Platelet function testing: does a randomized controlled trial settle the debate?

Antiplatelet Drugs for Neurointerventions: Part 2 Clinical Applications

Endovascular techniques have expanded to include balloon and stent-assistance, flow diversion and individualized endovascular occlusion devices, to widen the treatment spectrum for more complex aneurysm morphologies. While usually well-tolerated by patients, endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms carries the risk of complications, with procedure-related ischemic complications being the most common. Several antiplatelet agents have been studied in a neurointerventional setting for both prophylaxis and in the setting of intraprocedural thrombotic complications. Knowledge of these antiplatelet agents, evidence for their use and common dosages is important for the practicing neurointerventionist to ensure the proper application of these agents.Part one of this two-part review focused on basic platelet physiology, pharmacology of common antiplatelet medications and future directions and therapies. Part two focuses on clinical applications and evidence based therapeutic regimens.

Relationship between adverse events and antiplatelet drug resistance in neurovascular intervention: a meta-analysis

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between antiplatelet resistance and the risk of procedure-related complications in neurovascular interventions.

Methods

We identified relevant articles by searching electronic databases and reviewed the reference lists of selected papers. The risk of adverse events between antiplatelet responders and hyporesponders during neurointervention was compared in eligible clinical studies. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Of 2134 potentially relevant studies, our search identified 15 studies enrolling a total of 2365 patients. Pooled RRs showed thromboembolic events (TEE) were more frequent in hyporesponders (RR 2.634, 95% CI 1.465 to 4.734). However, hemorrhagic complications did not differ between the two groups (RR 1.236, 95% CI 0.642 to 2.380). In subgroup analysis, hyporesponders showed a higher prevalence of TEE with standard antiplatelet medication, but there was no obvious difference in TEE between the two arms when using a modified antiplatelet medication (RR 3.645, 95% CI 1.537 to 8.646; and RR 1.877, 95% CI 0.749 to 4.751). Studies using stent placement for aneurysms showed a higher TEE rate in hyporesponders (RR 3.221, 95% CI 1.899 to 5.464).

Conclusion

Antiplatelet resistance was significantly associated with TEE in neurointervention, and this adverse event was associated with individually-intensified antiplatelet medication as well as the type of neurointerventional procedure. Our findings support the use of antiplatelet resistance assays and tailored antiplatelet medications in neurovascular stent placement as a management strategy to reduce thromboembolic risk.

The Evolution of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke

OPINION STATEMENT

The natural history of an acute ischemic stroke from a large vessel occlusion (LVO) is poor and has long challenged stroke therapy. Recently, endovascular therapy has demonstrated superiority to medical management in appropriately selected patients. This advance has revolutionized acute care for LVO and mandates a reevaluation of the entire chain of stroke care delivery, including patient selection, intervention, and post-procedural care. Since endovascular therapy is a therapy specifically targeting LVO, its application should be restricted to those patients only. Clinical and radiologic parameters need to be considered in patient selection. Data supports that all patients over the age of 18 years presenting with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 6 or greater within 6 hours of symptom onset should be considered for emergent endovascular therapy. Radiologically, those with a LVO of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 portion, intermediate or good collaterals and without large established infarct should be considered endovascular candidates. Selection beyond these parameters remains an open question and is being actively evaluated. In all cases, revascularization should be attempted with a new generation device (stentriever or direct aspiration), as these techniques are most likely to deliver adequate reperfusion. Post-revascularization, patients are closely monitored in an intensive care setting followed by discharge to rehabilitation, if required, or directly home. Patients should be evaluated in delayed fashion to assess recovery (typically at 3 months post-treatment). Ultimately, the poor natural history of ischemic stroke from LVO and the potential significant benefit from endovascular therapy over medical management alone necessitate a national response to ensure we identify and treat all eligible patients as rapidly and effectively as possible.