Call for guidelines for monitoring renal function and haematological variables during intravenous infusion of immunoglobulin in neurological patients

Adverse Effects of Immunoglobulin Therapy

Immunoglobulin has been widely used in a variety of diseases, including primary and secondary immunodeficiency diseases, neuromuscular diseases, and Kawasaki disease. Although a large number of clinical trials have demonstrated that immunoglobulin is effective and well tolerated, various adverse effects have been reported. The majority of these events, such as flushing, headache, malaise, fever, chills, fatigue and lethargy, are transient and mild. However, some rare side effects, including renal impairment, thrombosis, arrhythmia, aseptic meningitis, hemolytic anemia, and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI), are serious. These adverse effects are associated with specific immunoglobulin preparations and individual differences. Performing an early assessment of risk factors, infusing at a slow rate, premedicating, and switching from intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) to subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) can minimize these adverse effects. Adverse effects are rarely disabling or fatal, treatment mainly involves supportive measures, and the majority of affected patients have a good prognosis.

Intravenous immunoglobulin and Alzheimer's disease: what now?

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) products are prepared from purified plasma immunoglobulins from large numbers of healthy donors. Pilot studies with the IVIG preparations Octagam and Gammagard in individuals with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) suggested stabilization of cognitive functioning in these patients, and a phase II trial with Gammagard reported similar findings. However, subsequent reports from Octagam’s phase II trial and Gammagard’s phase III trial found no evidence for slowing of AD progression. Although these recent disappointing results have reduced enthusiasm for IVIG as a possible treatment for AD, it is premature to draw final conclusions; a phase III AD trial with the IVIG product Flebogamma is still in progress. IVIG was the first attempt to use multiple antibodies to treat AD. This approach should be preferable to administration of single monoclonal antibodies in view of the multiple processes that are thought to contribute to AD neuropathology. Development of “AD-specific” preparations with higher concentrations of selected human antibodies and perhaps modified in other ways (such as increasing their anti-inflammatory effects and/or ability to cross the blood–brain barrier) should be considered. Such preparations, if generated with recombinant technology, could overcome the problems of high cost and limited supplies, which have been major concerns relating to the possible widespread use of IVIG in AD patients. This review summarizes the recent AD IVIG trials and discusses the major issues relating to possible use of IVIG for treating AD, as well as the critical questions which remain.

Adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

In addition to its U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved conditions, immune globulin intravenous (IGIV) is now being used to treat a vast array of autoimmune disorders. Some of the reasons for this overall increase in the use of IGIV include its effectiveness and safety. Despite many years of safe use, side effects and adverse reactions still occur. Common and mild side effects associated with IGIV include: headache, malaise, nausea, low-grade fever, urticaria, arthralgias, and myalgia. These symptoms typically resolve within a few days after their onset. Although rare, the serious and potentially fatal side effects include: anaphylactic reactions, aseptic meningitis, acute renal failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, and other thrombotic complications. Many of these side effects have occurred in patients who have significant, underlying risk factors for the development of the event. Thus, it is vitally important that a thorough and comprehensive medical evaluation be performed on every patient who is being evaluated for potential IGIV therapy. This evaluation can, to some extent, significantly minimize the risk of these side effects. Careful, constant, and close monitoring by trained personnel during the infusion can also result in early detection of such events. Physicians should thoroughly discuss the risks and benefits of IGIV with patients who are being considered for this therapy.