1
|
Kushner PR, DeMeis J, Stevens P, Gjurovic AM, Malvolti E, Tangri N. Patient and Clinician Perspectives: To Create a Better Future for Chronic Kidney Disease, We Need to Talk About Our Kidneys. Adv Ther 2024; 41:1318-1324. [PMID: 38443646 PMCID: PMC10960902 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02794-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than one in ten people worldwide. However, results from the REVEAL-CKD study suggest that it is often not diagnosed. Many patients are therefore unaware that they have CKD, putting them at increased risk of disease progression and complications. Empowering patients with knowledge about CKD will allow them to become active participants in their own care, driving improvements in diagnosis rates and changing patient outcomes for the better. In this article, we provide patient and clinician perspectives on the importance of early CKD diagnosis and management. We present an overview of the tests commonly used to diagnose CKD in clinical practice, as well as actionable suggestions for patients, clinicians, and health policymakers that could help improve disease detection and treatment. Navdeep Tangri, a nephrologist and epidemiologist at the University of Manitoba, and Jane DeMeis, a patient living with chronic kidney disease, discuss how results from the REVEAL-CKD study highlight the need for change to improve management of chronic kidney disease. Video Abstract (MP4 141866 KB).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela R Kushner
- Department of Family Medicine, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
| | | | - Petrina Stevens
- Global Patient Engagement, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ana Marija Gjurovic
- Global Patient Engagement, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Dubai, UAE
| | - Elmas Malvolti
- Global Medical Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolism, BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
- Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Siösteen-Holmblad I, Larsson EC, Kilander H. What factors influence a Quality Improvement Collaborative in improving contraceptive services for foreign-born women? A qualitative study in Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1089. [PMID: 37821891 PMCID: PMC10568973 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10060-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved contraceptive services could reduce the unmet need for contraception and unintended pregnancies globally. This is especially true among foreign-born women in high-income countries, as the health outcomes related to unmet need of contraception disproportionally affect this group. A widely used quality improvement approach to improve health care services is Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC). However, evidence on to what extent, how and why it is effective and what factors influence a QIC in different healthcare contexts is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyse what factors have influenced a successful QIC intervention that is aimed to improve contraceptive service in postpartum care, mainly targeting foreign-born women in Sweden. METHODS A qualitative, deductive design was used, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The study triangulated secondary data from four learning seminars as part of the QIC, with primary interview data with four QIC-facilitators. The QIC involved midwives at three maternal health clinics in Stockholm County, Sweden, 2018-2019. RESULTS Factors from all five CFIR domains were identified, however, the majority of factors that influenced the QIC were found inside the QIC-setting, in three domains: intervention characteristics, inner setting and process. Outside factors and those related to individuals were less influential. A favourable learning climate, emphasizing co-creation and mutual learning, facilitated reflections among the participating midwives. The application of the QIC was facilitated by adaptability, trialability, and a motivated and skilled project team. Our study further suggests that the QIC was complex because it required a high level of engagement from the midwives and facilitators. Additionally, it was challenging due to unclear roles and objectives in the initial phases. CONCLUSIONS The application of the CFIR framework identified crucial factors influencing the success of a QIC in contraceptive services in a high-income setting. These factors highlight the importance of establishing a learning climate characterised by co-creation and mutual learning among the participating midwives as well as the facilitators. Furthermore, to invest in planning and formation of the project group during the QIC initiation; and to ensure adaptability and trialability of the improvement activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elin C Larsson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Kilander
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haeffner LSB, Backes DS, Hammel GDSC, de Sousa FGM, Rupolo I, Smeha LN. Social and health vulnerability of homeless people. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2023; 57:e20220379. [PMID: 37942983 PMCID: PMC10634269 DOI: 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0379en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective is to conduct a theoretical reflection on the social and health vulnerability of homeless people, from the perspective of complexity thinking. Study with a theoretical and reflective approach that accessed bibliographical sources of contemporary authors who seek to understand the phenomenon of homeless populations and, at the same time, attribute theoretical support from the reference of complexity, under a critical and analytical bias. Health is conceived as a subsystem of the social system that transcends any linear and punctual diagnostic perspective. Theoretical reflection on the social and health vulnerability of homeless people sparks a unique and multidimensional apprehension of the human being - a complex unit par excellence, which demands equally complex interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dirce Stein Backes
- Universidade Franciscana, Programa em Saúde Materno-Infantil, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | | | | | - Irani Rupolo
- Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Luciane Najar Smeha
- Universidade Franciscana, Programa em Saúde Materno-Infantil, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
GREENHALGH TRISHA, ENGEBRETSEN EIVIND, BAL ROLAND, KJELLSTRÖM SOFIA. Toward a Values-Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review. Milbank Q 2023; 101:646-674. [PMID: 37219239 PMCID: PMC10509518 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Policy Points The concept of value complexity (complexity arising from differences in people's worldviews, interests, and values, leading to mistrust, misunderstanding, and conflict among stakeholders) is introduced and explained. Relevant literature from multiple disciplines is reviewed. Key theoretical themes, including power, conflict, language and framing, meaning-making, and collective deliberation, are identified. Simple rules derived from these theoretical themes are proposed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wehrens R, Oldenhof L, Heerings M, Petit-Steeghs V, van Haperen S, Bal R, Greenhalgh T. Integrating System Dynamics and Action Research: Towards a Consideration of Normative Complexity Comment on "Insights Gained From a Re-analysis of Five Improvement Cases in Healthcare Integrating System Dynamics Into Action Research". Int J Health Policy Manag 2023; 12:7582. [PMID: 37579386 PMCID: PMC10425676 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Holmström and co-authors argue for the value of integrating system dynamics into action research to deal with increasing complexity in healthcare. We argue that despite merits, the authors overlook the key aspect of normative complexity, which refers to the existence of multiple, often conflicting values that actors in healthcare systems have to pragmatically develop responses to in their daily practices. We argue that a better theoretical and empirical understanding of the multiplicity of values and how actors deal with value conflicts in daily practices can enrich discussions about complexity in healthcare. We introduce the alternative methodology of 'value exnovation' for action researchers to broaden the scope of system-based thinking and action research in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik Wehrens
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieke Oldenhof
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Heerings
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Violet Petit-Steeghs
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander van Haperen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Bal
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goldman J, Rotteau L, Flintoft V, Jeffs L, Baker GR. Measurement and Monitoring of Safety Framework: a qualitative study of implementation through a Canadian learning collaborative. BMJ Qual Saf 2022:bmjqs-2022-015017. [PMID: 36598000 DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Measurement and Monitoring of Safety Framework (MMSF) aims to move beyond a narrow focus on measurement and past harmful events as the major focus for safety in healthcare organisations. There is limited evidence of MMSF implementation and impact. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine participants' perspectives and experiences to increase understanding of the adaptive work of implementing the MMSF through a learning collaborative programme in diverse healthcare contexts across Canada. METHODS The Collaborative consisted of 11 teams from seven provinces. We conducted a qualitative study involving interviews with 36 participants, observations of 5 sites and learning sessions, and collection of documents. RESULTS Collaborative sessions and coaching allowed participants to explore reliability, sensitivity to operations, anticipation and preparedness, and integration and learning, in addition to past harm, and move beyond a project and measurement oriented safety approach. Participants noted the importance of time dedicated to engaging stakeholders in talk about MMSF concepts and their significance to their settings, prior to moving to implementing the Framework into practice. While participants generally started with a small number of ways of integrating the MMSF into practice such as rounds or huddles, many teams continued to experiment with incorporating the MMSF into a range of practices. Participants reported changes in thinking about safety, discussions and behaviours, which were perceived to impact healthcare processes. However, participants also reported challenges to sharing the Framework broadly and moving beyond its surface implementation, and difficulties with its sustained and widespread use given misalignments with existing quality and safety processes. CONCLUSION The MMSF requires a dramatic departure from traditional safety strategies that focus on discrete problems and emphasise measurement. MMSF implementation requires extensive discussion, coaching and experimentation. Future implementation should consider engaging local leaders and coaches and an organisation or system approach to enable broader reach and systemic change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Goldman
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leahora Rotteau
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Virginia Flintoft
- Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lianne Jeffs
- Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for the Science of Care and Innovation, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sutton E, Booth L, Ibrahim M, McCulloch P, Sujan M, Willars J, Mackintosh N. Am I safe? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Vulnerability as Experienced by Patients With Complications Following Surgery. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2022; 32:2078-2089. [PMID: 36321384 PMCID: PMC9709529 DOI: 10.1177/10497323221136956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Abdominal surgery carries with it risks of complications. Little is known about patients' experiences of post-surgical deterioration. There is a real need to understand the psychosocial as well as the biological aspects of deterioration in order to improve care and outcomes for patients. Drawing on in-depth interviews with seven abdominal surgery survivors, we present an idiographic account of participants' experiences, situating their contribution to safety within their personal lived experiences and meaning-making of these episodes of deterioration. Our analysis reveals an overarching group experiential theme of vulnerability in relation to participants' experiences of complications after abdominal surgery. This encapsulates the uncertainty of the situation all the participants found themselves in, and the nature and seriousness of their health conditions. The extent of participants' vulnerability is revealed by detailing how they made sense of their experience, how they negotiated feelings of (un)safety drawing on their relationships with family and staff and the legacy of feelings they were left with when their expectations of care (care as imagined) did not meet the reality of their experiences (care as received). The participants' experiences highlight the power imbalance between patients and professionals in terms of whose knowledge counts within the hospital context. The study reveals the potential for epistemic injustice to arise when patients' concerns are ignored or dismissed. Our data has implications for designing strategies to enable escalation of care, both in terms of supporting staff to deliver compassionate care, and in strengthening patient and family involvement in rescue processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences,
University
of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Mudathir Ibrahim
- Nuffield Department of Surgical
Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of General Surgery,
Maimonides
Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Peter McCulloch
- Nuffield Department of Surgical
Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Sujan
- Nuffield Department of Surgical
Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Human Factors Everywhere
Ltd., UK
| | - Janet Willars
- Department of Health Sciences,
University
of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicola Mackintosh
- Department of Health Sciences,
University
of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carr SE, Harris A, Scott K, Ani-Amponsah M, Hooker C, Phillips B, Noya F, Mavaddat N, Vuillermin DM, Reid S, Brett-MacLean P. InspirE5: a participatory, internationally informed framework for health humanities curricula in health professions education. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:490. [PMID: 35739520 PMCID: PMC9225807 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03551-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reporting on the effect of health humanities teaching in health professions education courses to facilitate sharing and mutual exchange internationally, and the generation of a more interconnected body of evidence surrounding health humanities curricula is needed. This study asked, what could an internationally informed curriculum and evaluation framework for the implementation of health humanities for health professions education look like? METHODS The participatory action research approach applied was based on three iterative phases 1. Perspective sharing and collaboration building. 2. Evidence gathering 3. Development of an internationally relevant curriculum and evaluation framework for health humanities. Over 2 years, a series of online meetings, virtual workshops and follow up communications resulted in the production of the curriculum framework. RESULTS Following the perspective sharing and evidence gathering, the InspirE5 model of curriculum design and evaluation framework for health humanities in health professions education was developed. Five principal foci shaped the design of the framework. ENVIRONMENT Learning and political environment surrounding the program. Expectations: Graduate capabilities that are clearly articulated for all, integrated into core curricula and relevant to graduate destinations and associated professional standards. EXPERIENCE Learning and teaching experience that supports learners' achievement of the stated graduate capabilities. EVIDENCE Assessment of learning (formative and/or summative) with feedback for learners around the development of capabilities. Enhancement: Program evaluation of the students and teachers learning experiences and achievement. In all, 11 Graduate Capabilities for Health Humanities were suggested along with a summary of common core content and guiding principles for assessment of health humanities learning. DISCUSSION Concern about objectifying, reductive biomedical approaches to health professions education has led to a growing expansion of health humanities teaching and learning around the world. The InspirE5 curriculum and evaluation framework provides a foundation for a standardised approach to describe or compare health humanities education in different contexts and across a range of health professions courses and may be adapted around the world to progress health humanities education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra E Carr
- Health Professions Education, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
| | - Anna Harris
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Karen Scott
- Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Claire Hooker
- Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Brid Phillips
- Health Professions Education, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Farah Noya
- Health Professions Education, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Medical School, University of Pattimura Indonesia, Nusaniwe, Indonesia
| | - Nahal Mavaddat
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Steve Reid
- University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Pamela Brett-MacLean
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fitzsimons B. Voices and stories are central to improving healthcare. BMJ 2022; 376:o114. [PMID: 35039314 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.o114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|