Translational research to improve the treatment of severe extremity injuries

Hyperbaric oxygen adjuvant therapy in severe mangled extremities

BACKGROUND

Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was first described more than 30 years ago by attempting to predict the need for empiric amputation. In severe traumatic crush and blast injuries, achieving satisfactory limb salvage may be difficult. Notably, a MESS of 7 or higher is consistently predictive of amputation. Additionally, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has been described for many purposes, and related studies have reported HBOT showed benefits in wound healing properties.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the results of a prospective series of a new modality of adjuvant HBOT for severe mangled extremities.

METHOD

A total of 18 patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic review. Current standard treatments followed by adjuvant HBOT were administered, and the mean follow-up period was 22 months. Time to wound closure, the number of surgeries and adjuvant HBOT treatment were analyzed for patient clinical evaluation. Complications and limb amputation rates were also recorded.

RESULT

Most clinical findings on follow-up were good to excellent after adjunctive HBOT. Minimal soft tissue infection was recorded, and limb salvage was successful in most cases. Only 1 patient (5.56 %) needed limb amputation because of a dying limb with chronic refractory osteomyelitis.

CONCLUSION

HBOT is an excellent adjunctive option in severely mangled extremities. Nevertheless, the main treatments are eliminating infection and managing surgery, and are promising in the recovery of severe extremity injuries. Although the MESS was evaluated at 7 or higher, limb salvage procedures followed by HBOT should be considered.

Amputation: Not a failure for severe lower extremity combat injury

INTRODUCTION

The use of improvised explosive devices is a frequent method of insurgents to inflict harm on deployed military personnel. Consequently, lower extremity injuries make up the majority of combat related trauma. The wounding pattern of an explosion is not often encountered in a civilian population and can lead to substantial disability. It is therefore important to study the impact of these lower extremity injuries and their treatment (limb salvage versus amputation) on functional outcome and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All Dutch repatriated service members receiving treatment for wounds on the lower extremity sustained in the Afghan theater between august 2005 and August 2014, were invited to participate in this observational cohort study. We conducted a survey regarding their physical and mental health using the Short Form health survey 36, EuroQoL 6 dimensions and Lower Extremity Functional Scale questionnaires. Results were collated in a specifically designed electronic database combined with epidemiology and hospital statistics gathered from the archive of the Central Military Hospital. Statistical analyses were performed to identify differences between combat and non-combat related injuries and between limb salvage treatment and amputation.

RESULTS

In comparison with non-battle injury patients, battle casualties were significantly younger of age, sustained more severe injuries, needed more frequent operations and clinical rehabilitation. Their long-term outcome scores in areas concerning well-being, social and cognitive functioning, were significantly lower. Regarding treatment, amputees experienced higher physical well-being and less pain compared to those treated with limb salvage surgery.

CONCLUSION

Sustaining a combat injury to the lower extremity can lead to partial or permanent dysfunction. However, wounded service members, amputees included, are able to achieve high levels of activity and participation in society, proving a remarkable resilience. These long-term results demonstrate that amputation is not a failure for casualty and surgeon, and strengthen a life before limb (damage control surgery) mindset in the initial phase. For future research, we recommend the use of adequate coding and injury scoring systems to predict outcome and give insight in the attributes that are supportive for the resilience that is needed to cope with a serious battle injury.