1
|
Oeckl P, Steinacker P, Feneberg E, Otto M. Neurochemical biomarkers in the diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: an update. J Neurochem 2016; 138 Suppl 1:184-92. [DOI: 10.1111/jnc.13669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2016] [Revised: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Oeckl
- Department of Neurology; Ulm University Hospital; Ulm Germany
| | | | - Emily Feneberg
- Department of Neurology; Ulm University Hospital; Ulm Germany
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology; Ulm University Hospital; Ulm Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baldeiras I, Santana I, Leitão MJ, Ribeiro MH, Pascoal R, Duro D, Lemos R, Santiago B, Almeida MR, Oliveira CR. Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ40 is similarly reduced in patients with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Alzheimer's Disease. J Neurol Sci 2015; 358:308-16. [PMID: 26388316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Revised: 08/11/2015] [Accepted: 09/08/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers have been increasingly studied for dementia diagnosis, however the accuracy to distinguish between different forms of dementia is still unsatisfactory. In this study, the added value of another CSF Aβ-peptide (Aβ40), along with the core CSF markers t-Tau, p-Tau, and Aβ42, in the discrimination between two large dementia groups of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD; n=107), Alzheimer's Disease (AD; n=107) and non-demented subjects (n=33) was evaluated. In FTLD, t-Tau and p-Tau were significantly increased in relation to controls, but lower than in AD, while Aβ42 was similar in FTLD and controls, but higher than in AD. Equally reduced Aβ40 levels were seen in both dementia groups, and therefore the combination of Aβ40 with core CSF biomarkers optimally discriminated FTLD and AD patients from controls. Aβ42 and t-Tau were selected as the best biomarker subset to differentiate FTLD from AD, with no added value of Aβ40 to the model. Diagnostic accuracy between FTLD and AD was still sub-optimal, with a significant percentage (23%) of FTLD patients, in particularly women, carrying an ApoE-ε4 allele, showing a CSF-AD biomarkers profile. Although CSF Aβ40 does not appear to have an additional value in the distinction between FTLD and AD, it increases the discrimination between subjects with dementia from controls. A CSF-AD biomarker profile can be seen in patients with a clinical phenotype of FTLD, reinforcing the need for autopsy confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Baldeiras
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Maria João Leitão
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Maria Helena Ribeiro
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Rui Pascoal
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Diana Duro
- Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | - Raquel Lemos
- Neurology Department, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
| | | | | | - Catarina Resende Oliveira
- Laboratory of Neurochemistry, Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal; Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal; Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deisenhammer F, Egg R, Giovannoni G, Hemmer B, Petzold A, Sellebjerg F, Teunissen C, Tumani H. EFNS guidelines on disease-specific CSF investigations. Eur J Neurol 2009; 16:760-70. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02595.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
5
|
Krolak-Salmon P, Seguin J, Perret-Liaudet A, Desestret V, Vighetto A, Bonnefoy M. [Near a biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders]. Rev Med Interne 2008; 29:785-93. [PMID: 18584921 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2008.01.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2007] [Revised: 12/24/2007] [Accepted: 01/23/2008] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review the current concepts in the biological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related disorders. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS As new therapeutics specific of AD may be available soon, early diagnosis of AD in the context of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia appears to be challenging. The high amount of atypical clinical forms of AD leads to develop new tools allowing in vivo diagnosis. New CerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) biomarkers seem to reflect specific aspects of deep neuropathological changes observed in AD, i.e. amyloid deposits and neurofibrillary tangles. Amyloid beta-peptide 1-42 (Abeta(1-42)) and hyperphosphorylated tubulin associated unit (tau) isoforms appear to be the most sensitive and specific CSF biomarkers, the combination of these biomarkers depicting the best diagnosis value for AD. These molecules are also efficient in the prediction of the conversion from the MCI state to the dementia state of AD. Combined to clinical and neuro-imaging information, CSF biomarkers appear thus to be highly relevant in improving the early etiological diagnosis of dementia. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS The current research focalises on the development of new molecules coming from Abeta and tau protein families, in the CSF and in the serum, as well as molecules reflecting other pathological metabolism changes, as alpha-synuclein in Lewy Body Disease. The diagnosis value of CSF biological markers is so promising that they have been recently included in the research diagnosis criteria of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Krolak-Salmon
- Service de médecine gériatrique, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite cedex, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sonnen JA, Keene CD, Montine KS, Li G, Peskind ER, Zhang J, Montine TJ. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Expert Rev Neurother 2007; 7:1021-8. [PMID: 17678497 DOI: 10.1586/14737175.7.8.1021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The development and validation of biomarkers for the latent, prodromal and dementia stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a pressing issue because of their high prevalence and an emerging set of experimental therapeutics that will soon force decisions regarding risk versus benefit. While genetic risk factors and neuroimaging will certainly have important roles to play, here we have focused on biomarkers assayed in body fluids. There is developing consensus for a central role for cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-beta (Abeta)42 and tau species to aid in the diagnosis of AD at different stages; plasma-based assays for Abeta species show some promise, but the picture is much less clear than in the cerebrospinal fluid. Biomarkers of different pathogenic steps thought to contribute to AD will also be important in assessing pharmacologic mechanisms of new therapies. Discovery approaches now underway may develop novel panels of biomarkers for AD. The next 5 years will see standardization of more established approaches, and the combination of different modalities into the most effective means for assessing different stages of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Sonnen
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bian H, Grossman M. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: recent progress in antemortem diagnosis. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114:23-9. [PMID: 17541785 DOI: 10.1007/s00401-007-0235-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2007] [Revised: 05/05/2007] [Accepted: 05/08/2007] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by changes in behaviour and language dysfunction. Two broad pathological subdivisions of FTLD are recognized in a recent classification scheme based on biochemical features: tau-positive pathology due to the accumulation of various forms of the microtubule-associated protein tau, such as FTLD with Pick bodies and corticobasal degeneration; and tau-negative pathology such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin/TDP-43-immunoreactive inclusions. Etiologically based treatments aim to target the mechanisms underlying the accumulation of these abnormal proteins in these conditions. It is essential for us to develop biomarkers that support the accurate diagnosis of the specific diseases causing FTLD. These biomarkers also can be useful in assessing efficacy during treatment trials. This review summarizes the epidemiologic, clinical, neuropsychological, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker features that can help identify these pathologically defined conditions during life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Bian
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alberici A, Armani M, Paterlini A, Benussi L, Nicosia F, Ghidoni R, Signorini S, Cotelli M, Frisoni GB, Geroldi C, Trevisan CP, Growdon JH, Borroni B, Padovani A, Rossini PM, Binetti G. Tau missing from CSF. J Neurol 2007; 254:107-9. [PMID: 17277912 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-006-0282-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2005] [Accepted: 04/27/2006] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|