1
|
Stiefel F, Bourquin C, Salmon P, Achtari Jeanneret L, Dauchy S, Ernstmann N, Grassi L, Libert Y, Vitinius F, Santini D, Ripamonti CI. Communication and support of patients and caregivers in chronic cancer care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. ESMO Open 2024; 9:103496. [PMID: 39089769 PMCID: PMC11360426 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
•ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline with key recommendations for communication and support of cancer patients and caregivers. •The guideline discusses training in communication of oncology clinicians and research on communication in cancer care. •Practical recommendations aim to support oncology clinicians in their communication with patients and caregivers. •Figures summarising the responsibilities of the clinician, the oncology team and the health care institution are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Stiefel
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Bourquin
- Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - P Salmon
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - L Achtari Jeanneret
- Department of Oncology, Réseau Hospitalier Neuchâtelois, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - S Dauchy
- Département Médico-Universitaire Psychiatrie et Addictologie, AP-HP, Centre-Université de Paris, Paris; Centre National Fin de Vie-Soins Palliatifs, Paris, France
| | - N Ernstmann
- Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn; Chair of Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - L Grassi
- Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Y Libert
- Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Faculté des Sciences Psychologiques et de l'Éducation, Brussels; Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (H.U.B.), Institut Jules Bordet, Service de Psychologie (Secteur Psycho-Oncologie), Brussels, Belgium
| | - F Vitinius
- Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital and University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Robert-Bosch Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - D Santini
- Medical Oncology A, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome
| | - C I Ripamonti
- Palliative Medicine, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Universita' degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lampart P, Schäppi L, Langewitz WA, Rubinelli S, Sigrist-Nix D, Scheel-Sailer A. Health care professionals’ experiences with goal setting during initial rehabilitation after newly acquired spinal cord injury/ disorder – a qualitative focus group study. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:982321. [PMID: 36189066 PMCID: PMC9397958 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.982321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionGoal setting (GS) is an important aspect of initial spinal cord injury/ disorder (SCI/D) rehabilitation. However, because expected outcomes are individual and often difficult to determine, GS is not straightforward. The aim of this study was to explore the health care professionals' (HCP's) experiences with and perspectives on the goal-setting process (GSP) during initial SCI/D rehabilitation.MethodFive semi-structured focus groups (FG) (22 purposively sampled HCP, mostly in leadership positions, six different professions). The FG were transcribed verbatim. We analyzed the transcripts for qualitative content analysis following Braun and Clarke (2013).ResultsHCP described GS-influencing aspects at the macro, meso and micro levels. At the macro level, participants spoke about restrictions imposed by health insurers or difficulties in planning the post-inpatient setting. Regarding the meso level, HCP spoke of institutional structures and culture that facilitated the GSP. At the micro level, knowledge of the diagnosis, expected outcomes, and individual patient characteristics were mentioned as important to the rehabilitation process. It was important for HCP to be patient and empathetic, to endure negative emotions, to accept that patients need time to adjust to their new situation, and to ensure that they do not lose hope. Open communication and interprofessional collaboration helped overcome barriers in the GSP.DiscussionThis paper shows the complex relationship between external (e.g., health insurers), emotional, and communication aspects. It calls for a comprehensive approach to optimizing the GSP, so that patients' experiences can be fully considered as a basis to identify the most appropriate care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Lampart
- Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Livia Schäppi
- Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Sara Rubinelli
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
- Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | | | - Anke Scheel-Sailer
- Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown SL, Fisher PL, Morgan A, Davies C, Olabi Y, Hope-Stone L, Heimann H, Hussain R, Cherry MG. 'I Don't Like Uncertainty, I Like to Know': How and why uveal melanoma patients consent to life expectancy prognostication. Health Expect 2022; 25:1498-1507. [PMID: 35474381 PMCID: PMC9327814 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technological advances have led to cancer prognostication that is increasingly accurate but often unalterable. However, a reliable prognosis of limited life expectancy can cause psychological distress. People should carefully consider offers of prognostication, but little is known about how and why they decide on prognostication. Using uveal melanoma (UM) patients, we aimed to identify (i) how and why do people with UM decide to accept prognostication and (ii) alignment and divergence of their decision-making from conceptualizations of a 'well-considered' decision. METHODS UM provides a paradigm to elucidate clinical and ethical perspectives on prognostication, because prognostication is reliable but prognoses are largely nonameliorable. We used qualitative methods to examine how and why 20 UM people with UM chose prognostication. We compared findings to a template of 'well-considered' decision-making, where 'well-considered' decisions involve consideration of all likely outcomes. RESULTS Participants wanted prognostication to reduce future worry about uncertain life expectancy. They spontaneously spoke of hoping for a good prognosis when making their decisions, but largely did not consider the 50% possibility of a poor prognosis. When pressed, they argued that a poor outcome at least brings certainty. CONCLUSIONS While respecting decisions as valid expressions of participants' wishes, we are concerned that they did not explicitly consider the realistic possibility of a poor outcome and how this would affect them. Thus, it is difficult to see their decisions as 'well-considered'. We propose that nondirective preference exploration techniques could help people to consider the possibility of a poor outcome. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This paper is a direct response to a patient-identified and defined problem that arose in therapeutic and conversational discourse. The research was informed by the responses of patient participants, as we used the material from interviews to dynamically shape the interview guide. Thus, participants' ideas drove the analysis and shaped the interviews to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter L Fisher
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Morgan
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Cari Davies
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Yasmin Olabi
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Laura Hope-Stone
- School of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.,Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Heinrich Heimann
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rumana Hussain
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,Liverpool Ocular Oncology Centre, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Neto IG. Palliative care and its own identity, through an autoethnography: do you recognize these patterns? Palliat Care Soc Pract 2022; 16:26323524221122346. [PMID: 36118620 PMCID: PMC9478704 DOI: 10.1177/26323524221122346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: After more than 25 years working in palliative care (PC) observing thousands
of patients and family behaviors, I use my long experience and notes as a
source of data for a qualitative research study. The aim is to identify
frequent families’ behavior patterns in PC and better describe the culture
in PC. Methods: This article is part of a larger project, using autoethnography as
methodology, with the aim of helping doctors and interested health
professionals better understand the culture and reality of PC. The focus is
not the author but patients and families’ patterns of
social behavior – the social context – within the
end-of-life period and how to deal with these professionally.
Confidentiality and privacy of patients’ data were guaranteed. Results: The vast number of treated cases, the regular observation and recording, and
the continuous reflection and analysis over many years have led to these
results. Due to editorial restrictions, in this article I only describe four
of at least eight typical scenarios I have identified. Each is given a short
title and I explore some of their inside-issues, integrating previous
knowledge, research, and explanations, with practical suggestions on how to
deal with them. Significance: As far as we know, these scenarios/patterns have never been described in this
way. This work expands knowledge, innovates, and contributes to better
describing PC culture. The final goal is to create a set of scripts that can
be used to help clinicians quickly identify the clinical situation and how
to deal with it in clinical practice. Reflecting on how patients and
families frequently behave in PC can be very useful and then teach other
professionals to better deal with these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Galriça Neto
- Palliative Care Unit, Hospital da Luz-Lisboa, Lisbon University Medical School, Catolica University Medical School, Av.Lusíada 100, Lisboa 1500-650, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|