Patient and provider perceptions of a novel cognitive functioning report for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a qualitative study

Comprehension, Utility, and Acceptability of a Multidomain Physical Functioning Report for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients and Their Providers

OBJECTIVE

Patient-provider discussions about functioning are often outside the scope of usual care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and tools to facilitate such discussions are lacking. The present study was undertaken to assess the comprehension, utility, and acceptability of a novel, individualized functioning report, the purpose of which is to facilitate patient-provider communication about functioning, in a predominantly Black SLE patient population.

METHODS

Individualized reports (including sections with pictorial representations of participants' measured activities of daily living, falls, physical performance, perceived physical functioning, and community mobility from a previous pilot study visit) and surveys were emailed or mailed to 59 SLE patients. Ease of interpretation was dichotomized ("very easy" versus all other responses). Utility and acceptability were assessed by items relating to usefulness for care planning and comfort with discussing the report.

RESULTS

Among 47 (79.7%) SLE patients who completed the survey (78.7% Black, 91.5% female, mean age 49.6 years), the reported ease of interpretation ranged from 70.2% to 85.1% across the report sections. Ease of interpretation was lower among those who were older, Black, and female and who had lower cognitive scores (P > 0.05 for all). Most reported that physical functioning domains of the report were useful for treatment or other care planning (70.2-80.5%) and that they felt comfortable discussing the report with a health care provider (93.2-100%).

CONCLUSION

We found that a novel functioning report for SLE patients was associated with high comprehension, utility, and acceptability. Future studies can help determine how an individualized functioning report could improve patient-provider communication in the clinic setting.

Cognitive problems and their clinical assessment in SLE: contrasting patient and provider views

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex chronic disease associated with reduced cognitive functioning. Patients with SLE report cognitive symptoms, but cognitive assessment is not routine and little is known about day-to-day cognitive problems and their effect on disease management. As part of a pilot exploring the use of a cognitive functioning report prototype for shared decision making in clinical encounters (Approaches to Positive Patient-Centered Experiences of Aging in Lupus study-APPEAL), we investigated the relevance of cognitive assessments performed using the NIH Toolbox among patients with SLE.

METHODS

We conducted four focus groups, two with SLE patients (n=18) and two with lupus providers (physicians and nurses; n=9) addressing cognitive issues and interest in communicating about cognition. We compared how NIH Toolbox cognitive domains (episodic memory; working memory; processing speed; attention and inhibitory control; cognitive flexibility) matched with patient- and provider-identified cognitive problems and needs.

RESULTS

Patients identified all NIH domains with rich experiential examples; providers identified fewer domains and offered less detail. An unanticipated additional domain was prospective memory, i.e., problems in remembering future actions. Use of technological aids (e.g., smart phone alerts) was mentioned by some patients, but not providers, and represent a potential opportunity for medical care. All participants expressed interest in discussing cognition in clinic.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive assessment using the NIH Cognitive Toolbox is relevant to this population, with the possible addition of a prospective memory assessment. Cognitive problems and indications of communication gaps suggest the appropriateness of more clinical communication about cognition in this population.