Medium-Fidelity Medical Simulators: Use in a Pre-Hospital,Operational, Military Environment

Plastic and Maxillofacial Training for War-Zones - A Systematic Review

Study Design

Injuries sustained in war-zones are variable and constantly developing according to the nature of the ongoing conflict. Soft tissue involvement of the extremities, head and neck often necessitates reconstructive expertise. However, current training to manage injuries in such settings is heterogenous. This study involves a systematic review.

Objective

To evaluate interventions in place to train Plastic and Maxillofacial surgeons for war-zone environments so that limitations to current training can be addressed.

Methods

A literature search of Medline and EMBase was performed using terms relevant to Plastic and Maxillofacial surgery training and war-zone environments. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were scored then educational interventions described in included literature were categorised according to their length, delivery style and training environment. Between-group ANOVA was performed to compare training strategies.

Results

2055 citations were identified through this literature search. Thirty-three studies were included in this analysis. The highest scoring interventions were over an extended time-frame with an action-oriented training approach, using simulation or actual patients. Core competencies addressed by these strategies included technical and non-technical skills necessary when working in war-zone type settings.

Conclusions

Surgical rotations in trauma centers and areas of civil strife, together with didactic courses are valuable strategies to train surgeons for war-zones. These opportunities must be readily available globally and be targeted to the surgical needs of the local population, anticipating the types of combat injuries that often occur in these environments.

A Systematic Review of Trauma Crew Resource Management Training: What Can the United States and the United Kingdom Learn From Each Other?

OBJECTIVE

Crew Resource Management (CRM) training incorporates methods such as simulation, debrief, and teamwork training to emphasize human factors skills. This systematic review aimed to assess differences in CRM between UK and USA trauma personnel.

DESIGN

A structured search of the databases MEDLINE and Embase in addition to unstructured reference review and Google Scholar search was undertaken without time restraint to identify articles describing CRM training courses of trauma personnel. Predetermined criteria for inclusion included comprehensive reports of CRM training in trauma personnel with participant assessment. Articles were analyzed for course details and descriptions, Kirkpatrick domains and levels utilized, and measure items and outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine full-text articles (24 USA, 5 UK) met predetermined criteria. UK-based CRM had a heavy emphasis on doctors while USA-based CRM reached a range of multidisciplinary civilian and military professionals. UK-based CRM focused on skills outcomes using pre- and post-training questionnaires, whereas USA-based training focused on behavior and nontechnical skills utilizing validated standardized measures. CRM-based training, and particularly courses incorporating simulation and multidisciplinary methods, resulted in significantly improved preparedness for trauma, emergency skills, and clinical behavioral change.

CONCLUSIONS

CRM training has the potential to give significant benefits to participant learning, teamwork behaviors, and clinical care outcomes. The USA appears to utilize a focused multidisciplinary and human factors approach to trauma training, which could be adopted by UK institutions to improve cohesive team performance and patient care.

Using full immersive simulation to prepare trauma teams to work in a major trauma centre

A reconfiguration of trauma services in the UK has led to the development of trauma networks with major trauma centres. This article describes the use of fully immersive simulation to train whole trauma teams in both a traditional simulation centre setting and ‘in situ’ in the clinical environment. Carefully designed scenarios that are driven by experienced faculty allow modern trauma management concepts, such as damage control resuscitation and massive transfusion to be explored within a hospital’s own organisational structure. Human factors specific to the trauma team can also be explored as part of a video-assisted debrief.