Involuntary orofacial movements in hospitalised patients with mental handicap or epilepsy: relationship to developmental/intellectual deficit and presence or absence of long-term exposure to neuroleptics

The adverse effects of long-term exposure to antipsychotics among older people with intellectual disabilities: a scoping review

Background Antipsychotics are among the medications most prescribed to older adults with intellectual disabilities despite limited evidence to support their safety and efficacy in this population. Antipsychotics are associated with a significant burden of long-term adverse effects including movement disorders, metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects, sedation and anticholinergic effects. This scoping review aims to evaluate the current extent of the literature relating to adverse effects of long-term antipsychotic use in older adults with intellectual disabilities and identify any existing gaps.  Methods The review was conducted in line with the framework for scoping reviews proposed by Arksey and O’Malley. A systematic literature search was carried out, including searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Embase, PsycINFO and grey literature databases. Reference lists of studies were also reviewed as part of the search. Studies were included in the review if they related to adults over 40 years of age with an intellectual disability who had been taking antipsychotic medication for at least 3 months. Results A total of 13 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. These included retrospective reviews,observational studies, case reports, cohort studies and cross-sectional studies. Adverse effects reported include extrapyramidal symptoms, cardiovascular and metabolic effects, and case reports of rhinorrhoea, hypothermia and ischaemic colitis. Increasing age was associated with a greater burden of adverse effects in some studies. Conclusion The available evidence on the adverse effects of long-term antipsychotic use in older adults with intellectual disabilities is weak and conflicting. The studies included were generally of poor quality with numerous limitations including small sample sizes and lack of control groups. More research is needed to inform understanding of adverse effects associated with long-term antipsychotic use in this population.

Aripiprazole use in individuals with intellectual disability and psychotic or behavioural disorders: a case series

People with intellectual disabilities may be at greater risk of developing movement disorders as a consequence of their underlying neurological damage, especially when they are treated with typical antipsychotic agents. Aripiprazole is a novel antipsychotic quinolone derivative that has been approved for the treatment of schizophrenia in adults. However, there are few reports on the use of aripiprazole in people with intellectual disabilities. Herein, we report on the use of aripiprazole in five individuals with intellectual disabilities and psychotic illness (four cases) or challenging behaviour (one case). Four of the five patients had an additional diagnosis of schizophrenia and one had autism spectrum disorder and challenging behaviour. Issues related to the usefulness of aripiprazole in the management of schizophrenia and challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities are also discussed. Aripiprazole was well tolerated and effective in each of the cases and appears to be a safe and efficacious alternative in the management of patients with both intellectual disabilities and schizophrenia. It can also be a useful treatment option in the management of challenging behaviour, especially when it is used as a part of a biopsychosocial approach.

Antipsychotic medication versus placebo for people with both schizophrenia and learning disability

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medication is the standard treatment for people with learning disability and schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of any antipsychotic medication compared with placebo for treating people with a dual diagnosis of learning disability and schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update we searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials (July 2004), relevant reference lists and sought unpublished data from pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials of longer than one month's duration, involving people with both schizophrenia and learning disability (a measured IQ of 70 or less) that evaluated antipsychotic medication versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We reliably selected and assessed studies for methodological quality. Two reviewers, working independently, extracted data. We would have analysed dichotomous data on an intention-to-treat basis and presented continuous data with 65% completion rate. For dichotomous outcomes, our intention was to estimate a fixed effect relative risk (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) together with the number needed to treat/harm (NNT/H).

MAIN RESULTS

We found only one relevant randomised trial using our search method and this had to be excluded. This study included four people with a dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and learning disability, but results were only available for two of the participants. It was unclear as to which groups the other two people were allocated. In order to display the data, we would have had to have made too many assumptions about these two people and any results would be uninformative and potentially misleading.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Using the methods described we found no randomised controlled trial evidence to guide the use of antipsychotic medication for people with both learning disability and schizophrenia. Until the urgent need for randomised controlled trials is met, clinical practice will continue to be guided by extrapolation of evidence from randomised controlled trials involving people with schizophrenia, but without learning disability, and non-randomised trials of those with learning disability and schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with learning disability

BACKGROUND

The term 'challenging behaviour', in the absence of psychiatric disorder, encompasses a wide range of behaviours that may be harmful to people or property, may be difficult to manage and may limit access to community facilities. Antipsychotic medications have been used to modify such behaviours in people with learning disability, but there is little evidence to suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with learning disability and challenging behaviour without additional mental illness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Biological Abstracts, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and BIOSIS were searched. Further references were sought from published trials and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were reliably identified and data extracted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention to treat basis. Data were evaluated at 4, 8 and 12 weeks as longer follow-up data were not available. Reviewers assumed that those subjects lost to follow-up had a bad outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Only nine randomised controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These provided no evidence of whether antipsychotic medication helps or harms adults with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There are limited data on this important issue and more research is urgently needed.

Tardive dyskinesia associated with metoclopramide in persons with developmental disabilities

Metoclopramide is an anti-emetic medication that has been associated with movement disorders such as extra-pyramidal reactions and tardive dyskinesia (TD). Reports of these reactions have been documented in the general population, but investigations of side effects in persons with mental retardation are scant. Given the high incidence of gastrointestinal disturbance in persons with mental retardation, and the popularity of this medication to treat such problems, these individuals could be at risk for developing movement disorders resulting from metoclopramide use. We compared incidence rates of TD over a 1-year period in developmentally disabled individuals taking either metoclopramide, typical antipsychotics, or no psychotropic medications (Table 1). Assessment was completed using the Dyskinesia Identification System--Condensed User Scale (DISCUS), a standardized measure of TD found to be reliable and valid for persons with mental retardation. No significant differences in DISCUS scores between the metoclopramide and antipsychotic treated groups were noted across four measurements taken during the course of 1 year. Additionally, no difference was found between these two groups for a number of participants who met criteria for probable TD on at least one of the DISCUS administrations. Comparisons between all three groups on one testing occasion revealed a significant difference between groups. The no psychotropic control group showed significantly less TD symptomology than the antipsychotic or metoclopramide groups.

Antipsychotic medication for those with both schizophrenia and learning disability

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medication is the standard treatment for people with learning disability and schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of any antipsychotic medication for treating people with a dual diagnosis of learning disability and schizophrenia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searching of Biological Abstracts, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycLIT and MEDLINE. Unpublished data were sought from pharmaceutical companies. Both authors independently selected the relevant studies from the reports identified in this way.

SELECTION CRITERIA

1. All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication, regardless of dosage, versus a placebo control, of longer than one month's duration. 2. Anyone over 18 years of age with both learning disability and schizophrenia. Learning disability was defined as a measured IQ of 70 or less. Any mode of diagnosis of schizophrenia was acceptable.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two reviewers independently attempted to select and then extract data but it was not possible to do this with the single study that met the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one relevant randomised trial was found by the searches. This study included four people with a dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and learning disability, but results were available for only two. The groups to which the other two people were allocated were unclear. In order to display the data, too many assumptions would have to have been made about these other two people and any results would be uninformative and potentially misleading.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Using the methods described the reviewers found no randomised controlled trial evidence to guide the use of antipsychotic medication for those with both learning disability and schizophrenia. Until the urgent need for randomised controlled trials is met clinical practice will continue to be guided by extrapolation of evidence from randomised controlled trials involving people with schizophrenia but without learning disability and non-randomised trials of those with learning disability and schizophrenia.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with learning disability

BACKGROUND

The term 'challenging behaviour', in the absence of psychiatric disorder, encompasses a wide range of behaviours that may be harmful to people or property, may be difficult to manage and may limit access to community facilities. Antipsychotic medications have been used to modify such behaviours in people with learning disability, but there is little evidence to suggest that the benefits outweigh the risks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Biological abstracts, the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycLIT were searched. Further references were sought from published trials and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were reliably identified and data extracted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of antipsychotic medication versus placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention to treat basis. Data were evaluated at 4 and 8 weeks as longer follow-up data were not available. Reviewers assumed that those subjects lost to follow-up had a bad outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

Only three randomised controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These provided no evidence of whether antipsychotic medication helps or harms adults with learning disability and challenging behaviour.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is limited data on this important issue and more research is urgently needed.

Antipsychotic medication for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disability: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

A study was performed to determine the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication for people with intellectual disability (ID) and challenging behaviour. Randomized controlled trials comparing antipsychotic medication to placebo in people with ID and challenging behaviour were identified by electronic searching and hand-searching. Reviewers independently evaluated and analysed data on an intention-to-treat basis. Only three randomized controlled trials could be included in the analyses. These trials provided no evidence as to whether antipsychotic medication does or does not help adults with ID and challenging behaviour. There is limited data on this important issue and good quality research is urgently needed.

Effectiveness of antipsychotic medication in people with intellectual disability and schizophrenia: a systematic review

The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of any antipsychotic medication for treating people with a dual diagnosis of intellectual disability and schizophrenia. The authors performed an electronic search of Biological Abstracts, the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register of trials, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycLIT and MEDLINE. Unpublished data were sought from pharmaceutical companies. Both authors independently selected the relevant studies from the reports identified in this way. Only one relevant randomized trial was found by the searches (Foote 1958). This study included four people with a dual diagnosis of schizophrenia and intellectual disability, but results were only available for two subjects. The groups to which the other two people were allocated were unclear. Using the methods described, the reviewers found no trial evidence to guide the use of antipsychotic medication for those with both intellectual disability and schizophrenia. Until the urgent need for randomized controlled trials is met, clinical practice will continue to be guided by evidence from trials involving people with schizophrenia but without intellectual disability.

Treatment of seizures in patients with learning disabilities

People with learning disabilities commonly have seizures. Combined electroencephalogram and video investigations improve diagnostic accuracy, while neuroimaging may indicate a role for surgery. When epilepsy is diagnosed, individually tailored care is necessary. Rational antiepileptic drug use is advocated, with emphasis upon the newer agents due to their better tolerability and ease of use. Regular clinical review will prevent over-medicating. Although an optimistic approach can now be adopted, future developments require a more solid evidence base together with a rationality to all aspects of care, including drug therapy, carer education, closer collaboration among specialists, and mutual skill awareness of all involved.

Epilepsy and learning disabilities--a challenge for the next millennium?

People with learning disabilities often have seizures in addition to other disorders. Precise diagnosis may be difficult, but accuracy can be improved using electroencephalographic and video investigations. Following the establishment of a diagnosis of epilepsy, individually tailored care is necessary taking into account other health, behavioural and therapeutic issues. Neuroimaging may indicate a need for surgery which should not be automatically excluded as a treatment option. Rational antiepileptic drug use is advised, with emphasis upon the newer agents due to their better tolerance and ease of use. A programme of regular review will prevent over-medicating. Drug therapy may be withdrawn in a seizure-free patient. Realistic goals should be established for each individual coupled with an optimistic approach to care. However, future developments require a solid evidence base combined with rationality in all aspects of management. The community learning disability epilepsy nurse specialist is the key health-care professional who can ensure that a learning disabled individual with epilepsy is able to take full advantage of all available services. Education, closer collaboration and the mutual recognition of skills will ensure more cohesive and comprehensive care for this disadvantaged patient population.

Movement disorder in Down's syndrome: a possible marker of the severity of mental handicap

This study examined the nature and prevalence of abnormal movements in adults with Down's syndrome and also the clinical correlates of orofacial dyskinesia and the relationship between dyskinesia and the level of functional and intellectual disability. Movement disorder, language age, and disability were assessed in an epidemiologically based sample of 145 individuals with Down's syndrome. Abnormal involuntary movements were common, with > 90% exhibiting dyskinesia, predominantly orofacial. Stereotypes were present in one-third of the sample. There was an association between the severity of dyskinesia and both current language age and functioning in terms of self-care and practical and academic skills, which suggested that dyskinesia may be a marker of the severity of mental handicap. The presence of dyskinesia was unrelated to neuroleptic exposure. Dyskinesia and stereotypies are very common in individuals with Down's syndrome and may represent an inherent manifestation of the disorder. The relationship between mental age and dyskinesia in Down's syndrome warrants further research.

A controlled community study of movement disorder in people with learning difficulties on anti-psychotic medication

The results of a community-based study measuring the occurrence of movement disorders in a population of people with learning difficulties treated with antipsychotic medication are presented. This group was compared with an age- and sex-matched group with a similar degree of handicap, who were not treated with antipsychotic medication. When medication was given within British National Formulary Guidelines, no significant increase in movement disorders in the treated group was found. The relevance of this to psychiatric practice is discussed.

Tardive dyskinesia in the mentally retarded: comparison of prevalence, risk factors and topography with a schizophrenic population

Thirty mentally retarded patients treated with neuroleptics for aberrant behavior were compared with 30 neuroleptic-treated schizophrenics for the presence, topography and risk factors associated with tardive dyskinesia (TD). In the total sample (n = 60), female sex, schizophrenic diagnosis and increasing age were associated with TD. The length of neuroleptic treatment and current neuroleptic dose were not significantly associated with TD. The only topographical difference in TD presentation was that the mentally retarded group had significantly more tongue involvement.

The motor disorders of mental handicap. An overlap with the motor disorders of severe psychiatric illness

Among 236 in-patients in one hospital for the mentally handicapped, there was a significant relationship between the amount of motor disorder (rated using a comprehensive check-list) and the severity of mental handicap, the presence of associated psychiatric disorder and the use of neuroleptic medication. The population was fairly evenly divided between those currently, previously and never having received neuroleptic medication. All categories of motor disorder, including abnormal movements, were present in all three subgroups. Neuroleptic medication appeared to modify the expression of motor disorder rather than producing it de novo. The range and frequency of motor disorders was comparable with that in patients with severe psychiatric illness. A common cerebral basis for the motor disorders of patients with mental handicap and severe psychiatric illness is suggested.

Obstetric complications, the putative familial-sporadic distinction, and tardive dyskinesia in schizophrenia

Obstetric complications were more common in the histories of those schizophrenic outpatients without a family history of psychiatric disorder, and were associated with an earlier onset of their illness. Those patients with tardive dyskinesia were more likely to have a family history of psychiatric disorder, less likely to have experienced obstetric complications, and showed greater cognitive deficit. Obstetric complications should be considered in juxtaposition with genetic factors in evaluating the putative familial-sporadic distinction in schizophrenia. Additionally, familial/genetic factors appears to contribute to vulnerability to tardive dyskinesia.

Reduction in antipsychotic drug dosage in mentally handicapped patients. A hospital study

An investigation in a large mental handicap hospital revealed that 24% of the in-patients were receiving antipsychotic drugs. Chlorpromazine and thioridazine prescriptions accounted for 62% of the total while 10% of patients received depot preparations. Fifty-five per cent of the patients receiving these drugs had no established psychiatric diagnosis; most of these could be categorised as having a behaviour disorder. Patients aged 30-50 received higher doses, and female patients received a significantly higher mean dosage than male ones. In the patients receiving neuroleptic drugs who had also been taking them four years previously, there was a significant reduction in the dosage of the drugs received and the extent of polypharmacy of these agents. A mandatory requirement to review all prescriptions annually, implemented in 1984, may be a reason for this.

Spontaneous orofacial movements induced in rodents by very long-term neuroleptic drug administration: phenomenology, pathophysiology and putative relationship to tardive dyskinesia

While understanding of the major clinical and ethical issue of tardive dyskinesia would be greatly facilitated by the development of an isomorphic or homologous animal model, particularly in rodents, this has proved to be a highly contentious issue. The literature on orofacial function in rats administered neuroleptic drugs for substantial proportions of their adult lifespan is reviewed. It reveals the emergence of late-onset orofacial movements in a number of studies, but very early-onset movements or no effect in others. Potential explanations for these discrepancies are considered, and ways of resolving such inconsistencies are suggested. The relationship of these various orofacial phenomena to dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic function, and to clinical syndromes, is critically evaluated.

Cognitive impairment, clinical course and treatment history in out-patients with bipolar affective disorder: relationship to tardive dyskinesia

Clinical, neuropsychological and psychopharmacological characteristics were investigated for their ability to distinguish individuals with and without involuntary movements (tardive dyskinesia), among a population of 40 out-patients with bipolar affective disorder and a history of exposure to neuroleptics and lithium. Impaired performance on a test of cognitive flexibility bore the primary association with both the presence and the severity of involuntary movements. The additional relationships identified emphasized further that individual vulnerability to involuntary movements appeared to be associated not with greater duration or dosage of treatment, but with features of the bipolar illness, including number and type of affective episodes, for which that treatment was prescribed.