Long-term efficacy and safety of incobotulinumtoxinA injections in patients with cervical dystonia

Content overlap of 91 dystonia symptoms among the seven most commonly used cervical dystonia scales

INTRODUCTION

Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia. There are several instruments assessing the symptoms of CD. However, different scales assess different features which may lead to poor patient evaluation.

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of overlap of most often used CD rating scales identified by the literature review.

METHODS

A thorough search of the Medline database was conducted in September 2021. Then the frequency of each scale was calculated, and 7 most common scales were included in the content overlap analysis using Jaccard index (0 - no overlap, 1 - full overlap).

RESULTS

Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), Tsui score, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile 58 (CDIP-58), Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire 24 (CDQ-24), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (CDSS), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (DDS) and The Dystonia Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (DNMSQuest) were the most common scales. 91 CD symptoms were distinguished from 134 items used in the scales. The mean overlap among all scales was 0.17. 52 (62%) symptoms were examined by more than one scale. The CIDP-58 captured the highest number of symptoms (63.0%), while the CDSS captured the lowest number (8.0%). None of the symptoms were examined by seven instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a very weak overlap among scales. High inconsistency between the scales may lead to highly different dystonia severity assessment in clinical practice. Thus, the instruments should be combined.

Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) and ABO solution for injection (ASI) for treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines.

METHODS

The EMBASE, PubMed, and web of science databases were systematically searched. Methodological quality was checked using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We also performed statistical analyses using Stata software to examine the efficacy and safety of ABO.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that at maximum frown, the proportion of responders as measured by the investigator's live assessment and subject's self-assessment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines were significantly higher in the ABO and ASI treatment groups than in the placebo group. In addition, from baseline to maximum frown, the ≥1-grade improvement rate in moderate-to-severe glabellar lines severity was also significantly higher in the ABO and ASI treatment groups than in the placebo group. No significant differences in adverse events were found between ABO, ASI and placebo groups, indicating that ABO and ASI have good safety.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO and ASI are effective and safe options for the treatment of moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. More high-quality studies are needed to verify these conclusions.

Improvement in Quality-of-Life-Related Outcomes Following Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA in Adults with Limb Spasticity: A Pooled Analysis

A strong correlation has been reported between patient-reported quality of life (QoL) and the investigator-rated Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) in patients with spasticity. The current analysis evaluates the effect of incobotulinumtoxinA on QoL-related outcomes (limb position abnormality, as well as dressing- and hygiene-related disability, measured with the DAS) in adults with upper limb spasticity, using pooled data from six studies. Separate analyses for each DAS domain were performed using data from patients with disabilities for that domain (DAS score ≥1). Results showed that a significantly greater proportion of incobotulinumtoxinA-treated compared with placebo-treated patients achieved a ≥1-point reduction from baseline in each of the DAS domains (improvement) 4 weeks after the first injection. The benefits of incobotulinumtoxinA were observed regardless of the baseline severity of DAS impairment and of the time elapsed since stroke. The effects of incobotulinumtoxinA 4 weeks after injection were maintained or enhanced over multiple injection cycles for all three DAS domains, supporting the use of repeated injection cycles to provide sustained QoL benefit. IncobotulinumtoxinA represents an important treatment option to achieve better QoL-related outcomes for patients with upper limb spasticity, irrespective of the duration of their condition.

Improving the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin for Cervical Dystonia: A Scoping Review

Cervical dstonia (CD) is a chronic disorder with a significant detrimental impact on quality of life, requiring long-term treatment. Intramuscular injections of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) every 12 to 16 weeks have become the first-line option for CD. Despite the remarkable efficacy of BoNT as a treatment for CD, a significantly high proportion of patients report poor outcomes and discontinue the treatment. The reasons that drive sub-optimal response or treatment failure in a proportion of patients include but are not limited to inappropriate muscle targets and/or BoNT dosing, improper method of injections, subjective feeling of inefficacy, and the formation of neutralizing antibodies against the neurotoxin. The current review aims to complement published research focusing on the identification of the factors that might explain the failure of BoNT treatment in CD, highlighting possible solutions to improve its outcomes. Thus, the use of the new phenomenological classification of cervical dystonia known as COL-CAP might improve the identification of the muscle targets, but more sensitive information might come from the use of kinematic or scintigraphic techniques and the use of electromyographic or ultrasound guidance might ensure the accuracy of the injections. Suggestions are made for the development of a patient-centered model for the management of cervical dystonia and to emphasize that unmet needs in the field are to increase awareness about the non-motor spectrum of CD, which might influence the perception of the efficacy from BoNT injections, and the development of dedicated rehabilitation programs for CD that might enhance its effectiveness.

Pooled Safety Analysis of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders in Adults

The pooled incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were examined by indication using the integrated clinical database of Merz-sponsored, placebo-controlled, or repeat-dose studies of incobotulinumtoxinA in adults with cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, limb spasticity, sialorrhea, or essential tremor of the upper limb. Overall incidences of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, fatal TEAEs, TEAEs of special interest (TEAESIs; indicating possible toxin spread), and treatment-related (TR) events were determined for incobotulinumtoxinA and placebo after a single injection and for repeated dose cycles of incobotulinumtoxinA. The most frequent events after a single dose of incobotulinumtoxinA are summarized. After a single cycle, incidences of overall TEAEs were similar between incobotulinumtoxinA and the placebo in most indications, although between-indication differences were observed. Few TEAEs led to incobotulinumtoxinA discontinuation; there were no fatal TEAEs with incobotulinumtoxinA. In general, repeated cycles did not increase the incidence of any event. The most frequent TR-TEAEs were indication-dependent, including dysphagia for indications affecting the head or neck. The TR-TEAESIs across all indications were most commonly muscular weakness, dysphagia and dry mouth. Overall, the results of this pooled analysis support and extend the favorable safety and tolerability profile of incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of adult neurological disorders established by individual clinical studies.

Pain Reduction in Cervical Dystonia Following Treatment with IncobotulinumtoxinA: A Pooled Analysis

This analysis pooled pain severity data from four phase 3 and 4 studies of incobotulinumtoxinA (incoBoNT-A) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) in adults. CD-related pain severity was assessed at baseline, each injection visit, and 4 weeks after each injection of incoBoNT-A using the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale pain severity subscale or a pain visual analog scale. Both were analyzed using a score range of 0-10 and pain was categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. Data for 678 patients with pain at baseline were assessed and sensitivity analyses evaluated pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication (n = 384 at baseline). At Week 4 after the first injection, there was a mean change of -1.25 (standard deviation 2.04) points from baseline pain severity (p < 0.0001), with 48.1% showing ≥ 30% pain reduction from baseline, 34.4% showing ≥50% pain reduction from baseline, and 10.3% becoming pain free. Pain responses were sustained over five injection cycles with a trend to incremental improvements with each successive cycle. Pain responses in the subgroup not taking concomitant pain medication demonstrated the lack of confounding effects of pain medications. These results confirmed the pain relief benefits of long-term treatment with incoBoNT-A.

Efficacy and safety of long-term botulinum toxin treatment for acquired cervical dystonia: a 25-year follow-up

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A) is the first-line treatment for idiopathic cervical dystonia (ICD) and is widely used in the clinical setting. To date, scanty data are available on the effectiveness of BoNT in treating acquired cervical dystonia (ACD). Here we present a long-term follow-up of ACD patients treated with BoNT/A that focused on safety and efficacy. The study included subjects who had received at least six treatments of three commercially available BoNT/A drugs [abobotulinumtoxinA (A/Abo), incobotulinumtoxinA (A/Inco) and onabotulinumtoxinA (A/Ona)]. Safety and efficacy were assessed based on patients' self-reports regarding adverse effects (AE), duration of improvement of dystonia and/or pain relief. Global clinical improvement was measured on a six-point scale. 23 patients with ACD were administered 739 treatments (A/Abo in 235, A/Inco in 72, A/Ona in 432) with a mean number of treatments of 31 ± 20 (range 6-76) and duration of 10 ± 6 weeks (range 2-25). The mean dose was 737 ± 292 U for A/Abo, 138 ± 108 U for A/Inco and 158 ± 80 U for A/Ona. The average benefit duration was 89 ± 26 (A/Abo), 88 ± 30 days (A/Inco), and 99 ± 55 days (A/Ona) (p = 0.011); global clinical improvement for all sessions was 4 ± 1. ANOVA one-way analysis indicated that A/Ona had the best profile in terms of duration (p < 0.05), whereas A/Abo had the best pain relief effect (p = 0.002). Side effects were reported in 9% of treatments (67/739), with ten treatments (1%) complicated by two side effects. Most side effects were rated mild to moderate; severe side effects occurred following three treatments with the three different BoNT; two required medical intervention. No allergic reactions were reported. Even after 25 years of repeated treatments, all serotypes of BoNT demonstrate positive effects in treating ACD with long-lasting efficacy and safety.

Safety Profile and Lack of Immunogenicity of IncobotulinumtoxinA in Pediatric Spasticity and Sialorrhea: A Pooled Analysis

IncobotulinumtoxinA, a pure botulinumtoxinA formulation, is free of accessory proteins. This analysis provides pooled safety data from phase 3 trials of children/adolescents (2–17 years), investigating incobotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of spasticity associated with cerebral palsy (at doses ≤20 U/kg (max. 500 U) per injection cycle (IC) for ≤6 ICs; three trials) or sialorrhea associated with neurologic disorders (at total doses of 20–75 U per IC for ≤4 ICs; one trial) for ≤96 weeks. Safety endpoints included the incidences of different types of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and immunogenicity. IncobotulinumtoxinA dose groups were combined. Of 1159 patients (mean age 7.3 years, 60.4% males) treated with incobotulinumtoxinA, 3.9% experienced treatment-related TEAEs, with the most common being injection site reactions (1.3%) (both indications), muscular weakness (0.7%) (spasticity), and dysphagia (0.2%) (sialorrhea). Two patients (0.2%) experienced a treatment-related treatment-emergent serious adverse event, and 0.3% discontinued the study due to treatment-related TEAEs. No botulinumtoxinA-naïve patients developed neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) after incobotulinumtoxinA. All children/adolescents with known pre-treatment status and testing positive for Nabs at final visit (n = 7) were previously treated with a botulinumtoxinA other than incobotulinumtoxinA. IncobotulinumtoxinA was shown to be safe, with very few treatment-related TEAEs in a large, diverse cohort of children/adolescents with chronic conditions requiring long-term treatment and was without new NAb formation in treatment-naïve patients.

OnabotulinumtoxinA Dosing, Disease Severity, and Treatment Benefit in Patients With Cervical Dystonia: A Cohort Analysis From CD PROBE

Introduction

The Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (CD PROBE) study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00836017), a multicenter, prospective, observational registry, was designed to identify real-world practices and outcomes for patients with cervical dystonia (CD) treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA). This secondary analysis from CD PROBE aims to determine the impact of presentation subtype on onabotA utilization and CD severity.

Materials and Methods

The study cohort includes those who completed all 3 treatments, 4 office visits, and had data recorded for all assessments. Patient outcomes were assessed with the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58), Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), and determination of CD severity. Treatment interval, dose, and adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. Data were stratified according to prior exposure to botulinum toxins (BoNTs) and analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results

Torticollis was the most common presentation subtype in the study cohort (N = 350); the proportion of patients with torticollis was highest in those with severe disease. At each treatment, between 40.7 and 65.2% of those categorized as severe shifted to moderate or mild severity after treatment. Sustained improvements in CDIP-58 and TWSTRS were observed regardless of prior exposure to BoNTs. Dosing of onabotA generally increased from injection 1 to injection 3 and tended to be lower for patients naïve to BoNT. Median time interval between injections for the study cohort was 94.0 to 97.5 days. The most common AEs (dysphagia, muscular weakness) and injection intervals were similar between naïve vs. non-naïve patients; there were no serious treatment-related AEs.

Conclusions

This secondary cohort analysis from CD PROBE demonstrates that three repeat treatments with onabotA at intervals consistent with labeling attenuated disease severity and neck pain, resulting in sustained improvements in physician- and patient-reported outcomes. No new safety signals were identified.

Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study

•

Botulinum toxin treatment benefit for CD can wane before typical reinjection cycle.

•

Shorter injection cycles of incobotulinumtoxinA are effective for treating CD.

•

Shorter injection intervals have no unexpected AEs or loss of treatment effect.

Introduction

Some patients with cervical dystonia (CD) receiving long-term botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) therapy report early waning of treatment benefit before the typical 12-week reinjection interval.

Methods

This phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study (CD Flex; NCT01486264) compared 2 incobotulinumtoxinA injection schedules (Short Flex: 8 ± 2 weeks; Long Flex: 14 ± 2 weeks) in CD patients. Previous BoNT-responsive subjects who reported acceptable clinical benefit lasting < 10 weeks were recruited. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after 8 injection cycles. The primary endpoint was change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) severity subscale 4 weeks after the eighth injection. Secondary endpoints included TWSTRS total and subscale scores. Immunogenicity was assessed in a subset of patients.

Results

Two hundred eighty-two CD patients were randomized and treated (Short Flex, N = 142; Long Flex, N = 140), and 207 completed the study. Significant improvements in TWSTRS severity from study baseline to 4 weeks after cycle 8 were observed in both the Short Flex (4.1 points; P < 0.0001) and Long Flex (2.4 points; P = 0.002) groups; Short Flex was noninferior to Long Flex (LS mean difference = 1.4 points; 95% CI = [−2.9, 0.1] < Δ = 2.0). Key secondary endpoints favored Short Flex intervals. Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between groups. There was no secondary loss of treatment effect.

Conclusion

Injection cycles < 10 weeks for incobotulinumtoxinA are effective (and noninferior to longer intervals) for treating CD patients with early waning of clinical benefit. Shorter injection intervals did not increase AEs or lead to loss of treatment effect.

Nonlinear Changes in Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Task-Specific Dystonia during Long-Term Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BoTX) is the standard treatment for task-specific dystonias (TSDs) such as musician’s dystonia (MD). Our aim was to assess the long-term changes in BoTX treatment in a highly homogeneous and, to our knowledge, largest group of MD patients with respect to the following parameters: (1) absolute and (2) relative BoTX dosage, (3) number of treated muscles, and (4) inter-injection interval. We retrospectively assessed a treatment period of 20 years in 233 patients, who had received a cumulative dose of 68,540 MU of BoTX in 1819 treatment sessions, performed by two neurologists. Nonlinear correlation was used to analyze changes in the parameters over the course of repeated treatments. Post-hoc we applied a median-split to classify two subgroups (high-BoTX, low-BoTX) depending on the total amount of BoTX needed during treatment. Across all patients, we found a decrease of dosage for the first approximately 25 treatments with an increase afterwards. The number of muscles and inter-injection intervals increased with time with a discrete decrease of inter-injection intervals after about 35 treatments. Subgroup differences were observed in the amount of BoTX and inter-injection intervals, with continuously increasing inter-injection intervals and decreasing BoTX dosage in the low-BTX group. Both groups showed a continuously increasing number of injected muscles. In summary, we found nonlinear changes of BoTX dosage and inter-injection intervals and a continuously increasing number of injected muscles with treatment duration in TSD-patients. Furthermore, we, for the first time, identified two subgroups with distinct differences. Increasing inter-injection intervals and decreasing BoTX dosages in the low-BoTX group indicated improvement of symptoms with continued treatment. Continually increasing BoTX dosages with unchanged inter-injection intervals in the high-BoTX group indicated deterioration.

Pain incidence in cervical dystonia is determined by the disease phenotype

BACKGROUND

Cervical dystonia (CD) is a movement disorder caused by prolonged contractions of the head and neck muscles resulting in abnormal postures and repetitive movements. Depending on the direction of the head and neck deviation, CD phenotypes are divided into torti-, latero-, antero-, and retro- impairments assessed in commonly used TWSTRS classification, or -caput and -collis according to the novel Col-Cap concept. Cervical pain, which pathophysiology has not been fully elucidated, affects more than 60% of CD patients. To date, none of the studies have investigated the risk of pain associated with the particular disease phenotype.

METHODS

In this observational study data collection was based on the survey completion by the participants, analysis of the medical records, and physical examination with the use of proper scales (TWSTRS, Col-Cap, Tsui). Extended pain profile questionnaire included detailed questions about pain localization, character, and intensity.

RESULTS

We examined 60 patients suffered from CD; 66,7% of them reported cervical pain. Latero- as the only TWSTRS phenotype was associated with increased risk of pain occurrence (OR = 3,95; p < 0,05). Interestingly, each of two Col-Cap phenotypes correlated with cervical pain: -caput positively (OR = 3,78; p < 0,05) and -collis negatively (OR = 0,29; p < 0,05).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of dystonic pain was highly differentiated within the particular CD phenotypes. The enhanced risk of cervical pain was observed in latero- (TWSTRS) and -caput (Col-Cap) phenotypes; conversely, -collis type (Col-Cap) was characterized by the lowest risk of cervical pain.

Cervical Dystonia Caused by Chronic Nonunion C2 Fracture: A Case Report

Chronic nonunion cervical fracture leading to cervical dystonia (CD) is very rare. This study reports a 72-year-old man who presented with 9-month history of progressively worsening neck tilting, neck tightness, neck pain, headache, and difficulty with swallowing. The patient was referred to speech therapy and confirmed to have dysphagia on modified barium swallow study. A cervical spine radiograph showed a chronic C2 nonunion fracture. Subsequent cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging confirmed chronic C2 nonunion fracture with kyphotic deformity of the cervical canal with associated cord compression at C1-C2 and severe central canal stenosis. Needle electromyography revealed dystonic or spasmodic neck muscles, consistent with diagnosis of CD. Botulinum toxin injection resulted in marked clinical improvement. The patient finally underwent occipital to C4 posterior segmental fusion. No recurrence of CD had occurred 12 months after botulinum toxin injection and surgery, which supports the conclusion that chronic C2 nonunion fracture is most likely responsible for CD in this case. The authors suggest that all patients with CD receive dysphagia evaluation and more importantly cervical spine imaging to rule out chronic C2 nonunion fracture.

Impact of abobotulinumtoxinA on the clinical features of cervical dystonia in routine practice

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in the management of cervical dystonia has been established in randomized, controlled trials that use a selected trial population. In this meta-analysis of observational data, we evaluated the real-life effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA as delivered in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of patient-level data for adult patients with cervical dystonia treated with abobotulinumtoxinA from three prospective, multicenter, observational studies (NCT01314365, NCT00833196 and NCT01753349).

RESULTS

We report data for patients treated with abobotulinumtoxinA over one injection cycle at 181 neurology centers in 35 countries. CD clinical features as assessed by Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Total scores (N = 920) significantly reduced by a mean [95%CI] of -12.9 [-13.9, -11.8] points at Week 4 (N = 449) and -3.2 [-3.8, -2.7] points at the end of the injection cycle (N = 890). All three TWSTRS domains (symptom severity, disability and pain) contributed to the overall improvement. Patients were generally content with symptom control at peak effect of the treatment cycle, with 86% reporting overall satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this meta-analysis of observational studies confirm the effectiveness of abobotulinumtoxinA in routine practice. Despite inclusion of a broader population sample, the magnitude of improvements observed is consistent with that seen in the pivotal, randomized controlled trials.

Benefits, Safety, and Adjunct Modality Prevalences of Long-Term Botulinum Toxin Injections for Cervical Dystonia and Myofascial Neck Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

There is a paucity of long-term treatment benefit and safety data of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) for cervical dystonia (CD) and myofascial neck pain syndrome (MPS). Additionally, the prevalence of adjunct modality uses during this period is unknown despite evolving practices.

Objective

To assess and compare treatment benefit, safety, and adjunct modality prevalences of long-term BTX-A injections between CD and MPS patients.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Private practice tertiary care clinics in Toronto.

Patients

Convenience sample of 37 (52.9%) CD and 33 (47.1%) MPS patients treated for a mean±SD duration of 7.2±4.3 and 8.3±4.7 years, respectively.

Interventions

BTX-A injections administered at least once yearly, for a duration longer than 1 year.

Main Outcome Measures

Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scales (TWSTRS) for disability and pain, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score, time to peak effect, duration of total response, adverse effects, and prevalence of adjunct modalities.

Results

CD patients experienced improvements in TWSTRS disability (17.57±6.79 to 9.81±4.35, p<0.001) and pain (14.61±3.08 to 9.05±3.49, p<0.001) scores as well as PGIC score (52.00%±23.60% to 64.80%±23.60%, p=0.007). MPS patients experienced improvements in TWSTRS disability (15.86±7.70 to 10.07±7.01, p=0.01) and pain (15.25±4.09 to 10.85±4.49, p=0.01) scores. In both cohorts, there were no changes in time to peak effect and duration of total response. Adverse effects were minimal and self-limiting. Prevalences of adjunct modalities used by CD versus MPS patients were 28.13% versus 50.00% for anesthetic procedures, 23.08% versus 15.38% for image-guidance, 65.71% versus 56.25% for pectoralis minor injections, and 47.06% versus 53.13% for cannabis-use.

Conclusion

There were demonstrated and comparable treatment benefit, safety, and adjunct modality prevalences. Our study is the first to demonstrate that long-term BTX-A injections for MPS, although commonly used off-label, can be effective and safe.

Immunogenicity Associated with Botulinum Toxin Treatment

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) has been used for the treatment of a variety of neurologic, medical and cosmetic conditions. Two serotypes, type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), are currently in clinical use. While considered safe and effective, their use has been rarely complicated by the development of antibodies that reduce or negate their therapeutic effect. The presence of antibodies has been attributed to shorter dosing intervals (and booster injections), higher doses per injection cycle, and higher amounts of antigenic protein. Other factors contributing to the immunogenicity of BoNT include properties of each serotype, such as formulation, manufacturing, and storage of the toxin. Some newer formulations with purified core neurotoxin devoid of accessory proteins may have lower overall immunogenicity. Several assays are available for the detection of antibodies, including both structural assays such as ELISA and mouse-based bioassays, but there is no consistent correlation between these antibodies and clinical response. Prevention and treatment of antibody-associated non-responsiveness is challenging and primarily involves the use of less immunogenic formulations of BoNT, waiting for the spontaneous disappearance of the neutralizing antibody, and switching to an immunologically alternate type of BoNT.

Specific characteristics of the medical history of swallowing before and after application of botulinum toxin in patients with cervical dystonia

OBJECTIVES

To compare signs and symptoms of dysphagia in individuals with cervical dystonia (CD) before and after application of botulinum toxin (BTX).

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted with 20 patients diagnosed with CD with indications for BTX application. We selected 18 patients who met the study inclusion criteria. All individuals were patients from the Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Federal University of São Paulo. BTX was applied in the cervical region at the necessary dose for each individual. To identify signs/complaints of changes in swallowing, we used a specific questionnaire that was completed by patients and/or their companions on the day of BTX injection and repeated 10 to 15 days after BTX injection.

RESULTS

Among the 18 study subjects, 15 (83.3%) showed primary and three (16.7%) showed secondary cervical dystonia. The most frequent dystonic movements were rotation (18), tilt (5), forward shift (3), backward shift (7), shoulder elevation (12), shoulder depression (2), and cervical tremor (6). The main complaints reported before BTX application were voice changes in 10 (55.6%), need for adjustment of eating position in 10 (55.6%), coughing and/or choking while eating in nine (50%), and increased eating time in nine (50%) individuals. The main complaints reported after BTX application were coughing and/or choking while eating in 11 (61.1%), voice changes in nine (50%), sensation of food stuck in the throat in eight (44%), and increased eating time in eight (44%) individuals.

CONCLUSION

The administration of a swallowing-specific questionnaire to individuals with CD before and after BTX application enabled the identification of possible dysphagia symptoms prior to drug treatment resulting from CD, which are often subsequently interpreted as side effects of the drug treatment. Thus, dysphagia can be managed, and aspiration symptoms can be prevented.

Pain in cervical dystonia and the antinociceptive effects of botulinum toxin: what is currently known?

Pain is the most common and disabling non-motor symptom in cervical dystonia (CD). Up to 88.9% of patients report pain at some point in the course of the disease. It is still a matter of debate whether CD-related pain originates only from prolonged muscle contraction. Recent data suggest that the alterations of transmission and processing of nociceptive stimuli play a crucial role in pain development. Botulinum toxin (BT) is the first-line therapy for CD. Despite fully elucidated muscle relaxant action, the antinociceptive effect of BT remains unclear and probably exceeds a simple decompression of the nerve fibers due to the reduction in muscle tone. The proposed mechanisms of the antinociceptive action of BT include inhibition of pain mediator release, inhibition of membrane sodium channels, retrograde axonal transport and impact on the other pain pathways. This article summarizes the current knowledge about the antinociceptive properties of BT and the clinical analgesic efficacy in the treatment of CD patients.

Clinical Pharmacology of Botulinum Toxin Drugs

Botulinum toxin (BT) has changed from a deadly poison to a novel therapeutic principle for a large number of disorders in many medical areas.BT drugs are special in many ways: they are biologicals, their active ingredient BT is not patentable, their spectrum of clinical applications is extremely broad, their dose range is enormous, their mode of action is local and their life cycles are special.This review covers BT's therapeutic mode of action, time course of action, target tissues, pharmacological profile, adverse effects, interactions, potency labelling and antigenicity as well as BT's therapeutic preparations.

Longitudinal studies of botulinum toxin in cervical dystonia: Why do patients discontinue therapy?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have established botulinum toxin (BoNT) to be safe and effective for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). Despite its well-documented efficacy, there has been growing awareness that a significant proportion of CD patients discontinue therapy. The reasons for discontinuation are only partly understood.

METHODS

This summary describes longitudinal studies that provided information regarding the proportions of patients discontinuing BoNT therapy, and the reasons for discontinuing therapy. The data come predominantly from un-blinded long-term follow-up studies, registry studies, and patient-based surveys.

RESULTS

All types of longitudinal studies provide strong evidence that BoNT is both safe and effective in the treatment of CD for many years. Overall, approximately one third of CD patients discontinue BoNT. The most common reason for discontinuing therapy is lack of benefit, often described as primary or secondary non-response. The apparent lack of response is only rarely related to true immune-mediated resistance to BoNT. Other reasons for discontinuing include side effects, inconvenience, cost, or other reasons.

DISCUSSION

Although BoNT is safe and effective in the treatment of the majority of patients with CD, approximately one third discontinue. The increasing awareness of a significant proportion of patients who discontinue should encourage further efforts to optimize administration of BoNT, to improve BoNT preparations to extend duration or reduce side effects, to develop add-on therapies that may mitigate swings in symptom severity, or develop entirely novel treatment approaches.

New Rhizotomy Procedure for Primary Spasmodic Torticollis

OBJECTIVE

Spasmodic torticollis (ST) is an idiopathic neurologic disorder affecting the muscles of the neck. Surgery is a preferred treatment, when conservative treatments or Botulinum neurotoxin injections fail to relieve the symptoms. Our objective here is to report the outcome of a new surgical method for treating ST patients in our department.

METHODS

The new procedure consists of rhizotomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) and C1-C2 nerve roots, coagulation of the distal end of SAN (Group A). The results of this procedure were compared with a group of patients who underwent only rhizotomy of the SAN and anterior C1-C2 nerve roots (Group B). Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 39 patients with laterocollis and rotatory torticollis subtypes of ST from Jun 1, 2014 to Jun 1, 2015. The effect of the surgery was evaluated by the reduction in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total scores preoperatively and postoperatively. The mean duration of the postoperative follow-up period was 2.57 years, ranging from 2 to 3 years.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative TWSTRS score was 65.89 ± 3.55 and 65.80 ± 3.45 in Groups A and B, respectively. Six months after the surgery, the TWSTRS scores decreased to 40.00 ± 12.14 and 26.04 ± 11.77, respectively. There was a statistically significant improvement preoperatively and postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.05). The decrease in TWSTRS score of Group B was more significant than that of Group A (P < 0.05). The main complications included shoulder numbness, shoulder weakness, and hoarseness.

CONCLUSIONS

The procedure in this study provides a new and effective surgical method for patients with ST. This procedure should be recommended if conservative therapy does not offer satisfactory relief of symptoms.

The European AntibotABE Framework Program and Its Update: Development of Innovative Botulinum Antibodies

The goal of the AntiBotABE Program was the development of recombinant antibodies that neutralize botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) A, B and E. These serotypes are lethal and responsible for most human botulinum cases. To improve therapeutic efficacy, the heavy and light chains (HC and LC) of the three BoNT serotypes were targeted to achieve a synergistic effect (oligoclonal antibodies). For antibody isolation, macaques were immunized with the recombinant and non-toxic BoNT/A, B or E, HC or LC, followed by the generation of immune phage-display libraries. Antibodies were selected from these libraries against the holotoxin and further analyzed in in vitro and ex vivo assays. For each library, the best ex vivo neutralizing antibody fragments were germline-humanized and expressed as immunoglobulin G (IgGs). The IgGs were tested in vivo, in a standardized model of protection, and challenged with toxins obtained from collections of Clostridium strains. Protective antibody combinations against BoNT/A and BoNT/B were evidenced and for BoNT/E, the anti-LC antibody alone was found highly protective. The combination of these five antibodies as an oligoclonal antibody cocktail can be clinically and regulatorily developed while their high “humanness” predicts a high tolerance in humans.

Determinants of botulinum toxin discontinuation in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective study

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the long-term persistence to treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for multiple sclerosis (MS)-related spasticity and the determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation in daily clinical setting. We retrospectively collected data of patients who started BoNT-A injections and underwent regular follow-up visits. Determinants of BoNT-A discontinuation were explored in a time-to-event Cox regression analysis which included as independent variables a large set of demographic and clinical characteristics. A total of 185 patients started BoNT-A injections from 2002 to 2014 and were followed up to September 2016. Of them, data on 121 were considered in our analysis. At follow-up, 53 (44%) patients were still on treatment and 68 (56%) patients discontinued BoNT-A after a median time of 1.2 years [interval 6 months to 7.4 years]. The reasons for discontinuation were loss of efficacy (n = 45), logistic problems or barriers to reach the structure (n = 16), and adverse events (n = 7). The absence of caregiver (hazard ratio = 1.69, p = 0.03) and lack of regular rehabilitation (hazard ratio = 1.78, p = 0.02) were two independent predictors for BoNT-A discontinuation. Our study confirms the beneficial effect of combining BoNT-A injections with rehabilitation and highlights the crucial role of caregivers for achieving better long-term outcomes in people with MS suffering from spasticity.

Botulinum Neurotoxins: Biology, Pharmacology, and Toxicology

The study of botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) is rapidly progressing in many aspects. Novel BoNTs are being discovered owing to next generation sequencing, but their biologic and pharmacological properties remain largely unknown. The molecular structure of the large protein complexes that the toxin forms with accessory proteins, which are included in some BoNT type A1 and B1 pharmacological preparations, have been determined. By far the largest effort has been dedicated to the testing and validation of BoNTs as therapeutic agents in an ever increasing number of applications, including pain therapy. BoNT type A1 has been also exploited in a variety of cosmetic treatments, alone or in combination with other agents, and this specific market has reached the size of the one dedicated to the treatment of medical syndromes. The pharmacological properties and mode of action of BoNTs have shed light on general principles of neuronal transport and protein-protein interactions and are stimulating basic science studies. Moreover, the wide array of BoNTs discovered and to be discovered and the production of recombinant BoNTs endowed with specific properties suggest novel uses in therapeutics with increasing disease/symptom specifity. These recent developments are reviewed here to provide an updated picture of the biologic mechanism of action of BoNTs, of their increasing use in pharmacology and in cosmetics, and of their toxicology.

Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA liquid formulation in cervical dystonia: A randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Approved botulinum toxin A products require reconstitution. AbobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection is a ready-to-use liquid formulation of abobotulinumtoxinA.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the superior efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection to placebo and to test the noninferior efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection versus abobotulinumtoxinA (dry formulation) in cervical dystonia.

METHODS

This was a phase-3, multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized, active, and placebo-controlled study (N = 369). Patients with cervical dystonia were randomized (3:3:1) to abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection 500 U, abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U, or placebo. Following the double-blind phase, patients received abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection, open-label, for up to 4 cycles. The primary outcome was change from baseline at week 4 of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score. Secondary measures included change from baseline or cycle baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale scores.

RESULTS

At week 4, both products were superior to placebo (Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score least square mean decrease from baseline, abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection 500 U -12.5, abobotulinumtoxinA 500 U -14.0, placebo -3.9; P < .0001 vs placebo). The noninferiority limit of 3 points in the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score at week 4 was not met for abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection versus abobotulinumtoxinA. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total score reductions were maintained for up to 4 cycles of abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection open-label follow-up treatment. Safety profiles of abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection and abobotulinumtoxinA were similar, with dysphagia and injection-site pain the most frequent drug-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the predefined noninferiority criterion was not met, abobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection was similarly effective to freeze-dried abobotulinumtoxinA in reducing Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale total scores with a similar safety profile. AbobotulinumtoxinA solution for injection efficacy was maintained with chronic open-label treatment, and this novel formulation may add convenience as well as dosing accuracy to treatment with abobotulinumtoxinA. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Botulinum toxin type A with or without needle electromyographic guidance in patients with cervical dystonia

Aim

To investigate the efficacy and safety of electromyography (EMG)- and palpation-guided botulinum toxin type A injection in cervical dystonia (CD) patients.

Methods

In this randomized, controlled trial, 68 CD patients were randomly allocated to two groups, receiving botulinum toxin type A injections guided by either palpation (Group A) or EMG (Group B). The primary endpoint is defined as the difference in the Tsui score between groups at 16 weeks. The secondary endpoints were the visual analog scale (VAS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores and Clinical and Patient Global Impression of Change (CGIC and PGIC).

Results

Sixty-five patients completed the study. No significant difference was observed in the Tsui score between groups A and B at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment (p > 0.05). However, 16 weeks after treatment, the Tsui score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B. For both groups, the degree of pain at each time point during follow-up significantly reduced after treatment. However, no significant difference was observed in VAS scores between the two groups. Interestingly, the patient HADS score decreased without statistical significance 8 weeks following treatment. No significant difference in HADS scores was observed between the two groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in PGIC and CGIC between the two groups. However, CGIC was significantly higher than PGIC. No significant difference in adverse reactions was observed between groups. CD patients treated with EMG guidance experienced a significantly more pain at the injection site but a significantly lower adverse event occurrence rate of dysphagia when compared to CD patients treated with palpation guidance only.

Conclusions

CD patients treated with EMG guidance experienced a prolonged benefit as measured by the Tsui scale when compared to CD patients treated with palpation guidance alone. EMG-guided injection resulted in a lower incidence of dysphagia and higher incidence of discomfort at the injection site than palpation-guided injection.

A mixed treatment comparison to compare the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatments for cervical dystonia

A systematic pair-wise comparison of all available botulinum toxin serotype A and B treatments for cervical dystonia (CD) was conducted, as direct head-to-head clinical trial comparisons are lacking. Five botulinum toxin products: Dysport^® (abobotulinumtoxinA), Botox^® (onabotulinumtoxinA), Xeomin^® (incobotulinumtoxinA), Prosigne^® (Chinese botulinum toxin serotype A) and Myobloc^® (rimabotulinumtoxinB) have demonstrated efficacy for managing CD. A pair-wise efficacy and safety comparison was performed for all toxins based on literature-reported clinical outcomes. Multi-armed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified for inclusion using a systematic literature review, and assessed for comparability based on patient population and efficacy outcome measures. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was selected as the efficacy outcome measurement for assessment. A mixed treatment comparison (MTC) was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical model allowing indirect comparison of the interventions. Due to the limitation of available clinical data, this study only investigated the main effect of toxin treatments without explicitly considering potential confounding factors such as gender and formulation differences. There was reasonable agreement between the number of unconstrained data points, residual deviance and pair-wise results. This research suggests that all botulinum toxin serotype A and serotype B treatments were effective compared to placebo in treating CD, with the exception of Prosigne. Based on this MTC analysis, there is no significant efficacy difference between Dysport, Botox, Xeomin and Myobloc at week four post injection. Of the adverse events measured, neither dysphagia nor injection site pain was significantly greater in the treatment or placebo groups.

Striving for more good days: patient perspectives on botulinum toxin for the treatment of cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

The recommended reinjection interval for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) formulations in the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD) is generally ≥12 weeks, though intervals ≥10 weeks are approved for incobotulinumtoxinA in Europe. However, recurring symptoms can occur before the end of this period. Using qualitative research, we sought a greater understanding of disease burden, unmet patient needs, and barriers to treatment.

METHODS

We conducted online semistructured, focus-group discussions, and online forum follow-up discussions among patients with CD, focusing on disease burden, patient needs, injection cycle preferences, and relationships with health care professionals. A subset of patients was also questioned in telephone interviews about individual experiences of CD and BoNT treatment. All participants were UK residents who had received onabotulinumtoxinA or abobotulinumtoxinA for CD for ≥1 year.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (81% female; mean duration of CD 16.4 [range 4-31] years; mean BoNT injection cycle length 12.8 weeks) participated in the online focus-group and forum follow-up discussions. Of these, seven patients participated in telephone interviews. All had recurring symptoms between treatments, which substantially impacted on their work, family, and social life. Symptom severity fluctuated throughout an injection cycle and differed between patients and across injection cycles. Participants' relationships with health care professionals and treatment satisfaction varied greatly. Many participants wanted longer-lasting and/or more stable symptom relief with shorter and/or more flexible injection intervals, according to individual needs. Lack of health care resources, long journeys to treatment centers, and immunogenicity/side-effect concerns were perceived as the main barriers to more flexible treatment.

CONCLUSION

The high burden of recurring primary and secondary symptoms of CD considerably affects patients' quality of life. Patient-led assessments of disease burden revealed that personalized, more flexible, and/or shorter BoNT injection intervals may reduce the day-to-day impact of CD. Collaboration between patients, clinicians, and health care systems may effect change and improve treatment for patients with CD.

Development of human-like scFv-Fc antibodies neutralizing Botulinum toxin serotype B

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are responsible for human botulism, a life-threatening disease characterized by flaccid muscle paralysis that occurs naturally by food poisoning or colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by BoNT-producing clostridia. BoNTs have been classified as category A agents by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To date, 7 subtypes of BoNT/B were identified showing that subtypes B1 (16 strains) and B2 (32 strains) constitute the vast majority of BoNT/B strains. Neutralizing antibodies are required for the development of anti-botulism drugs to deal with the potential risk. In this study, macaques (Macaca fascicularis) were immunized with recombinant light chain (LC) or heavy chain (HC) of BoNT/B2, followed by the construction of 2 hyper-immune phage display libraries. The best single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) isolated from each library were selected according to their affinities and cross reactivity with BoNT/B1 toxin subtype. These scFvs against LC and HC were further analyzed by assessing the inhibition of in vitro endopeptidase activity of BoNT/B1 and B2 and neutralization of BoNT/B1 and B2 toxin-induced paralysis in the mouse ex vivo phrenic nerve assay. The antibodies B2–7 (against HC) and BLC3 (against LC) were produced as scFv-Fc, and, when tested individually, neutralized BoNT/B1 and BoNT/B2 in a mouse ex vivo phrenic nerve assay. Whereas only scFv-Fc BLC3 alone protected mice against BoNT/B2-induced paralysis in vivo, when B2–7 and BLC3 were combined they exhibited potent synergistic protection. The present study provided an opportunity to assess the extent of antibody-mediated neutralization of BoNT/B1 and BoNT/B2 subtypes in ex vivo and in vitro assays, and to confirm the benefit of the synergistic effect of antibodies targeting the 2 distinct functional domains of the toxin in vivo. Notably, the framework regions of the most promising antibodies (B2–7 and BLC3) are close to the human germline sequences, which suggest that they may be well tolerated in potential clinical development.

Clinical and pharmacological properties of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in neurological disorders

Background

IncobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®) is a purified botulinum neurotoxin type A formulation, free from complexing proteins, with proven efficacy and good tolerability for the treatment of neurological conditions such as blepharospasm, cervical dystonia (CD), and post-stroke spasticity of the upper limb. This article provides a comprehensive overview of incobotulinumtoxinA based on randomized controlled trials and prospective clinical studies.

Summary

IncobotulinumtoxinA provides clinical efficacy in treating blepharospasm, CD, and upper-limb post-stroke spasticity based on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with open-label extension periods (total study duration up to 89 weeks). Adverse events were generally mild or moderate. The most frequent adverse events, probably related to the injections, included eyelid ptosis and dry eye in the treatment of blepharospasm, dysphagia, neck pain, and muscular weakness in patients with CD, and injection site pain and muscular weakness when used for treating spasticity. In blepharospasm and CD, incobotulinumtoxinA was investigated in clinical trials permitting flexible intertreatment intervals based on the individual patient’s clinical need; the safety profile of intervals shorter than 12 weeks was comparable to intervals of 12 weeks and longer. There were no cases of newly formed neutralizing antibodies during the Phase III and IV incobotulinumtoxinA trials. Phase III head-to-head trials of incobotulinumtoxinA versus onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of blepharospasm and CD have demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of both formulations. Additional Phase III trials of incobotulinumtoxinA in conditions such as lower-limb spasticity, spasticity in children with cerebral palsy, and sialorrhea in various neurological disorders are ongoing.

Conclusion

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an effective, well-tolerated botulinum neurotoxin type A formulation. Data from randomized clinical trials and further observational studies are expected to help physicians to optimize treatment by tailoring the choice of formulation, dose, and treatment intervals to the patient’s clinical needs.

Factors influencing secondary non-response to botulinum toxin type A injections in cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND

The development of secondary non-response (SNR) to botulinum neurotoxin type-A (BoNT-A) is considered a key issue in the management of cervical dystonia (CD). This case-controlled study was performed to systematically identify factors influencing SNR during BoNT-A therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, international, non-interventional study of CD patients. Patients with SNR were matched with up to three responder patients (control) on the basis of duration of therapy and number of injection cycles. Factors influencing the development of SNR were screened using a univariate logistic regression model and confirmed using a multivariate conditional logistic regression model.

RESULTS

216 patients were enrolled, and 201 (SNR = 52; responder = 149) were matched and subdivided into blocks (doublets, triplets or quadruplets). At baseline, a significantly higher proportion of SNR patients had received previous or concomitant therapies (p = 0.038) and surgery for CD (p = 0.007) compared with controls. Although disease severity at onset was similar between groups, a significantly higher proportion of SNR patients experienced severe CD at the time of SNR compared with controls at the last documented visit. Multivariate analyses identified five factors that were significantly associated in predicting SNR (odds ratio [OR] > 1 indicated higher chances for being SNR): previous surgical procedure for CD (OR 9.8, p = 0.013), previous BoNT-A related severe adverse event (AE) (OR 5.6 p = 0.027), physical therapy (OR 4.6, p = 0.028), neuroleptic use (OR 3.3, p = 0.019) and average BoNT-A dose (OR 2.7, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that SNR may not reflect true pharmacological resistance to BoNT-A therapy, but may be related to underlying disease severity.

Microvascular decompression surgery is effective for the laterocollis subtype of spasmodic torticollis: a long-term follow-up result

BACKGROUND

Spasmodic torticollis (ST) is characterized by sustained, involuntary, and painful spasms of specific muscle (s), which results into abnormal posture of the neck and head. Although various treatments for ST have been introduced, none of them shows absolute effectiveness. Earlier research from our department showed that microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery is effective in the short-term for ST patients with confirmed accessory nerve compression. However, the long-term outcome of MVD remains unknown.

METHOD

Twelve ST patients with confirmed accessory nerve compression received MVD surgery of their accessory nerves. We utilized the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) to evaluate the long-term outcome (5.4 ± 0.87 years).

RESULTS

The MVD lowered total TWSTRS scores by 42.8 % in all ST patients. This result, however, only counted for moderate relief. Interestingly, we observed that the laterocollis (LC) subtypes of ST (n = 3) obtained a higher TWSTRS score improvement (86.9 ± 6.2 %), compared to that of the non-LC (28.1 ± 12 %) (P =0.0001). Additionally, the disability (92.7 ± 2 %) subscale score in the LC subtypes had the most prominent improvement compared to the pain (88.1 ± 5.1 %) and severity (81.3 ± 10.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

In the cases of confirmed accessory nerve compression, the MVD could be considered as a treatment alternative for ST, especially for the LC subtypes.

The dystonia discomfort scale (DDS): a novel instrument to monitor the temporal profile of botulinum toxin therapy in cervical dystonia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conventional scales measure the effect of botulinum toxin (BT) therapy only at specific points in time. The Dystonia Discomfort Scale (DDS), a novel, easy-to-use, self-assessment scale to record temporal profiles of the effect of BT therapy in cervical dystonia (CD), is introduced and evaluated against the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS).

METHODS

Seventy-six patients with CD (age 54.4 ± 10.9 years, 34% male) receiving ≤5 cycles of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin); Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) injections at intervals ≥10 weeks used DDS to record the severity of their symptoms daily. DDS data were compared with TWSTRS-Total scores and patients' subjective estimation (SE) of the onset (TO) and waning (TW) of the treatment effect.

RESULTS

The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale - Total scores correlated significantly with DDS (P ≤ 0.028 at all visits evaluated). TO-DDS and TO-SE were 7.9 ± 8.6 and 7.1 ± 4.1 days, respectively; TW-DDS and TW-SE were 41.8 ± 19.2 and 45.1 ± 21.5 days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Dystonia Discomfort Scale is a novel, easy-to-use, self-assessment scale for valid and sensitive monitoring of the temporal profile of the effect of BT therapy in patients with CD. DDS provides important additional information about onset, duration, waning, stability and reproducibility of the effects of BT therapy.