E-042 Immediate procedural outcomes in 35 consecutive pipeline embolization cases: a single-center, single-user experience

French collaborative group series on giant intracranial aneurysms: Current management

OBJECTIVES

Giant intracranial aneurysms represent a major therapeutic challenge for each surgical team. The aim of our study was to extensively review the French contemporary experience in treating giant intracranial aneurysms in order to assess the current management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study concerned consecutive patients treated for giant intracranial aneurysms (2004-2008) in different French university hospitals (Bordeaux, Caen, Clermont-Ferrand, Lille, Lyon, Nice, Paris-Lariboisière, Rouen et Toulouse). Different variables were analyzed: the diagnostic circumstances, the initial clinical status based on the WFNS scale, aneurysmal features and exclusion procedure. At 6 months, the outcome was evaluated according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS): favorable (mRS 0-2) and unfavorable (mRS 3-6). A multivariate logistic regression model included all the independent variables with P<0.25 in the univariate analysis (P<0.05).

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients with a mean age of 51.5 ± 1.6 years (median: 52 years; range: 16-79) were divided into two groups, with the ruptured group (n=26, 32.9%) significantly younger (P<0.05, Student's-t-test) than the unruptured group (n=53, 67.1%). After SAH, the initial clinical status was good in 12 patients (46.2%), and in the unruptured group, the predominant diagnosis circumstance was a pseudo-tumor syndrome occurring in 22 (41.5%). The first procedure of aneurysm treatment in the global population was endovascular in 42 patients (53.1%), microsurgical in 29 (36.7%) and conservative in 8 (10.2). An immediate neurological deterioration was reported in 38 patients (48.1%) after endovascular treatment in 19 (45.2% of endovascular procedures), after miscrosurgical in 15 (51.7% of microsurgical procedures) and after conservative in 4 (the half). At 6 months, the outcome was favorable in 45 patients (57%) and after multivariate analysis, the predictive factors of favorable outcome after management of giant cerebral aneurysm were the initial good clinical status in cases of SAH (P<0.002), the endovascular treatment (P<0.005), and the absence of neurological deterioration (P<0.006). The endovascular procedure was obtained as a predictive factor because of the low risk efficacy of indirect procedures, in particular a parent vessel occlusion.

CONCLUSION

The overall favorable outcome rate concerned 57% of patients at 6 months despite 53.8% of poor initial clinical status in cases of rupture. The predictive factors for favorable outcome were good clinical status, endovascular treatment and the absence of postoperative neurological deterioration. Endovascular treatment should be integrated into the therapeutic armenmatarium against giant cerebral aneurysms but the durability of exclusion should be taken into account during the multidisciplinary discussion by the neurovascular team.

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diverters are important tools in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, their impact on aneurysmal occlusion rates, morbidity, mortality, and complication rates is not fully examined.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature searching multiple databases for reports on the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverter devices. Random effects meta-analysis was used to pool outcomes of aneurysmal occlusion rates at 6 months, and procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and complications across studies.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were included in this analysis, including 1451 patients with 1654 aneurysms. Aneurysmal complete occlusion rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-81%). Procedure-related morbidity and mortality were 5% (95% CI, 4%-7%) and 4% (95% CI, 3%-6%), respectively. The rate of postoperative subarachnoid hemorrhage was 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%). Intraparenchymal hemorrhage rate was 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%). Perforator infarction rate was 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%), with significantly lower odds of perforator infarction among patients with anterior circulation aneurysms compared with those with posterior circulation aneurysms (odds ratio, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08; P<0.0001). Ischemic stroke rate was 6% (95% CI, 4%-9%), with significantly lower odds of perforator infarction among patients with anterior circulation aneurysms compared with those with posterior circulation aneurysms (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.27; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverter devices is feasible and effective with high complete occlusion rates. However, the risk of procedure-related morbidity and mortality is not negligible. Patients with posterior circulation aneurysms are at higher risk of ischemic stroke, particularly perforator infarction. These findings should be considered when considering the best therapeutic option for intracranial aneurysms.