Xu XQ, Cao LL, Ma G, Shen GC, Lu SS, Zhang YX, Zhang Y, Shi HB, Liu S, Wu FY. Potential Approach to Quantifying the Volume of the Ischemic Core in Truncated Computed Tomography Perfusion Scans: A Preliminary Study.
J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024;
48:298-302. [PMID:
37757843 DOI:
10.1097/rct.0000000000001552]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to provide an alternative approach for quantifying the volume of the ischemic core (IC) if truncation of computed tomography perfusion (CTP) occurs in clinical practice.
METHODS
Baseline CTP and follow-up diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) data from 88 patients with stroke were retrospectively collected. CTP source images (CTPSI) from the unenhanced phase to the peak arterial phase (CTPSI-A) or the peak venous phase (CTPSI-V) were collected to simulate the truncation of CTP in the arterial or venous phases, respectively. The volume of IC on CTPSI-A (V CTPSI-A ) or CTPSI-V (V CTPSI-V ) was defined as the volume of the brain tissue with >65% reduction in attenuation compared with that of the normal tissue. The volume of IC on the baseline CTP (V CTP ) was defined as a relative cerebral blood flow of <30% of that in the normal tissue. The volume of the posttreatment infarct on the follow-up DWI (V DWI ) image was manually delineated and calculated. One-way analysis of variance, Bland-Altman plots, and Spearman correlation analyses were used for the statistical analysis.
RESULTS
V CTPSI-A was significantly higher than V DWI ( P < 0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between V CTP and V DWI ( P = 0.073) or between V CTPSI-V and V DWI ( P > 0.999). The mean differences between V DWI and V CTPSI-V , V DWI and V CTP , and V DWI and V CTPSI-A were 1.70 mL (limits of agreement [LoA], -56.40 to 59.70), 8.30 mL (LoA, -40.70 to 57.30), and -68.10 mL (LoA, -180.90 to 44.70), respectively. Significant correlations were observed between V DWI and V CTP ( r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and between V DWI and V CTPSI-V ( r = 0.39, P < 0.001); however, no significant correlation was observed between V DWI and V CTPSI-A ( r = 0.20, P = 0.068).
CONCLUSIONS
V CTPSI-V may be a promising method for quantifying the volume of the IC if truncation of CTP occurs.
Collapse