1
|
Chen D. Ethical frameworks of informed consent in the age of pediatric precision medicine. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. PRECISION MEDICINE 2024; 2:e6. [PMID: 38774589 PMCID: PMC11106543 DOI: 10.1017/pcm.2024.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
Precision medicine is an emergent medical paradigm that uses information technology to inform the use of targeted therapies and treatments. One of the first steps of precision medicine involves acquiring the patient's informed consent to protect their rights to autonomous medical decision-making. In pediatrics, there exists mixed recommendations and guidelines of consent-related practices designed to safeguard pediatric patient interests while protecting their autonomy. Here, we provide a high-level, clinical primer of (1) ethical informed consent frameworks widely used in clinical practice and (2) promising modern adaptations to improve informed consent practices in pediatric precision medicine. Given the rapid scientific advances and adoption of precision medicine, we highlight the dual need to both consider the clinical implementation of consent in pediatric precision medicine workflows as well as build rapport with pediatric patients and their substitute decision-makers working alongside interdisciplinary health teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Chen
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jansen SNG, Kamphorst BA, Mulder BC, van Kamp I, Boekhold S, van den Hazel P, Verweij MF. Ethics of early detection of disease risk factors: A scoping review. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:25. [PMID: 38443930 PMCID: PMC10913641 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01012-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific and technological advancements in mapping and understanding the interrelated pathways through which biological and environmental exposures affect disease development create new possibilities for detecting disease risk factors. Early detection of such risk factors may help prevent disease onset or moderate the disease course, thereby decreasing associated disease burden, morbidity, and mortality. However, the ethical implications of screening for disease risk factors are unclear and the current literature provides a fragmented and case-by-case picture. METHODS To identify key ethical considerations arising from the early detection of disease risk factors, we performed a systematic scoping review. The Scopus, Embase, and Philosopher's Index databases were searched for peer-reviewed, academic records, which were included if they were written in English or Dutch and concerned the ethics of (1) early detection of (2) disease risk factors for (3) disease caused by environmental factors or gene-environment interactions. All records were reviewed independently by at least two researchers. RESULTS After screening 2034 titles and abstracts, and 112 full papers, 55 articles were included in the thematic synthesis of the results. We identified eight common ethical themes: (1) Reliability and uncertainty in early detection, (2) autonomy, (3) privacy, (4) beneficence and non-maleficence, (5) downstream burdens on others, (6) responsibility, (7) justice, and (8) medicalization and conceptual disruption. We identified several gaps in the literature, including a relative scarcity of research on ethical considerations associated with environmental preventive health interventions, a dearth of practical suggestions on how to address expressed concerns about overestimating health capacities, and a lack of insights into preventing undue attribution of health responsibility to individuals. CONCLUSIONS The ethical concerns arising with the early detection of risk factors are often interrelated and complex. Comprehensive ethical analyses are needed that are better embedded in normative frameworks and also assess and weigh the expected benefits of early risk factor detection. Such research is necessary for developing and implementing responsible and fair preventive health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sammie N G Jansen
- Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands.
- Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands.
| | - Bart A Kamphorst
- Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands
| | - Bob C Mulder
- Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Hollandseweg 1, Wageningen, 6706 KN, The Netherlands
| | - Irene van Kamp
- Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Boekhold
- Centre for Sustainability, Environment and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM, P.O. Box 1, Bilthoven, 3720 BA, The Netherlands
| | - Peter van den Hazel
- International Network on Children's Health, Environment & Safety (INCHES), Ellecom, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel F Verweij
- Ethics Institute, Utrecht University, Janskerkhof 13a, Utrecht, 3512 BL, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Subasri M, Cressman C, Arje D, Schreyer L, Cooper E, Patel K, Ungar WJ, Barwick M, Denburg A, Hayeems RZ. Translating Precision Health for Pediatrics: A Scoping Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10050897. [PMID: 37238445 DOI: 10.3390/children10050897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Precision health aims to personalize treatment and prevention strategies based on individual genetic differences. While it has significantly improved healthcare for specific patient groups, broader translation faces challenges with evidence development, evidence appraisal, and implementation. These challenges are compounded in child health as existing methods fail to incorporate the physiology and socio-biology unique to childhood. This scoping review synthesizes the existing literature on evidence development, appraisal, prioritization, and implementation of precision child health. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched. The included articles were related to pediatrics, precision health, and the translational pathway. Articles were excluded if they were too narrow in scope. In total, 74 articles identified challenges and solutions for putting pediatric precision health interventions into practice. The literature reinforced the unique attributes of children and their implications for study design and identified major themes for the value assessment of precision health interventions for children, including clinical benefit, cost-effectiveness, stakeholder values and preferences, and ethics and equity. Tackling these identified challenges will require developing international data networks and guidelines, re-thinking methods for value assessment, and broadening stakeholder support for the effective implementation of precision health within healthcare organizations. This research was funded by the SickKids Precision Child Health Catalyst Grant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathushan Subasri
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Celine Cressman
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Danielle Arje
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Leighton Schreyer
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Erin Cooper
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Komal Patel
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Wendy J Ungar
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Melanie Barwick
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Avram Denburg
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
- Division of Haematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
| | - Robin Z Hayeems
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kerr A, Broer T, Ross E, Cunningham Burley S. Polygenic risk-stratified screening for cancer: Responsibilization in public health genomics. SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE 2019; 49:605-626. [PMID: 31230567 PMCID: PMC6688132 DOI: 10.1177/0306312719858404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we examine professional discourse around the development of polygenic risk-stratified screening (PRSS) for cancer. Analyzing a range of contemporary professional literatures from Europe, North America and Australia, we explore how the drive to screen for molecular markers of cancer risk makes professionals, screening recipients and publics responsible, in different ways, for acquiring, curating and analyzing molecular data. Investigating how these responsibilities are invoked in discussions of new data practices, technologies, organizational arrangements, engagement, education and protocols for participation, we argue that agendas for PRSS for cancer are both expanding and stratifying responsibilities. Data collection is to be achieved by intensified responsibilities for including, reassuring and recruiting populations, as well as by opening and enriching the datasets on which models and preventative screening arrangements are based. Enhanced responsibilities for screening recipients and publics are also invoked, not just in relation to personal health but for population health more generally, via research participation and consenting to data re-use in the public interest. Professionals, screening recipients and publics are also to become responsible for moderating expectations of screening according to genomic designations. Together these discourses go beyond individual risk management to extend and diversify the responsibilities of practitioners, screening recipients and publics as public health genomics develops.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kerr
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tineke Broer
- Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology, and Society (TILT), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sarah Cunningham Burley
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
With rapid advances in genetics and genomics, the commercialization and access to new applications has become more widespread and omnipresent throughout biomedical research. Thus, increasingly, more patients will have personal genomic information they may share with primary care providers (PCPs) to better understand the clinical significance of the data. To be able to respond to patient inquiries about genomic data, variant interpretation, disease risk, and other issues, PCPs will need to be able to increase or refresh their awareness about genetics and genomics, and identify reliable resources to use or refer patients. While provider educational efforts have increased, with the rapid advances in the field, ongoing efforts will be needed to prepare PCPs to manage patient needs, integrate results into care, and refer as indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne B Haga
- Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Briggs S, Slade I. Evaluating the Integration of Genomics into Cancer Screening Programmes: Challenges and Opportunities. CURRENT GENETIC MEDICINE REPORTS 2019; 7:63-74. [PMID: 32117599 PMCID: PMC7019642 DOI: 10.1007/s40142-019-00162-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As the costs of genomic testing have fallen, and our understanding of genetic susceptibility to cancers has grown, there has been increasing interest in incorporating testing for cancer susceptibility genes, and polygenic risk estimates, into population cancer screening. A growing body of evidence suggests that this would be both clinically and cost-effective. In this article, we aim to explore the frameworks used to evaluate screening programmes, evaluate whether population screening for cancer susceptibility can be assessed using these standards, and consider additional issues and outcomes of importance in this context. RECENT FINDINGS There are tensions between traditional approaches of genetic testing (utilising tests with high sensitivity and specificity) and the principles of population screening (in which the screening test typically has low specificity), as well as the frameworks used to evaluate the two. Despite the existence of many screening guidelines, including consensus papers, these often do not align fully with broader considerations of genetic test evaluation. Population screening for genetic risk in cancer shifts the focus from diagnostics to prognostication and has wider implications for personal and familial health than existing screening programmes. In addition, understanding of the prevalence and penetrance of cancer susceptibility genes, required by many screening guidelines, may only be obtainable through population-level testing; prospective multi-disciplinary research alongside implementation will be essential. SUMMARY Appropriate evaluation of genetic screening for cancer risk will require modification of existing screening frameworks to incorporate additional complexity of outcomes and population values. As evidence supporting population screening for cancer susceptibility mounts, development of an appropriate evaluative framework, and expansion of public dialogue will be key to informing policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Briggs
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7BN UK
| | - Ingrid Slade
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities and Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide insight into how and in what clinical fields overdiagnosis is studied and give directions for further applied and methodological research. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES Medline up to August 2017. STUDY SELECTION All English studies on humans, in which overdiagnosis was discussed as a dominant theme. DATA EXTRACTION Studies were assessed on clinical field, study aim (ie, methodological or non-methodological), article type (eg, primary study, review), the type and role of diagnostic test(s) studied and the context in which these studies discussed overdiagnosis. RESULTS From 4896 studies, 1851 were included for analysis. Half of all studies on overdiagnosis were performed in the field of oncology (50%). Other prevalent clinical fields included mental disorders, infectious diseases and cardiovascular diseases accounting for 9%, 8% and 6% of studies, respectively. Overdiagnosis was addressed from a methodological perspective in 20% of studies. Primary studies were the most common article type (58%). The type of diagnostic tests most commonly studied were imaging tests (32%), although these were predominantly seen in oncology and cardiovascular disease (84%). Diagnostic tests were studied in a screening setting in 43% of all studies, but as high as 75% of all oncological studies. The context in which studies addressed overdiagnosis related most frequently to its estimation, accounting for 53%. Methodology on overdiagnosis estimation and definition provided a source for extensive discussion. Other contexts of discussion included definition of disease, overdiagnosis communication, trends in increasing disease prevalence, drivers and consequences of overdiagnosis, incidental findings and genomics. CONCLUSIONS Overdiagnosis is discussed across virtually all clinical fields and in different contexts. The variability in characteristics between studies and lack of consensus on overdiagnosis definition indicate the need for a uniform typology to improve coherence and comparability of studies on overdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Jenniskens
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Joris A H de Groot
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes B Reitsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Cochrane Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Karel G M Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Cochrane Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lotty Hooft
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Cochrane Centre, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiana A Naaktgeboren
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kerruish NJ, Healey DM, Gray AR. Psychosocial effects in parents and children 12 years after newborn genetic screening for type 1 diabetes. Eur J Hum Genet 2017; 25:397-403. [PMID: 28120838 PMCID: PMC5386412 DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 11/13/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Little is known about the psychosocial consequences of testing newborns for genetic susceptibility to multifactorial diseases. This study reports quantitative psychosocial evaluations of parents and children 12 years after screening for type 1 diabetes (T1D). Two parent-child cohorts participated: children at increased genetic risk of T1D and children at low genetic risk. T1D risk status was determined at birth as part of a prospective study investigating potential environmental triggers of autoimmunity. Parent measures included ratings of children's emotional, behavioural and social functioning (Child Behaviour Checklist) and parenting style (Alabama Parenting Questionnaire). Child self-concept was assessed using the self-description questionnaire (SDQ1). Statistical analyses were conducted to test for differences between the groups. Twelve years after testing there was no evidence that knowledge of a child's increased genetic risk of T1D adversely affected parental ratings of their child's emotional, behavioural or social functioning, or impacted upon parenting style. There was no adverse effect upon the child's assessment of their self-concept. This study provides important preliminary data concerning longer-term psychosocial effects of incorporating tests for genetic risk of complex disorders into NBS panels. While it is reassuring that no significant adverse effects have been detected, more data will be required to adequately inform policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Kerruish
- Department of Women's and Children's Health and Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Dione M Healey
- Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Andrew R Gray
- Preventive & Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knoppers BM, Nguyen MT, Sénécal K, Tassé AM, Zawati MH. Next-Generation Sequencing and the Return of Results. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2016; 6:a026724. [PMID: 27599532 PMCID: PMC5046689 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a026724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The impact of next-generation sequencing (NGS) on the issue of return of results is defying clear policy guidance and creating international confusion. Limiting ourselves to the return of results revealed by NGS (including incidental findings) in adults, children, family members of deceased individuals, and population studies, we describe and contrast emerging policy positions in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Until there are clear, scientific, and professional standards and practical policy, both researchers and clinicians cannot be faulted for being either hesitant or pressured to return NGS results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Minh Thu Nguyen
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Karine Sénécal
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Anne Marie Tassé
- Public Population Project in Genomics and Society (PG), Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| | - Ma'n H Zawati
- Centre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wendler DS, Rid A. Genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk. Trends Genet 2015; 31:11-5. [PMID: 25530152 PMCID: PMC4281290 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2014] [Revised: 09/29/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Genetic research on human biospecimens is increasingly common. However, debate continues over the level of risk that this research poses to sample donors. Some argue that genetic research on biospecimens poses minimal risk; others argue that it poses greater than minimal risk and therefore needs additional requirements and limitations. This debate raises concern that some donors are not receiving appropriate protection or, conversely, that valuable research is being subject to unnecessary requirements and limitations. The present paper attempts to resolve this debate using the widely-endorsed 'risks of daily life' standard. The three extant versions of this standard all suggest that, with proper measures in place to protect confidentiality, most genetic research on human biospecimens poses minimal risk to donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Wendler
- Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Annette Rid
- Department of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Hall A, Chowdhury S, Hallowell N, Pashayan N, Dent T, Pharoah P, Burton H. Implementing risk-stratified screening for common cancers: a review of potential ethical, legal and social issues. J Public Health (Oxf) 2014; 36:285-91. [PMID: 23986542 PMCID: PMC4041100 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdt078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The identification of common genetic variants associated with common cancers including breast, prostate and ovarian cancers would allow population stratification by genotype to effectively target screening and treatment. As scientific, clinical and economic evidence mounts there will be increasing pressure for risk-stratified screening programmes to be implemented. METHODS This paper reviews some of the main ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI) raised by the introduction of genotyping into risk-stratified screening programmes, in terms of Beauchamp and Childress's four principles of biomedical ethics--respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice. Two alternative approaches to data collection, storage, communication and consent are used to exemplify the ELSI issues that are likely to be raised. RESULTS Ultimately, the provision of risk-stratified screening using genotyping raises fundamental questions about respective roles of individuals, healthcare providers and the state in organizing or mandating such programmes, and the principles, which underpin their provision, particularly the requirement for distributive justice. CONCLUSIONS The scope and breadth of these issues suggest that ELSI relating to risk-stratified screening will become increasingly important for policy-makers, healthcare professionals and a wide diversity of stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.E. Hall
- PHG Foundation (Foundation for Genomics and Population Health), 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S. Chowdhury
- PHG Foundation (Foundation for Genomics and Population Health), 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - N. Hallowell
- PHG Foundation (Foundation for Genomics and Population Health), 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - N. Pashayan
- UCL Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - T. Dent
- PHG Foundation (Foundation for Genomics and Population Health), 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - P. Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 OSR, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - H. Burton
- PHG Foundation (Foundation for Genomics and Population Health), 2 Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knoppers BM, Senecal K, Borry P, Avard D. Whole-Genome Sequencing in Newborn Screening Programs. Sci Transl Med 2014; 6:229cm2. [DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
14
|
Iredale R, Madden K. Let's talk about genes, and I dont mean trousers: encouraging cancer genetics literacy amongst children. Ecancermedicalscience 2014; 8:408. [PMID: 24624228 PMCID: PMC3934802 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2014.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Acquiring genetic literacy is one of the most important things a person can do to promote their own and their family’s health. Family history—genetics and the shared environment—is a significant risk factor for cancer as well as other common diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes. A good understanding of family health history should increasingly be used to personalise health messages and promote healthy lifestyles. The Let’s Talk About Genes project explored whether it was feasible and acceptable to engage young children in Wales with family history as it relates specifically to cancer, so they increase their cancer genetics literacy over time and become more aware of general health issues that relate to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Iredale
- Genomics Policy Unit, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, UK
| | - Kim Madden
- Genomics Policy Unit, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, CF37 1DL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pashayan N, Hall A, Chowdhury S, Dent T, Pharoah PDP, Burton H. Public health genomics and personalized prevention: lessons from the COGS project. J Intern Med 2013; 274:451-6. [PMID: 24127941 PMCID: PMC4283043 DOI: 10.1111/joim.12094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Using the principles of public health genomics, we examined the opportunities and challenges of implementing personalized prevention programmes for cancer at the population level. Our model-based estimates indicate that polygenic risk stratification can potentially improve the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes. However, compared with 'one-size-fits-all' screening programmes, personalized screening adds further layers of complexity to the organization of screening services and raises ethical, legal and social challenges. Before polygenic inheritance is translated into population screening strategy, evidence from empirical research and engagement with and education of the public and the health professionals are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Pashayan
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|