial aneurysm may be the important hemodynamic risk factors related to delayed aneurysm rupture.