Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data

Perspectives of adult offspring of participants recruited to a randomised trial in pregnancy: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Routinely assessed outcomes in paediatric health studies may not reflect families' priorities. Increasing our understanding of childhood experiences of research participation may contribute to improving the quality of consent and better align study aims with the concerns of relevant communities.

OBJECTIVE

To explore young adults' views on their participation in medical research during their childhood, specifically around the acceptability of consent and their priorities regarding health, development and well-being as potential trial outcomes.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive 20-year follow-up study of a medical trial which aimed to improve outcomes after preterm birth. Semistructured dialogue transcripts were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen young adults whose parents consented to their participation in a clinical trial when they were fetuses, and in follow-up studies as preschoolers and school-age children.

RESULTS

Overall, participants expressed comfort with their parents consenting to medical research on their behalf. However, autonomous child assent may not be attainable due to children's susceptibility to suggestions. Participants generally expressed satisfaction with the outcomes investigated in the follow-up studies, although some suggested other outcomes of interest such as mental health and learning disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Current consent procedures were deemed acceptable as parents hold responsibility for making decisions on behalf of their children, and their commitment to their child's well-being ensures that they make appropriate choices. The outcomes assessed in this trial and health and developmental outcomes in the follow-up assessments aligned well with outcomes of interest to the young adult participants.

Pediatric biobanks to enhance clinical and translational research for children

Including children in biomedical research is an argument for continual reflection and practice refinement from an ethical and legal standpoint. Indeed, as children reach adulthood, a reconsent method should be used, and data connected with samples should ideally be updated based on the children's growth and long-term results. Furthermore, because most pediatric disorders are uncommon, children's research initiatives should conform to standard operating procedures (SOPs) set by worldwide scientific organizations for successfully sharing data and samples. Here, we examine how pediatric biobanks can help address some challenges to improve biomedical research for children. Indeed, modern biobanks are evolving as complex research platforms with specialized employees, dedicated spaces, information technologies services (ITS), and ethical and legal expertise. In the case of research for children, biobanks can collaborate with scientific networks (i.e., BBMRI-ERIC) and provide the collection, storage, and distribution of biosamples in agreement with international standard procedures (ISO-20387). Close collaboration among biobanks provides shared avenues for maximizing scarce biological samples, which is required to promote the translation of scientific breakthroughs for developing clinical care and health policies tailored to the pediatric population. Moreover, biobanks, through their science communication and dissemination activities (i.e., European Biobank Week), may be helpful for children to understand what it means to be engaged in a research study, allowing them to see it as a pleasant, useful, and empowering experience. Additionally, biobanks can notify each participant about which projects have been accomplished (i.e., through their websites, social media networks, etc.); they can facilitate future reconsent procedures and update sample-associated data based on the children's growth. Finally, because of the increasing interest from public and commercial organizations in research efforts that include the sharing and reuse of health data, pediatric biobanks have a crucial role in this context. Consequently, they could benefit from funding opportunities for sustaining research activities even regarding rare pediatric disorders.  Conclusion: Pediatric biobanks are helpful for providing biological material for research purposes, addressing ethical and legal issues (i.e. data protection, consent, etc.), and providing control samples from healthy children of various ages and from different geographical regions and ethnicities. Therefore, it is vital to encourage and maintain children's engagement in medical research programs and biobanking activities, especially as children become adults, and reconsent procedures must be applied. What is Known: • Biobanks are critical research infrastructures for medical research, especially in the era of "omic" science. However, in light of their fragility and rights children's participation in biobanking and medical research programs is a complex argument of continuous debate in scientific literature. What is New: • We propose a review of the literature on pediatric biobanks with a particular focus on oncological biobanks. The main current limitations and challenges for pediatric biobanks are presented and possible solutions are discussed.

Returning Individual Research Results to Vulnerable Individuals

Although issues associated with returning individual research results to study participants have been well explored, these issues have been less thoroughly investigated in vulnerable individuals and populations. Considerations regarding return of research results to these individuals and populations, including how best to ensure truly informed consent, how to minimize the risks and benefits of the return of research results, and how best to ensure justice may differ from those of the population at large. This article discusses the issues and challenges associated with the return of individual research results (such as genomic, proteomic, or other biomarker data) to potentially vulnerable individuals and populations, including those who may be vulnerable for cognitive, communicative, institutional, social, deferential, medical, economic, or social reasons. It explores factors that should be considered in the design, conduct, and oversight of ethically responsible research involving the return of research results to vulnerable individuals and populations and discuss recommendations for those engaged in this work.