Comparative clinical trial of epsilon amino-caproic acid and tranexamic acid in the prevention of early recurrence of subarachnoid haemorrhage

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Rebleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rebleeding is probably related to the dissolution of the blood clot at the site of the aneurysm rupture by natural fibrinolytic activity. This review is an update of previously published Cochrane Reviews.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antifibrinolytic treatment in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (May 2022), CENTRAL (in the Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 1), MEDLINE (December 2012 to May 2022), and Embase (December 2012 to May 2022). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing studies, we searched reference lists and trial registers, performed forward tracking of relevant references, and contacted drug companies (the latter in previous versions of this review).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid, or an equivalent) with control in people with subarachnoid haemorrhage of suspected or proven aneurysmal cause.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors (MRG & WJD) independently selected trials for inclusion, and extracted the data for the current update. In total, three review authors (MIB & MRG in the previous update; MRG & WJD in the current update) assessed risk of bias. For the primary outcome, we dichotomised the outcome scales into good and poor outcome, with poor outcome defined as death, vegetative state, or (moderate) severe disability, assessed with either the Glasgow Outcome Scale or the Modified Rankin Scale. We assessed death from any cause, rates of rebleeding, delayed cerebral ischaemia, and hydrocephalus per treatment group. We expressed effects as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used random-effects models for all analyses. We assessed the quality of the evidence with GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one new trial in this update, for a total of 11 included trials involving 2717 participants. The risk of bias was low in six studies. Five studies were open label, and we rated them at high risk of performance bias. We also rated one of these studies at high risk for attrition and reporting bias.  Five trials reported on poor outcome (death, vegetative state, or (moderate) severe disability), with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.13; P = 0.53; 5 trials, 2359 participants; high-quality evidence), which showed no difference between groups. All trials reported on death from all causes, which showed no difference between groups, with a pooled RR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.16; P = 0.77; 11 trials, 2717 participants; high-quality evidence). In trials that combined short-term antifibrinolytic treatment (< 72 hours) with preventative measures for delayed cerebral ischaemia, the RR for poor outcome was 0.98 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.18; P = 0.83; 2 trials, 1318 participants; high-quality evidence).  Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of rebleeding, reported at the end of follow-up (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.91; P = 0.01; 11 trials, 2717 participants; absolute risk reduction 7%, 95% CI 3 to 12%; moderate-quality evidence), but there was heterogeneity (I² = 59%) between the trials. The pooled RR for delayed cerebral ischaemia was 1.27 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.62; P = 0.05; 7 trials, 2484 participants; moderate-quality evidence). However, this effect was less extreme after the implementation of ischaemia preventative measures and < 72 hours of treatment (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.46; P = 0.49; 2 trials, 1318 participants; high-quality evidence). Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.20; P = 0.09; 6 trials, 1992 participants; high-quality evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence does not support the routine use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. More specifically, early administration with concomitant treatment strategies to prevent delayed cerebral ischaemia does not improve clinical outcome. There is sufficient evidence from multiple randomised controlled trials to incorporate this conclusion in treatment guidelines.

Tranexamic acid for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in surgery, trauma and bleeding disorders: a narrative review

OBJECTIVES

We review the evidence for tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment and prevention of bleeding caused by surgery, trauma and bleeding disorders. We highlight therapeutic areas where evidence is lacking and discuss safety issues, particularly the concern regarding thrombotic complications.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library to identify clinical trials, safety reports and review articles.

FINDINGS

TXA reduces bleeding in patients with menorrhagia, and in patients undergoing caesarian section, myomectomy, hysterectomy, orthopedic surgery, cardiac surgery, orthognathic surgery, rhinoplasty, and prostate surgery. For dental extractions in patients with bleeding disorders or taking antithrombotic drugs, as well as in cases of idiopathic epistaxis, tonsillectomy, liver transplantation and resection, nephrolithotomy, skin cancer surgery, burn wounds and skin grafting, there is moderate evidence that TXA is effective for reducing bleeding. TXA was not effective in reducing bleeding in traumatic brain injury and upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding. TXA reduces mortality in patients suffering from trauma and postpartum hemorrhage. For many of these indications, there is no consensus about the optimal TXA dose. With certain dosages and with certain indications TXA can cause harm, such as an increased risk of seizures after high TXA doses with brain injury and cardiac surgery, and an increased mortality after delayed administration of TXA for trauma events or postpartum hemorrhage. Whereas most trials did not signal an increased risk for thrombotic events, some trials reported an increased rate of thrombotic complications with the use of TXA for gastro-intestinal bleeding and trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

TXA has well-documented beneficial effects in many clinical indications. Identifying these indications and the optimal dose and timing to minimize risk of seizures or thromboembolic events is work in progress.

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Rebleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rebleeding is probably related to dissolution of the blood clot at the site of aneurysm rupture by natural fibrinolytic activity. This review is an update of a previously published Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of antifibrinolytic treatment in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (February 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1948 to December 2012), and EMBASE (1947 to December 2012). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing studies we searched reference lists and trial registers, performed forward tracking of relevant references and contacted drug companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid, or an equivalent) with control in people with subarachnoid haemorrhage of suspected or proven aneurysmal cause.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the data. Three review authors assessed trial quality. For the primary outcome we converted the outcome scales between good and poor outcome for the analysis. We scored death from any cause and rates of rebleeding, cerebral ischaemia, and hydrocephalus per treatment group. We expressed effects as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used random-effects models for all analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 10 trials involving 1904 participants. The risk of bias was low in six studies. Four studies were open label and were rated as high risk of performance bias. One of these studies was also rated as high risk for attrition bias. Four trials reported on poor outcome (death, vegetative state, or severe disability) with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.15). All trials reported on death from all causes with a pooled RR of 1.00 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.18). In a trial that combined short-term antifibrinolytic treatment (< 72 hours) with preventative measures for cerebral ischaemia the RR for poor outcome was 0.85 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.14). Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of re-bleeding reported at the end of follow-up (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.97; 78 per 1000 participants), but there was heterogeneity (I² = 62%) between the trials. The pooled RR for reported cerebral ischaemia was 1.41 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.91, 83 per 1000 participants), again with heterogeneity between the trials (I² = 52%). Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus in five trials (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.36).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence does not support the use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage, even in those who have concomitant treatment strategies to prevent cerebral ischaemia. Results on short-term treatment are promising, but not conclusive. Further randomised trials evaluating short-term antifibrinolytic treatment are needed to evaluate its effectiveness.

Clinical trials in cardiac arrest and subarachnoid hemorrhage: lessons from the past and ideas for the future

Introduction. Elevated intracranial pressure that occurs at the time of cerebral aneurysm rupture can lead to inadequate cerebral blood flow, which may mimic the brain injury cascade that occurs after cardiac arrest. Insights from clinical trials in cardiac arrest may provide direction for future early brain injury research after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods. A search of PubMed from 1980 to 2012 and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted to identify published and ongoing randomized clinical trials in aneurysmal SAH and cardiac arrest patients. Only English, adult, human studies with primary or secondary mortality or neurological outcomes were included. Results. A total of 142 trials (82 SAH, 60 cardiac arrest) met the review criteria (103 published, 39 ongoing). The majority of both published and ongoing SAH trials focus on delayed secondary insults after SAH (70%), while 100% of cardiac arrest trials tested interventions within the first few hours of ictus. No SAH trials addressing treatment of early brain injury were identified. Twenty-nine percent of SAH and 13% of cardiac arrest trials showed outcome benefit, though there is no overlap mechanistically. Conclusions. Clinical trials in SAH assessing acute brain injury are warranted and successful interventions identified by the cardiac arrest literature may be reasonable targets of the study.

Antifibrinolytic therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Rebleeding is an important cause of death and disability in people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Rebleeding is probably due to dissolution of the clot by natural fibrinolytic activity.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifibrinolytic treatment in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Embase (last searched June 2002) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing oral or intravenous antifibrinolytic drugs (tranexamic acid, epsilon amino-caproic acid or an equivalent) with control in people with confirmed subarachnoid haemorrhage.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted the data. All five reviewers assessed trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials involving 1399 patients were included. Based on 1041 patients in three trials, antifibrinolytic treatment did not show any evidence of benefit for poor outcome (death, vegetative state or severe disability) with an odds ratio of 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 1.43. Death from all causes was not significantly influenced by treatment across all nine trials (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.24). Antifibrinolytic treatment reduced the risk of re-bleeding reported at the end of follow-up, with some heterogeneity between the trials (odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.71). Treatment increased the risk of cerebral ischaemia in five trials (odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.07 to 1.82) with considerable heterogeneity between the most recent study (Roos 2000), in which specific treatments to prevent cerebral ischemia were used, and the four older studies. Antifibrinolytic treatment showed no effect on the reported rate of hydrocephalus in five trials (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.86 to 1.51).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Treatment does not improve clinical outcome because the benefit is offset by an increase in poor outcome caused by cerebral ischemia as a result of treatment with antifibrinolytics. These data do not support the routine use of antifibrinolytic drugs in the treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Benefits and risks of antifibrinolytic therapy in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. A double-blind placebo-controlled study

One hundred patients with a verified subarachnoid haemorrhage were studied in a double blind, placebo-controlled trial at a single centre to determine the value and relative risks of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. The incidence of recurrent haemorrhage between active and placebo groups was identical (12%) and the mortality from recurrent haemorrhage was 7% and 5%, respectively. The overall incidence of cerebral infarction before surgery, at discharge and at 6 months follow-up was greater in the TXA group (27%) than in the control group (11%). Post-operative cerebral ischaemia was significantly more frequent in the active, 18 of 29 as compared to 6 of 32 patients, in the placebo group. In a fifth of the patients in whom cerebral blood flow was estimated there was a significant reduction of cerebral blood flow (CBF) on the side of the ruptured aneurysm in the TXA treated group. It is suggested that this may be the cause of the increased incidence of cerebral ischaemia in this group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of cerebral vasospasm, hydrocephalus, visual disturbances and gastrointestinal disturbances. More fatalities were encountered from ischaemia and recurrent haemorrhage in the TXA group but these differences did not reach statistical significance at the 5% level. Given that disability was due to either vasospasm or recurrent haemorrhage than a patient under TXA treatment was significantly more likely to have disability due to vasospasm (p less than 0.04); the reverse was true for the placebo patient (p less than 0.05).

Rebleeding, ischaemia and hydrocephalus following anti-fibrinolytic treatment for ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective clinical study

350 patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage from aneurysmal rupture--admitted in the years 1966-1983--were selected for a retrospective controlled study on the efficacy of antifibrinolytic therapy (AFT). Patients treated with antifibrinolytics were divided into two groups, according to the day of hospital admission and onset of therapy, respectively between 0 and 3 days (SG 1) and between 4 and 7 days from SAH (SG 2); treated patients (260 cases) received i.v. tranexamic acid (6 gr/day) for at least two weeks. Patients admitted before 1974, not receiving antifibrinolytics (90 cases), were selected as controls and divided into two groups (CG 1 and CG 2), according to the day of admission. In the first study group (admission 0-3 days) the rebleeding rate within 2 weeks was 9% versus 23% in controls (p less than 0.01). The incidence of rebleeding within 3 and 4 weeks was also significantly lower (p less than 0.05) than in controls. No significant difference was observed in the rebleeding rate in treated and untreated patients with late admission (4-7 days). Mortality from rebleeding was 16% in the first study group versus 17% in controls; in the second study group the figure was 6% versus 8% in controls. Seventy-five cases of ischaemic disorders (29%) were registered in treated patients versus 13 cases in controls (14%; p less than 0.01). Thirty-seven patients receiving AFT (14%) developed significant ventricular dilatation requiring shunt insertion, versus one patient in the control groups (1%; p less than 0.001). Final outcome was similar in the 4 groups. In conclusion--according to our data--AFT modifies the behaviour of rebleeding and the patients' course, although it does not modify the outcome after SAH. Clinical use of antifibrinolytic therapy appears still justified in those patients who cannot be operated on in the acute stage after SAH, provided that an associated anti-ischaemic therapy is undertaken.

Antifibrinolytic agents in subarachnoid haemorrhage

For many years clinicians have used antifibrinolytic agents to try to reduce rebleeding after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Early studies of their effectiveness produced conflicting results. This paper re-evaluates the available trials and considers benefits in the light of potential complications. Present evidence conclusively demonstrates that epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid administered in standard dosage, reduce the risk of rebleeding but, as a result of an increased incidence of ischaemic complications, do not benefit patients' outcome.