Effectiveness of multiple disease-modifying therapies in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: causal inference to emulate a multiarm randomised trial

Comparative efficacy of ofatumumab versus oral therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis patients using propensity score analyses and simulated treatment comparisons

Background

Evidence from network meta-analyses (NMAs) and real-world propensity score (PS) analyses suggest monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer a therapeutic advantage over currently available oral therapies and, therefore, warrant consideration as a distinct group of high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). This is counter to the current perception of these therapies by some stakeholders, including payers.

Objectives

A multifaceted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was undertaken to clarify the relative efficacy of mAbs and oral therapies.

Design

Two ITC methods that use individual patient data (IPD) to adjust for between-trial differences, PS analyses and simulated treatment comparisons (STCs), were used to compare the mAb ofatumumab versus the oral therapies cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod.

Data sources and methods

As IPD were available for trials of ofatumumab and fingolimod, PS analyses were conducted. Given summary-level data were available for cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod trials, STCs were conducted between ofatumumab and each of these oral therapies. Three efficacy outcomes were compared: annualized relapse rate (ARR), 3-month confirmed disability progression (3mCDP), and 6-month CDP (6mCDP).

Results

The PS analyses demonstrated ofatumumab was statistically superior to fingolimod for ARR and time to 3mCDP but not time to 6mCDP. In STCs, ofatumumab was statistically superior in reducing ARR and decreasing the proportion of patients with 3mCDP compared with cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod and in decreasing the proportion with 6mCP compared with fingolimod and ozanimod. These findings were largely consistent with recently published NMAs that identified mAb therapies as the most efficacious DMTs for RMS.

Conclusion

Complementary ITC methods showed ofatumumab was superior to cladribine, fingolimod, and ozanimod in lowering relapse rates and delaying disability progression among patients with RMS. Our study supports the therapeutic superiority of mAbs over currently available oral DMTs for RMS and the delineation of mAbs as high-efficacy therapies.

A Case of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma That Developed in a Patient Receiving Fingolimod Therapy for Multiple Sclerosis

Fingolimod is an oral medication for the prevention of multiple sclerosis relapse, and its efficacy has been demonstrated in several clinical trials. Fingolimod has various side effects, such as arrhythmia and hepatic dysfunction. In addition, there have been rare reports of the development of lymphoproliferative disorders in patients undergoing fingolimod therapy, including primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). We diagnosed and treated a multiple sclerosis patient who developed PCNSL while undergoing fingolimod therapy. Fourteen months after starting fingolimod therapy, the patient developed aphasia, and underwent biopsy analysis for a lesion displaying a homogeneous gadolinium-enhanced lesion in the left frontal lobe. The lesion was diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by pathological examination. After the diagnosis, the patient received chemotherapy together with methotrexate combination therapy, and the lesion became smaller and the patient's symptoms improved. Although several autopsy cases of PCNSL in patients who received fingolimod therapy have been reported, there have been few reports to date of patients diagnosed by biopsy analysis.