1
|
Udoh U, Dewar B, Nicholls S, Fedyk M, Fahed R, Perry J, Hill MD, Menon B, Swartz RH, Poppe AY, Gocan S, Brehaut J, Dainty K, Shepherd V, Dowlatshahi D, Shamy M. Advance Consent in Acute Stroke Trials: Survey of Canadian Stroke Physicians. Can J Neurol Sci 2024; 51:122-125. [PMID: 36799025 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2023.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Advance consent presents a potential solution to the challenge of obtaining informed consent for participation in acute stroke trials. Clinicians in stroke prevention clinics are uniquely positioned to identify and seek consent from potential stroke trial participants. To assess the acceptability of advance consent to Canadian stroke clinic physicians, we performed an online survey. We obtained 58 respondents (response rate 35%): the vast majority (82%) expressed comfort with obtaining advance consent and 92% felt that doing so would not be a significant disruption to clinic workflow. These results support further study of advance consent for acute stroke trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ubong Udoh
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Dewar
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart Nicholls
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Fedyk
- School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Robert Fahed
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff Perry
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael D Hill
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary and Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bijoy Menon
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary and Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Richard H Swartz
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto & Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandre Y Poppe
- Department of Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sophia Gocan
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jamie Brehaut
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katie Dainty
- Department of Research and Innovation, North York General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Dar Dowlatshahi
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Shamy
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harzheim L, Lorke M, Rostamzadeh A, Jessen F, Woopen C, Jünger S. The Promotion of Health Literacy. GEROPSYCH 2023. [DOI: 10.1024/1662-9647/a000310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Abstract: Progress in predictive medicine has increased the challenges to navigating complex risk information for patients and healthcare professionals. This contribution investigates how people facing the risk of developing Alzheimer’s dementia perceive risk, what aspects are relevant to their health literacy, and how to promote individual health literacy in predictive medicine. We conducted a qualitative study analyzing narrative interviews, body maps, and sociodemographic data from persons who had undergone early predictive procedures in a memory clinic. We understand the promotion of health literacy as an ethical task in predictive medicine and argue for (1) emphasizing personal resources to promote subjective health literacy, (2) reframing communication and decision-making about disease risk, and (3) teaching skills for value-sensitive, individualized risk communication.
Collapse
|
3
|
Niznick N, Lun R, Dewar B, Perry J, Dowlatshahi D, Shamy M. Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066742. [PMID: 36750278 PMCID: PMC9906254 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Advance consent is a recognised method of obtaining informed consent for participation in research, whereby a potential participant provides consent for future involvement in a study contingent on qualifying for the study's inclusion criteria on a later date. The goal of this study is to map the existing literature on the use of advance consent for enrolment in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for emergency conditions. DESIGN Scoping review designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials from inception to 10 February 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Eligible studies included articles that discussed or employed the use of advance consent for enrolment in RCTs related to emergency conditions. There were no restrictions on the type of eligible study. Data were extracted directly from included papers using a standardised data charting form. We produced a narrative review including article type and authors' dispositions towards advance consent. RESULTS Our search yielded 1039 titles with duplicates removed. Six articles met inclusion criteria. Three articles discussed the theoretical use of research advance directives in emergency conditions; one article evaluated stakeholders' perceptions of advance consent; and one article described a method for patients to document their preferences for participation in future research. Only one study employed advance consent to enrol participants into a clinical trial for an emergency condition. CONCLUSION Our review demonstrates that there has been minimal exploration of advance consent for enrolment in RCTs for emergency conditions. Future studies could aim to assess the acceptability of advance consent to participants, along with the feasibility of enrolling research participants using this method of consent. PROTOCOL The protocol for this scoping review was published a priori.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Niznick
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronda Lun
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Dewar
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Perry
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dar Dowlatshahi
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Shamy
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Perry J. Challenges of anticipation of future decisions in dementia and dementia research. HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE LIFE SCIENCES 2022; 44:62. [PMID: 36376514 PMCID: PMC9663374 DOI: 10.1007/s40656-022-00541-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Anticipation of future decisions can be important for individuals at risk for diseases to maintain autonomy over time. For future treatment and care decisions, advance care planning is accepted as a useful anticipation tool. As research with persons with dementia seems imperative to develop disease-modifying interventions, and with changing regulations regarding research participation in Germany, advance research directives (ARDs) are considered a solution to include persons with dementia in research in an ethically sound manner. However, little is known about what affected people deem anticipatable.This contribution provides a critical reflection of the literature on anticipation and of a qualitative study on the assessment of ARDs with persons with cognitive impairment in Germany. It combines theoretical and empirical reflections to inform the ethical-legal discourse.Anticipation involves the conceptual separation of the past, the present, and the future. Including dimensions such as preparedness, injunction, and optimization helps in establishing a framework for anticipatory decision-making. While dementia may offer a window of time to consider future decisions, individual beliefs about dementia including fears about stigma, loss of personhood, and solitude strongly impact anticipating sentiments. Concepts of anticipation can be useful for the examination of uncertainty, changing values, needs, and preferences interconnected with the dementia trajectory and can serve as a means to make an uncertain future more concrete. However, fears of losing one's autonomy in the process of dementia also apply to possibilities of anticipation as these require cognitive assessment and reassessment of an imagined future with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Perry
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Heinrichs B. Advance research directives: avoiding double standards. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:137. [PMID: 34627232 PMCID: PMC8502375 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00704-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advance research directives (ARD) have been suggested as a means by which to facilitate research with incapacitated subjects, in particular in the context of dementia research. However, established disclosure requirements for study participation raise an ethical problem for the application of ARDs: While regular consent procedures call for detailed information on a specific study (“token disclosure”), ARDs can typically only include generic information (“type disclosure”). The introduction of ARDs could thus establish a double standard in the sense that within the context of ARDs, type disclosure would be considered sufficient, while beyond this context, token disclosure would remain necessary. Main body This paper provides an ethical analysis of ARDs, taking into account the results of numerous empirical studies that have been performed so far. It will be argued that a revised understanding of informed consent can allow for context-sensitive disclosure standards. As a consequence, ARDs that include type disclosure can be acceptable under suitable circumstances. Such an approach raises a number of objections. A thorough examination shows, however, that they are not sufficient to justify a rejection of the approach. Conclusion The approach presented in this paper avoids introducing a double standard. It is, therefore, more suitable for the implementation of ARDs than established approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Heinrichs
- Institute of Neurosciences and Medicine: Ethics in the Neurosciences (INM-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425, Jülich, Germany. .,Institute of Science and Ethics (IWE), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonner Talweg 57, 53113, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Soofi H. Ethical aspects of facilitating the recruitment of people with dementia for clinical trials: A call for further debate. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:22-26. [PMID: 34192378 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Under-representation of people with dementia in clinical research remains a significant obstacle to develop evidence-based practice guidelines and recommendation for dementia care and slows down the development of disease-modifying pharmacological interventions. This is partly due to the ethical challenges and complexities of recruiting people with dementia for clinical trials. The traditional approach adopted by research ethics committees and regulatory bodies has been to protect people with dementia as a vulnerable population from harms of participating in research. There are concerns that this approach is unduly rigid, precludes the conduct of necessary research, and has exclusionary, paternalistic and discriminatory ramifications. As such, there are increasing calls to shift to a new hybrid facilitative/protective approach. This paper identifies 4 strategies to operationalise the facilitative/protective approach in the context of dementia research. These are: (i) embedding dementia research in clinical care; (ii) increasing the recruitment of people at preclinical stages of dementia; (iii) streamlined proxy consent procedures; and (iv) advance research consent. I note that all 4 strategies hold the promise of facilitating the recruitment of people with dementia in clinical research. Nonetheless, they give rise to a diverse range of new ethical concerns and issues. This necessitates further scholarly work to explore possible ways to address the ethical concerns and issues arisen by the uptake of protective/facilitative approach. In particular, further research is necessary to clarify, to what extent, the said strategies ameliorate or increase the vulnerability of people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hojjat Soofi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niznick N, Lun R, Dewar B, Dowlatshahi D, Shamy M. Advanced consent for participation in acute care randomised control trials: protocol for a scoping review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e039172. [PMID: 33067291 PMCID: PMC7569993 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Informed consent is essential to clinical research, though obtaining informed consent for participation in research for emergency conditions is challenging. Adapted consent methods include consent from a substitute-decision maker, deferral of consent and waiver of consent. A novel approach is to use advanced consent, where a potential participant provides consent in the present in the event that they become eligible for enrolment into a future study. This scoping review will map and synthesise the literature on the use of advanced consent for participation and enrolment in randomised control trials for emergency conditions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Guided by Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology framework, we will search electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials), the grey literature sources and reference lists of relevant studies. Eligible studies will include English language articles that discuss, examine or employ the use of advanced consent for enrolment in randomised control trials, specifically related to emergency conditions or emergency treatment. Diverse types of articles will be eligible for inclusion, including peer-reviewed qualitative and quantitative studies such as randomised control trials, observational studies, surveys, systematic reviews, as well as narrative reviews and ethics papers. Studies will be screened by two independent reviewers to determine eligibility for inclusion. Data on bibliographic information, study characteristics and methodology, and reported results, specifically author disposition, will be extracted and described using qualitative analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Formal ethics review is not required as primary data will not be collected. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication. The findings of this study will help identify knowledge gaps that may guide areas for future research and may aid in the design of future clinical trials using advanced consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi Niznick
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ronda Lun
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Dewar
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dar Dowlatshahi
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michel Shamy
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wangmo T, Lipps M, Kressig RW, Ienca M. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:98. [PMID: 31856798 PMCID: PMC6924051 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0437-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in artificial intelligence (AI), robotics and wearable computing are creating novel technological opportunities for mitigating the global burden of population ageing and improving the quality of care for older adults with dementia and/or age-related disability. Intelligent assistive technology (IAT) is the umbrella term defining this ever-evolving spectrum of intelligent applications for the older and disabled population. However, the implementation of IATs has been observed to be sub-optimal due to a number of barriers in the translation of novel applications from the designing labs to the bedside. Furthermore, since these technologies are designed to be used by vulnerable individuals with age- and multi-morbidity-related frailty and cognitive disability, they are perceived to raise important ethical challenges, especially when they involve machine intelligence, collect sensitive data or operate in close proximity to the human body. Thus, the goal of this paper is to explore and assess the ethical issues that professional stakeholders perceive in the development and use of IATs in elderly and dementia care. Methods We conducted a multi-site study involving semi-structured qualitative interviews with researchers and health professionals. We analyzed the interview data using a descriptive thematic analysis to inductively explore relevant ethical challenges. Results Our findings indicate that professional stakeholders find issues of patient autonomy and informed consent, quality of data management, distributive justice and human contact as ethical priorities. Divergences emerged in relation to how these ethical issues are interpreted, how conflicts between different ethical principles are resolved and what solutions should be implemented to overcome current challenges. Conclusions Our findings indicate a general agreement among professional stakeholders on the ethical promises and challenges raised by the use of IATs among older and disabled users. Yet, notable divergences persist regarding how these ethical challenges can be overcome and what strategies should be implemented for the safe and effective implementation of IATs. These findings provide technology developers with useful information about unmet ethical needs. Study results may guide policy makers with firsthand information from relevant stakeholders about possible solutions for ethically-aligned technology governance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mirjam Lipps
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reto W Kressig
- Chair of Geriatrics, University of Basel; Chief Medical Officer, University Department of Geriatric Medicine Felix Platter, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marcello Ienca
- Health Ethics & Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, HOA H 17, Hottingerstrasse 10, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Forero Villalobos JJ, Vargas Celis I, Bernales Silva M. Voluntades anticipadas: desafíos éticos en el cuidado del paciente. PERSONA Y BIOÉTICA 2019. [DOI: 10.5294/pebi.2019.23.2.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Las voluntades anticipadas en salud tienen como finalidad que la persona manifieste de manera anticipada su voluntad sobre los cuidados y el tratamiento de su salud, lo cual le permite expresar personalmente y de forma previa sus preferencias. Esta revisión de la literatura tiene por objetivo describir el concepto y la estructura de las voluntades anticipadas, así como los aspectos éticos involucrados durante el cuidado del paciente. Con las palabras clave “Advanced Health Care Directive” AND “Ethical Implication” y sus símiles en español (voluntades anticipadas, implicaciones éticas), se revisaron cinco bases de datos: ProQuest, Philosophy (JSTOR), PubMed, Web of Science y SciELO; las publicaciones se agruparon entre los años 2010 y 2018. Se obtuvieron 31 artículos de los cuales se realizó una lectura crítica. Los resultados de esta revisión fueron agrupados en las siguientes categorías: concepto, estructura, situaciones clínicas donde se aplican las voluntades anticipadas, fortalezas y limitaciones; así como los aspectos éticos involucrados. Actualmente, son más comunes las vivencias relacionadas con las situaciones al final de la vida, donde la persona pierde su capacidad de decidir y no puede manifestar sus deseos, por lo que es imposible conocer su voluntad. Gran parte de los profesionales de la salud no tienen capacitación adecuada sobre el desarrollo y la aplicación de las voluntades anticipadas, escenario que se convierte en una oportunidad para la investigación y profundización sobre el tema. Las voluntades anticipadas son una herramienta que proporciona al equipo de salud información fidedigna de los valores y deseos del paciente, por lo que es importante capacitar a estos profesionales para brindar una atención respetuosa y de calidad.
Collapse
|
10
|
Götz SC, Marckmann G, Hasford J, Jox RJ. [Critical evaluation of the new legal regulation of pharmaceutical trials with adults who lack decision-making capacity: a survey of human research ethics committees in Germany]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2019; 63:465-474. [PMID: 31773175 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-019-03058-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany, the drug law was revised in 2016 to include new regulations on clinical drug trials with adults who lack decision-making capacity. For the first time, trials with a merely indirect benefit (benefit for other patients with similar characteristics) will be possible if several safeguards are respected. The ethical justification and practicality of this regulation are controversially discussed. OBJECTIVES (1) Eliciting the current pertinent practice of research ethics committees in Germany regarding research with indirect benefit on adults without decision-making capacity; (2) exploring the possibilities and difficulties of implementing the new law. METHODS Semiquantitative, anonymous questionnaire among 249 members of all 53 human research ethics committees in Germany. RESULTS Eighty-four questionnaires were analyzed (response rate 34%). The participants disagreed on assigning research projects to the categories of research with direct benefit to the subject, with an indirect benefit, and without any benefit. Moreover, the criteria of minimum risk and minimum burden were interpreted heterogeneously. More than half of the participants judged the newly introduced research advance directive to be unnecessary, given the legal safeguards in place. The applicability of these directives was doubted because of the strict requirements for anticipatory informed consent and the restricted predictability of future research. CONCLUSION In spite of the new legal regulation, significant ethical uncertainties remain concerning research with indirect benefit on adults without decision-making capacity. It remains an open question whether we need a better explanation of the law, additional legal regulation, practice evaluation, or a completely new law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie-Charlotte Götz
- Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Georg Marckmann
- Institut für Ethik, Geschichte und Theorie der Medizin, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Joerg Hasford
- Institut für Med. Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| | - Ralf J Jox
- Unité d'Éthique Clinique, Universitätsklinikum Lausanne (CHUV), Universität Lausanne, Lausanne, Schweiz.
- Institut des Humanités en Médecine, Universitätsklinikum Lausanne (CHUV), Universität Lausanne, Avenue de Provence 82, 1007, Lausanne, Schweiz.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ries N, Mansfield E, Sanson-Fisher R. Planning Ahead for Dementia Research Participation: Insights from a Survey of Older Australians and Implications for Ethics, Law and Practice. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2019; 16:415-429. [PMID: 31297689 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-019-09929-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
People with dementia have commonly been excluded from research. The adverse impacts of this exclusion are now being recognized and research literature, position statements, and ethics guidelines increasingly call for inclusion of people with dementia in research. However, few published studies investigate the views of potential participants on taking part in research should they experience dementia-related cognitive impairment. This cross-sectional survey examined the views of people aged sixty and older (n=174) attending hospital outpatient clinics about clinical research participation if they had dementia and impaired decision-making ability. Over 90 percent of respondents were agreeable to participating in a wide range of research activities, such as cognitive testing, physical measurements, imaging procedures, and blood draws. For drug studies, however, agreement dropped to 60 percent. Altruism was a strong motivator for research participation. In regard to who should be involved in decisions about their participation in research during periods of incapacity, respondents mostly preferred the person they appoint as their substitute decision-maker for healthcare matters (88%) or a doctor or health professional on the research team (78%). Over three-quarters (79%) expressed interest in making an advance research directive. The study findings are discussed in relation to law reforms in Australia that aim to strengthen respect and inclusion for people with impaired decision-making capacity, especially by providing frameworks for advance planning for research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nola Ries
- Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, PO Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Elise Mansfield
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Corneli A, Perry B, Collyar D, Powers JH, Farley JJ, Calvert SB, Santiago J, Donnelly HK, Swezey T, Dombeck CB, De Anda C, Fowler VG, Holland TL. Assessment of the Perceived Acceptability of an Early Enrollment Strategy Using Advance Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia. JAMA Netw Open 2018; 1:e185816. [PMID: 30646295 PMCID: PMC6324354 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.5816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Better treatment options are needed in life-threatening infections, including health care-associated pneumonia. Enrolling patients in antibacterial clinical trials before diagnosis may circumvent existing time-to-enrollment constraints. However, the acceptability of an early enrollment strategy using advance consent is unknown. OBJECTIVE To assess the perceived acceptability of an early enrollment strategy for enrolling patients in an antibacterial clinical trial before a pneumonia diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative, descriptive study used semistructured telephone interviews. Framed within a planned noninferiority pneumonia antibiotic trial, an early enrollment strategy was described and perceptions were assessed. Using this strategy, patients give consent to enroll before developing pneumonia, to be monitored by study staff, and to be randomly assigned a study antibiotic if pneumonia develops. All interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. Fifty-two key stakeholders from across the United States, including 18 patients at risk of pneumonia, 12 caregivers, 10 representatives of institutional review boards, 7 investigators, and 5 study coordinators, were interviewed from June 20 to August 19, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Perceived acceptability of the early enrollment strategy. RESULTS Among the 52 stakeholders interviewed (ages 29-75 years; 14 women), patients and caregivers expressed no concerns about patients being approached about participation before developing pneumonia; however, some patients may experience anxiety on learning about their risk for pneumonia. No concerns with study staff accessing patients' medical records were expressed. The clarity of consent information was important for understanding the study rather than having the condition under investigation. Among patients, caregivers, and institutional review board representatives, preferences varied regarding opt-out and precedent autonomy procedures. Nearly all patients would be willing to join a trial using the early enrollment strategy and caregivers would be willing to provide proxy consent. Institutional review board representatives were supportive of the strategy and made recommendations for the study protocol, primarily around informed consent. Investigators and study coordinators believed the strategy would not be burdensome and offered suggestions to ensure its feasibility. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Results of the study suggest that the early enrollment strategy is acceptable. Future research should evaluate whether the strategy improves enrollment rates in registrational pneumonia trials and in trials of other acute infection syndromes with narrow enrollment windows and/or patients with transient decisional incapacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Corneli
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian Perry
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - John H. Powers
- Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - John J. Farley
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Sara B. Calvert
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jonas Santiago
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Helen K. Donnelly
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Teresa Swezey
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Carrie B. Dombeck
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Vance G. Fowler
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Thomas L. Holland
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thorogood A, Mäki‐Petäjä‐Leinonen A, Brodaty H, Dalpé G, Gastmans C, Gauthier S, Gove D, Harding R, Knoppers BM, Rossor M, Bobrow M. Consent recommendations for research and international data sharing involving persons with dementia. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:1334-1343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Revised: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Mäki‐Petäjä‐Leinonen
- Faculty of Social Sciences and Business StudiesLaw SchoolUniversity of Eastern FinlandJoensuuFinland
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Faculty of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Gratien Dalpé
- Centre of Genomics and PolicyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and LawKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Serge Gauthier
- McGill Centre for Studies in AgingMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | | | - Rosie Harding
- Birmingham Law SchoolUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Martin Rossor
- UCL Institute of NeurologyUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Martin Bobrow
- Department of Medical GeneticsUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Volhard T, Jessen F, Kleineidam L, Wolfsgruber S, Lanzerath D, Wagner M, Maier W. Advance directives for future dementia can be modified by a brief video presentation on dementia care: An experimental study. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0197229. [PMID: 29795605 PMCID: PMC5967707 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether life-sustaining measures in medical emergency situations are less accepted for an anticipated own future of living with dementia, and to test whether a resource-oriented, in contrast to a deficit-oriented video about the same demented person, would increase the acceptance of such life-saving measures. DESIGN Experimental study conducted between September 2012 and February 2013. SETTING Community dwelling female volunteers living in the region of Bonn, Germany. PARTICIPANTS 278 women aged 19 to 89 (mean age 53.4 years). INTERVENTION Presentation of a video on dementia care focusing either on the deficits of a demented woman (negative framing), or focusing on the remaining resources (positive framing) of the same patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Approval of life-sustaining treatments in five critical medical scenarios under the assumption of having comorbid dementia, before and after the presentation of the brief videos on care. RESULTS At baseline, the acceptance of life-sustaining measures in critical medical situations was significantly lower in subjects anticipating their own future life with dementia. Participants watching the resource-oriented film on living with dementia had significantly higher post-film acceptance rates compared to those watching the deficit-oriented negatively framed film. This effect particularly emerges if brief and efficient life-saving interventions with a high likelihood of physical recovery are available (eg, antibiotic treatment for pneumonia). CONCLUSIONS Anticipated decisions regarding life-sustaining measures are negatively influenced by the subjective imagination of living with dementia, which might be shaped by common, unquestioned stereotypes. This bias can be reduced by providing audio-visual information on living with dementia which is not only centred around cognitive and functional losses but also focuses on remaining resources and the apparent quality of life. This is particularly true if the medical threat can be treated efficiently. These findings have implications for the practice of formulating, revising, and supporting advance directives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresia Volhard
- German Reference Centre for Ethics in the Life Sciences (DRZE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank Jessen
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Luca Kleineidam
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Steffen Wolfsgruber
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Dirk Lanzerath
- German Reference Centre for Ethics in the Life Sciences (DRZE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Wagner
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- * E-mail: (WM); (MW)
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Geriatric Psychiatry, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- * E-mail: (WM); (MW)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Guo P, Dzingina M, Firth AM, Davies JM, Douiri A, O’Brien SM, Pinto C, Pask S, Higginson IJ, Eagar K, Murtagh FEM. Development and validation of a casemix classification to predict costs of specialist palliative care provision across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings in the UK: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020071. [PMID: 29550781 PMCID: PMC5879599 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Provision of palliative care is inequitable with wide variations across conditions and settings in the UK. Lack of a standard way to classify by case complexity is one of the principle obstacles to addressing this. We aim to develop and validate a casemix classification to support the prediction of costs of specialist palliative care provision. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Phase I: A cohort study to determine the variables and potential classes to be included in a casemix classification. Data are collected from clinicians in palliative care services across inpatient hospice, hospital and community settings on: patient demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. Cost predictors are derived using multivariate regression and then incorporated into a classification using classification and regression trees. Internal validation will be conducted by bootstrapping to quantify any optimism in the predictive performance (calibration and discrimination) of the developed classification. Phase II: A mixed-methods cohort study across settings for external validation of the classification developed in phase I. Patient and family caregiver data will be collected longitudinally on demographics, potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use. This will be triangulated with data collected from clinicians on potential complexity/casemix criteria and patient-level resource use, and with qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers about care provision across difference settings. The classification will be refined on the basis of its performance in the validation data set. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the National Health Service Health Research Authority Research Ethics Committee. The results are expected to be disseminated in 2018 through papers for publication in major palliative care journals; policy briefs for clinicians, commissioning leads and policy makers; and lay summaries for patients and public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN90752212.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Guo
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Mendwas Dzingina
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Alice M Firth
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Joanna M Davies
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Abdel Douiri
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health
Sciences, King’s College London,
London, UK
| | - Suzanne M O’Brien
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Cathryn Pinto
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Sophie Pask
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Department of Palliative Care, Policy and
Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King’s
College London, London,
UK
| | - Kathy Eagar
- University of Wollongong, Australian Health Services Research Institute, Centre for
Health Service Development, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull
York Medical School, University of Hull,
Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hallich O. Tom Buller on the principle of precedent autonomy and the relation between critical and experiential interests. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2015; 41:709-711. [PMID: 25673769 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
|
17
|
Abstract
Dementia is highly prevalent and incurable. The participation of dementia patients in clinical research is indispensable if we want to find an effective treatment for dementia. However, one of the primary challenges in dementia research is the patients' gradual loss of the capacity to consent. Patients with dementia are characterized by the fact that, at an earlier stage of their life, they were able to give their consent to participation in research. Therefore, the phase when patients are still competent to decide offers a valuable opportunity to authorize research, by using an advance research directive (ARD). Yet, the use of ARDs as an authorization for research participation remains controversial. In this paper we discuss the role of autonomous decision-making and the protection of incompetent research subjects. We will show why ARDs are a morally defensible basis for the inclusion of this population in biomedical research and that the use of ARDs is compatible with the protection of incompetent research subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Rolanda Jongsma
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Office NA 21.17, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Suzanne van de Vathorst
- Department of Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Office NA 21.17, PO box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|